Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Formation and evolution of the Solar System

~9 min read · Ch. 1 of 7
7 sections
  • The formation and evolution of the Solar System began not with a burst of light, but with a quiet collapse. About 4.6 billion years ago, a fragment of a giant molecular cloud gave way under its own gravity. That collapse started a chain of events that produced the Sun, the planets, our Moon, and every asteroid, comet, and icy body in the outer reaches of space. What set it off? Why does Earth have water at all? And what will become of all of it, in the end? These are the questions at the heart of one of science's longest-running investigations, one that draws on astronomy, chemistry, geology, physics, and planetary science all at once. The oldest solid material yet found, locked inside ancient meteorites, dates to 4,568.2 million years ago. That number is, by one definition, the age of the Solar System itself.

  • Emanuel Swedenborg, Immanuel Kant, and Pierre-Simon Laplace each contributed to the idea now called the nebular hypothesis in the 18th century. The hypothesis holds that the Solar System grew from a collapsing cloud of gas and dust, with the Sun forming at the center and the remaining material flattening into a disc from which everything else took shape. It sounds tidy, but for a long time the idea had a serious problem: critics pointed out that the Sun rotates far more slowly than the planets orbit it, which seemed to contradict the physics the model predicted. The hypothesis fell out of favour until the early 1980s, when studies of young stars revealed them surrounded by cool discs of dust and gas, exactly as the model requires. That evidence brought the hypothesis back into wide acceptance. Since the discovery of exoplanets in the 1990s and the dawn of the Space Age in the 1950s, researchers have continued pushing the model to account for new observations it did not originally anticipate. Arthur Stanley Eddington's work on Albert Einstein's theory of relativity led Eddington to establish that the Sun's energy comes from fusing hydrogen into helium in its core. In 1935, Eddington proposed that other elements might also form inside stars. Fred Hoyle later argued that red giants forge many elements heavier than hydrogen and helium, and that when those stars shed their outer layers, those heavier elements are recycled into new star systems.

  • The presolar nebula most likely formed at the edge of a Wolf-Rayet bubble and covered a region about 20 parsecs across, with individual fragments roughly 1 parsec wide. The composition of that region was nearly identical to what the Sun contains today: hydrogen, helium, and trace lithium from the Big Bang making up about 98% of the mass, with the remaining 2% consisting of heavier elements forged in earlier stellar generations. Some scientists have given the name Coatlicue to a hypothetical star whose supernova may have triggered the Solar System's birth by compressing the surrounding cloud into collapse. Evidence for a nearby supernova comes from traces of iron-60 found in ancient meteorites. Iron-60 is a short-lived isotope produced only in exploding stars, and its even distribution throughout the Solar System points to a supernova injection occurring well before any of the nebular dust had accreted into planetary bodies. The collapse was not instantaneous. Conservation of angular momentum caused the cloud to spin faster as it shrank, and over roughly 100,000 years gravity, gas pressure, magnetic fields, and rotation together flattened the nebula into a spinning disc about 200 AU across, with a hot, dense protostar at its center. At that stage, the young Sun would have been classified as a T Tauri star, surrounded by a disc that could extend to several hundred AU. The Hubble Space Telescope has photographed protoplanetary discs up to 1,000 AU in diameter in star-forming regions including the Orion Nebula. Within 50 million years, conditions at the Sun's core became extreme enough for hydrogen fusion to begin, marking its entry into the main sequence, the stable phase it still occupies today.

  • Accretion, the process by which small dust grains stick together and grow, is how the current scientific consensus explains planet formation. Grains in the solar disc first clumped into bodies up to 200 metres across, then collided to form planetesimals roughly 10 kilometres in size, growing at the rate of centimetres per year over a span of millions of years. Inside a boundary called the frost line, located between the present orbits of Mars and Jupiter, temperatures were too high for water and other volatile compounds to solidify. Only materials with high melting points, such as iron, nickel, aluminium, and rocky silicates, could condense there. Because those compounds make up only about 0.6% of the nebula's total mass, the inner planets could not grow very large. Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars all trace their origins to this region. Beyond the frost line, icy compounds were far more abundant, letting the outer planet cores grow massive enough to gravitationally capture hydrogen and helium. Today, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune together hold just under 99% of all mass orbiting the Sun. Saturn may be less massive than Jupiter simply because it formed a few million years later, when less gas remained available in the disc. Uranus and Neptune are sometimes called failed cores because the strong solar wind from the young T Tauri Sun had already blown away much of the disc material by the time they formed, limiting how much hydrogen and helium each could accumulate. After three to ten million years, that same solar wind cleared the remaining gas and dust from the disc entirely, ending planetary growth.

  • After the gas cleared, the Solar System did not settle quietly into its present arrangement. The outer giant planets continued changing orbits for hundreds of millions of years, driven by gravitational interactions with the vast swarm of planetesimals still surrounding them. According to the Nice model, about 500-600 million years after the Solar System formed, Jupiter and Saturn fell into a 2:1 resonance, meaning Saturn completed one orbit for every two of Jupiter's. That resonance delivered a gravitational push to the outer planets, and Neptune may have surged past Uranus and ploughed into what had been a much denser, more compact Kuiper belt than the one we see today. The scattered icy bodies from that disruption were flung inward by Neptune, then handed off to Jupiter, whose gravity either ejected them from the Solar System entirely or hurled them into the distant Oort cloud. Some of those same scattered objects, including Pluto, were caught in gravitational resonances with Neptune and remain locked there. A June 2011 study from Southwest Research Institute, known as the Grand Tack hypothesis, proposed that Jupiter migrated inward as far as 1.5 AU before Saturn formed, then both planets reversed course and moved back outward. That migration may explain why Mars ended up so small: Jupiter consumed much of the material that would otherwise have built a larger planet. The same simulations reproduce features of the modern asteroid belt, including both dry asteroids and water-rich objects resembling comets. The disruption caused by the outer planets' migration is also thought to have triggered the Late Heavy Bombardment, a period hypothesised to have occurred around 4 billion years ago. Evidence of that bombardment is still visible in the cratering on the Moon and Mercury. The oldest known signs of life on Earth date to 3.8 billion years ago, almost immediately after that bombardment is thought to have ended.

  • Earth's Moon is thought to have formed from a single large collision near the end of the period of giant impacts. The impacting object probably had a mass comparable to Mars. The blow kicked mantle material into orbit, and that debris coalesced into the Moon. Mars's two small moons, Deimos and Phobos, are thought to be captured asteroids rather than collision products. The large inner moons of Jupiter and Saturn, including Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Titan, likely formed from discs of gas and dust circling those planets in much the same way the planets themselves formed around the Sun. The outer irregular moons of the giant planets, by contrast, tend to be small, follow eccentric and inclined orbits, and mostly travel in the direction opposite their planet's rotation. All of those are signatures of captured bodies. The largest irregular moon in the Solar System is Neptune's Triton, thought to be a captured Kuiper belt object. Tidal forces govern how moon systems evolve over time. When the Moon orbits in the same direction as Earth's rotation and Earth spins faster than the Moon orbits, angular momentum transfers from Earth's spin to the Moon's orbit. The Moon gradually spirals outward while Earth's rotation slowly slows. Phobos, by contrast, orbits Mars faster than Mars rotates, so angular momentum flows the other way: Phobos spirals inward and is expected to be torn apart by tidal stresses or crash into Mars within 30 to 50 million years. Triton faces a similar fate in about 28 billion years. Pluto and its moon Charon, by contrast, are tidally locked to each other, so no angular momentum is being exchanged and their orbits remain stable.

  • In roughly 600 million years, the Sun's brightening will disrupt Earth's carbon cycle to the point where forests can no longer survive. Around 800 million years from now, it will have killed all complex surface and ocean life. By 1.1 billion years from now, the habitable zone will have moved outward past Earth's orbit, leaving only single-celled organisms possible. Around 5.4 billion years from now, hydrogen fusion will begin in the shell surrounding the solar core, triggering the red-giant expansion. Within 7.5 billion years, the Sun will have grown to a radius of 1.2 AU, about 256 times its current size. Its surface temperature will drop to roughly 2,600 K while its luminosity reaches up to 2,700 times present levels. Mercury and Venus will be swallowed. Earth's fate is less certain: a study from 2008 concluded that Earth will possibly be slowly vaporized through tidal interactions with the Sun's outer envelope, though more recent research adds nuance to that picture. After the red-giant phase, the Sun will pass through a helium-burning horizontal-branch phase and then an asymptotic-giant phase lasting about 30 million years, before ejecting its outer layers as a planetary nebula over roughly 100,000 years. What remains will be a white dwarf containing 54% of the Sun's original mass but no larger than Earth. That white dwarf will gradually cool over billions of years. About 4 billion years from now, the Andromeda Galaxy, currently approaching the Milky Way at about 120 km/s, will begin to collide with it. Astronomers calculate a 12% chance that the Solar System will be pulled into the Milky Way's tidal tail during that event, and a 3% chance it will become gravitationally bound to Andromeda. Over the course of roughly 6 billion years the two galaxies will merge into a giant elliptical galaxy, and the Solar System will most likely be pushed into that new galaxy's outer halo. Eventually, after about 1 quadrillion years, the gravity of passing stars will have stripped the cold, dim Sun of every remaining planet, and the Solar System, in any meaningful sense, will cease to exist.

Common questions

How old is the Solar System and how do scientists know?

The Solar System is approximately 4.567 to 4.568 billion years old. Scientists determine this age through radiometric dating of meteorites formed during the early condensation of the solar nebula, with the oldest known solid inclusions dating to 4,568.2 million years ago.

What triggered the formation of the Solar System?

The Solar System formed from the gravitational collapse of a fragment of a giant molecular cloud, most likely triggered by a nearby supernova explosion or the bipolar outflows of young stars. Evidence for a nearby supernova comes from iron-60, a short-lived isotope found in ancient meteorites that can only be produced in exploding stars.

Who developed the nebular hypothesis for Solar System formation?

The nebular hypothesis was first developed in the 18th century by Emanuel Swedenborg, Immanuel Kant, and Pierre-Simon Laplace. The hypothesis fell out of favour due to criticism about the Sun's angular momentum, but was revived after early 1980s studies showed young stars surrounded by cool discs of dust and gas exactly as the model predicts.

How did Earth get its water?

Earth's water was delivered after the planet formed, because water is too volatile to have condensed in the inner Solar System during planetary formation. The water was probably brought by planetary embryos and small planetesimals thrown out of the asteroid belt by Jupiter's gravity; a population of main-belt comets discovered in 2006 has also been suggested as a possible source.

What will happen to the Solar System when the Sun dies?

In about 5-7 billion years, the Sun will expand into a red giant, swallowing Mercury and Venus. It will then shed its outer layers as a planetary nebula, leaving a white dwarf. Eventually, after roughly 1 quadrillion years, the gravity of passing stars will strip all remaining planets from orbit, and the Solar System will cease to exist.

What is the Late Heavy Bombardment and when did it occur?

The Late Heavy Bombardment is a hypothesised period of intense asteroid and comet impacts on the inner Solar System that occurred approximately 4 billion years ago, about 500-600 million years after the Solar System formed. Evidence of this bombardment is still visible in the cratering on the Moon and Mercury, and the oldest known signs of life on Earth date to 3.8 billion years ago, shortly after this period ended.

All sources

140 references cited across the entry

  1. 1webSolar system2008
  2. 2journalRotation in the Solar SystemMichael Mark Woolfson — 1984
  3. 4bookThe Sun: A BiographyDavid Whitehouse — John Wiley and Sons — 2005
  4. 5bookFred Hoyle: A Life in ScienceSimon Mitton — Aurum — 2005
  5. 6journalTriggered Star Formation inside the Shell of a Wolf–Rayet Bubble as the Origin of the Solar SystemVikram V. Dwarkadas et al. — 22 December 2017
  6. 8journalFurther Considerations on Contracting Solar NebulaJ. J. Rawal — Springer Netherlands — 1986
  7. 9conferenceThe chemical composition of the pre-solar nebulaW. M. Irvine — 1983
  8. 10journalThe age of the solar system redefined by the oldest Pb-Pb age of a meteoritic inclusionAudrey Bouvier et al. — 2010
  9. 11journalThe supernova trigger for formation of the solar systemA. G. W. Cameron et al. — March 1977
  10. 12journalThe astrophysical environment of the solar birthplaceJ. Williams — 2010
  11. 14journalThe Cradle of the Solar SystemJ. Jeff Hester et al. — 21 May 2004
  12. 15journalEvidence for a Late Supernova Injection of 60Fe into the Protoplanetary DiskMartin Bizzarro et al. — 2007
  13. 17journalThe Lost Siblings of the SunSimon F. Portegies Zwart — 2009
  14. 18journalThe formation of the Oort cloud in open cluster environmentsNathan A. Kaib et al. — 2008
  15. 19journalTrajectory of the stellar flyby that shaped the outer Solar SystemSusanne Pfalzner et al. — 2024-09-04
  16. 20journalSolar System Formation and Early Evolution: the First 100 Million YearsThierry Montmerle et al. — Springer — 2006
  17. 21journalDisks Around Stars and the Growth of Planetary SystemsJane S. Greaves — 2005
  18. 23journalWas Jupiter the protosun's core?E. M. DROBYSHEVSKI — Springer Science and Business Media LLC — 1974
  19. 24journalEvidence in meteorites for an active early sunCaffe, M. W. et al. — February 1, 1987
  20. 25conferenceInvestigation of the Physical Properties of Protoplanetary Disks around T Tauri Stars by a High-resolution Imaging Survey at lambda = 2 mmM. Momose et al. — Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series — 2003
  21. 26journalHubble Space Telescope/NICMOS Imaging of Disks and Envelopes around Very Young StarsDeborah L. Padgett et al. — March 1999
  22. 28journalToward Better Age Estimates for Stellar Populations: The Isochrones for Solar MixtureSukyoung Yi et al. — 2001
  23. 29harvnbZeilik, Gregory (1998) p. p. 320Zeilik, Gregory — 1998
  24. 30journalKeeping It Cool: Much Orbit Migration, yet Little Heating, in the Galactic DiskNeige Frankel et al. — June 2020
  25. 31journalThe Birth Environment of the Solar SystemFred C. Adams — 2010-08-01
  26. 32journalChondrule-forming Shock Fronts in the Solar Nebula: A Possible Unified Scenario for Planet and Chondrite FormationA. P. Boss et al. — 2005
  27. 33journalThe Formation of PlanetesimalsP. Goldreich et al. — 1973
  28. 34journalThree-dimensional Disk-Planet Torques in a Locally Isothermal DiskG. D'Angelo — 2010
  29. 35bookExoplanetsS. H. Lubow — University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ — 2011
  30. 36webHow Earth Survived BirthStaff — 12 January 2010
  31. 37journalGas accretion on to planetary cores: three-dimensional self-gravitating radiation hydrodynamical calculationsB. Ayliffe — 2009
  32. 38journalThree-dimensional Radiation-hydrodynamics Calculations of the Envelopes of Young Planets Embedded in Protoplanetary DisksG. D'Angelo — 2013
  33. 39journalModels of Jupiter's growth incorporating thermal and hydrodynamic constraintsJ. J. Lissauer — 2009
  34. 40journalThe Genesis of PlanetsDouglas N. C. Lin — May 2008
  35. 41bookExoplanetsGennaro D'Angelo et al. — University of Arizona Press — December 2010
  36. 43journalOn the disruption of a protoplanetary disc nebula by a T Tauri like solar windB. G. Elmegreen — 1979
  37. 44webDisc-Protoplanet interactionsHeng Hao — Harvard University — 24 November 2004
  38. 46journalThe Effect of Tidal Interaction with a Gas Disk on Formation of Terrestrial PlanetsJunko Kominami et al. — 2001
  39. 47journalMercury: the enigmatic innermost planetSean C. Solomon — 2003
  40. 48journalFinal Stages of Planet FormationPeter Goldreich et al. — 10 October 2004
  41. 50journalThe Primordial Excitation and Clearing of the Asteroid BeltJean-Marc Petit et al. — 2001
  42. 52conferenceConstraints on Jupiter's Age and Formation Mechanism and the Nebula Lifetime from Chondrites and AsteroidsE. R. D. Scott — Lunar and Planetary Society — 2006
  43. 53webMysteries of the Solar NebulaSusan Watanabe — NASA — 20 July 2001
  44. 55journalHidden Mass in the Asteroid BeltGeorgij A. Krasinsky — July 2002
  45. 56journalHigh-resolution simulations of the final assembly of Earth-like planets 2: water delivery and planetary habitabilityRaymond, Sean N. et al. — 2007
  46. 57journalA Population of Comets in the Main Asteroid BeltHenry H. Hsieh — 23 March 2006
  47. 58webNew comet class in Earth's backyardFrancis Reddy — astronomy.com — 2006
  48. 59journalSource regions and timescales for the delivery of water to the EarthMorbidelli, Alessandro et al. — 2000
  49. 60journalFrom Panspermia to Bioastronomy, the Evolution of the Hypothesis of Universal LifeFlorence Raulin-Cerceau et al. — Springer Netherlands — 1998
  50. 61webUranus, Neptune, and the Mountains of the MoonG. Jeffrey Taylor — Hawaii Institute of Geophysics & Planetology — 21 August 2001
  51. 62journalThe Formation of Uranus and Neptune among Jupiter and SaturnThommes, E. W. et al. — 2002
  52. 63journalOrigin of the cataclysmic Late Heavy Bombardment period of the terrestrial planetsGomes, R. et al. — 2005
  53. 64journalOrigin of the Structure of the Kuiper Belt during a Dynamical Instability in the Orbits of Uranus and NeptuneHarold F. Levison et al. — 2007
  54. 65arxivOrigin and dynamical evolution of comets and their reservoirsAlessandro Morbidelli — 3 February 2008
  55. 67journalThe Origin of Pluto's Orbit: Implications for the Solar System Beyond NeptuneR. Malhotra — 1995
  56. 68journalOn the formation of terrestrial planets in hot-Jupiter systemsM. J. Fogg et al. — 2007
  57. 70journalA low mass for Mars from Jupiter's early gas-driven migrationWalsh, K. J. et al. — 2011
  58. 71journalOutward Migration of Jupiter and Saturn in Evolved Gaseous DisksG. D'Angelo — 2012
  59. 72journalLate-stage planetary accretion including hit-and-run collisions and fragmentationJ. E. Chambers — 2013
  60. 73journalTerrestrial Planet Formation in a Protoplanetary Disk with a Local Mass Depletion: A Successful Scenario for the Formation of MarsA. Izidoro — 2014
  61. 74journalDynamics of the terrestrial planets from a large number of N-body simulationsR. A. Fischer — 2014
  62. 75webOrbital shuffle for early solar systemKathryn Hansen — 2005
  63. 76journalCataclysm No More: New Views on the Timing and Delivery of Lunar ImpactorsNicolle E. B. Zellner — September 2017
  64. 77webChronology of Planetary surfacesJ. Veverka — January 1984
  65. 78press releaseUCLA scientists strengthen case for life more than 3.8 billion years agoUniversity of California-Los Angeles — 21 July 2006
  66. 81arxivOrigin and dynamical evolution of comets and their reservoirsAlessandro Morbidelli — 2008-02-03
  67. 82journalInterplanetary Weathering: Surface Erosion in Outer SpaceBeth E. Clark et al. — 1996
  68. 83conferenceThe origin and evolution of stony meteoritesBottke, William F. et al. — 2005
  69. 84webThe Small BodiesH. Alfvén et al. — NASA — 1976
  70. 85bookOrigin of Europa and the Galilean SatellitesCanup, Robin M. et al. — University of Arizona Press — 2008-12-30
  71. 86journalCapture and Evolution of Planetesimals in Circumjovian DisksG. D'Angelo — 2015
  72. 87journalDetection of a Deep 3-m Absorption Feature in the Spectrum of Amalthea (JV)N. Takato et al. — 2004
  73. 88conferenceJupiter's outer satellites and TrojansD. C. Jewitt et al. — Cambridge University Press — 2004
  74. 90journalOrigin of the moon – The collision hypothesisD. J. Stevenson — 1987
  75. 91journalOrigin of the Moon in a giant impact near the end of the Earth's formationR. M. Canup et al. — 2001
  76. 92webOrigin of the Earth and MoonG. Jeffrey Taylor — Hawaii Institute of Geophysics & Planetology — 31 December 1998
  77. 93journalA Giant Impact Origin of Pluto-CharonRobin M. Canup — 28 January 2005
  78. 94journalThe Size, Density, and Formation of the Orcus-Vanth System in the Kuiper BeltM. E. Brown et al. — 2010
  79. 95journalA Jovian analogue orbiting a white dwarf starBlackman, J. W. — 13 October 2021
  80. 98journalLarge-scale chaos in the solar systemJ. Laskar — 1994
  81. 99journalNumerical evidence that the motion of Pluto is chaoticGerald Jay Sussman et al. — 1988
  82. 100journalOn the long term evolution of the spin of the EarthO. Neron de Surgy — February 1997
  83. 101journalIs the outer Solar System chaotic?Wayne B. Hayes — 2007
  84. 102bookDoes God Play Dice?Ian Stewart — Penguin Books — 1997
  85. 103newsThe solar system could go haywire before the sun diesDavid Shiga — 23 April 2008
  86. 104journalOn the Dynamical Stability of the Solar SystemK. Batygin et al. — 2008
  87. 105journalTidal Heating of Io and orbital evolution of the Jovian satellitesA. Gailitis — 1980
  88. 106journalResonances and close approaches. I. The Titan-Hyperion caseR. Bevilacqua et al. — April 1980
  89. 107journalImproved estimate of tidal dissipation within Mars from MOLA observations of the shadow of PhobosBruce G. Bills et al. — 2006
  90. 109journalOrbits and Photometry of Pluto's Satellites: Charon, S/2005 P1, and S/2005Marc Buie et al. — 2006
  91. 110bookPlanets, Stars and Stellar SystemsM. S. Tiscareno — Springer — 2012-07-04
  92. 112newsScience: Fiery future for planet EarthJeff Hecht — 2 April 1994
  93. 113webOur changing solar systemKnut Jørgen et al. — 2004
  94. 114bookMars: A Warmer, Wetter PlanetJeffrey Stuart Kargel — Springer — 2004
  95. 116journalDistant future of the Sun and Earth revisitedK. P. Schroder et al. — 2008
  96. 117journalOur Sun. III. Present and FutureI. J. Sackmann et al. — 1993
  97. 118journalOn the Final Destiny of the Earth and the Solar SystemK. R. Rybicki et al. — 2001
  98. 119journalHabitable Zones of Post-Main Sequence StarsRamses M. Ramirez et al. — 16 May 2016
  99. 121journalA Gaseous Metal Disk Around a White DwarfB. T. Gänsicke et al. — 2006
  100. 122webThe Once & Future SunRichard W. Pogge — 1997
  101. 123journalTesting White Dwarf Crystallization Theory with Asteroseismology of the Massive Pulsating DA Star BPM 37093T. S. Metcalfe et al. — 2004
  102. 124journalThe Potential of White Dwarf CosmochronologyG. Fontaine et al. — 2001
  103. 126webPerturbing the Oort CloudMichael Szpir — The Scientific Research Society
  104. 127journalMass Extinctions and The Sun's Encounters with Spiral ArmsErik M. Leitch et al. — 1998
  105. 129journalThe Collision Between The Milky Way And AndromedaJ. T. Cox et al. — 2007
  106. 131journalTime Without End: Physics and Biology in an open universeFreeman Dyson — July 1979
  107. 132journalThe absolute chronology and thermal processing of solids in the solar protoplanetary diskJ.N. Connelly et al. — 2012
  108. 133journalU–Pb chronology of the Solar System's oldest solids with variable 238U/235UY. Amelin et al. — 2010
  109. 134journalThe age of the Solar System redefined by the oldest Pb–Pb age of a meteoritic inclusionA. Bouvier et al. — 2010
  110. 135journalStatistical chronometry of meteorites. I. A test of 26Al homogeneity and the Pb-Pb age of the solar system's t=0S.J. Desch et al. — 2023
  111. 136journalA unified chronology of dust formation in the early solar systemM. Piralla et al. — 2023
  112. 137journalTime of proto-Earth reservoir formation and volatile element depletion from 53Mn-53Cr chronometryPascal M. Kruttasch et al. — 2025
  113. 139journalAn Estimate of the Age Distribution of Terrestrial Planets in the Universe: Quantifying Metallicity as a Selection EffectCharles H. Lineweaver — 2001
  114. 140webDid newborn Earth harbour life?Rachel Courtland — July 2, 2008