Henry VI, Part 3

• 1. The Wars Of Roses

  ›

  In 1455, the First Battle of St Albans erupted as Yorkist forces pursued King Henry VI and his queen Margaret from the field. This conflict marked the beginning of a decades-long struggle for the English throne known as the Wars of the Roses. The play opens with victorious Yorkists including Duke of York, Edward, Richard, Warwick, Montague, and Norfolk chasing their enemies through London. The political landscape had shifted dramatically since the death of Henry V in 1422. England now faced internal chaos as noble families turned against one another in pursuit of power and revenge. The stable nation described earlier had fractured into warring factions that subverted traditional moral codes. Families broke down as brothers fought brothers and fathers killed sons on the battlefield. The stage would witness four actual battles plus one reported battle, more than any other Shakespeare play. These scenes depicted the horrors of civil war rather than the glory of national unity.

• 2. Composition And Publication

  ›

  Robert Greene's pamphlet A Groatsworth of Wit registered on the 20th of September 1592 contained a parody proving the play existed by at least June 1592. The government shut theatres on the 23rd of June to prevent plague outbreaks, meaning the play must have been written in either 1591 or early 1592. Thomas Millington published an octavo version titled The True Tragedie of Richard Duke of Yorke in 1595 under Peter Short's printing press. William White reprinted this text in quarto form for Millington in 1600. William Jaggard included it in folio format during 1619 as part of his False Folio project printed for Thomas Pavier. The First Folio editors John Heminges and Henry Condell finally published the play under its current title in 1623. No references to Part 3 exist prior to that year, suggesting the numbering was their invention. The play appeared alongside The Whole Contention betweene the Two Famous Houses, Lancaster and Yorke which combined material from both Henry VI parts one and two. Pericles Prince of Tyre also appeared within this same False Folio collection.

• 3. Textual Variations

  ›

  Samuel Johnson proposed in 1765 that the 1595 octavo represented a memorial reconstruction by actors attempting to sell a reported version of Shakespeare's work. Edmond Malone challenged this theory in 1790 suggesting instead that the octavo might be an early draft of the final play. Peter Alexander re-established dominance of the bad quarto theory in 1928 through detailed textual analysis. Steven Urkowitz championed the early draft theory decades later arguing that differences reflected authorial revision rather than faulty reporting. Randall Martin supports a hybrid view where True Tragedy represents both a reported text of an early draft simultaneously. Evidence includes the Bonfield versus Bonville name discrepancy appearing only in the octavo but not in chronicle sources. Act 4 Scene 1 shows Clarence reproaching Edward about marriages with Lord Hungerford's daughter while 3 Henry VI describes different arrangements matching Hall's chronicle. The line "Away my Lord for vengeance comes along with him" lacks qualification in True Tragedy whereas 3 Henry VI specifies "them" refers to Warwick Richard and Edward. These anomalies suggest either reporter confusion or deliberate authorial changes made after initial composition.

• 4. Sources And Influences

  ›

  Edward Hall's The Union of the Two Noble and Illustre Families of Lancaster and York published in 1548 served as Shakespeare's primary historical source. Raphael Holinshed's Chronicles of England Scotland and Ireland from 1577 provided additional material though often reproducing Hall verbatim. Sackville and Norton's Gorboduc written in 1561 offered structural models for depicting civil society destruction through factional conflict. William Baldwin's The Mirror for Magistrates from 1559 influenced character speeches including Margaret of Anjou King Edward IV and Richard Plantagenet 3rd Duke of York. Thomas Kyd's The Spanish Tragedy between 1582 and 1591 may have inspired the bloody handkerchief motif used during York's torture scene. Arthur Brooke's The Tragical History of Romeus and Juliet from 1562 supplied much of Margaret's speech to her army in Act 5 Scene 4. Mystery cycles possibly influenced depictions of Christ-like suffering in York's death scene according to Randall Martin's analysis. Desiderius Erasmus' Tragicus Rex and Thomas More's Utopia from 1516 contributed elements to Richard's soliloquy about playing actors.

• 5. Critical Reception

  ›

  F.P. Wilson argued in 1969 that no dramatist before the defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588 dared stage plays based on recent English history. Michael Taylor countered by listing thirty-nine history plays existing prior to 1592 including Christopher Marlowe's Tamburlaine and anonymous works like Selimus. E.M.W. Tillyard claimed the play violated neoclassical precepts showing violence mimetically rather than reporting it diegetically through dialogue. Philip Sidney's An Apology for Poetry from 1579 established distinctions between high art verbalizing battles versus low art displaying them directly. Ben Jonson wrote in 1605 that showing battles was only "for the vulgar who are better delighted with that which pleaseth the eye." Thomas Nashe praised didactic drama depicting martial action as teaching both history and military tactics to masses in Piers Penniless his Supplication to the Devil published in 1592. Thomas Heywood argued in An Apology for Actors (1612) that lively well-spirited action could new mould spectators' hearts toward noble attempts. Modern productions since Peter Hall's 1963 staging have re-evaluated the play as complex dramatic text rather than crude spectacle.

• 6. Montague Problem

  ›

  Act 1 Scene 1 introduces Montague as York's brother-in-law representing Richard Neville Earl of Salisbury while Act 2 Scene 1 presents him as John Neville Marquis of Montague Warwick's younger brother. The character refers to York as 'brother' initially making sense if portraying Salisbury but inaccurate if representing John Neville. Warwick calls Montague brother starting at line 168 of Act 2 Scene 1 though neither title applied to Salisbury historically. True Tragedy reports Salisbury's death through Richard's speech describing a father crying out for Warwick until beset by thousand swords. In contrast 3 Henry VI describes Thomas Neville never appearing elsewhere dying under horse bellies stained with smoking blood. Michael Byrne played Montague consistently as John Neville in the BBC adaptation filmed in 1981 and broadcast in 1983. Lines contradicting this identity were reassigned or altered including changing "Brother" to "Cousin" throughout dialogue. Productions resolve discrepancies by establishing one consistent figure representing Warwick's brother and Salisbury's son rather than two separate personas shifting identities mid-play.