Italic languages

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The Italic languages hold a quiet kind of power. Over 900 million people speak them today as their native tongues, yet most of those speakers have never heard the name 'Italic' applied to what they speak. French, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Romanian: all of them are the living descendants of a language family whose origins stretch back to the first millennium BC, when Latin was just one voice among many on a rugged peninsula in the Mediterranean. How did one of those voices come to swallow all the others? And what became of the languages that fell silent along the way? This documentary traces the Italic languages from their murky prehistoric origins north of the Alps, through the rise of Rome and the slow extinction of a dozen rival tongues, to the moment when Vulgar Latin cracked open into the mosaic of modern Romance speech.

• 2. A Peninsula of Many Tongues

  ›

  Around 700 BC, Ionian Greek settlers from Euboea established colonies along the coast of southern Italy. They brought something more durable than trade goods: the alphabet, which they had in turn received from the Phoenicians. Specifically, they carried what scholars now call the Western Greek alphabet, and the technology spread quickly across the whole peninsula, crossing language and political boundaries alike. Local communities adapted it, tweaking letter shapes and adding or dropping a few characters, producing what are collectively called the Old Italic alphabets.

  Before those alphabets arrived, the peninsula was already home to a striking variety of languages. Etruscan was among the most significant of the non-Indo-European ones, documented by more than 10,000 inscriptions and some short texts. No relation has ever been found between Etruscan and any other known language, leaving its origin a genuine puzzle, apart from a set of intriguing inscriptions found on the island of Lemnos in the eastern Mediterranean. Other possibly non-Indo-European languages of the period included Rhaetian in the Alpine region, Ligurian in the area around present-day Genoa, and some unidentified languages in Sardinia. Each of those languages left a detectable imprint on Latin.

  In southern Italy, the largest language apart from Greek was Messapian, known from roughly 260 inscriptions dating to the 6th and 5th centuries BC. Scholars have noted a historical link between the Messapians and the Illyrian tribes, supported by shared patterns in ceramics and metalwork, but the evidence from Illyrian inscriptions is limited to personal names and place names, making a firm linguistic connection difficult to establish.

• 3. The Italic Languages Themselves

  ›

  Among the languages that scholars group as Italic, Latin was the most consequential, but it was not alone. Faliscan stood closest to Latin among the ancient Italic languages. The Osco-Umbrian group, which included Oscan and Umbrian, formed a parallel cluster. South Picene made up yet another distinct member. Venetic and Siculian have been proposed for inclusion in the Italic branch, though their membership remains disputed among specialists.

  The oldest known samples of any Italic language come from Umbrian and Faliscan inscriptions from the 7th century BC. Their alphabets were clearly derived from the Etruscan alphabet, which had itself been derived from the Western Greek alphabet not long before. All of these long-extinct languages are known today only from inscriptions recovered in archaeological finds; no continuous literary tradition preserved them.

  Faliscan went through three distinct phases: an Early period running from the 7th to 5th centuries BC, a Middle period from the 5th to 3rd centuries BC, and a Late period from the 3rd to 2nd centuries BC, during which it was strongly influenced by Latin. Umbrian is attested from the 7th to the 1st century BC; Oscan from the 5th to the 1st. By the first centuries AD, all of these had gone silent, their speakers absorbed into the expanding Roman world.

• 4. Origins and Debates

  ›

  Antoine Meillet, who lived from 1866 to 1936, is credited as the founder of the theory that all the ancient Indo-European languages of the Italian peninsula that were not identifiable as belonging to other established branches formed a single Italic branch of the family. The argument rests on shared innovations in grammar and sound patterns that cut across all the languages.

  That unitary view has attracted persistent critics. Alois Walde, Vittore Pisani, and Giacomo Devoto proposed instead that the Latino-Faliscan and Osco-Umbrian groups represented two separate branches of Indo-European, not descendants of a common Proto-Italic ancestor. This two-branch theory gained acceptance in the second half of the 20th century. But the argument shifted again: Rix, initially a proponent of the split, later rejected the idea and became what the sources describe as an outspoken supporter of Italic as a unified family. The unitary theory remains dominant in contemporary scholarship.

  The deeper question of how Italic got to Italy at all is even less settled. The scholarly consensus holds that 1st millennium Italic languages descend from Indo-European languages brought to the peninsula by migrants sometime in the 2nd millennium BC, associated with the Bell Beaker and Urnfield culture groups north and east of the Alps. Italic peoples probably moved toward the Italian Peninsula during the second half of that millennium, gradually reaching the southern regions. The Proto-Italic language is generally linked with the Terramare culture, dated 1700-1150 BC, and the Proto-Villanovan culture, dated 1200-900 BC. Some scholars, including Schrijver, argue for a Proto-Italo-Celtic stage spoken in approximately the first half or the middle of the 2nd millennium BC, from which Celtic split off first, then Venetic, before the remaining languages divided into Latino-Faliscan and Sabellian.

• 5. Latin's Rise and Rivals' Fall

  ›

  Latin's displacement of the other Italic languages was a gradual process, not a single event. Starting in the 4th and 3rd centuries BC, as the Roman Republic extended its political dominion across the peninsula, Latin began pushing out the languages of other Italic tribes, along with Illyrian, Messapian, and Venetic. The Romanisation of the Italian Peninsula was essentially complete by the 1st century BC, with one significant exception: in the south of Italy and in Sicily, Greek maintained its dominance.

  The pre-classical period of Latin's literary development, covering the 3rd and 2nd centuries BC, produced works by Plautus and Terence in comedy, and the agricultural writing of Cato the Elder. Classical Latin in its golden phase ran until the death of Ovid in AD 17, a period that saw Cicero, Caesar, Sallust, Virgil, and Horace flourish and the vocabulary of the language expand and sharpen. The silver phase of classical Latin extended until the death of the emperor Marcus Aurelius in AD 180, during which the phonetic, morphological, and spelling norms of the language were finally consolidated. Juvenal, Tacitus, Suetonius, and the Satyricon of Petronius all belong to this period.

  From the archaic period before even classical Latin, a handful of inscriptions from the 6th to the 4th centuries BC survive, along with fragments of the oldest laws, portions of the sacral anthem of the Salii, and the anthem of the Arval Brethren. These fragments are the earliest direct evidence of Latin as a written language.

• 6. When Latin Became Many Languages

  ›

  Between the 3rd and 8th centuries AD, Vulgar Latin diversified into the Romance languages. Vulgar Latin is itself dated from approximately the 2nd century BC to the 3rd or 4th century AD; the reconstructed Proto-Romance ancestor of the modern Romance languages is dated from the 3rd or 4th century AD to roughly the 8th. By the 9th century AD, Proto-Romance was no longer mutually intelligible with Latin.

  The earliest attested Romance language is French, with written evidence from 842 AD. Italo-Dalmatian, including Italian and Dalmatian, appears around 960. Occitano-Romance, which includes Catalan and Occitan, is attested around 1000. Ibero-Romance, the group that includes Spanish, Portuguese, and Galician, appears around 1075. Rhaeto-Romance, covering Romansh, Ladin, and Friulian, is attested around 1100. Sardinian appears in 1102, and Eastern Romance, which includes Romanian and Aromanian, is attested from 1521.

  African Romance is the one branch of the Romance family that did not survive; it was spoken at least until the 12th century AD before going extinct. The combined native speaker count for the modern Romance languages exceeds 900 million, making Italic the second-most-widely spoken branch of Indo-European, behind only Indo-Iranian at 1.7 billion speakers. Judaeo-Spanish, also known as Ladino, is one of the notable exceptions within the Romance family regarding script; it is sometimes written in the Hebrew, Greek, or Cyrillic script rather than the Latin alphabet.

• 7. How the Languages Were Built

  ›

  The Italic languages share a set of distinctive features that distinguish them from other Indo-European branches. One of the most telling concerns a category of Proto-Indo-European sounds called voiced aspirated stops. In initial position, the sounds reconstructed as bh-, dh-, and gwh- all merged to the sound /f-/ in Italic languages, while gh- became /h-/. Latin shows some additional variation, with *gh- also yielding /w-/ and /g-/ in specific environments.

  Grammar provides another set of shared markers. Three innovations appear across both the Osco-Umbrian and Latino-Faliscan branches: a suffix in the imperfect subjunctive reconstructed as -se-, visible in the Oscan form fusid and the Latin form foret; a suffix in the imperfect indicative reconstructed as -fa-, seen in the Oscan form fufans meaning 'they were', which in Latin became -ba- as in portabamus meaning 'we carried'; and a suffix for forming gerundive adjectives from verbs, reconstructed as *-ndo-, seen in the Latin operandam meaning 'which will be built', with the Oscan form upssannam carrying the additional reduction of -nd- to -nn-.

  The Italic languages preserve six grammatical cases in the noun and adjective: nominative, accusative, genitive, dative, ablative, and vocative, with traces of a seventh locative case. The dual number, which exists in some other Indo-European languages for referring to exactly two of something, disappeared entirely from both the noun and the verb in Italic. Taken together, these shared features, along with a notable overlap in vocabulary with Celtic and Germanic, place Italic in a specific corner of the Indo-European family. Oscan pis meaning 'who?' corresponds to Latin quis, with the p in Oscan reflecting the labiovalar shift that marks the Osco-Umbrian branch from its Latin-Faliscan relatives.