Homo
Homo is the genus of great apes to which every person alive today belongs. Carl Linnaeus created it in the 18th century and coined the name Homo sapiens in 1758. He never wrote down what the genus included. At the time it held only humans, and he saw no reason to expect more members. The Latin word homo means human being, and that was definition enough. Then fossils began to surface, and the question stopped being simple. Today Homo holds one living species and a long list of extinct ones, and scientists still dispute many of them. Where does the genus really begin? Which fossils earn a place in it? And how separate were its members from one another?
The Neanderthal became the first addition to Homo after Linnaeus. Homo neanderthalensis received its name in 1864, and Homo erectus followed in 1892. Between the late 19th and mid 20th centuries, researchers also proposed brand new genera for early human fossils. Pithecanthropus, Sinanthropus, Africanthropus and Atlanthropus were among them, alongside Protanthropus, Cyphanthropus, Telanthropus and Tchadanthropus. Most have since been merged into Homo, because Homo erectus is now understood as a single species that spread across a very wide area.
In 2000, Wood and Richmond suggested a way to organize the wider family tree. They proposed that Hominini be a tribe containing all early humans and pre-humans since the split from chimpanzees. Within it, a subtribe called Hominina would hold the genus Homo alone. That would leave out earlier upright walkers such as Australopithecus, Orrorin tugenensis, Ardipithecus and Sahelanthropus. Rival labels existed, including Australopithecinae from Gregory and Hellman in 1939 and Preanthropinae from Cela-Conde and Altaba in 2002.
Scientific papers today often use the plain names Neanderthal and Denisovan. The habit avoids three-part names such as H. sapiens neanderthalensis. It also avoids the Latin label incertae sedis, which means uncertain placement. Some recently identified groups, including the Denisova hominin, still lack a name that researchers agree on. Much of that uncertainty traces back to a harder question about how far back the genus actually reaches.
Chimpanzees and bonobos, which form the genus Pan, are the closest living relatives of Homo. Their ancestors and ours are estimated to have diverged between 5.7 and 11 million years ago, during the Late Miocene. Homo itself grew out of Australopithecus. Together with the genus Paranthropus, it is probably most closely related to Australopithecus africanus.
Australopithecus garhi, sediba, africanus and afarensis have each been proposed as an ancestor or sister of the Homo lineage. All of them show features that resemble Homo, yet researchers have not agreed on which one gave rise to it. Two older markers help anchor the debate. The Laetoli footprints show that competent upright walking was inherited from Australopithecus more than four million years ago. Stone tool culture had begun by 2.5 to 3 million years ago.
Tools were once treated as the sign that Homo had arrived, marking the start of the Lower Palaeolithic. In 2010, evidence was presented that Australopithecus afarensis used stone tools around 3.3 million years ago. That is close to a million years before the first Homo fossils. A mandible fragment known as LD 350-1, found in Afar, Ethiopia in 2013, is dated to 2.8 million years ago. It blends primitive traits of early Australopithecus with features seen in later Homo.
Some authors push the origin of Homo close to or beyond 3 million years ago. A phylogenetic study combining anatomical, molecular and radiometric data puts it at 3.3 million years ago, within a range of 4.30 to 2.56 million. Others go the opposite way and doubt that Homo habilis belongs at all. They would start the genus with Homo erectus at roughly 1.9 million years ago.
Brain size looks like a tidier yardstick, but it fails as one. The volume inside the skull rises from about 460 cubic centimeters in Australopithecus garhi to 660 in Homo habilis and 760 in Homo erectus. It reaches 1250 in Homo heidelbergensis and up to 1760 in Homo neanderthalensis. The climb had already begun among the australopithecines and kept going afterward, so no single number marks where the genus starts. The species long treated as the oldest member, Homo habilis, has itself come under suspicion.
Homo habilis appeared about 2.1 million years ago, and its claim to the genus has weakened steadily. Even before 2010, some researchers argued it belonged in Australopithecus. Its strongest credential was undisputed tool use. That evidence lost force once Australopithecus tool use was traced back at least a million years earlier.
Fossils from the Koobi Fora Formation, east of Lake Turkana in Kenya, upset the old family tree in 2007. A study of them argued that Homo habilis survived after Homo erectus had appeared. The two may have lived side by side for about half a million years, during the early Calabrian. If so, erectus did not descend directly from habilis. Both would instead share a common ancestor.
Earlier finds in the Caucasus had pointed the other way. Specimens called Homo erectus georgicus seemed to show traits halfway between habilis and erectus. Their skull capacity rose from around 575 cubic centimeters in habilis to around 850 in erectus. Because the oldest erectus evidence sat outside Africa, some even imagined the species arising in Eurasia and returning to Africa.
The publication of Dmanisi skull 5 in 2013 shook that picture again. It made it less certain that Asian erectus descended from an African form called Homo ergaster. Ergaster and erectus now look like variants of one species. It may have originated in either Africa or Asia, and by 0.5 million years ago it had spread widely across Eurasia, including Europe, Indonesia and China. The species proved adaptive and successful and lasted more than a million years. Around 500,000 years ago it gradually diverged into new species. A separate South African species, Homo gautengensis, was postulated in 2010 as a contemporary of erectus.
Genetic studies add a darker footnote. On the 31st of August 2023, researchers reported a population bottleneck among human ancestors, from a possible 100,000 individuals down to about 1,000. They placed it between roughly 930,000 and 813,000 years ago. It lasted about 117,000 years and brought human ancestors close to extinction.
By about 1.8 million years ago, Homo erectus lived in two places far apart. In East Africa it is called Homo ergaster, and in Western Asia it is called Homo georgicus. The ancestors of the Indonesian Homo floresiensis may have left Africa even earlier. Over the following 1.5 million years, erectus and its relatives or descendants spread through Africa and Eurasia.
Homo heidelbergensis reached Europe by about 0.5 million years ago. After about 300,000 years ago, Homo neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens developed. Homo naledi was already present in Southern Africa by that same time.
Homo sapiens soon spread across Africa and then to Western Asia in several waves. The earliest may have come as far back as 250,000 years ago, and the movement is certain by 130,000 years ago. A discovery announced in July 2019 complicated the story further. In Apidima Cave, in the Peloponnese of Greece, anthropologists reported 210,000-year-old remains of Homo sapiens and 170,000-year-old remains of a Neanderthal. The sapiens bones were more than 150,000 years older than any earlier sapiens find in Europe.
The best known exodus is the Southern Dispersal, dated to around 60,000 years ago. Other estimates place its start between 70,000 and 50,000 years ago. It led to the lasting settlement of Oceania and Eurasia by anatomically modern humans, who were established there by 50,000 years ago.
Living populations carry the mark of these journeys. The San people of Southern Africa show the deepest split among extant groups, estimated at close to 130,000 years, or possibly more than 300,000. Australo-Melanesians separated from other non-Africans on the order of 60,000 years ago. Europeans and East Asians separated about 50,000 years ago, and repeated mixing between populations has continued throughout Eurasia since the Holocene began.
A minimalist approach to human taxonomy recognizes at most three species. Homo habilis would stay, though its membership in Homo is questionable. Homo erectus would absorb most archaic varieties as subspecies, with Homo heidelbergensis as a late or transitional form. Homo sapiens would include the Neanderthals and other varieties as subspecies. Anthropology and palaeontology have no generally agreed method for drawing these lines.
The opposite habit has a long record. Researchers have often postulated new human species from as little as a single fossil. Homo cepranensis rests on one skull cap found in Italy, dated to about 450,000 years ago and possibly belonging to Homo heidelbergensis. Penghu 1, a single individual from Taiwan around 100,000 years old, may be Homo erectus or a Denisovan. Homo luzonensis, from the Philippines, is known from three individuals who lived between 134,000 and 49,000 years ago.
The bodies behind these names differ remarkably. Homo floresiensis, from Indonesia, stood about 100 centimeters tall, a little over 3 feet. It weighed about 25 kilograms and had a cranial capacity near 400 cubic centimeters, with seven individuals known. Homo naledi, from South Africa, weighed about 45 kilograms and is known from 15 individuals dated between 335,000 and 236,000 years ago. Homo antecessor of western Europe, living between 1.2 million and 800,000 years ago, stood about 175 centimeters and weighed around 90 kilograms.
The status of Homo rudolfensis, ergaster, georgicus, antecessor, cepranensis, rhodesiensis, neanderthalensis, the Denisova hominin and floresiensis all remains under debate. Heidelbergensis and neanderthalensis are so closely related that they have been treated as subspecies of Homo sapiens. Meanwhile, a group called Nesher Ramla Homo, known from several individuals in Israel and dated between 140,000 and 120,000 years ago, was added to the roster in 2021 with its classification still uncertain.
Kenneth M. Weiss estimated that about 44 billion individuals of the genus Homo lived from its origins to the evolution of Homo erectus. He put the next stretch, from Homo erectus to the Neolithic, at about 56 billion. Another 51 billion have lived since the Neolithic began. Those billions belong to a genus that, since the start of the Holocene, has likely had only one extant species, Homo sapiens.
Updated
Common questions
What is Homo in biology?
Homo is a genus of great apes in the family Hominidae. It has one living species, Homo sapiens, and several extinct species such as Homo erectus and Homo neanderthalensis.
Who named Homo sapiens and when?
Carl Linnaeus coined the name Homo sapiens in 1758. He created the genus Homo in the 18th century without defining it, because it then held only humans.
When did the genus Homo first appear?
The oldest member by the traditional view is Homo habilis, which emerged about 2.1 million years ago. Some studies place the origin of Homo near 3.3 million years ago, while others start it with Homo erectus at roughly 1.9 million years ago.
Which animals are the closest living relatives of Homo?
Chimpanzees and bonobos, the genus Pan, are the closest living relatives of Homo. Their ancestors and the ancestors of Homo are estimated to have diverged between 5.7 and 11 million years ago.
Did Homo sapiens interbreed with other Homo species?
Yes. Homo sapiens interbred with archaic humans in Africa and Eurasia, notably with Neanderthals and Denisovans. Genomes of people outside sub-Saharan Africa show Neanderthal mixing events around 45,000 years ago.
When did the other species of Homo die out?
Neanderthals and other separate archaic human species are thought to have survived until around 40,000 years ago. Homo floresiensis lasted until about 50,000 years ago, and Homo sapiens is likely the only extant species of Homo.
All sources
100 references cited across the entry
- 1JournalNew species from Ethiopia further expands Middle Pliocene hominin diversityHaile-Selassie Y, Gibert L, Melillo SM, Ryan TM, Alene M, Deino A, Levin NE, Scott G, Saylor BZ — May 2015
- 2JournalGhosts of extinct apes: genomic insights into African hominid evolutionRobert A. Foley et al. — January 2024
- 3BookThe Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human EvolutionC.B. Stringer — Cambridge University Press — 1994
- 4BookHandbook of PaleoanthropologyF. Schrenk et al. — 2007
- 5JournalReconstructed Homo habilis type OH 7 suggests deep-rooted species diversity in early HomoF. Spoor et al. — March 2015
- 6JournalThe age of the 20 meter Solo River terrace, Java, Indonesia and the survival of Homo erectus in AsiaIndriati E, Swisher CC, Lepre C, Quinn RL, Suriyanto RA, Hascaryo AT, Grün R, Feibel CS, Pobiner BL, Aubert M, Lees W, Antón SC — 2011
- 7JournalOldest Homo sapiens fossil claim rewrites our species' historyEwen Callaway — 7 June 2017
- 8JournalPleistocene Mitochondrial Genomes Suggest a Single Major Dispersal of Non-Africans and a Late Glacial Population Turnover in EuropePosth C, Renaud G, Mittnik A, Drucker DG, Rougier H, Cupillard C, Valentin F, Thevenet C, Furtwängler A, Wißing C, Francken M, Malina M, Bolus M, Lari M, Gigli E, Capecchi G, Crevecoeur I, Beauval C, Flas D, Germonpré M, van der Plicht J, Cottiaux R, Gély B, Ronchitelli A, Wehrberger K, Grigorescu D, Svoboda J, Semal P, Caramelli D, Bocherens H, Harvati K, Conard NJ, Haak W, Powell A, Krause J — March 2016
- 9JournalA recent bottleneck of Y chromosome diversity coincides with a global change in cultureKarmin M, Saag L, Vicente M, Wilson Sayres MA, Järve M, Talas UG, Rootsi S, Ilumäe AM, Mägi R, Mitt M, Pagani L, Puurand T, Faltyskova Z, Clemente F, Cardona A, Metspalu E, Sahakyan H, Yunusbayev B, Hudjashov G, DeGiorgio M, Loogväli EL, Eichstaedt C, Eelmets M, Chaubey G, Tambets K, Litvinov S, Mormina M, Xue Y, Ayub Q, Zoraqi G, Korneliussen TS, Akhatova F, Lachance J, Tishkoff S, Momynaliev K, Ricaut FX, Kusuma P, Razafindrazaka H, Pierron D, Cox MP, Sultana GN, Willerslev R, Muller C, Westaway M, Lambert D, Skaro V, Kovačevic L, Turdikulova S, Dalimova D, Khusainova R, Trofimova N, Akhmetova V, Khidiyatova I, Lichman DV, Isakova J, Pocheshkhova E, Sabitov Z, Barashkov NA, Nymadawa P, Mihailov E, Seng JW, Evseeva I, Migliano AB, Abdullah S, Andriadze G, Primorac D, Atramentova L, Utevska O, Yepiskoposyan L, Marjanovic D, Kushniarevich A, Behar DM, Gilissen C, Vissers L, Veltman JA, Balanovska E, Derenko M, Malyarchuk B, Metspalu A, Fedorova S, Eriksson A, Manica A, Mendez FL, Karafet TM, Veeramah KR, Bradman N, Hammer MF, Osipova LP, Balanovsky O, Khusnutdinova EK, Johnsen K, Remm M, Thomas MG, Tyler-Smith C, Underhill PA, Willerslev E, Nielsen R, Metspalu M, Villems R, Kivisild T — April 2015
- 10JournalA Rare Deep-Rooting D0 African Y-Chromosomal Haplogroup and Its Implications for the Expansion of Modern Humans Out of AfricaHaber M, Jones AL, Connell BA, Arciero E, Yang H, Thomas MG, Xue Y, Tyler-Smith C — August 2019
- 11JournalA draft sequence of the Neandertal genomeGreen RE, Krause J, Briggs AW, Maricic T, Stenzel U, Kircher M, Patterson N, Li H, Zhai W, Fritz MH, Hansen NF, Durand EY, Malaspinas AS, Jensen JD, Marques-Bonet T, Alkan C, Prüfer K, Meyer M, Burbano HA, Good JM, Schultz R, Aximu-Petri A, Butthof A, Höber B, Höffner B, Siegemund M, Weihmann A, Nusbaum C, Lander ES, Russ C, Novod N, Affourtit J, Egholm M, Verna C, Rudan P, Brajkovic D, Kucan Ž, Gušic I, Doronichev VB, Golovanova LV, Lalueza-Fox C, de la Rasilla M, Fortea J, Rosas A, Schmitz RW, Johnson PL, Eichler EE, Falush D, Birney E, Mullikin JC, Slatkin M, Nielsen R, Kelso J, Lachmann M, Reich D, Pääbo S — May 2010
- 12JournalNeanderthal and Denisova genetic affinities with contemporary humans: introgression versus common ancestral polymorphismsLowery RK, Uribe G, Jimenez EB, Weiss MA, Herrera KJ, Regueiro M, Herrera RJ — November 2013
- 14JournalThe background of Linnaeus's contributions to the nomenclature and methods of systematic biologyW.T. Stearn — 1959
- 15BookSystema naturæ. Regnum animale.C. von Linné — Sumptibus Guilielmi Engelmann — 1758
- 16JournalDefining the genus HomoJ.H. Schwartz et al. — August 2015
- 17NewsHomo naledi and the problems with the Homo genusN. Lents — 4 October 2014
- 18JournalThe human genusB. Wood et al. — April 1999
- 19JournalExpanded geographic distribution and dietary strategies of the earliest Oldowan hominins and ParanthropusThomas Plummer — 9 February 2023
- 20"ape-man", from Pithecanthropus erectus (Java Man), Eugène Dubois, Pithecanthropus erectus: eine menschenähnliche Übergangsform aus Java (1894), identified with the Pithecanthropus alalus (i.e. "non-s
- 21JournalProtanthropus primigenius1895
- 22"Sinic man", from Sinanthropus pekinensis (Peking Man), Davidson Black (1927).
- 23"crooked man", from Cyphanthropus rhodesiensis (Rhodesian Man) William Plane Pycraft (1928).
- 26JournalA recent discovery in human paleontology: Atlanthropus of ternifine (Algeria)C. Arambourg — 1955
- 27JournalL'Hominien du TchadY. Coppens — 1965
- 28JournalLe TchadanthropusY. Coppens — 1966
- 29ThesisCharacterization of Unique Features of the Denisovan ExomeAlexandra Vivelo — California State University — 25 August 2013
- 30Chinese human fossils unlike any known speciesC. Barras — 14 March 2012
- 31JournalAn outline of an attempt at the disposition of Mammalia into Tribes and Families, with a list of genera apparently appertaining to each TribeJ.E. Gray — 1825
- 32JournalA new hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad, Central AfricaM. Brunet et al. — July 2002
- 33JournalGenera of the human lineageC.J. Cela-Conde et al. — June 2003
- 34JournalThe hominin fossil record: taxa, grades and cladesB. Wood et al. — April 2008
- 35JournalAustralopithecus sediba at 1.977 Ma and implications for the origins of the genus HomoR. Pickering et al. — September 2011
- 36JournalAustralopithecus garhi: a new species of early hominid from EthiopiaB. Asfaw et al. — April 1999
- 37JournalEvidence for stone-tool-assisted consumption of animal tissues before 3.39 million years ago at Dikika, EthiopiaS.P. McPherron et al. — August 2010
- 38JournalPaleoanthropology. Early Homo at 2.8 Ma from Ledi-Geraru, Afar, EthiopiaB. Villmoare et al. — March 2015
- 39JournalDivergence-time estimates for hominins provide insight into encephalization and body mass trends in human evolutionHans P. Püschel et al. — June 2021
- 40JournalDid early Homo migrate "out of" or "in to" Africa?Bernard Wood — 28 June 2011
- 41JournalFrom Australopithecus to Homo: the transition that wasn'tW.H. Kimbel et al. — July 2016
- 42JournalCraniofacial variation in Homo habilis: an analysis of the evidence for multiple speciesJ.M. Miller — May 2000
- 43JournalHow "African" was the early human dispersal out of Africa?Agustí J, Lordkipanidze D — June 2011
- 44BookEvolution and prehistory: the human challengeH.E. Prins et al. — Wadsworth Publishing — 2007
- 45JournalImplications of new early Homo fossils from Ileret, east of Lake Turkana, KenyaF. Spoor et al. — August 2007
- 47JournalGenomic inference of a severe human bottleneck during the Early to Middle Pleistocene transitionHu, Wangjie — 31 August 2023
- 48JournalOn the Number of Members of the Genus Homo Who Have Ever Lived, and Some Evolutionary ImplicationsWeiss, Kenneth M. — December 1984
- 49JournalA review of early Homo in southern Africa focusing on cranial, mandibular and dental remains, with the description of a new species (Homo gautengensis sp. nov.)D. Curnoe — June 2010
- 50JournalEarliest Remains of Genus HomoSchuster AM — 1997
- 51JournalApproximate Bayesian computation with deep learning supports a third archaic introgression in Asia and OceaniaM. Mondal et al. — January 2019
- 52JournalHigh occurrence of a basicranial feature in Homo erectus: anatomical description of the preglenoid tubercleV. Zeitoun — September 2003
- 53JournalBayesian analysis of a morphological supermatrix sheds light on controversial fossil hominin relationshipsDembo M, Matzke NJ, Mooers AØ, Collard M — August 2015
- 54JournalThe evolutionary relationships and age of Homo naledi: An assessment using dated Bayesian phylogenetic methodsDembo M, Radovčić D, Garvin HM, Laird MF, Schroeder L, Scott JE, Brophy J, Ackermann RR, Musiba CM, de Ruiter DJ, Mooers AØ, Collard M — August 2016
- 55BookThe Origins of Europeans and Their Pre-Historic Innovations from 6 Million to 10,000 BCE: From 6 Million to 10,000 BCEN. Harrison — Algora Publishing — 1 May 2019
- 56BookAnalyzing Hominin Hominin Phylogeny: Cladistic ApproachDavid Strait et al. — Springer — 2015
- 57JournalHominin taxic diversity: Fact or fantasy?Bernard Wood et al. — 2016
- 58JournalThe phylogenetic position of the Yunxian cranium elucidates the origin of Homo longi and the DenisovansXiaobo Feng et al. — 2025-09-25
- 59JournalNeanderthal language revisited: not only usD. Dediu et al. — 1 June 2018
- 60JournalEvidence mounts for interbreeding bonanza in ancient human speciesEwen Callaway — 17 February 2016
- 61JournalWhy are there no persisting hybrids of humans with Denisovans, Neanderthals, or anyone else?A. Varki — April 2016
- 62JournalHominin interbreeding and the evolution of human variationK.H. Ko — December 2016
- 63JournalAncient west Eurasian ancestry in southern and eastern AfricaPickrell JK, Patterson N, Loh PR, Lipson M, Berger B, Stoneking M, Pakendorf B, Reich D — February 2014
- 64JournalProgress in human systematics. A reviewColin Groves — July 2017
- 65JournalUpper Pleistocene Human Dispersals out of Africa: A Review of the Current State of the DebateA. Beyin — 2011
- 66JournalOldest ancient-human DNA details dawn of NeanderthalsE. Callaway — March 2016
- 68News'Oldest remains' outside Africa reset human migration clockStaff — 10 July 2019
- 69JournalApidima Cave fossils provide earliest evidence of Homo sapiens in EurasiaK. Harvati et al. — July 2019
- 70JournalGenetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in SiberiaReich D, Green RE, Kircher M, Krause J, Patterson N, Durand EY, Viola B, Briggs AW, Stenzel U, Johnson PL, Maricic T, Good JM, Marques-Bonet T, Alkan C, Fu Q, Mallick S, Li H, Meyer M, Eichler EE, Stoneking M, Richards M, Talamo S, Shunkov MV, Derevianko AP, Hublin JJ, Kelso J, Slatkin M, Pääbo S — December 2010
- 71JournalDenisova admixture and the first modern human dispersals into Southeast Asia and OceaniaReich D, Patterson N, Kircher M, Delfin F, Nandineni MR, Pugach I, Ko AM, Ko YC, Jinam TA, Phipps ME, Saitou N, Wollstein A, Kayser M, Pääbo S, Stoneking M — October 2011
- 72JournalHunter-gatherer genomic diversity suggests a southern African origin for modern humansHenn BM, Gignoux CR, Jobin M, Granka JM, Macpherson JM, Kidd JM, Rodríguez-Botigué L, Ramachandran S, Hon L, Brisbin A, Lin AA, Underhill PA, Comas D, Kidd KK, Norman PJ, Parham P, Bustamante CD, Mountain JL, Feldman MW — March 2011
- 73JournalSouthern African ancient genomes estimate modern human divergence to 350,000 to 260,000 years agoSchlebusch CM, Malmström H, Günther T, Sjödin P, Coutinho A, Edlund H, Munters AR, Vicente M, Steyn M, Soodyall H, Lombard M, Jakobsson M — November 2017
- 74NewsSkull suggests three early human species were oneSid Perkins — 17 October 2013
- 75NewsBeautiful Skull Spurs Debate on Human HistoryB. Switek — 17 October 2013
- 76JournalA complete skull from Dmanisi, Georgia, and the evolutionary biology of early HomoLordkipanidze D, Ponce de León MS, Margvelashvili A, Rak Y, Rightmire GP, Vekua A, Zollikofer CP — October 2013
- 78JournalIs Homo heidelbergensis a distinct species? New insight on the Mauer mandibleA. Mounier et al. — March 2009
- 79JournalThe evolution and development of cranial form in HomosapiensD.E. Lieberman et al. — February 2002
- 80JournalTwo types of molecular evolution. Evidence from studies of interspecific hybridizationA.C. Wilson et al. — July 1974
- 81JournalMitochondrial Pseudogenes Suggest Repeated Inter-Species Hybridization among Direct Human AncestorsK. Popadin et al. — 2022
- 82JournalHybridization in human evolution: Insights from other organismsR.R. Ackermann et al. — July 2019
- 83JournalHomo naledi and Pleistocene hominin evolution in subequatorial AfricaL.R. Berger et al. — May 2017
- 84BookHandbook of PaleoanthropologyFriedemann Schrenk et al. — Springer — 2007
- 85JournalPaleoanthropology. Late Pliocene fossiliferous sedimentary record and the environmental context of early Homo from Afar, EthiopiaE.N. DiMaggio et al. — March 2015
- 87JournalContemporaneity of Australopithecus, Paranthropus, and early Homo erectus in South AfricaAndy I. R. Herries et al. — 2020
- 88JournalEarliest human occupations at Dmanisi (Georgian Caucasus) dated to 1.85-1.78 MaFerring R, Oms O, Agustí J, Berna F, Nioradze M, Shelia T, Tappen M, Vekua A, Zhvania D, Lordkipanidze D — June 2011
- 89JournalThe age of the 20 meter Solo River terrace, Java, Indonesia and the survival of Homo erectus in AsiaE. Indriati et al. — 2011
- 90BookEAA Summer School eBookManjil Hazarika — European Anthropological Association — 2007
- 91JournalPleistocene magnetochronology of early hominin sites at Ceprano and Fontana Ranuccio, ItalyGiovanni Muttoni et al. — 2009
- 92JournalHomo naledi and associated sediments in the Rising Star Cave, South AfricaP.H. Dirks et al. — May 2017
- 93JournalDeeply divergent archaic mitochondrial genome provides lower time boundary for African gene flow into NeanderthalsC. Posth et al. — July 2017
- 94JournalMassive cranium from Harbin in northeastern China establishes a new Middle Pleistocene human lineageNi X, Ji Q, Wu W, Shao Q, Ji Y, Zhang C, Liang L, Ge J, Guo Z, Li J, Li Q, Grün R, Stringer C — 25 June 2021
- 95JournalThe Sima de los Huesos Hominids Date to Beyond U/Th Equilibrium (>350 kyr) and Perhaps to 400–500 kyr: New Radiometric DatesJames L. Bischoff et al. — March 2003
- 96JournalOn the phylogenetic position of the pre-Neandertal specimen from Reilingen, GermanyD. Dean et al. — May 1998
- 97JournalThe first archaic Homo from TaiwanC.H. Chang et al. — January 2015
- 99JournalA new species of Homo from the Late Pleistocene of the PhilippinesF. Détroit et al. — April 2019
- 100JournalDirect dating of human fossils and the ever-changing story of human evolutionRainer Grün et al. — December 2023
- 101JournalHuman evolution: taxonomy and paleobiologyBernard Wood et al. — July 2000