Homo habilis

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Homo habilis means "handy man," a name suggested by the Australian anthropologist Raymond Dart and given to remains officially assigned to the genus Homo in 1964. The first recognised fossils, catalogued as OH 7, were a partial juvenile skull with hand and foot bones found in Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania, in 1960. They were unearthed by Jonathan Leakey, working alongside native African excavators who dug into the gorge. By then his parents, Louis and Mary Leakey, had spent 29 years searching Olduvai for early hominin remains. Mostly they had found animal bones and a curious industry of struck stones. This is the story of a species that arrived already contested. Why did so many researchers want to fold it into Australopithecus? How did a creature with a brain barely larger than an ape's come to be called human? And what did its scattered bones reveal about how it walked, what it ate, and what hunted it?

• 2. A Contested Name

  ›

  In 1964, Louis Leakey joined the South African palaeoanthropologist Phillip V. Tobias and the British primatologist John R. Napier to place the Olduvai remains into the genus Homo. The specimen OH 7 became the holotype. Their justification leaned heavily on association with the Oldowan stone-tool industry, then taken as evidence of advanced cognitive ability. Yet the very first remains had been found earlier and missed. OH 4, a single molar, was recovered in 1959 by Heselon Mukiri, the senior assistant of Louis and Mary Leakey, working with other native Africans. Its significance went unrecognised at the time. The Oldowan industry itself had been ascribed in 1959 to Paranthropus boisei, then called "Zinjanthropus," because it was the only hominin found in the area. That attribution was revised once OH 7 came to light. The new species drew immediate resistance. Many argued it should be merged with Australopithecus africanus, the only other early hominin then known. Homo was presumed to have evolved in Asia, and the remains seemed too old. The brain was also smaller than Wilfrid Le Gros Clark had proposed for Homo in 1955. Acceptance came slowly, as more fossils and species emerged from the ground.

• 3. Splitters And Lumpers

  ›

  By 1983, Tobias had built a sweeping model of human descent. He proposed that A. africanus was a direct ancestor of both Paranthropus and Homo, evolving into H. habilis, which evolved into H. erectus, which evolved into modern humans. He argued there was a major evolutionary leap between A. africanus and H. habilis, because the brain had nearly doubled from its australopithecine predecessors. The model gained wide acceptance, and with it came a problem. Researchers began assigning Late Pliocene to Early Pleistocene remains to H. habilis on the basis of size alone, lacking clear diagnostic features. The range of variation grew so wide that scholars coined the terms sensu stricto and sensu lato to exclude or include the more discrepant forms. In 1985, the English palaeoanthropologist Bernard Wood proposed that the massive skull KNM-ER 1470, found at Lake Turkana, Kenya, in 1972, was actually a separate species, now called Homo rudolfensis. Others countered that it was simply a male, with the other specimens female. In 2010, the Australian archaeologist Darren Curoe proposed splitting off South African early Homo as "Homo gautengensis," though only H. rudolfensis won broad support. The discovery of the 1.8 million-year-old Dmanisi skulls in Georgia in the early 2000s reopened everything, prompting some to argue that all contemporary early Homo in Africa belonged to a single species, H. erectus.

• 4. Bones That Climb

  ›

  In 1986, the American anthropologist Tim D. White found OH 62, a fragmentary skeleton lying alongside H. habilis skull fragments. For the first time, aspects of the species' body anatomy were established, and the bones looked more Australopithecus-like than Homo-like. The presumed female OH 62, assuming australopithecine proportions, has generally been read as small-bodied. But assuming longer, modern humanlike legs, she would have stood about 148 cm and weighed about 35 kg, with the presumed male KNM-ER 3735 about the same size. For comparison, modern human men and women in the year 1900 averaged 163 cm and 152.7 cm. The arms tell a divided story. The humerus of OH 62 and its even longer ulna sit closer to the proportions seen in chimpanzees. Yet in 2004 the anthropologists Martin Haeusler and Henry McHenry argued that the humerus-to-femur ratio of OH 62 falls within the modern human range, making apelike proportions unsafe to assume. The hand bones of OH 7 suggest precision gripping alongside adaptations for climbing. A foot, OH 8, is better suited to walking the ground than that of A. afarensis, though it retains apelike features. Its projected toe bone and compacted mid-foot joints restrict rotation and stabilise the foot. That stability feeds the plantar arch spring mechanism, which generates energy while running but not walking, hinting that H. habilis may have managed some endurance running.

• 5. Inside The Skull

  ›

  Brain size in H. habilis generally varied from 500 to 900 cubic centimetres. The brains of all Homo show an expanded cerebrum compared to australopithecines. A 2015 reappraisal of the brain volume of OH 7 placed H. habilis, H. rudolfensis, and H. ergaster in a shared range, still marking a jump above australopithecine brains. The teeth of one specimen, OH 65, carry striations that slant right. These may have been self-inflicted by accident, as the individual pulled a piece of meat with its teeth and left hand while cutting with a stone tool in the right. If so, it points to right-handedness, which is tied to major reorganisation of the brain and the lateralisation of function between hemispheres. The same scenario has been hypothesised for some Neanderthal specimens, and in modern humans lateralisation is weakly linked to language. The tooth rows formed a V-shape rather than the U-shape of later Homo. The mouth jutted outwards, prognathic, though the face was flat from the nose up. From dental development rates, the species is thought to have grown at an accelerated pace, more like a modern non-human ape than a modern human.

• 6. Scavenger At The Carcass

  ›

  Meat reached H. habilis mostly through scavenging rather than hunting, in what is called the scavenger hypothesis. The species is cast as a confrontational scavenger, stealing kills from smaller predators such as jackals or cheetahs. Fruit likely mattered too, suggested by dental erosion consistent with repeated exposure to acidity. Dental microwear-texture analysis indicates it did not regularly eat tough foods, sitting on average between tough-food eaters and leaf eaters, and pointing toward a generalised, omnivorous diet. Fish remains at sites most likely linked to the species suggest freshwater fish were also eaten. The shift toward meat is often tied to brain growth, through competing ideas: that meat pressured cognition to drive strategic scavenging, or that a richer diet let the calorie-expensive ape gut shrink and divert energy to the brain. A rival proposal holds that in a drying climate, early Homo leaned on underground storage organs such as tubers and on food sharing, which built social bonds. The jaws complicate the picture. The mandibles of H. habilis are thicker than those of modern humans and all living apes, closer to Australopithecus, and able to resist torsion and produce powerful chewing stresses. Greater molar cusp relief than in Australopithecus suggests tools were used to fracture tough foods, sparing the cusps from wear.

• 7. Stones And Shelter

  ›

  The Oldowan industry was first reported in 1934, but only in the 1960s was it widely accepted as the earliest culture, dating to 1.8 million years ago and credited to H. habilis. Later finds pushed material culture back further, with Oldowan tools at Ledi-Geraru and Gona in Ethiopia dating to 2.6 million years ago. Knappers selected lithic cores and understood that certain rocks would fracture in a predictable way when struck hard and in the right spot. They produced choppers, polyhedrons, and discoids, though specific shapes were probably not planned in advance. The raw material shaped the result: spheroids are common at Olduvai, rich in soft quartz and quartzite, while Koobi Fora, dominated by hard basalt lava, lacks them. Unlike the later Acheulean culture of H. ergaster, the Oldowan required no planning or foresight, and tools were often discarded immediately after use. Australopithecines had made tools too, including the 3.3 million-year-old Lomekwi industry, yet the sharp-edged Oldowan was a major innovation that opened new feeding strategies. In 1962, a circle of volcanic rocks was found in Olduvai Gorge, with rocks piled at intervals. Mary Leakey suggested the piles supported poles, perhaps for a windbreak or rough hut, an arrangement some modern nomadic tribes still use. Dated to 1.75 million years ago, it stands as the oldest-claimed evidence of architecture.

• 8. Among The Predators

  ›

  Group size for H. habilis was estimated at 70 to 85 members by the American palaeoanthropologist Leslie C. Aiello and the British evolutionary psychologist Robin Dunbar in 1993, drawing on the relationship between neocortex size and group size in modern primates. That figure sits on the upper end of chimp and baboon ranges. The behaviour of early Homo is sometimes modelled on savanna chimps and baboons, communities of several males rather than a harem, who defend the group on dangerous open ground by throwing sticks and stones at predators. The danger was real. The left foot OH 8 appears to have been bitten off by a crocodile, possibly Crocodylus anthropophagus, and the leg OH 35 shows evidence of leopard predation. Other carnivores stalked the same landscape, including the hunting hyena Chasmaporthetes nitidula and the saber-toothed cats Dinofelis and Megantereon. H. habilis shared its world with H. rudolfensis, H. ergaster, and Paranthropus boisei, and how they interacted remains unclear. When describing H. habilis, Leakey and colleagues floated the idea that P. boisei might have been killed by H. habilis, perhaps as food. Five years earlier, describing P. boisei, Louis Leakey had written, "There is no reason whatever, in this case, to believe that the skull represents the victim of a cannibalistic feast by some hypothetical more advanced type of man." The youngest H. habilis specimen, OH 13, dates to about 1.65 million years ago.