Nice model
The Nice model is a scientific scenario describing how the giant planets of our Solar System reached their current positions long after the Solar System first formed. It takes its name from Nice, France, where the Côte d'Azur Observatory first developed it in 2005. At its heart, the model asks a question most of us have never thought to ask: why are Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune where they are today, and were they always there? The answer, it turns out, involves a period of slow drift, a sudden gravitational crisis, and a cascade of destruction that reshaped the entire Solar System. The Nice model was introduced to the world in a triplet of papers published in the journal Nature, and it has been debated, revised, and extended ever since.
When the four authors of the original 2005 papers set out their proposal, they described a Solar System that would look alien to us today. Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune occupied near-circular orbits with radii between 5.5 and 17 astronomical units from the Sun. That places even the outermost giant planet closer to the Sun than Uranus sits today. Beyond those planets stretched a vast, dense disk of rocky and icy planetesimals with a combined mass of roughly 35 Earth masses, reaching out to about 35 astronomical units. This disk was the engine that would drive everything that followed. Planetesimals along its inner edge drifted into gravitational encounters with the outermost planets, and those brief interactions carried enormous long-term consequences. Each exchange of momentum nudged the planets outward by only a tiny amount, but over several hundred million years the accumulated effect shifted the orbits of the outer planets by significant distances. Jupiter, receiving planetesimals flung inward by its neighbors, actually moved slightly closer to the Sun.
After several hundred million years of this slow migration, Jupiter and Saturn reached a critical alignment known as their 1:2 mean-motion resonance, in which Saturn's orbital period became exactly twice that of Jupiter. That resonance amplified the orbital eccentricities of both planets and destabilized the entire planetary system. What followed was rapid and dramatic. Jupiter flung Saturn outward toward its present position, and Saturn's relocation triggered gravitational encounters between Saturn and the two ice giants, Neptune and Uranus. Those encounters sent both ice giants onto much more eccentric orbits, which drove them plowing into the outer planetesimal disk. The disruption scattered tens of thousands of planetesimals and stripped the disk of roughly 99% of its mass. In about half of the initial simulations run by Tsiganis and colleagues, Neptune and Uranus also exchanged places during this upheaval. The model's authors noted that such a statistic cannot be treated as a probability in a dynamically chaotic system, but it does highlight how violent the rearrangement was.
The main motivation for building the Nice model was to explain a hypothetical event known as the Late Heavy Bombardment, a proposed surge of asteroid impacts and crater formation on the Moon and the inner planets roughly 600 million years after the Solar System formed. In the model's original framing, icy planetesimals scattered by Uranus and Neptune crossed into the inner Solar System, and sweeping mean-motion resonances excited the eccentricities of asteroids in the asteroid belt, driving them onto orbits that intersected the terrestrial planets. That process would have removed roughly 90% of the asteroid belt's mass. The number of planetesimals that would have reached the Moon was stated to be consistent with the lunar crater record. However, more recent studies complicate the picture considerably. Newer analyses of lunar craters show no peak in the cratering record but rather an exponential decay in the number of craters over time, suggesting the bombardment spike may be a statistical artifact. Laser ablation microprobe measurements of the argon-40 to argon-39 isotope ratio on the surface of the asteroid Vesta are also in considerable tension with the Late Heavy Bombardment. These doubts about the bombardment as a real event weaken one of the Nice model's central pillars.
Jupiter and Saturn crossing the 2:1 resonance opened what researchers describe as a "dynamically open" trojan co-orbital region around Jupiter's L4 and L5 Lagrange points, allowing primordial trojans to escape and new objects from the disrupted disk to stream in. When the separation between Jupiter's and Saturn's orbits eventually increased, the trojan region became "dynamically closed" again, trapping a fraction of the newcomers. The captured trojans display a wide range of orbital inclinations, a feature that had not previously been understood, and the libration amplitudes and eccentricities of simulated populations match real observations of Jupiter trojans. A similar mechanism generates Neptune's trojan population. Objects captured in Jupiter's 3:2 mean-motion resonance as Jupiter migrated inward form the Hilda family of asteroids. A much larger population escaped onto stable orbits in the outer asteroid belt beyond 2.6 astronomical units. Those objects then underwent collisional erosion, with the Yarkovsky effect and Poynting-Robertson drag removing material over time. That process may have eliminated more than 90% of the original mass implanted into the belt. The remaining spectral D-type asteroids in the outer belt, along with the Jupiter trojans and the Hildas, are thought to be remnant planetesimals from this capture and erosion sequence. A few recently discovered D-type asteroids with semi-major axes less than 2.5 astronomical units sit closer to the Sun than the original Nice model would predict.
Before the instability, the Kuiper belt was much denser and closer to the Sun, with an outer edge at approximately 30 astronomical units. Uranus and Neptune formed most likely in the 15-20 astronomical unit range and in opposite locations, with Uranus sitting farther from the Sun than Neptune. Gravitational encounters with other planets scattered Neptune outward to a semi-major axis of roughly 28 astronomical units with an eccentricity as high as 0.4. That high eccentricity caused Neptune's mean-motion resonances to overlap, creating chaotic orbits in the surrounding region. Objects trapped in resonance as Neptune migrated outward had their eccentricities reduced and inclinations increased through the Kozai mechanism, allowing some to escape onto stable higher-inclination orbits. Others remained in resonance, forming the plutinos and other resonant populations. The model does correctly produce both resonant and non-resonant populations and an outer edge at Neptune's 2:1 resonance, but it predicts a greater average eccentricity in classical Kuiper belt objects than is actually observed: 0.10-0.13 in simulations versus 0.07 in observations. Objects scattered by Uranus and Neptune onto orbits with semi-major axes of roughly 5,000 astronomical units could have their perihelia lifted by the galactic tide, forming the inner Oort cloud. Those reaching even larger orbits could be perturbed by nearby stars to form the outer Oort cloud with its nearly isotropic distribution of inclinations. Objects scattered by Jupiter and Saturn were typically ejected from the Solar System entirely. Several percent of the initial planetesimal disk can be deposited across all these reservoirs.
The Nice model has been modified repeatedly since 2005. Hydrodynamical models of the early Solar System showed that the giant planets would have migrated toward the Sun in the gas disk, potentially ending up as close-orbiting hot Jupiters had Saturn not been captured into resonance with Jupiter first. That resonance eventually locked all four giant planets into a quadruple resonant configuration with Jupiter and Saturn in their 3:2 resonance, a setup known as the Nice 2 model. A second major revision introduced what became known as the jumping-Jupiter scenario, in which an ice giant encounters Saturn, is scattered inward onto a Jupiter-crossing orbit, and then is scattered outward after encountering Jupiter. That step-wise orbital separation avoids the slow sweeping of secular resonances that would otherwise leave the terrestrial planets with overly large eccentricities. The frequent ejection of an ice giant in simulations led David Nesvorný and others to propose a five-planet Nice model, in which the early Solar System contained five giant planets rather than four, with one being ejected during the instability. In that model, Neptune first migrates outward to 28 astronomical units before encounters between planets begin, and its eccentricity can remain small during the instability because it encounters only the ejected planet. A 2015 study found that the five-planet Nice model has a statistically small likelihood of reproducing the orbits of the terrestrial planets, and that finding suggests the instability may have occurred before those planets fully formed. At the present time, no satisfactory computer model fully explains all observed features of the Solar System's current architecture.
Up Next
Common questions
What is the Nice model in astronomy?
The Nice model is a scenario for the dynamical evolution of the Solar System, proposing that the four giant planets migrated from an initial compact configuration into their present positions long after the protoplanetary disk dissipated. It was developed in 2005 at the Côte d'Azur Observatory in Nice, France, and first published as three papers in the journal Nature.
Why is the Nice model named after Nice France?
The Nice model takes its name from Nice, France, because it was initially developed at the Côte d'Azur Observatory, which is located there. The pronunciation of the model follows the French city name, rendered as "niːs".
What triggered the planetary instability in the Nice model?
Jupiter and Saturn reaching their 1:2 mean-motion resonance triggered the instability, meaning Saturn's orbital period became exactly twice Jupiter's. This amplified the orbital eccentricities of both planets, destabilizing the entire planetary system and causing Neptune and Uranus to be flung onto more eccentric orbits.
Does the Nice model explain the Late Heavy Bombardment?
The Nice model was originally designed to explain the Late Heavy Bombardment, a hypothesized spike in impacts on the Moon and inner planets roughly 600 million years after the Solar System formed. However, newer studies of lunar craters show exponential decay in crater numbers rather than a peak, and isotope measurements on Vesta are in tension with the bombardment hypothesis, casting serious doubt on the model's explanation.
What is the five-planet Nice model?
The five-planet Nice model, developed by David Nesvorný and others, proposes that the early Solar System had five giant planets rather than four, with one being ejected during the instability. A 2015 study found this version has a statistically small likelihood of reproducing the current orbits of the terrestrial planets.
How does the Nice model explain the Kuiper belt and Oort cloud?
In the Nice model, Neptune was scattered outward to a semi-major axis of roughly 28 astronomical units with an eccentricity as high as 0.4, disrupting the outer planetesimal disk and trapping objects in resonances that form the Kuiper belt populations. Objects scattered onto orbits of roughly 5,000 astronomical units had their perihelia lifted by the galactic tide, forming the inner Oort cloud, while those reaching even larger orbits were perturbed by nearby stars to form the outer Oort cloud.
All sources
51 references cited across the entry
- 1press releaseSolving solar system quandaries is simple: Just flip-flop the position of Uranus and NeptuneArizona State University — 13 December 2007
- 2journalMass distribution and planet formation in the Solar nebulaS. Desch — 2007
- 3bookFormation and Evolution of Cosmic StructuresA. Crida — 2009
- 4journalOrigin of the cataclysmic Late Heavy Bombardment period of the terrestrial planetsR. Gomes et al. — 2005
- 5journalOrigin of the orbital architecture of the giant planets of the Solar SystemK. Tsiganis et al. — 2005
- 6journalChaotic capture of Jupiter's Trojan asteroids in the early Solar SystemA. Morbidelli et al. — 2005
- 7newsOrbital shuffle for early solar systemKathryn Hansen — 7 June 2005
- 8journalOn the reliability of N-body simulationsT. Boekholt et al. — 2014
- 9journalEvidence against a Late Heavy Bombardment event on VestaJ. Cartwright et al. — 2022
- 10conferenceProblematic evidence of a Late Heavy BombardmentT.M Harrison et al. — 30 September – 2 October 2018
- 11newsComet impacts explain Ganymede-Callisto dichotomyEmily Baldwin — 25 January 2010
- 12journalImpact-driven ice loss in outer Solar system satellites: Consequences for the Late Heavy BombardmentF. Nimmo et al. — 2012
- 13journalDynamical evolution of Jupiter's Trojan asteroidsHarold F. Levison et al. — 1997
- 14journalContamination of the asteroid belt by primordial trans-Neptunian objectsHarold F. Levison et al. — 2009
- 15conferenceThe collisional evolution of objects captured in the outer Asteroid Belt during the Late Heavy BombardmentW.F. Bottke et al. — 2008
- 16journalOn the possibility of large KBOs being injected into the outer Asteroid BeltWilliam B. McKinnon — 2008
- 17journalUnexpected D-type interlopers in the inner main beltFrancesca E. de Meo et al. — 2014
- 18journalA new perspective on the irregular satellites of Saturn - I.. Dynamical and collisional historyD. Turrini et al. — December 2008
- 19journalCapture of Irregular Satellites during Planetary EncountersD. Nesvorný et al. — 2007
- 20journalCollisional origin of families of irregular satellitesDavid Nesvorný et al. — 2004
- 21journalThe irregular satellites: The most collisionally evolved populations in the Solar systemWilliam F. Bottke et al. — 2010
- 22journalNeptune's capture of its moon Triton in a binary-planet gravitational encounterCraig B. Agnor et al. — 2006
- 23journalIrregular satellite capture by exchange reactionsDavid Vokrouhlický et al. — 2008
- 24journalOrigin of the structure of the Kuiper Belt during a dynamical instability in the orbits of Uranus and NeptuneHarold F. Levison et al. — 2007
- 25journalOrigin of the structure of the Kuiper belt during a dynamical instability in the orbits of Uranus and NeptuneHarold F. Levison et al. — 2008-04-03
- 26arxivOrigin and dynamical evolution of comets and their reservoirsAlessandro Morbidelli — 2006
- 27newsKuiper Belt may be born of collisionsRick Lovett — 2010
- 28journalNeptune on tiptoes: Dynamical histories that preserve the cold classical Kuiper BeltSchuyler Wolff et al. — 2012
- 29journalRetention of a primordial cold classical Kuiper Belt in an instability-driven model of Solar system formationKonstantin Batygin et al. — 2011
- 30conferenceOort cloud formation and dynamicsL. Dones et al. — Astronomical Society of the Pacific — 30 June – 3 July 2003
- 31journalOort cloud and Scattered Disc formation during a late dynamical instability in the Solar systemR. Brasser et al. — 2013
- 32journalDynamics of the giant planets of the Solar system in the gaseous protoplanetary disk, and their relationship to the current orbital architectureAlessandro Morbidelli et al. — 2007
- 33journalLate Orbital Instabilities in the Outer Planets Induced by Interaction with a Self-gravitating Planetesimal DiskHarold F. Levison et al. — 2011
- 34journalConstructing the secular architecture of the solar system II: The terrestrial planetsR. Brasser et al. — 2009
- 35journalEvidence from the Asteroid Belt for a Violent Past Evolution of Jupiter's OrbitAlessandro Morbidelli — 2010
- 36journalCapture of irregular satellites at JupiterDavid Nesvorný et al. — 2014
- 37journalCapture of trojans by jumping JupiterDavid Nesvorný — 2013
- 38journalAn Archaean heavy bombardment from a destabilized extension of the asteroid beltWilliam F. Bottke et al. — 2012
- 39journalCapture of trans-Neptunian planetesimals in the main Asteroid BeltDavid Vokrouhlický et al. — 2016
- 40journalYoung Solar system's fifth giant planet?David Nesvorný — 2011
- 41journalInstability-driven dynamical evolution model of a primordially five-planet outer Solar systemKonstantin Batygin et al. — 2012
- 42journalStatistical study of the early Solar system's instability with four, five, and six giant planetsDavid Nesvorný et al. — 2012
- 43journalJumping Neptune can explain the Kuiper Belt kernelDavid Nesvorný — 2015
- 44journalEvidence for Slow Migration of Neptune from the Inclination Distribution of Kuiper Belt ObjectsDavid Nesvorný — 2015
- 45conferenceThe impact rate on giant planet satellites during the Late Heavy BombardmentL. Dones et al. — 2013
- 46journalConstraining the giant planets' initial configuration from their evolution: Implications for the timing of the planetary instabilityRogerio Deienno et al. — 2017
- 47journalThe fragility of the terrestrial planets during a giant-planet instabilityNathan A. Kaib et al. — Oct 2015
- 48journalThe fragility of the terrestrial planets during a giant-planet instabilityNathan A. Kaib et al. — 2016
- 49webJupiter May Have Ejected A Planet From Our Solar SystemEthan Siegel — Forbes — Nov 3, 2015
- 50journalThe effect of an early planetesimal-driven migration of the giant planets on terrestrial planet formationK.J. Walsh et al. — 2011
- 51journalMagnitude and timing of the giant planet instability: A reassessment from the perspective of the asteroid beltA. Toliou et al. — 2016