Georg Simmel

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Georg Simmel was born on the 1st of March 1858 in Berlin, the youngest of seven children in an assimilated Jewish family. His father, a prosperous businessman, had founded a confectionery store called "Felix & Sarotti." His mother came from a family that had converted to Lutheranism. Georg himself was baptized as a Protestant in childhood. The family was a jumble of religious conversions and cultural crossings, and that capacity for living between worlds would mark everything Simmel later wrote.

  When his father died in 1874, leaving Georg at age sixteen, he was adopted by Julius Friedlander, the founder of the international music publishing house Peters Verlag. Friedlander left him a substantial fortune. That fortune freed Simmel from the ordinary pressures of academic survival, but it could not buy him acceptance inside the university he served for nearly thirty years.

  He would go on to become one of the founding figures of sociology. He asked "What is society?" in direct analogy to Kant's famous question "What is nature?" He spent a career answering it in ways that made academic gatekeepers uncomfortable: writing for general readers, theorizing flirtation and fashion alongside money and the metropolis. His name is less famous than Marx or Weber, yet his ideas thread through urban studies, cultural theory, and social psychology in ways that are still being traced today.

• 2. The Outsider Scholar

  ›

  Beginning in 1876, Simmel studied philosophy and history at the Humboldt University of Berlin. He received his doctorate in 1881 for a thesis on Kantian philosophy of matter, titled "Das Wesen der Materie nach Kants Physischer Monadologie." By 1885 he had become a privatdozent at the University of Berlin, which meant he could lecture but held no salaried chair.

  His lectures drew the intellectual elite of Berlin into the lecture hall, not only students. His applications for vacant chairs were supported by Max Weber, Rainer Maria Rilke, Stefan George, and Edmund Husserl. None of that support was enough. Simmel was seen as Jewish during an era of intense anti-Semitism, and he was also dismissed because his articles were written for a general audience rather than for professional sociologists. These were treated as disqualifying flaws.

  Simmel's inheritance from Friedlander let him continue the work regardless. He did not receive an ordinary professorship with a full chair until 1914, when he was appointed at the University of Strassburg. He was then fifty-six years old. The position was at an institution where he never felt at home, in a city that converted its lecture halls to military hospitals when World War I broke out that same year. He applied for a chair at Heidelberg University in 1915 and was turned down again.

• 3. A Life Between Circles

  ›

  In 1890, Simmel married Gertrud Kinel, herself a philosopher who published under the pseudonym Marie-Luise Enckendorf as well as under her own name. Their home became a gathering place in the tradition of the Berlin salon, drawing artists and thinkers from across the city's cultivated circles. They had one son, Hans Eugen Simmel, who became a medical doctor. Georg and Gertrud's granddaughter, Marianne Simmel, grew up to become a psychologist.

  Simmel also carried on a secret affair with his assistant Gertrud Kantorowicz. She bore him a daughter in 1907, though this was concealed until after his death. Kantorowicz remained bound to him intellectually as well; he asked her to edit his unpublished manuscripts posthumously, and her edited collection appeared after 1918.

  In 1909, Simmel joined Max Weber, Ferdinand Tonnies, and others in co-founding the German Society for Sociology, serving on its first executive body. By 1917, worn down by the war and withdrawn from public life, he stopped reading newspapers and retreated to the Black Forest to finish his final book, The View of Life. He died from liver cancer in Strasbourg on the 26th of September 1918, just before the armistice.

• 4. Forms of Social Life

  ›

  Simmel approached social life through what he called "forms" and "contents," treating the two as existing in a transient relationship where each could become the other depending on context. This made him a forerunner of structuralist reasoning in the social sciences decades before structuralism became a named movement.

  His method was dialectical: multicausal, multidirectional, attentive to contradiction. He rejected the idea that there are hard and fast dividing lines between social phenomena, insisting that interactions exist between everything. He was drawn above all to dualisms and conflicts, whatever realm of social life he happened to be examining.

  At the most concrete level, Simmel analyzed specific forms of association: subordination, superordination, exchange, conflict, and sociability. He paid little attention to individual psychology in isolation. What interested him was the creative force that emerges when people interact and the way social structures, once formed, take on a life of their own and can crush the very creativity that built them.

  His concept of "social geometry" examined how group size reshapes individual experience. In a dyad, two people can each retain individuality because neither fears being outvoted. In a triad, one member risks becoming subordinate to the other two. As groups grow larger still, individuals become more isolated from each other, and may need to retreat into smaller units like the family simply to preserve a sense of self.

• 5. The Metropolis and the Mind

  ›

  "The Metropolis and Mental Life" was originally delivered in 1903 as part of a series of lectures organized alongside the Dresden cities exhibition of that year. Simmel had been asked to speak on the role of intellectual life in the big city. He reversed the assignment and analyzed the effect of the big city on the mind of the individual instead. The gap he left had to be filled by the series editor writing his own essay on the original topic.

  The essay was not particularly well received in Simmel's lifetime. The organizers of the exhibition focused on its negative comments about urban life and ignored the positive transformations Simmel also described. It was only during the 1920s that the text became influential, shaping the thinking of Robert E. Park and other sociologists at the University of Chicago who formed what became known as the "Chicago School." It reached a wider anglophone audience in the 1950s when it was translated into English and included in Kurt Wolff's edited collection, The Sociology of Georg Simmel.

  Simmel wrote in that essay that "the deepest problems of modern life flow from the attempt of the individual to maintain the independence and individuality of his existence against the sovereign powers of society." He compared this struggle to the one primitive humans had waged against nature for bodily survival. The essay's lasting power comes partly from its refusal to settle the question. Simmel did not argue that city life was simply bad for the mind. He argued that it changes the mind permanently, and that the blasé attitude so often noted was only one stage in an irreversible sequence of transformations. That ambiguity is precisely what gave the essay a durable place in debates about urban experience.

• 6. Money, Strangers, and Secrets

  ›

  Philosophie des Geldes, published in 1900, treated money not as an economic instrument but as a philosophical object that illuminates the totality of human life. Simmel believed that people create value by making objects, then separating themselves from those objects, then trying to close that distance again. Things too close at hand are not valued; things too far away to reach are also not valued. Scarcity, time, sacrifice, and difficulty all figure in how value is determined.

  City life, for Simmel, accelerated both the division of labor and the growth of financial exchange. As transactions become more abstract, what a person can do starts to matter more than who that person is.

  His concept of "the stranger" extended the same logic of distance to social relationships. A stranger is far enough away to be unknown but close enough that it is possible to get to know them. Because strangers stand at that peculiar distance from a group, they often carry out tasks that other members are unwilling to perform. In pre-modern societies, strangers commonly made their living from trade, which native members often regarded as an unpleasant activity. Strangers also served as arbitrators and judges, expected to treat rival factions impartially because they were not entangled with either side.

  On secrecy, Simmel observed that small groups have less need for secrets because their members are more similar. In larger, more heterogeneous groups, secrets become socially necessary. Money, he noted, enables a kind of secrecy previously unavailable: "invisible" transactions that allow the purchase of silence.

• 7. Fashion, Flirtation, and Art

  ›

  Simmel's essay "Women, Sexuality & Love," published in 1923, approached flirtation as a generalized form of social interaction rather than a personal behavior. He defined its distinctiveness as lying in an alternation of accommodation and denial, a simultaneous suggestion of availability and its opposite. "A sidelong glance with the head half-turned," he wrote, is flirtation in its most ordinary form.

  Fashion he analyzed as a social relationship that serves two contradictory needs at once. It allows people who wish to conform to a group to do so. It also provides a path for those who wish to appear individual by deviating from the norm. But Simmel pointed out that the person who tries to be unfashionable is simply practicing an inverse form of imitation. In trying to be different, they join a new group that has labeled itself different. Individuality, in that sense, keeps slipping away from those who chase it most directly.

  His writing on art history ranged across the Middle Ages to the early twentieth century, covering Goethe, Rembrandt, Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and Auguste Rodin. He wrote on aesthetics after Kant and Schopenhauer and on the sociology of art in modern culture. From 1901 onward he planned a volume integrating his philosophy of art, which he described to the philosopher Heinrich Rickert as a "burning" and "dominant interest." That volume was never completed. Suhrkamp Verlag eventually published many unknown texts in a Gesamtausgabe that ran from 1989 to 2014, making the full range of Simmel's output visible for the first time.