Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Radiative forcing

~9 min read · Ch. 1 of 8
8 sections
  • Radiative forcing sits at the heart of every climate projection scientists have ever made. It is the measure of how much the energy flowing through Earth's atmosphere has been pushed out of balance by a given cause. By 2019, human activity had nudged that balance by 2.72 watts per square meter relative to the year 1750. That number, small enough to fit on a postage stamp, contains within it the story of rising seas, shifting weather patterns, and a planet warming faster than at almost any point in its history. What exactly is a watt per square meter of forcing, and why does such a seemingly modest figure carry such enormous consequences? The answers involve the physics of sunlight and shadow, the chemistry of invisible gases, and a scientific concept that took decades to fully develop.

  • Radiative forcing is not something a single instrument can simply point at the sky and measure directly. It is a calculated quantity, derived from fundamental physics, that describes the change in the net downward-minus-upward energy flux, in units of watts per square meter, caused by some external driver of climate change. Positive forcing means Earth is absorbing more energy from the Sun than it releases to space, which drives warming. Negative forcing means the planet is losing more energy than it receives, which produces cooling sometimes called global dimming.

    Scientists evaluate this balance at two key layers of the atmosphere: the tropopause and the stratopause. The tropopause marks the boundary between the lower, weather-bearing atmosphere and the calmer stratosphere above it. What happens at these boundaries matters enormously because radiation that passes through them determines how much heat the surface ultimately retains.

    The concept also distinguishes carefully between external drivers and internal feedbacks. An external driver is something like a change in the concentration of carbon dioxide or a shift in the Sun's output. An internal feedback is the climate system's own response, such as changes in water vapor or cloud cover that amplify or dampen the original forcing. The two categories behave on different timescales, and keeping them separate is essential for understanding how much warming any particular cause will ultimately produce.

  • Physicists working during the first half of the 20th century built a comprehensive mathematical description of how radiation moves through matter, which they then applied to the atmospheres of stars and planets in radiative equilibrium. From that foundation grew studies of what scientists call radiative-convective equilibrium, a more realistic framework that accounts for the mixing and rising of air in addition to pure radiative transfer. Those models matured through the 1960s and 1970s and began to incorporate the water cycle, giving them better agreement with observations.

    The crucial conceptual step came from recognizing that the same equilibrium framework could be used to estimate how a perturbation, an externally imposed change, would shift the system toward a new equilibrium state. Researchers distilled this into a forcing-feedback framework, and the term "radiative forcing" gained widespread use in the scientific literature by the 1980s.

    Since then the concept has continued to evolve. What was originally called instantaneous radiative forcing, which accounts for no changes in atmospheric temperatures at all, gave way to stratospherically adjusted forcing, and then to effective radiative forcing, which accounts for both stratospheric and tropospheric adjustments. A 2003 analysis explained how the adjusted troposphere-and-stratosphere forcing could be applied within general circulation models. The IPCC's CMIP6 intercomparison programme now recommends using effective radiative forcing as its standard, though the stratospherically adjusted approach remains in use for well-mixed greenhouse gases where tropospheric adjustments are considered minor.

  • Carbon dioxide follows a logarithmic relationship between concentration and forcing, at least up to concentrations roughly eight times the current value. This means that each successive doubling of CO2 adds roughly the same amount of forcing rather than the same absolute concentration. A simplified formula used by researchers treats a reference concentration C0 of 278 parts per million, estimated for the year 1750, as the pre-industrial baseline.

    The decade-by-decade data show how this plays out in practice. From 1979 to 1989, a baseline concentration of 336.8 ppm rose by 16.0 ppm, adding 0.248 watts per square meter of forcing. Three decades later, from 2009 to 2019, a larger baseline of 386.5 ppm rose by 23.6 ppm, adding 0.316 watts per square meter despite the logarithmic dampening. Absolute concentrations grew faster than the curve shrank each additional unit's effect.

    By 2020, atmospheric CO2 had risen 50% above its pre-industrial level, a ratio of C to C0 equal to 1.5, producing a cumulative forcing change of positive 2.17 watts per square meter since 1750. If concentrations were to double from pre-industrial levels without any change in the current emissions path, the cumulative forcing would reach positive 3.71 watts per square meter. Physicists trace the logarithmic behavior partly to a broadening of the relevant 15-micrometer absorption band, caused by a Fermi resonance in the carbon dioxide molecule itself.

  • Water vapor is Earth's primary greenhouse gas, currently responsible for about half of all atmospheric gas forcing. Unlike carbon dioxide, water vapor does not accumulate independently in the atmosphere. Its concentration is governed almost entirely by temperature: for every degree Celsius of warming, the atmosphere can hold as much as 7% more water vapor. This makes water vapor a powerful amplifier of the forcing from other gases rather than an independent driver.

    The five major greenhouse gases, water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and ozone, together account for roughly 96% of the direct radiative forcing from long-lived greenhouse gas increases since 1750. The remaining 4% comes from 15 minor halogenated gases. Looking at the trajectory over time, carbon dioxide increasingly dominates the total, while chlorofluorocarbons, whose atmospheric burden fell after the Montreal Protocol, became a declining share. The Annual Greenhouse Gas Index, a metric referenced to conditions in 1990 (chosen because that year was the baseline for the Kyoto Protocol), reached 1.34 by 2013, meaning total direct radiative forcing from long-lived greenhouse gases had grown 34% above the 1990 level. The decline in CFCs during the same period considerably tempered what would otherwise have been an even steeper rise in net forcing.

    Methane and some CFCs follow different mathematical relationships than carbon dioxide. Methane and nitrous oxide scale with the square root of their concentration; CFCs follow a linear relationship. A 2016 study proposed a significant revision to the methane formula used in IPCC reports, indicating that scientists continue to refine even the foundational equations underlying these calculations.

  • Solar irradiance at the top of Earth's atmosphere, measured at the planet's mean orbital distance of one astronomical unit, averages about 1361 watts per square meter. Multiple satellite instruments, including ERB, ACRIM 1-3, VIRGO, and TIM, have tracked this Total Solar Irradiance continuously since 1978. Because Earth is a sphere, only one quarter of that incoming energy reaches any given square meter of the planet's surface on average.

    The Sun's output does vary. Earth's elliptical orbit means that TSI swings between roughly 1321 watts per square meter near aphelion in early July and about 1412 watts per square meter near perihelion in early January, a range of about plus-or-minus 3.4% over the year. This annual cycle drives net-zero forcing on decadal timescales, because the planet averages out both the high and low ends of the range across each orbit.

    The well-known 11-year sunspot cycle produces average TSI variations of only about plus-or-minus 0.05%, swinging between roughly 1360 and 1362 watts per square meter. Sunspot observations stretch back to about 1600, revealing longer oscillation patterns that modulate the 11-year cycle, including the Gleissberg and Devries-Seuss cycles. Some research suggests sunspot-driven TSI changes may have partly influenced climate shifts during the Little Ice Age, alongside volcanic activity and deforestation. Since the late 20th century, average TSI has trended slightly downward, tracking a slight decline in sunspot activity. On longer timescales still, Milankovitch cycles spanning 40,000 to 100,000 years affect Earth's orbital shape and tilt; the 100,000-year eccentricity cycle produces TSI fluctuations of about plus-or-minus 0.2%.

  • NASA's Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System, known as CERES, has continuously monitored Earth's radiation balance since 1998, making it the primary instrument record for tracking how the planet's energy flows have changed. Each pass of the satellite provides an estimate of the total instantaneous radiation balance across the full sky. The record captures both natural fluctuations, such as those driven by large-scale ocean circulation patterns like ENSO, and the longer-term trends from human activities.

    Parsing out those two signals is technically demanding. Researchers combined CERES measurements with data from AIRS, CloudSat, and other instruments in NASA's Earth Observing System to isolate the human-caused trend. After removing the natural fluctuations and system feedbacks from the multi-year data record, the analysis found that anthropogenic radiative forcing at the top of the atmosphere rose by positive 0.53 watts per square meter, with an uncertainty of plus-or-minus 0.11 watts per square meter, between 2003 and 2018. About 20% of that increase traced to a reduction in the atmospheric aerosol burden; the remaining 80% came from rising concentrations of greenhouse gases.

    Ground-based confirmation has come from two Atmospheric Radiation Measurement sites, one in Oklahoma and one in Alaska, operating under clear-sky conditions. Each site independently measured an increase in infrared heating experienced at the surface of positive 0.2 watts per square meter, with an uncertainty of plus-or-minus 0.07 watts per square meter, across the decade ending in 2010. The discrepancy between that surface-level figure and the larger top-of-atmosphere value reflects how the atmosphere itself absorbs some of the infrared radiation on its way down.

  • Radiative forcing connects to temperature change through a quantity scientists call the climate sensitivity parameter, typically denoted by the Greek letter lambda and expressed in kelvins per watt per square meter. Multiply the forcing by lambda and the result is an estimate of the eventual change in steady-state global surface temperature. Using a commonly accepted value of lambda, the CO2 increase from 278 to 405 parts per million, representing a forcing of 2.0 watts per square meter, predicts a warming of roughly 1.6 kelvins above the 1750 baseline. A further doubling of CO2 from pre-industrial levels would, under the same assumptions, add another 1.4 kelvins above present temperatures.

    Observed warming has been noticeably less than some of these predictions, and the gap illuminates where the limits of the framework lie. Part of the difference comes from thermal lag: the global temperature has not yet fully caught up with the forcing already in the atmosphere. Part of the remainder reflects the cooling effect of aerosols, fine particles in the atmosphere that reflect sunlight and partially offset greenhouse gas warming. The IPCC noted that the aerosol cooling effect has meaningfully reduced the net forcing below what greenhouse gases alone would produce. Radiative forcing has proven its strongest predictive power specifically for greenhouse gases, while its performance is less reliable for other human influences like soot, whose effects are more spatially heterogeneous and more difficult to represent with a single global average figure. The parallel albedo record from CERES shows that between 2000 and 2012, Earth's overall reflectivity held remarkably steady, varying by no more than 0.1%, which some researchers interpret as evidence that complex system feedbacks may be actively stabilizing planetary albedo even as individual components shift.

Common questions

What is radiative forcing and how is it measured?

Radiative forcing is the change in the net downward-minus-upward energy flux through Earth's atmosphere, expressed in watts per square meter, caused by an external driver such as a greenhouse gas or a change in solar output. It cannot be measured by a single instrument directly; scientists calculate it from fundamental physics principles using atmospheric observations and satellite data.

How much radiative forcing have humans caused since 1750?

Human-caused radiative forcing reached 2.72 watts per square meter in 2019 relative to 1750, according to the IPCC. This warming is mainly due to increased greenhouse gas concentrations, partly reduced by cooling from increased aerosol concentrations.

What greenhouse gases contribute most to radiative forcing?

Carbon dioxide has the largest individual impact on total radiative forcing. The five major greenhouse gases, water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and ozone, account for about 96% of the direct radiative forcing from long-lived greenhouse gas increases since 1750. The remaining 4% comes from 15 minor halogenated gases.

How has CO2 radiative forcing changed by decade since 1979?

From 1979 to 1989, a CO2 concentration rise of 16.0 ppm added 0.248 watts per square meter of forcing. From 2009 to 2019, a rise of 23.6 ppm added 0.316 watts per square meter. The logarithmic relationship between CO2 concentration and forcing means each additional unit of gas has a progressively smaller warming effect, but faster concentration growth has more than compensated.

What did NASA CERES observations reveal about radiative forcing trends?

CERES satellite data showed that anthropogenic radiative forcing at the top of the atmosphere rose by positive 0.53 watts per square meter between 2003 and 2018, with an uncertainty of plus-or-minus 0.11 watts per square meter. About 20% of that increase was linked to a reduction in atmospheric aerosols; the remaining 80% was attributed to rising greenhouse gas concentrations.

How does the Sun's output affect radiative forcing compared to greenhouse gases?

Solar irradiance at Earth's orbital distance averages about 1361 watts per square meter, but its decadal variations are small. The 11-year sunspot cycle produces TSI fluctuations of only about plus-or-minus 0.05%, contributing a modest net forcing on climate. The IPCC's 2.72 watts per square meter of human-caused forcing since 1750 substantially exceeds what changes in solar output have contributed over the same period.

All sources

67 references cited across the entry

  1. 2webClimate and Earth's Energy Budget: Feature ArticlesLindsey Rebecca — 14 January 2009
  2. 3bookFundamental planetary science: physics, chemistry, and habitabilityJack Jonathan Lissauer et al. — 16 September 2013
  3. 4bookRadiative Forcing of Climate Change: Expanding the Concept and Addressing UncertaintiesNational Research Council — The National Academic Press — 2005
  4. 6journalAn alternative to radiative forcing for estimating the relative importance of climate change mechanismsKeith P. Shine et al. — 23 October 2003
  5. 11journalQuantifying Climate Feedbacks Using Radiative KernelsBrian J. Soden et al. — 2008-07-01
  6. 12journalIndicators of Global Climate Change 2022: annual update of large-scale indicators of the state of the climate system and human influencePiers M. Forster et al. — 2023
  7. 16webClimate and Earth's Energy BudgetLindsey Rebecca — 14 January 2009
  8. 17journalObservational Evidence of Increasing Global Radiative ForcingKramer, R.J., H. He, B.J. Soden, L. Oreopoulos, G. Myhre, P.M. Forster, and C.J. Smith — 2021-03-25
  9. 18webNASA's Earth Observing System homepageNASA EOS Project Science Office
  10. 19journalAngular Distribution Models for Top-of-Atmosphere Radiative Flux Estimation from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System Instrument on the Terra Satellite. Part I: MethodologyLoeb, N.G., S. Kato, K. Loukachine, and N. Manalo-Smith — 2005-04-01
  11. 20journalToward a Consistent Definition between Satellite and Model Clear-Sky Radiative FluxesLoeb, N.G., F.G. Rose, S. Kato, D.A. Rutan, W. Su, H. Wang, D.R. Doelling, W.L. Smith, and A. Gettelman — 2020-01-01
  12. 21journalAdjustments in the Forcing-Feedback Framework for Understanding Climate ChangeSherwood, S.C., S. Bony, O. Boucher, C. Bretherton, P.M. Forster, J.M. Gregory, and B. Stevens — 2015-02-01
  13. 22journalMission to Planet Earth: Role of Clouds and Radiation in ClimateWielicki, B.A., R.D. Cess, M.D. King, D.A. Randall, and E.F. Harrison — 1995-11-01
  14. 23webUMBC's Ryan Kramer confirms human-caused climate change with direct evidence for first timeSarah Hansen — University of Maryland, Baltimore County — 12 April 2021
  15. 25webARM Capabilities - Atmospheric ObservatoriesU.S. Department of Energy - Office of Science
  16. 26journalObservational determination of surface radiative forcing by CO2 from 2000 to 2010Feldman, D.R., W.D. Collins, P.J. Gero, M.S. Torn, E.J. Mlawer, and T.R. Shippert — 2015-02-25
  17. 27webNew study directly measures greenhouse effect at Earth's surfaceRobert McSweeney — Carbon Brief — 2015-02-25
  18. 29journalGlobal Warming Has Accelerated: Are the United Nations and the Public Well-Informed?James E. Hansen et al. — 3 February 2025
  19. 30journalNew estimates of radiative forcing due to well mixed greenhouse gasesG. Myhre et al. — 1998
  20. 31journalWhy logarithmic?Yi Huang et al. — 28 November 2014
  21. 32journalThe greenhouse effect and carbon dioxideWenyi Zhong et al. — 27 March 2013
  22. 35journalFermi Resonance and the Quantum Mechanical Basis of Global WarmingR. Wordsworth et al. — 2024-03-01
  23. 38journalRadiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: A significant revision of the methane radiative forcingM. Etminan et al. — 2016-12-27
  24. 39webTaking the Measure of the Greenhouse EffectGavin Schmidt — NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies - Science Briefs — 2010-10-01
  25. 40webIt's Water Vapor, Not the CO2American Chemical Society
  26. 41journalAtmospheric CO2: Principal Control Knob Governing Earth's TemperatureAndrew A. Lacis et al. — 15 October 2010
  27. 42journalA new, lower value of total solar irradiance: Evidence and climate significanceGregg Kopp et al. — 2011-01-14
  28. 43webSolar Radiation and Climate ExperimentUniversity of Colorado, Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics
  29. 44webTSIS-1 Mission OverviewNASA — 28 November 2017
  30. 46webEarth reaches perihelion, closer to the sun than any other daySophie Lewis — CBS News — 2021-01-02
  31. 47webThe Seasons, the Equinox, and the SolsticesNational Weather Service
  32. 48journalSolar radiative output and its variability: evidence and mechanismsClaus Fröhlich & Judith Lean — 2004-12-01
  33. 49journalThe Solar CycleDavid H. Hathaway — 2015-09-21
  34. 50journalEvaluating sun–climate relationships since the Little Ice AgeJudith Lean et al. — 1999-01-01
  35. 51journalWhat influence will future solar activity changes over the 21st century have on projected global near-surface temperature changes?Gareth S. Jones, Mike Lockwood, Peter A. Stott — 2012-03-16
  36. 52webMilankovitch (Orbital) Cycles and Their Role in Earth's ClimateAlan Buis — NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory — 2020-02-27
  37. 53journalDoes mean annual insolation have the potential to change the climate?Marie-France Loutre, Didier Paillard, Françoise Vimeux, Elsa Cortijo — 2004-04-30
  38. 56webThere Is No Impending 'Mini Ice Age'NASA Global Climate Change — 2020-02-13
  39. 58journalThe Impacts of Atmospheric and Surface Parameters on Long-Term Variations in the Planetary AlbedoBida Jian, Jiming Li, Guoyin Wang, Yongli He, Ying Han, Min Zhang, and Jianping Huang — 2018-11-01
  40. 59journalThe albedo of EarthGraeme L. Stephens, Denis O'Brien, Peter J. Webster, Peter Pilewski, Seiji Kato, Jui-lin Li — 2015-01-25
  41. 60webMeasuring Earth's AlbedoNASA Earth Observatory — 21 October 2014
  42. 62journalVolcanic eruptions and climateAlan Robock — 2000-05-01
  43. 63webThe NOAA Annual Greenhouse Gas Index (AGGI)National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) — 2026
  44. 66webGISS Surface Temperature Analysis: Analysis Graphs and PlotsJ.E. Hansen — Goddard Institute for Space Studies, National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  45. 67journalWhy hasn't Earth warmed as much as expected?Stephen E. Schwartz et al. — 2010
  46. 68bookClimate change 2013 : the physical science basis: Working Group I contribution to the Fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeThomas Stocker — Cambridge University Press — 24 March 2014