Greenhouse effect
The greenhouse effect is the reason Earth is not a frozen rock. Without it, the planet's surface would be far colder than the 20th century average of about 14 C. With it, the average sits closer to that livable figure. The mechanism is invisible and constant. Sunlight pours in, the ground warms, and the warmth tries to escape back to space as a different kind of light. Heat-trapping gases catch most of that escaping warmth and slow the planet's cooling. This single process keeps oceans liquid and air breathable. It also sits at the center of a warming world. Since the Industrial Revolution, the planet has heated by about 1.2 C, and since 1981 the global average surface temperature has climbed at 0.18 C per decade. How did scientists first detect a force they could not see? Why does Venus roast at 735 K while Mars, with far more carbon dioxide, barely warms at all? And why do experts insist the real story is happening not at the ground, but at the top of the sky?
Every object warmer than absolute zero glows with thermal radiation, and the color of that glow depends on temperature. The Sun, with a surface temperature of 5,500 C, blazes mostly in shortwave radiation: near-infrared and visible wavelengths we call sunlight. Earth, far cooler, emits longwave radiation at mid- and far-infrared wavelengths. This difference is the hinge of the whole system. A gas counts as a greenhouse gas only if it absorbs that longwave radiation. Earth's atmosphere lets most sunlight through, absorbing just 23% of incoming shortwave radiation. But it captures 90% of the longwave radiation rising off the surface. The asymmetry is the trap. Energy enters easily and leaves with difficulty, so heat accumulates near the ground. The name itself is borrowed by analogy, yet the comparison is imperfect. A garden greenhouse holds warmth mainly by blocking convection, stopping warm air from drifting away. The atmospheric greenhouse effect works differently. It restricts radiative transfer through the air and slows the rate at which thermal radiation slips into space.
Joseph Fourier proposed the idea as early as 1824, though he never used the word greenhouse. His reasoning suggested the atmosphere somehow held warmth that should have escaped. Claude Pouillet strengthened both the argument and the evidence in 1827 and again in 1838. The first laboratory breakthrough came in 1856, when Eunice Newton Foote demonstrated that air carrying water vapour warms more under the sun than dry air, and that carbon dioxide warms it more still. She drew a startling conclusion from her results. "An atmosphere of that gas would give to our earth a high temperature," she wrote. John Tyndall took measurement further. From 1859 onward he measured the infrared absorption and emission of various gases and vapors. He found that the main atmospheric gases had no effect at all. The warming came from a tiny fraction of the air, largely water vapor, with small amounts of hydrocarbons and carbon dioxide carrying outsized weight. Svante Arrhenius quantified the effect in 1896, making the first numerical prediction of warming from a hypothetical doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide. The label finally arrived in 1901, when Nils Gustaf Ekholm applied the term greenhouse to the phenomenon.
Two numbers describe the same trapped heat, and both reveal its scale. Earth's average surface temperature sits around 15 C, but without absorption by greenhouse gases and clouds it would be far lower. That gap registers as a temperature change of 33 C. The effect can also be read as an energy flow. Longwave radiation leaves the surface at an average rate of 398 W/m, yet only 239 W/m reaches space. The difference, 159 W/m, is the greenhouse effect expressed as energy. Stated as a fraction it is 0.40, meaning 40 percent of the longwave radiation leaving the surface never escapes. Whether scientists report a temperature shift or an energy flow, they are measuring one phenomenon. The numbers come from incoming and outgoing radiation, the only process capable of exchanging energy between Earth and the rest of the universe. Of the sunlight that arrives, the atmosphere and clouds reflect about 23% and absorb 23%, the surface reflects 7% and absorbs 48%, and overall the planet reflects roughly 30% and absorbs 240 W/m. That absorbed energy must eventually leave, and how it leaves is where the greenhouse effect does its work.
The surface budget fallacy is one of the most common errors in thinking about warming. It assumes carbon dioxide can only heat the planet by sending more thermal radiation downward, and that if the lower atmosphere is already nearly opaque, more carbon dioxide could change nothing. The mistake is looking at the wrong ledger. What matters is the top-of-atmosphere energy budget. Increasing carbon dioxide reduces the longwave radiation reaching space, creating an imbalance that forces warming, regardless of what happens at the surface. The history here is instructive. Callendar in 1938 and Plass in 1959 focused on the surface budget. The work of Manabe in the 1960s clarified that the top of the atmosphere is what counts. The vertical structure of the air makes this possible. In the troposphere, temperature falls with altitude at about 6.5 C per kilometer, a decline called the lapse rate, driven by air rising, expanding, and cooling while other air descends and warms. This gradient is essential. If the lapse rate were zero, the greenhouse effect would vanish entirely. Outgoing radiation is better understood as emitted not by the surface but by a layer in the mid-troposphere, coupled to the ground by that lapse rate. The temperature difference between those two locations is the greenhouse effect made visible. As gases increase, the effective radiating level must rise to keep the same mass of carbon dioxide above it, and Earth's equivalent emission altitude has been climbing at 23 m per decade.
More than 99% of the dry atmosphere does nothing to trap heat. Gases with a single atom, like argon, and gases with two identical atoms, like nitrogen and oxygen, are transparent to longwave radiation. Their molecules are symmetrical, with no dipole moment to interact with the passing energy. The active gases are the asymmetrical ones. Most molecules with two different atoms, such as carbon monoxide, and all molecules with three or more atoms are infrared active. When they vibrate, those vibrations shift the molecule's distribution of electrical charge, letting them absorb and emit longwave radiation. A persistent myth holds that these gases simply re-emit the photons they catch. The reality is faster and messier. Each molecule undergoes billions of collisions every second, so absorbed energy spreads to surrounding molecules as heat long before a new photon could be released. Carbon dioxide leaves a clear fingerprint in the outgoing radiation, responsible for a dip at around 667 cm minus 1, equivalent to a wavelength of 15 microns. The Mauna Loa Observatory has tracked its rise directly. Concentrations climbed from about 313 parts per million in 1960, passing the 400 ppm milestone in 2013. Over the past 800,000 years, ice cores show carbon dioxide ranging from 180 ppm to a pre-industrial level near 270 ppm, never matching today's figure.
Venus burns at 735 K, the most extreme greenhouse effect in the inner Solar System. Its atmosphere is about 97% carbon dioxide and crushingly dense, with surface pressure roughly equal to what a diver feels 900 m underwater on Earth. The counterintuitive part is that proximity is not the cause. Venus is about 30% closer to the Sun, yet it absorbs less sunlight than Earth because it reflects 77% of incoming light against Earth's 30%. Without its atmosphere, Venus would sit at just 232 K. A runaway greenhouse effect, long hypothesized and still largely accepted, is thought to have boiled away any oceans Venus once held. Mars makes the opposite case. It holds about 70 times as much carbon dioxide as Earth, but its greenhouse effect is only about 6 K, limited by the lack of water vapor and the sheer thinness of the air. Saturn's moon Titan runs both directions at once. Nitrogen, methane, and hydrogen warm its surface by 21 K, even though nitrogen and hydrogen normally ignore infrared light. Pressure-induced collisions, the atmosphere's mass, and the long wavelengths from its 94 K surface let them absorb after all. A high-altitude haze works against this, producing an anti-greenhouse effect of about 9 K. The net result is a warming of 12 K. The deciding factor across these worlds is often pressure itself. Higher pressure broadens absorption lines and lets each molecule trap a wider range of wavelengths, which is why the same gas behaves so differently on Venus, on Earth where molecules near the surface collide about 7 billion times per second, and on thin-aired Mars.
Up Next
Continue Browsing
Common questions
What is the greenhouse effect and how does it work?
The greenhouse effect occurs when heat-trapping gases in a planet's atmosphere prevent heat from escaping to space, raising the surface temperature. On Earth, sunlight passes through greenhouse gases to warm the surface, which then emits longwave radiation that those gases mostly absorb, slowing the planet's cooling.
Who discovered the greenhouse effect?
Joseph Fourier proposed the existence of the greenhouse effect as early as 1824, though he did not name it. Claude Pouillet strengthened the evidence in 1827 and 1838, Eunice Newton Foote demonstrated carbon dioxide's warming power in 1856, and John Tyndall measured the infrared absorption of gases from 1859 onward.
How much warmer does the greenhouse effect make Earth?
The greenhouse effect makes Earth's surface about 33 C warmer than it would otherwise be, raising the average to around 15 C. Measured as energy, it equals 159 W/m, or 40 percent of the longwave radiation that leaves the surface but never reaches space.
Why is Venus hotter than Earth even though Mars has more carbon dioxide?
Venus reaches 735 K because its atmosphere is about 97% carbon dioxide and extremely dense, producing the strongest greenhouse effect in the inner Solar System. Mars holds about 70 times as much carbon dioxide as Earth but warms only about 6 K, because its atmosphere is thin and lacks water vapor.
How much has the greenhouse effect contributed to global warming?
Burning fossil fuels has raised atmospheric carbon dioxide and methane, producing about 1.2 C of global warming since the Industrial Revolution as of 2023. The global average surface temperature has been rising at 0.18 C per decade since 1981.
What gases cause the greenhouse effect?
Greenhouse gases are those with asymmetrical molecules that absorb longwave radiation, including carbon dioxide and molecules with three or more atoms. Symmetrical gases such as nitrogen, oxygen, and argon are transparent to longwave radiation and make up more than 99% of the dry atmosphere without trapping heat.
All sources
97 references cited across the entry
- 1webSolar Radiation and the Earth's Energy BalanceColumbia University
- 2bookClimate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeLe Treut H, Somerville R, Cubasch U, Ding Y, Mauritzen C, Mokssit A, Peterson T, Prather M — Cambridge University Press — 2007
- 5webClimate and Earth's Energy Budget : Feature ArticlesLindsey Rebecca — 14 January 2009
- 8webClimate Change: Global TemperatureRebecca Lindsey et al.
- 9webWhat is Earth's Energy Budget? Five Questions with a Guy Who Knows10 April 2017
- 10journalRemarques Generales sur les Temperatures Du Globe Terrestre et des Espaces PlanetairesJ. Fourier — 1824
- 11bookCircumstances affecting the Heat of the Sun's RaysEunice Foote — November 1856
- 12webHappy 200th birthday to Eunice Foote, hidden climate science pioneerAmara Huddleston — 17 July 2019
- 13webWho first coined the term "Greenhouse Effect"?Steve Easterbrook — 18 August 2015
- 14journalOn The Variations Of The Climate Of The Geological And Historical Past And Their CausesEkholm N — 1901
- 16webGreenhouses: Heating, Cooling and VentilationJohn Worley
- 17bookContribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007, Chapter 1Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
- 19webTaking the Measure of the Greenhouse EffectGavin Schmidt — NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies - Science Briefs — 1 October 2010
- 20webEarth Matters: Earth's Radiation Budget is Out of BalanceJoseph Atkinson — NASA Earth Observatory — 22 June 2021
- 21journalQuantifying climate loss and damage consistent with a social cost of carbonMarshall Burke et al. — 25 March 2026
- 22webIPCC AR6 WG1
- 23webNew study directly measures greenhouse effect at Earth's surfaceRobert McSweeney — Carbon Brief — 25 February 2015
- 24webDirect observations confirm that humans are throwing Earth's energy budget off balanceScience X — 26 March 2021
- 25webEnhanced Greenhouse EffectAce.mmu.ac.uk
- 28magazineClimate Milestone: Earth's Level Passes 400 ppm12 May 2013
- 29journalA slippery slope: How much global warming constitutes "dangerous anthropogenic interference"?Hansen J. — February 2005
- 30newsDeep ice tells long climate story4 September 2006
- 31journalIce Core Record ExtendedHileman B — 28 November 2005
- 32bookThin Ice: Unlocking the Secrets of Climate in the World's Highest MountainsMark Bowen — Owl Books — 2006
- 33webTemperature change and carbon dioxide change20 August 2008
- 34webEarth Fact SheetDavid R. Williams — NSSDCA
- 35bookIntroduction to Atmospheric ChemistryDaniel J. Jacob — Princeton University Press — 1999
- 36journalAttribution of the present-day total greenhouse effectG. A. Schmidt et al. — 2010
- 37journalDependence of Earth's Thermal Radiation on Five Most Abundant Greenhouse GasesW. A. van Wijngaarden et al. — 2020
- 40webWhat is the Surface Area of the Earth?11 February 2017
- 41journalEarth's Energy Imbalance More Than Doubled in Recent DecadesThorsten Mauritsen et al. — American Geophysical Union — 10 May 2025
- 43webDon't Worry about CO2, Worry about the Earth's 'Energy Balance'Scientific American
- 44journalAn imperative to monitor Earth's energy imbalanceK. von Schuckmann et al. — 2016
- 45webEarth's energy imbalanceEd Hawkins — 27 January 2016
- 46webRRTM Earth's Energy BudgetUniversity of Chicago
- 47webEarth's Big Heat Bucket - Bad News, Good NewsMichon Scott — NASA Earth Observatory — 24 April 2006
- 48webATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES AND PHENOMENA: Chapter 5: Atmospheric StabilityAlison Nugent et al.
- 49bookRadiative Transfer in the Atmosphere and OceanGary E. Thomas et al. — Cambridge University Press — 1999
- 50journalThe Effect of Pressure Broadening of Spectral Lines on Atmospheric TemperatureJ. Strong et al. — 1950
- 51webInfrared radiation and planetary temperatureR. T. Pierrehumbert — American Institute of Physics — January 2011
- 52journalThe "Greenhouse" effect and Climate ChangeJohn F. B. Mitchell — 1989
- 53webMETEO 469: From Meteorology to Mitigation - Understanding Global Warming - Lesson 5 - Modelling of the Climate System - One-Layer Energy Balance ModelMichael Mann et al. — Pennsylvania State University College of Mineral and Earth Sciences - Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences
- 54bookGlobal Warming ScienceEli Tziperman — Princeton University Press — 2022
- 55bookGlobal Warming: Understanding the Forecast, Chapter 4: Greenhouse GasesDavid Archer — Wiley — 2011
- 56bookAtmospheric ScienceJ. M. Wallace et al. — Academic Press — 2006
- 57journalThermal Equilibrium of the Atmosphere with a Convective AdjustmentS. Manabe et al. — 1964
- 58webCloud Radiative EffectNOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
- 59journalInfluence of Cirrus Clouds on Weather and Climate Processes: A Global PerspectiveKuo-Nan Liou — 1 June 1986
- 61bookClimate Change 2021: The Physical Science BasisIPCC — 2021
- 62journalObservational determination of the greenhouse effectA. Raval et al. — 1989
- 63journalObservational determination of the greenhouse effectA. Raval et al. — 1990
- 64journalEstimating the power of Mars' greenhouse effectRobert M. Haberle — 2013
- 65webThe Earth's Energy Imbalance: Where does the energy go?United Nations Climate Change
- 66webPredicted Planetary TemperaturesAmerican Chemical Society
- 67journalThe artificial production of carbon dioxide and its influence on temperatureG. S. Callendar — April 1938
- 68bookPrinciples of Planetary ClimateRaymond T. Pierrehumbert — Cambridge University Press — 2010
- 70journalComment on "falsification of the Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within the Frame of Physics"J. B. Halpern et al. — 2010
- 71bookRadiative Heat TransferMichael F. Modest — Academic Press — 2021
- 72webThermal Radiation Heat TransferR. Siegel et al. — NASA — 1971
- 73webThe Earth's Energy Budget II -- Radiation Emitted by the Earth, the Greenhouse Effect, and the Overall Energy BalanceUniversity of Arizona, Hydrology & Atmospheric Sciences — 2017
- 74webACS Climate Science Toolkit - Atmospheric Warming - A Single-Layer Atmosphere ModelAmerican Chemical Society
- 75webACS Climate Science Toolkit - Atmospheric Warming - A Multi-Layer Atmosphere ModelAmerican Chemical Society
- 76journalA mental picture of the greenhouse effectR. E. Benestad — 2017
- 77webRadiation Balance of the Earth-Atmosphere SystemUniversity of Wisconsin
- 78webWhat is the best description of the greenhouse effect?R. E. Benestad — 2016
- 79journalHow increasing leads to an increased negative greenhouse effect in AntarcticaHolger Schmithüsen et al. — 16 December 2015
- 80journalUnmasking the negative greenhouse effect over the Antarctic PlateauS.A. Sejas et al. — 2018
- 82journalThe greenhouse and antigreenhouse effects on TitanC. P. McKay et al. — 6 September 1991
- 83webTitanNASA — 2 May 2018
- 84webATM S - Climate and Climate ChangeUniversity of Washington — 10 October 2001
- 85webVenus Fact Sheet
- 86web5 Weird Facts About VenusBritannica
- 87journalThe Runaway Greenhouse and the Accumulation of CO2 in the Venus AtmosphereI. Rasool et al. — June 1970
- 88webNASA climate modeling suggests Venus may have been habitableMichael Cabbage and Leslie McCarthy — 10 August 2016
- 89journalFelsic highland crust on Venus suggested by Galileo Near-Infrared Mapping Spectrometer dataHashimoto, G. L. — 2008
- 90webDid Venus's ancient oceans incubate life?David Shiga — 10 October 2007
- 91bookThe New Solar SystemBruce M. Jakosky — Sky Publishing — 1999
- 92webGREENHOUSE EFFECTS ON VENUS, EARTH, AND MARSD. Crisp — Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology — 2012
- 93webDoes Mars Have a Greenhouse Effect?John Brennan — 2017
- 94webDoes the atmosphere of Mars disprove greenhouse warming?14 May 2019
- 95webThe Discovery of Global Warming: Venus & MarsSpencer Weart — American Institute of Physics
- 96webTitan: Greenhouse and Anti-greenhouse3 November 2005
- 97webThe Atmosphere
- 98bookGeosphere-biosphere Interactions and ClimateStephen H. Schneider — Cambridge University Press — 2001
- 99journalWater Vapor Feedback and Global WarmingIsaac M. Held et al. — November 2000