Fra Mauro formation

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Fra Mauro formation is a hilly region on the near side of Earth's Moon, and it holds a place in space exploration history as the landing site Apollo 14 nearly missed. Apollo 13 was supposed to land there in 1971. A technical failure mid-flight changed that, leaving the destination waiting. When Apollo 14 finally touched down, astronauts Alan Shepard and Edgar Mitchell stepped into terrain shaped by one of the most violent events in the Moon's early history. Beneath their feet lay material flung outward by the colossal impact that carved Mare Imbrium, a vast lunar sea visible from Earth with the naked eye. How old is that impact? How deep did the formation reach? And what does a 1,000-foot-wide crater tell us about what lies buried far below the surface? Those questions drove everything that happened at Fra Mauro.

• 2. Origins in Catastrophe

  ›

  Fra Mauro is thought to be composed of ejecta, debris hurled outward by the impact that formed the Imbrium basin. That single event scattered material across wide portions of the lunar surface around Mare Imbrium, building up the low ridges and hills that define the formation today. Between those ridges lie undulating valleys, and much of the original ejecta blanket has since been buried under debris from younger impacts and material churned up by possible moonquakes. The petrology of the formation, based on Apollo 14 data, suggests a history of impact and ejection spanning approximately 500 million years. Samples from the formation suggest that the Imbrium basin impact itself is no older than 4.25 billion years, a figure that anchors our understanding of when the early solar system was still rearranging itself violently. Debris found throughout the formation may have originated from deep beneath the Moon's original crust, which is precisely what made it scientifically valuable to mission planners.

• 3. Cone Crater as a Natural Drill Hole

  ›

  A relatively recent impact created Cone crater near the Apollo 14 landing site. That crater measures 1,000 feet across and 250 feet deep, punching well into the underlying Imbrium ejecta. Mission planners specifically chose this landing location because Cone crater functioned as what they called a natural drill hole, exposing Imbrium material that would otherwise require digging far beyond any human capability. Shepard and Mitchell collected ejecta from the Cone crater impact, material believed to have been excavated from a possible depth of about 80 meters below the surface. The crater is approximately 25 million years old, relatively young in lunar terms, which helped preserve its ejecta in a readable state. Boulders near the crater's rim appeared layered and fractured, and as those boulders grew larger and more numerous closer to the crater itself, geologists concluded they came from the deepest levels of excavation. Those boulders display what is considered the general character of the Fra Mauro formation as a whole: clastic texture, stratification, and fracturing.

• 4. What the Samples Revealed

  ›

  Analysis of the Apollo 14 samples identified five major geologic types at the immediate landing area: regolith breccias, fragmental breccias, igneous lithologies, granulitic lithologies, and impact-melt lithologies. Samples from each type were recovered across two main surface units at the site, including Cone crater's ejecta blanket and the surrounding older terrain. One question the samples raised involved basalt. Studies showed that basalts are sparse in samples from Cone crater ejecta, but somewhat abundant in material recovered farther west. Two explanations competed: either the bulk of basalt in the landing site lies below Cone crater's maximum excavation depth, or a nearby crater about 100 meters in diameter exposed a basalt flow from beneath the landing area. The evidence leans toward the first explanation, as the basalts recovered resemble those found at Cone crater itself. Whether those basalts are truly native to the Fra Mauro landing site or were deposited there by entirely separate impacts remains inconclusive; the site sits in a valley between ridges, and any number of impacts could have moved material there.

• 5. Landing Site Selection

  ›

  As an early Apollo mission, Apollo 14 faced a constraint that later missions would not: the landing site had to sit in equatorial regions of the Moon. That requirement kept the spacecraft on a free-return trajectory in case the Apollo Service Module engine failed, a precaution that proved well-founded during Apollo 13. After Apollo 12 demonstrated that a precise landing at a pre-specified site was achievable, planners began considering geologically interesting but rough terrain. Fra Mauro originally belonged to Apollo 13's manifest; the Littrow region of Mare Serenitatis was slated for Apollo 14 instead. When Apollo 13 failed to complete its mission, planners reassigned Apollo 14 to Fra Mauro, judging it more scientifically interesting than Littrow. The formation takes its name from the 80-kilometer-diameter crater Fra Mauro, which is itself named after a 15th-century Italian monk and mapmaker. That medieval cartographer, who spent his life charting the known world, now lends his name to a landscape 250 feet deep and billions of years old.