Herbert Marcuse

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Herbert Marcuse was born on the 19th of July, 1898, in Berlin, into an upper-middle-class Jewish family well integrated into German society. Few thinkers of the twentieth century managed to shape radical politics from inside a government intelligence agency while simultaneously becoming the intellectual patron saint of student revolutionaries. That is exactly what Marcuse did. He wrote philosophy under Martin Heidegger, analyzed Nazi ideology for American spies, and then watched his ideas ignite campuses across West Germany, France, and the United States. How does a scholar from Berlin end up being called "the Father of the New Left" by a press corps he gently rebuffed? And what exactly did he mean when he argued that tolerance itself could be repressive? Those are the questions worth sitting with.

• 2. From Berlin to Freiburg

  ›

  Marcuse's formal schooling ran from the Mommsen Gymnasium through the Kaiserin-Augusta Gymnasium in Charlottenburg, finishing in 1916. That same year he was drafted into the German Army, though he never left Berlin and spent his service in horse stables. It was an unglamorous posting, but it gave him proximity to the city's intellectual life: he managed to attend lectures at the University of Berlin while still on active duty. He then joined a Soldiers' Council that participated in the abortive Spartacist uprising, his first brush with organized radical politics.

  In 1920, he transferred to the University of Freiburg to study German literature, philosophy, politics, and economics. His 1922 doctoral thesis focused on the German Kunstlerroman, the tradition of the artist-novel. He returned to Berlin afterward and worked in publishing before marrying Sophie Wertheim, a mathematician, in 1924. Four years later, he went back to Freiburg to write a habilitation under Martin Heidegger. That project, published in 1932 as Hegel's Ontology and the Theory of Historicity, positioned Marcuse within a broader European Hegel Renaissance, one that foregrounded Hegel's thinking on life, history, and the dialectic. Jürgen Habermas later argued that understanding Marcuse's mature thought requires appreciating this early Heideggerian influence.

• 3. Exile and Intelligence Work

  ›

  In 1932, Marcuse stopped working with Heidegger, who joined the Nazi Party the following year. Recognizing that the regime would bar him from any professorship, Marcuse joined the Institute for Social Research in Frankfurt, which had already moved its endowment to Holland in anticipation of the Nazi takeover. He left Nazi Germany in May 1933 and began his work with the Institute at a branch office in Geneva. He emigrated to the United States in June 1934 and served at the Institute's Columbia University branch until 1942, becoming a US citizen in 1940.

  In March 1943, Marcuse joined the Research and Analysis Branch of the Office of Strategic Services, the precursor to the Central Intelligence Agency. The branch was directed by the Harvard historian William L. Langer and at its peak, between 1943 and 1945, employed over twelve hundred people, four hundred of whom were stationed abroad. Marcuse joined fellow Frankfurt School scholar Franz Neumann in the Central European Section and rapidly established himself as, in the words of his colleagues, "the leading analyst on Germany." After the OSS dissolved in 1945, he moved to the US Department of State as head of the Central European section. A later compilation of his wartime reports was published in 2013 under the title Secret Reports on Nazi Germany: The Frankfurt School Contribution to the War Effort. He retired after the death of his first wife, Sophie, in 1951.

• 4. The Theory of One-Dimensional Society

  ›

  At Brandeis University, where he taught from 1954 to 1965, Marcuse wrote One-Dimensional Man, published in 1964. The argument at the heart of the book drew on Karl Marx's concept of objectification: under capitalism, he said, the laborer becomes alienated, eventually reduced to a functional object. Marcuse pushed this further. He wrote that people recognize themselves in their commodities, finding their soul, as he put it, in "their automobile, hi-fi set, split-level home, kitchen equipment." Consumer society, in his reading, does not liberate its participants; it integrates them so thoroughly that the capacity for dissent quietly disappears.

  Central to this argument was what Marcuse called repressive desublimation. Postwar mass culture, with its constant flow of sexual provocation, he contended, redirects political energy. People preoccupied with that kind of stimulation do not act to change the world; they remain, in his framing, repressed and uncritical. The working class, once the engine of revolutionary possibility in Marxist theory, had been absorbed into the capitalist system through its bureaucratized parties and trade unions. Marcuse consequently shifted his faith to a different coalition: radical intellectuals allied with the socially marginalized, the unemployed, ethnic minorities, and others not yet folded into the consuming mainstream. Their opposition, he argued, was revolutionary even when their political consciousness was not.

• 5. Repressive Tolerance and the New Left

  ›

  Marcuse's 1965 essay "Repressive Tolerance" made his political argument explicit and drew sustained conservative criticism. His core claim was that capitalist democracies can carry totalitarian dimensions: tolerance of repressive speech, he wrote, is inauthentic because it guarantees that marginalized voices remain inaudible. He called for what he termed "liberating tolerance," which he defined directly as "intolerance against movements from the Right and toleration of movements from the Left." He also argued that if the paths to a subversive majority were blocked by organized repression and indoctrination, their reopening might require apparently undemocratic means.

  Brandeis did not renew his teaching contract in 1965, and he moved to the University of California, San Diego. In 1968, California Governor Ronald Reagan and other conservatives objected to his reappointment there, but the university let his contract run until 1970. The media claimed he openly advocated violence, though he consistently clarified that only "violence of defense" could be appropriate, not "violence of aggression." He brushed aside the label "Father of the New Left" with characteristic dryness, saying it would have been more accurate to call him the grandfather. Among those he influenced were Angela Davis, Abbie Hoffman, and Rudi Dutschke. Noam Chomsky, who knew him personally, liked Marcuse as a person but thought very little of his intellectual work.

• 6. Feminism, Art, and Late Thinking

  ›

  In a 1974 Stanford lecture titled Marxism and Feminism, Marcuse described the Women's Liberation Movement as "perhaps the most important and potentially the most radical political movement that we have." He hoped for a shift in collective values away from what he called aggressive and masculine qualities toward feminine ones. He regarded women's entry into the labor force as necessary but not sufficient for genuine liberation. Feminist philosophers Jessica Benjamin and Nancy Chodorow later argued that his reliance on Freud's drive theory left him unable to account for the individual's intersubjective development.

  His final book, The Aesthetic Dimension, appeared in 1977. In it he examined the role of art in what he called the process of emancipation from bourgeois society. He had also defended the arrested East German dissident Rudolf Bahro, discussing in a 1979 essay Bahro's theories of change from within. Bahro's book Die Alternative: Zur Kritik des real existierenden Sozialismus had argued for reform inside actually existing socialism, a position Marcuse took seriously even as his own reputation was bound up with the Western New Left.

• 7. Criticism and Legacy

  ›

  Leszek Kolakowski described Marcuse's views as essentially anti-Marxist, arguing that they discarded the historical theory of class struggle in favor of an inverted Freudian reading of history where all social rules could simply be abolished to create what Kolakowski called a "New World of Happiness." He concluded that Marcuse's ideal society would be ruled despotically by an enlightened group who had, in Kolakowski's phrase, "realized in themselves the unity of Logos and Eros" and thrown off the authority of logic, mathematics, and the empirical sciences.

  The philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre mounted a different attack, accusing Marcuse of falsely assuming that consumers are entirely passive recipients of corporate advertising. MacIntyre called him a pre-Marxist thinker and concluded that Marcuse "invokes the great names of freedom and reason while betraying their substance at every important point."

  Marcuse died on the 29th of July, 1979, ten days after his eighty-first birthday, after suffering a stroke during a trip to Germany. He had just spoken at the Frankfurt Römerberggespräche and was traveling to the Max Planck Institute in Starnberg, at the invitation of Jürgen Habermas, where he had delivered lectures and participated in discussions from 1974 to 1979. In 2003, his ashes were buried in the Dorotheenstadtischer cemetery in Berlin. Writing in the journal New Political Science, Robert Kirsch and Sarah Surak described his influence in the twenty-first century as "alive and well, vibrant across multiple fields of inquiry across many areas of social relations." His concept of repressive tolerance attracted renewed attention after the September 11 attacks and has remained a reference point in debates about campus protests and the Black Lives Matter movement.