Svante Arrhenius

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Svante Arrhenius taught himself to read at age three, not because anyone encouraged him, but because he decided to. By watching his father add numbers in account books, he became an arithmetical prodigy before most children can tie their shoes. At eight, he entered the cathedral school in Uppsala starting already in the fifth grade. By 1876, he graduated as both the youngest and the most able student in his class. What this prodigy would eventually calculate, sitting at a desk in the 1890s, would not be fully understood by the wider world for the better part of a century. He worked out, using basic principles of physical chemistry, how burning fossil fuels would heat the planet. He named it. He quantified it. He warned about it. And then the world moved on, until it could no longer afford to. The questions this documentary will chase are not just about what Arrhenius discovered, but how a man who nearly failed his own doctorate ended up reshaping how science understands the atmosphere itself.

• 2. A Difficult Beginning

  ›

  Arrhenius was born on the 19th of February 1859 at Vik, near Uppsala, in what was then the Kingdom of Sweden. His father, Svante Gustav Arrhenius, had worked as a land surveyor for Uppsala University before rising to a supervisory role. That background in careful measurement seems to have passed directly to the son.

  At Uppsala University, Arrhenius quickly ran into a wall. He was dissatisfied with the chief instructor of physics and found that Per Teodor Cleve, the only faculty member who might have supervised him in chemistry, was an obstacle rather than a guide. So in 1881 he left Uppsala entirely, heading to the Physical Institute of the Swedish Academy of Sciences in Stockholm to work under the physicist Erik Edlund.

  The work he produced there was extraordinary, and the reception it received was not. In 1884, he submitted a 150-page dissertation on electrolytic conductivity to Uppsala for his doctorate. The professors, including Cleve, were unimpressed. He received a fourth-class degree, though it was reclassified as third-class after his defense. The committee that nearly buried him had no idea what it was holding.

  Arrhenius sent the dissertation to scientists across Europe who were building the new science of physical chemistry: Rudolf Clausius, Wilhelm Ostwald, and Jacobus Henricus van 't Hoff. Ostwald was so taken with the work that he traveled personally to Uppsala to recruit Arrhenius to his research team in Riga. Arrhenius declined, partly because his father was gravely ill and would die in 1885, and partly because he had secured an appointment at Uppsala. The rejection of his dissertation and the enthusiasm from abroad would set the pattern for much of his career: undervalued at home, celebrated everywhere else, at least at first.

• 3. Ions and the Science of Solutions

  ›

  The central idea in that 1884 dissertation was about what happens when you dissolve a salt in water. The prevailing assumption, following Michael Faraday, was that ions, which Faraday had named, were produced only through electrolysis, meaning you needed an external direct electrical current to create them. Arrhenius disagreed. He proposed that aqueous solutions of salts contain ions even without any electric current running through them. The salt simply disassociates into charged particles on its own.

  This was not a minor technical quibble. It meant that chemical reactions taking place in solution were, at their core, reactions between ions. The implications spread across chemistry, biology, and eventually medicine. Arrhenius put forward 56 separate theses in that dissertation, and most of them would survive into modern chemistry either unchanged or with only minor modifications.

  In the same work, he proposed definitions that chemists still use. He argued that acids are substances that produce hydrogen ions in solution and that bases are substances that produce hydroxide ions in solution. The clarity of this framework, since called the Arrhenius definition of acids and bases, gave chemistry a functional vocabulary for reactions that had previously been described in more ambiguous terms.

  With a travel grant from the Swedish Academy of Sciences in 1885, Arrhenius finally got to work alongside the scientists who had recognized him. He studied with Ostwald in Riga, with Friedrich Kohlrausch in Würzburg, with Ludwig Boltzmann in Graz, and with van 't Hoff in Amsterdam. Out of that period of collaboration came the concept of activation energy, formalized in 1889: the idea that most chemical reactions require a threshold of added heat energy before they will proceed. The equation bearing his name gives the quantitative relationship between that energy barrier and the speed of a reaction.

• 4. The Greenhouse Calculation

  ›

  In 1896, Arrhenius published what would become his most consequential work. Trying to understand the temperature difference between glacial and inter-glacial periods, he became the first person to apply the principles of physical chemistry to estimate how much changes in atmospheric carbon dioxide would alter the temperature of Earth's surface.

  He built on work by Joseph Fourier, John Tyndall, and Claude Pouillet, who had established that the atmosphere traps heat in a way analogous to the glass panes of a greenhouse. Arrhenius took their qualitative framework and turned it into a calculation. His data came from infrared observations of the moon made by Frank Washington Very and Samuel Pierpont Langley at the Allegheny Observatory in Pittsburgh. Using those measurements and the Stefan-Boltzmann law, he worked out how much infrared radiation is captured by carbon dioxide and water vapor in the atmosphere.

  The rule he formulated states that if carbon dioxide increases in geometric progression, the temperature rise follows nearly in arithmetic progression. In the version still used today, the relationship is expressed through natural logarithms, with a coefficient for CO2 now measured at 5.35 (plus or minus 10 percent) watts per square meter. He concluded, drawing on information from his colleague Arvid Hogbom, that fossil fuel combustion was already producing enough CO2 to cause global warming. His calculation included feedback from changes in water vapor and accounted for latitudinal differences, though it left out clouds and convective heat transfer.

  Knut Angstrom challenged the work in 1900, publishing the first modern infrared absorption spectrum of CO2 and arguing that absorption in the atmosphere was already saturated, meaning additional CO2 could not make a meaningful difference. Arrhenius replied forcefully in 1901 in the Annalen der Physik, dismissing the critique entirely. Both men, it turns out, were qualitatively correct in their respective positions and quantitatively wrong in their precise figures.

• 5. Warming as Good News

  ›

  Arrhenius did not regard the warming he calculated as a catastrophe. In Världarnas utveckling, published in 1906 and translated into English as Worlds in the Making in 1908, he wrote for a general audience and presented his conclusions with something close to optimism. He believed that increasing CO2 from industrial combustion might prevent Earth from entering a new ice age and that a warmer planet would support larger harvests for a rapidly growing human population.

  His own words, quoted in that book, are striking in their confidence. He wrote that the enormous combustion of coal by industrial establishments sufficed to increase the percentage of carbon dioxide in the air to a perceptible degree, and that more equable climates, especially in colder regions, would benefit rapidly propagating mankind. He even offered a kind of reassurance to those worried about coal depletion, suggesting that burning fossil fuel had a compensating benefit for the Earth's future climate.

  His estimates, spelled out in that same work, were that reducing CO2 to between 0.55 and 0.62 of its then-current level would drop temperatures by 4 to 5 degrees Celsius, while increasing CO2 by a factor of 2.5 to 3 would raise Arctic temperatures by 8 to 9 degrees Celsius. He also wrote that doubling CO2 would raise Earth's surface temperature by about 4 degrees, and that quadrupling it would add 8 degrees. In 1971, S. Ichtiaque Rasool and Stephen Henry Schneider revisited the question with more sophisticated tools and concluded that doubling CO2 would raise temperature by about 0.8 degrees Celsius. The true sensitivity, as understood today, sits between those bookends. Charles David Keeling's measurements in the 1960s would confirm that CO2 was indeed rising, and that the greenhouse hypothesis was sufficient to account for significant global warming.

• 6. Nobel Prizes and Rivalries

  ›

  In 1901, Arrhenius was elected to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, against significant opposition. Two years later, in 1903, he became the first Swede to receive the Nobel Prize in Chemistry, awarded for the very dissertation that had earned him a near-failing grade nineteen years earlier.

  He did not step back from the prize machinery after receiving his own award. He became involved in setting up the Nobel Institutes and the Nobel Prizes around 1900, was a member of the Nobel Committee on Physics for the remainder of his life, and served as a de facto member of the Nobel Committee on Chemistry. He used those positions actively. He arranged prizes for friends including Jacobus van 't Hoff, Wilhelm Ostwald, and Theodore Richards. He worked to block prizes for people he considered enemies: Paul Ehrlich, Walther Nernst, and Dmitri Mendeleev each reportedly found Arrhenius an obstacle at the committee level.

  In 1905, he was appointed director of the Nobel Institute for Physical Research in Stockholm, a post he held until his retirement in 1927. In 1911, he received the first Willard Gibbs Award. Honorary memberships and foreign fellowships followed across the major scientific academies of Europe and North America, including election as a Foreign Member of the Royal Society in 1910 and election to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1912.

• 7. Science Without Borders

  ›

  Arrhenius did not confine himself to physical chemistry after his core theoretical work was accepted. From 1902 onward he turned to physiological chemistry, demonstrating that reactions in living organisms followed the same laws as reactions in laboratory glassware. In 1904, he delivered a lecture series at the University of California that examined the application of physical chemistry to the study of toxins and antitoxins. Those lectures were published in 1907 under the title Immunochemistry.

  He also extended his thinking to geology, proposing an explanation for the origin of ice ages. He ventured into astronomy and physical cosmology, accounting for the birth of the Solar System through interstellar collision. He considered radiation pressure as the mechanism behind comets, the solar corona, the aurora borealis, and zodiacal light. He advocated for what is now called panspermia, the hypothesis that life might travel between planets carried by spores.

  His personal connections extended in unexpected directions as well. He was married twice: first to his former pupil Sofia Rudbeck from 1894 to 1896, with whom he had one son, and then to Maria Johansson from 1905 until his death in 1927, with whom he had two daughters and a son. He was the grandfather of bacteriologist Agnes Wold and chemist Svante Wold. And Svante Thunberg, father of climate activist Greta Thunberg, was named after Arrhenius and is an ancestral cousin of his. In September 1927, Arrhenius came down with an attack of acute intestinal catarrh. He died on the 2nd of October 1927 and was buried in Uppsala.