Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Ivory carving

15 min listen · Ch. 1 of 8
8 sections
  • Ivory carving has occupied human hands since prehistoric times, yet its story is inseparable from extinction, empire, and the slow disappearance of the animals that made it possible. At the center of this history sits a simple paradox: the qualities that made ivory so prized, its softness relative to other hard materials, its capacity for fine detail, its resistance to recycling, are the same qualities that preserved it across millennia while the creatures it came from vanished.

    Unlike silver or gold, a carved ivory panel has no bullion value. A goldsmith can melt down a Byzantine cup and cast something new. An ivory plaque, once shaped, cannot easily be remade. That irreversibility meant ivory objects were kept, stored in church treasuries, passed between courts, traded across continents. They survived when other luxury goods did not. The 25,000-year-old Venus of Brassempouy, arguably the earliest real likeness of a human face ever made, was carved from mammoth ivory. She is still here.

    What drove craftsmen from ancient Egypt to Edo-period Japan to work this material? What made Paris the industrial capital of ivory carving in the Gothic age? And what finally brought that centuries-long tradition to a close?

  • Hippopotamus tooth enamel is roughly as hard as jade. That single fact explains why elephant ivory became the carver's preferred material above almost all others: the enamel on the largest hippopotamus teeth must be ground away before the usable dentine underneath can be reached. Elephant ivory carries no such obstacle. It arrives relatively soft, even-grained, and in large pieces, making it ideal for almost any form a carver might attempt.

    Every tooth, regardless of species, shares the same three-layer structure: outer dental enamel, a main body of dentine, and an inner root of osteo-dentine. For practical carving purposes, the two inner layers are usable in most animals. The outer enamel, however, is often too hard to cut directly and must be removed first. The species from which a piece of ivory came can usually be identified by placing it under ultra-violet light, where different types fluoresce in different colours.

    Elephant ivory itself changed its source over the centuries. Eurasian supplies came first from India, then from North Africa during Roman times, and from the 18th century onward the main source shifted to sub-Saharan Africa. In early medieval northern Europe, walrus ivory traveled south from Norse Greenland to Scandinavia, southern England, and northern France and Germany, filling the gap when elephant ivory was difficult to obtain. In Siberia and Arctic North America, mammoth tusks were pulled from permafrost and put to use; by the 19th century this had become a large-scale business, with convicts performing much of the labour. Sperm whale teeth provided yet another source, and whalebone, sourced either from the Basque whaling industry or from natural strandings, served cultures that lacked access to tusk ivory entirely.

  • The MacGregor plaque is dated to around 2985 BC and may have decorated a royal sandal. That a piece of carved ivory from nearly five thousand years ago can be tied to something as specific as footwear tells us how deeply embedded this material was in ancient elite life, not as art in the modern sense, but as the substance of power's daily rituals.

    Thin ivory plaques were inlaid across the ancient world into palace furniture, musical instruments, and gaming boards. The tomb of Tutankhamun, from the 1330s BC, contains many such elements; the largest is his carved headrest. The Nimrud ivories, recovered from a furniture storeroom at the Assyrian capital, date from around the 9th to the 6th centuries BC and came from multiple origins across the Assyrian Empire, with the Levant the most common source. A smaller group, the Pratt Ivories, are furniture attachments from the early second millennium BC, found at the Assyrian karum at Acemhöyük in Anatolia.

    In the Achaemenid Empire, an inscription by Darius I records the use of ivory in his palace at Susa, with raw material brought from Nubia and from South Asia, specifically Sind and Arachosia. Even the largest imperial building programs reached across continents for this one material. The Khufu Statuette may date from the Fourth Dynasty, roughly 2613 to 2494 BC, when its subject lived, or it may have been carved much later during the Twenty-Sixth Dynasty, between 664 and 525 BC; that uncertainty across nearly two thousand years reflects how persistently the ancient world returned to ivory as the right medium for commemorating rulers.

  • The cathedra of Maximianus, bishop of Ravenna from 546 to 556, was covered entirely in ivory panels. It was probably carved in Constantinople and shipped west to Ravenna. The throne is considered the most important Late Antique work of art made of ivory, and it shows exactly how the medium functioned in the early Christian world: not as personal ornament but as the visible authority of the church made physical.

    Late Roman consular diptychs had established the form. Consuls, civil officers who retained an important administrative role until 541, gave these paired carved panels as official gifts. Each diptych showed the consul on the outer faces of two hinged panels. When Christianity absorbed the form, the figures of Christ, the Theotokos, and saints replaced the consul's portrait, and the objects were used for private prayer.

    Such panels moved naturally onto book covers from the 6th century onward. Because tusk width was limited, covers were sometimes assembled from up to five smaller panels. That physical constraint shaped the iconographic program: Christ or Mary occupied the centre panel, with angels, apostles, and saints filling the narrower flanking pieces. Very few of the jewelled metalwork surrounds that framed these ivory covers have survived intact, but the ivory plaques themselves survived in relatively high numbers, precisely because they could not be melted down for their metal.

    After the Iconoclastic period, Byzantine carvers favored triptychs for private devotion. The Harbaville Triptych from the 10th century carried many figurative panels. The Borradaile Triptych, also from the 10th century and now in the British Museum, centers on a single image of the Crucifixion. The Romanos Ivory departs from purely religious content: its central panel shows Christ crowning Emperor Romanos and Empress Eudokia, and one scholarly reading places its production between 944 and 949, associating it with Romanos II. Ivory carving in Byzantium appears to have declined sharply after the 12th century.

  • African elephant ivory became increasingly available in Europe from the 13th century, and Paris emerged as the dominant centre of production, operating at what the sources describe as virtually industrial scale and exporting pieces across the continent. The shift away from purely clerical patronage was gradual but decisive: secular pieces and religious objects made for laypeople replaced much of the production that had previously gone to the church.

    Mirror-cases, gaming pieces, boxes, and combs were typical products alongside small personal religious diptychs and triptychs. The Lewis Chessmen are among the best-known examples of the elaborately carved gaming pieces that medieval carvers produced. Olifants, horns made from the end of an elephant's tusk and carved over at least part of their surface, served more for display than for practical use in hunting. The Casket with Scenes of Romances, now catalogued as Walters 71264, belongs to a small group of very similar boxes probably presented by a future bridegroom to his future wife, drawing together scenes from medieval romance literature into a unified decorative program.

    Most medieval ivories were gilded and coloured, sometimes entirely and sometimes only in selected areas, but surface colouring rarely survived the centuries intact. Many pieces were scrubbed by 19th-century dealers. A fair number of Gothic ivories do retain their original colour in good condition, however, making them valuable evidence for how different medieval objects looked when new.

    The supply of African ivory contracted sharply in the later 14th century. One direct result was a rise in bone carving for marriage caskets, mirrors, and religious pieces. The north Italian Embriachi workshop led this trend, supplying bone carvings to princes and the extremely wealthy. When the Embriachi workshop did use ivory, it typically turned to hippopotamus teeth rather than elephant tusk.

  • From 750 to 1258 AD, the year the Mongols besieged and destroyed Baghdad, the Islamic world had more direct access to ivory from both India and Africa than Europe did, and the generosity of its use reflects that advantage. Many Islamic pieces are notably large, including round boxes that use a full cross-section of tusk.

    The ivory caskets produced on the Iberian Peninsula were likely made in the workshops of Madinat al-Zahra, a Umayyad palace in Cordoba. The palace was the administrative and political centre of the Umayyad caliphate in Spain, and objects produced in this courtly setting were made for elite political and religious figures. Motifs of hunting scenes, floral patterns, geometrical designs, and Kufic script covered their surfaces. The imagery was read from right to left, with distinct scenes completing a unified display across the whole object.

    The Pyxis of al-Mughira uses lions, hunting imagery, and abundant vegetal ornament to project the prevalence of Islam rather than celebrating any single caliph by name. Women of the court were often the recipients of these containers, presented at weddings or ceremonies and used to hold jewellery or perfumes. The Pyxis of Zamora carries an inscription describing the container in the first person: "The sight I offer is of the fairest, the firm breast of a delicate maiden. Beauty has invested me with splendid raiment that makes a display of jewels. I am a receptacle for musk, camphor, and ambergris." The text activates the object, collapsing the distance between the ivory, the gift, and the woman who received it.

    Openwork, where panels are cut entirely through to create negative space, appears frequently in Islamic ivory and mirrors a technique equally common in Islamic woodwork. This shared approach across different materials reflects the Byzantine traditions that Islamic craft inherited and adapted.

  • A throne and footstool carved under the patronage of Uthram Thirunal Marthanda Varma was presented at the Great London Exhibition in 1851. The pieces were heavily carved and embedded with precious gemstones, incorporating both Indian and European motifs alongside the conch-shell emblem of Travancore. The throne is now displayed at the Garter Throne Room, Windsor Castle. That a single piece of Travancore royal furniture ended up in a British royal residence is a compressed version of how Indian ivory carving traveled into imperial networks.

    The Begram ivories, a large ancient find of plaques and furniture fittings discovered in Bagram, Afghanistan, came from a palace of the Kushan Empire dating to the 1st or 2nd century BC. Most were probably carved in north India, though the same hoard also contained luxury objects from the Greco-Roman world. The ivory Pompeii Lakshmi, carved in India, was found in the ruins of Pompeii after its destruction in 79 AD, tracing a direct commercial connection between the subcontinent and the Roman world.

    In Murshidabad, West Bengal, carvers developed their own technical vocabulary for the tusk itself: Nakshidant for the solid end, Khondidant for the middle portion, and Galhardant for the thick hollow end. They preferred the solid end for their finest work. A set of ivory table and chairs from Murshidabad, now at the Victoria Memorial in Kolkata, features chair legs that culminate in tiger claws and tiger heads, with perforated floral jaali work throughout.

    In Japan, ivory carving grew popular around the Edo period in the 17th century, driven by a specific practical need: kimono had no pockets. Small objects, including the netsuke toggle and the kiseru smoking pipe, were carried hanging from the obi sash and decorated with fine ivory carvings of animals and legendary creatures. When the Meiji Restoration in the mid-1800s abolished the samurai class and westernized Japanese clothing, the demand for these objects collapsed. The Meiji government responded by promoting arts and crafts at international exhibitions, and Japanese ivory carving gained a particularly high reputation abroad. Ishikawa Komei and Asahi Gyokuzan were especially celebrated; their masterpieces presented to the Imperial Family are now housed in the Museum of the Imperial Collections.

  • In January 1990, CITES enacted its ban on international trade in ivory. The decision came after decades during which ivory hunting had driven elephant populations across much of their former range toward extinction or near-extinction. The trade did not stop immediately, nor did the legal complexities disappear.

    In the United States, legality turned partly on age. In November 2013, the Obama administration orchestrated the destruction of six tons of ivory to signal opposition to the trade and undermine its market. In February 2014, the Interior Department's Fish and Wildlife Service announced a ban on trade in elephant ivory within the United States, prohibiting all imports and, with narrow exceptions, exports and resales. In November 2017, President Donald Trump announced that he was lifting a ban on ivory imports from Zimbabwe that Obama had implemented.

    The material itself contributed to the crisis. African ivory, coming in larger pieces, a more sought-after cream colour, and easier to carve than Asian ivory, was the most commercially desirable. Asian ivory is comparatively brittle, harder to polish, and yellows with air exposure. That differential in quality focused commercial pressure directly on African elephant populations, with hunters favoring the bush elephant, whose tusks are larger and heavier, over the forest elephant.

    Kholmogory in Russia has carved ivory for centuries, though the tradition now works mostly in bone. The shift is a small-scale version of what happened globally: the material that shaped decorative traditions across five continents became too costly, legally and ecologically, to continue using freely. Scrimshaw, the engraving tradition practiced by whalers mainly in the 18th and 19th centuries on sperm whale teeth, stands as one reminder that the drive to mark animal material with human images ran through many cultures simultaneously, each constrained eventually by the limits of the creatures they depended on.

Up Next

Common questions

What is ivory carving and what materials are used?

Ivory carving is the carving of animal tooth or tusk, generally using sharp cutting tools applied either mechanically or manually. While elephant tusks are the most common source, ivory can also come from walrus, mammoth, hippopotamus, and sperm whale teeth, among other species with large tusks or teeth.

Why did ivory carvings survive better than other medieval luxury objects?

Ivory has no bullion value and cannot easily be recycled or remelted, so carved pieces were kept rather than broken down for raw material. Unlike precious metals, a thin ivory panel could not be repurposed, giving ivory objects a much higher survival rate than equivalent works in gold or silver.

What is the oldest known ivory carving?

The Venus of Brassempouy, considered arguably the earliest real likeness of a human face, was carved from mammoth ivory and is approximately 25,000 years old.

Where was the most important centre of ivory carving in medieval Europe?

Paris became the dominant centre of ivory carving from the 13th century onward, operating at virtually industrial scale and exporting pieces across Europe. The city's prominence grew as African elephant ivory became more widely available in Europe from that period.

What are the Umayyad ivory caskets of Cordoba?

The Umayyad ivory caskets were intricately carved containers likely produced in the workshops of Madinat al-Zahra, a palace in Cordoba, Spain. They featured hunting scenes, floral patterns, geometrical designs, and Kufic script, and were made for elite political and religious figures of the Umayyad caliphate.

When did the international ban on ivory trade take effect?

CITES enacted the ban on international trade in ivory in January 1990. In the United States, the Interior Department's Fish and Wildlife Service announced a further ban on trade in elephant ivory within the country in February 2014, prohibiting imports and, with narrow exceptions, exports and resales.

All sources

21 references cited across the entry

  1. 1Old Persian TextsJoseph H. Peterson
  2. 2CleopatraThe Walters Art Museum
  3. 3BookIslamic Radicalism and Multicultural Politics: The British ExperienceTahir Abbas — Taylor & Francis — 1 March 2011
  4. 4BookLabour in the Medieval Islamic WorldMaya Shatzmiller — BRILL — 1993
  5. 5BookUmayyad legacies : medieval memories from Syria to SpainBrill — 2010
  6. 7BookThe Grove encyclopedia of Islamic art and architectureOxford University Press — 2009
  7. 9BookMedieval Persian court poetryMeisami, Julie Scott, 1937– — 14 July 2014
  8. 11BookIvory IndiaEdgar Thurston — 1901
  9. 12JournalIndian Ivory CarvingStephen Markel — 2006-01-01
  10. 14JournalGOLDEN TEMPLE AT AMRITSAR, PUNJABH. H. Cole — October 1890