Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Phobos (moon)

~8 min read · Ch. 1 of 7
7 sections
  • Phobos is a tiny, lumpy rock orbiting Mars so close to the planet's surface that it travels faster than Mars itself spins. On the 18th of August 1877, American astronomer Asaph Hall spotted it through the world's largest refracting telescope, the 26-inch Great Equatorial at the United States Naval Observatory in Washington, D.C. He had already found Mars's other moon, Deimos, just days before. Two worlds discovered in a single week, circling a planet named for the Roman god of war.

    Hall named his find after the Greek god of fear and panic. Phobos was, in mythology, the twin brother of Deimos and the son of Ares. It is a fitting name. This small, scarred body is caught in a slow spiral toward destruction, and the grooves etched across its surface have puzzled scientists for decades. What carved them? Where did Phobos come from in the first place? And what will become of it? Those questions have driven generations of astronomers, spacecraft designers, and theorists to keep returning to one of the Solar System's most peculiar objects.

  • Phobos has a mean radius of just 11 km, far too small for gravity to pull it into a sphere. Its density, measured directly by spacecraft at 1.887 grams per cubic centimetre, is lower than solid rock. Calculations suggest that somewhere between a quarter and a third of its volume is simply empty space, giving it a porosity of 30 percent, plus or minus 5 percent.

    Its albedo sits at 0.071, meaning it reflects only about 7 percent of the sunlight that strikes it, placing it among the least reflective bodies in the entire Solar System. The surface is dark and chemically rich in carbon, with infrared spectra resembling carbonaceous chondrite meteorites. The similarity to C- and D-type asteroids is so strong that one longstanding hypothesis holds that Phobos and Deimos are captured main-belt asteroids.

    Images from Mars Global Surveyor revealed that Phobos is blanketed by a layer of fine-grained regolith at least 100 metres thick. How that material stays put on a body with almost no gravity remains an open question. Spectral observations show that the regolith's surface layer lacks hydration, though ice below it has not been ruled out. Some areas of the surface appear reddish, while others show a bluish hue, a contrast scientists attribute to Martian gravity dragging weathered reddish regolith across the surface and exposing fresher, unweathered material beneath.

  • Phobos orbits Mars at an altitude of just 5,989 km, closer to its parent planet than any other known natural satellite in the Solar System. A complete trip around Mars takes only 7 hours and 39 minutes, far faster than the Martian day of roughly 24.6 hours. Because of this speed, Phobos rises in the west and sets in the east, the reverse of what any moon-watcher on Earth would expect.

    From the Martian surface, Phobos crosses the sky in 4 hours and 15 minutes or less, and it completes this journey roughly twice per Martian day, which lasts about 11 hours and 6 minutes. The moon cannot be seen at all from latitudes above 70.4 degrees, because its orbit hugs the equator so tightly. At the horizon it appears about 0.14 degrees wide; directly overhead it grows to 0.20 degrees, roughly a third the apparent diameter of the full Moon as seen from Earth. The Sun, by comparison, spans about 0.35 degrees in Mars's sky, making Phobos far too small to produce a total solar eclipse. The Mars Rover Opportunity photographed several of Phobos's transits across the Sun, capturing it as a small dark disk sliding across the solar face.

    Because Phobos orbits below Mars's synchronous orbit radius, tidal forces are gradually pulling it inward. The orbit shrinks by approximately 2 metres every 100 years, or about 2 cm per year, making the orbital dynamics of Phobos what researchers have called the best-studied in the Solar System.

  • The crater Stickney dominates Phobos. Nine kilometres in diameter, it occupies a substantial fraction of the moon's entire surface area. It is named after Angeline Stickney, born in 1830, the wife of Asaph Hall, the man who discovered Phobos. The impact that carved Stickney almost certainly came close to shattering the moon entirely, in the same way that the crater Herschel tested the Saturnian moon Mimas.

    For decades after Phobos was first imaged, the grooves scoring its surface were assumed to be fractures radiating outward from the Stickney impact. Analysis from the Mars Express spacecraft complicated that picture. The grooves are not radial to Stickney at all; instead, they converge on the leading apex of Phobos as it moves through its orbit. By 2015, researchers suspected the grooves were more like stretch marks produced by tidal deformation from the moon's unusually close orbit. Later modelling found the stresses were probably too weak to fracture a moon of that size unless Phobos is a rubble pile wrapped in roughly 100 metres of powdery regolith.

    In November 2018, a computational probability analysis offered another explanation: boulders ejected from the Stickney impact rolled and bounced in a predictable pattern across the surface, travelling more than 360 degrees around the moon and compressing the soft regolith into long grooves. The grooves have been grouped into 12 or more families of varying age, suggesting at least 12 separate Martian impact events sent debris into Phobos's path over geological time. The origin of the grooves remains an active dispute, one that dates back to the 1970s.

  • Around 1958, Soviet astrophysicist Iosif Samuilovich Shklovsky was studying the secular acceleration of Phobos's orbital motion when he proposed something extraordinary. Using estimates of the Martian atmosphere's density, he calculated that for the observed braking effect to account for the measured acceleration, Phobos would have to be extraordinarily light. One calculation yielded a hollow iron sphere 16 km across but less than 6 cm thick. Shklovsky floated the possibility that Phobos was of artificial origin.

    The idea attracted serious attention. In a February 1960 letter to the journal Astronautics, Fred Singer, then science advisor to U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower, assessed the hypothesis carefully. Singer acknowledged that if the spiraling inward were real, a hollow and therefore artificial origin would be difficult to dismiss, but he flagged the astronomical observations as the weak link: they rested on independent measurement sets taken decades apart by different observers with different instruments, leaving systematic error as a real possibility.

    Singer's caution proved well placed. By 1969 accurate orbital measurements showed no discrepancy at all. Earlier studies had used an overestimated rate of altitude loss of 5 cm per year; the corrected figure came in at 1.8 cm per year. The secular acceleration was attributed to tidal effects, not to any unusual internal structure. Viking probe images taken in the 1970s confirmed Phobos as a natural object. The density of 1.887 g/cm3, measured directly by spacecraft, is consistent with a porous rubble pile, and subsequent Mars Express mapping confirmed the presence of voids. Shklovsky himself later received the honour of having a 2-km crater on Phobos named after him, approved in 2011.

  • The origin of Phobos has not been settled. The surface resembles carbonaceous C- and D-type asteroids in spectrum, albedo, and density, which supports a capture hypothesis. But capturing a body of Phobos's size requires a mechanism to circularise what would initially have been a highly eccentric orbit and to tilt it into Mars's equatorial plane. The current Martian atmosphere is too thin to do that by atmospheric braking alone. Researcher Geoffrey A. Landis noted that capture might have worked if the original body was a binary asteroid that separated under tidal forces, allowing the pieces to dissipate energy during the encounter.

    Other evidence points away from an asteroid origin. The high interior porosity, estimated from the 1.88 g/cm3 density as comprising 25 to 35 percent of Phobos's volume, is inconsistent with known asteroidal composition. Thermal infrared observations suggest Phobos contains mainly phyllosilicates, minerals well known from the surface of Mars itself, and the spectra do not match any class of chondrite meteorite. Both findings lean toward an impact origin: a large object strikes Mars, ejects material into orbit, and that material reaccretes to form Phobos, a process analogous to the leading theory for the formation of Earth's Moon.

    In February 2021, a team led by Amirhossein Bagheri at ETH Zurich, working with colleagues at the U.S. Naval Observatory, analyzed seismic and orbital data from the Mars InSight Mission. Their analysis proposed that Phobos and Deimos are not independent captures but fragments of a single common parent body. That progenitor was struck by another object and shattered somewhere between 1 and 2.7 billion years ago, producing both moons simultaneously.

  • Phobos is on a one-way trip toward Mars. Tidal deceleration shrinks its orbital radius by approximately 2 metres every 100 years, and as the orbit tightens, the tidal forces pulling at the moon grow stronger. Researchers estimate that Phobos will reach the critical breakup point when it arrives at approximately 2.1 Mars radii from the planet's centre, with that moment expected somewhere in the range of 30 to 50 million years from now; one specific study placed the estimate at about 43 million years.

    At that threshold, assuming Phobos behaves as a Mohr-Coulomb rubble pile, tidal forces will overcome the loose cohesion binding the body together. The loosely bound material will disperse into a planetary ring around Mars. That ring, according to models, could persist for anywhere from 1 million to 100 million years. The more coherent, strongly bound fragments will not join the ring; instead, they will enter the Martian atmosphere.

    The fraction of Phobos that ends up in the ring versus the atmosphere depends entirely on the internal structure of the moon, which is not yet known. A dedicated sample return mission, the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency's Martian Moons eXploration, is scheduled to launch in 2026 and return samples to Earth in 2031, aiming to retrieve a minimum of 10 grams of Phobos material that could finally resolve the open questions about what, exactly, holds this doomed moon together.

Common questions

Who discovered Phobos and when was it found?

Phobos was discovered by American astronomer Asaph Hall on the 18th of August 1877 at the United States Naval Observatory in Washington, D.C. Hall made the discovery using the 26-inch Great Equatorial refracting telescope, then the world's largest. He had found Mars's other moon, Deimos, just days earlier.

How close is Phobos to the surface of Mars?

Phobos orbits Mars at an altitude of 5,989 km, closer to its parent planet than any other known natural satellite in the Solar System. Its orbit is so low that it cannot be seen from Martian latitudes greater than 70.4 degrees.

Why does Phobos rise in the west on Mars?

Phobos orbits Mars faster than Mars rotates, completing a full orbit in just 7 hours and 39 minutes. Because it outruns the planet's rotation, it rises in the west and sets in the east, crossing the Martian sky in 4 hours and 15 minutes or less.

What caused the grooves on Phobos?

The origin of the grooves has been debated since the 1970s. A 2018 computational analysis concluded the most likely cause is boulders ejected from the 9-km Stickney impact crater that rolled and bounced more than 360 degrees around the moon, compressing the soft regolith into long grooves. The grooves range up to 20 km in length and have been grouped into 12 or more families of varying age.

What will happen to Phobos in the future?

Tidal forces are gradually shrinking Phobos's orbit by approximately 2 metres every 100 years. In roughly 30 to 50 million years, the moon is expected to break apart when it reaches approximately 2.1 Mars radii from the planet. The loose material will form a planetary ring around Mars that could last from 1 million to 100 million years, while more cohesive fragments will fall into the Martian atmosphere.

What is the origin of Phobos and where did it come from?

The origin of Phobos is disputed. Its spectral and density properties resemble carbonaceous C- and D-type asteroids, suggesting capture, but its high porosity and phyllosilicate composition point toward formation from debris ejected by a large impact on Mars. A 2021 study led by Amirhossein Bagheri at ETH Zurich proposed that Phobos and Deimos both formed from a single parent body that was shattered by another object between 1 and 2.7 billion years ago.

All sources

106 references cited across the entry

  1. 1encyclopediaPhobosOxford University Press
  2. 3webMars: Moons: PhobosNASA Solar System Exploration — 30 September 2003
  3. 5journalPhobos' degree-1 ellipsoidal harmonic gravity field recovery from two Mars Express flybysXi Guo et al. — 11 April 2026
  4. 6conferenceNear Photometry of C-Type Asteroid 253 MathildeBeth Ellen Clark — Lunar and Planetary Institute — March 1998
  5. 8journalThe Beginning of the Astronomical DayW.W. Campbell — 1918
  6. 9journalNotes: The Satellites of Mars20 September 1877
  7. 10journalObservations of the Satellites of MarsAsaph Hall — 17 October 1877
  8. 12citationMars Moons: FactsNASA — 15 November 2017
  9. 14journalLetters to the Editor: The Satellites of MarsHenry George Madan — 4 October 1877
  10. 15journalNames of the Satellites of MarsAsaph Hall — 14 March 1878
  11. 16webPhobos and Deimos symbolsGavin Jared Bala et al. — The Unicode Consortium — 7 March 2025
  12. 18webPlanetary Satellite Physical ParametersJPL (Solar System Dynamics) — 13 July 2006
  13. 19journalFormation of Phobos and Deimos via a giant impactR. I. Citron et al. — 2015
  14. 22journalArecibo Radar Observations of Phobos and DeimosMichael W. Busch et al. — 2007
  15. 23journalDisk-resolved Spectral Reflectance Properties of Phobos from 0.3–3.2 microns: Preliminary Integrated Results from PhobosH 2Scott L. Murchie et al. — 1991
  16. 24journalNear-Infrared Spectrophotometry of Phobos and DeimosAndrew S. Rivkin et al. — March 2002
  17. 25journalLoss of water from PhobosFraser P. Fanale et al. — 1989
  18. 26journalEvolution of the water regime of PhobosFraser P. Fanale et al. — Dec 1990
  19. 28webPhobos12 January 2004
  20. 29magazineViking looks at Phobos in detailReed Business Information — 21 October 1976
  21. 31webNew Evidence on the Origin of Phobos' Parallel Grooves from HRSC Mars ExpressJohn B. Murray et al. — 37th Annual Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, March 2006
  22. 33journalOrigin of Phobos grooves: Testing the Stickney Crater ejecta modelKenneth R. Ramsley et al. — 2019
  23. 35webForgotten Moons: Phobos and Deimos Eat Mars' DustRobert Roy Britt — space.com — 13 March 2001
  24. 36journalIs the Kaidun Meteorite a Sample from Phobos?Andrei V. Ivanov — March 2004
  25. 37journalThe Kaidun Meteorite: Where Did It Come From?Andrei Ivanov et al. — 2003
  26. 39journalIs Phobos Artificial?Ernst Julius Öpik — September 1964
  27. 40journalNews and Comments: Phobos, Nature of AccelerationErnst Julius Öpik — March 1963
  28. 41citationOn the Origin of the Martian Satellites Phobos and DeimosS. Fred Singer — 1967
  29. 42newsPhysics of bodily tides in terrestrial planets and the appropriate scales of dynamical evolutionMichael Efroimsky et al. — 29 December 2007
  30. 47journalWorking Group for Planetary System Nomenclature (Groupe de Travail Pour la Nomenclature du Systeme Planetaire)1988
  31. 48journalImproved estimate of tidal dissipation within Mars from MOLA observations of the shadow of PhobosBruce G. Bills et al. — 2005
  32. 49webCheck out NASA's latest footage of a solar eclipse on MarsMary Beth Griggs — The Verge — 21 April 2022
  33. 50webMars' Moon Phobos is Slowly Falling ApartElizabeth Zubritsky — 10 November 2015
  34. 51journalPhysics of bodily tides in terrestrial planets and the appropriate scales of dynamical evolution.Michael Efroimsky et al. — 2007
  35. 52journalCharacter and origin of Phobos' groovesJ. B. Murray et al. — 2014-11-01
  36. 54journalSesquinary catenae on the Martian satellite Phobos from reaccretion of escaping ejectaM. Nayak et al. — 2016-08-30
  37. 56journalEquilibrium Configurations of Solid Cohesionless BodiesKeith A. Holsapple — December 2001
  38. 58webViews of Phobos and Deimos27 November 2007
  39. 61journalOrbital history of the Martian satellites with inferences on their originAnny Cazenave et al. — 1980
  40. 62journalOrigin of Phobos and Deimos by the impact of a Vesta-to-Ceres sized body with MarsRobin Canup — 18 April 2018
  41. 63webPhobos Flyby SuccessMartin Pätzold et al. — ESA — 4 March 2010
  42. 64journalPrecise mass determination and the nature of PhobosThomas P. Andert et al. — 7 May 2010
  43. 69bookRussian Planetary Exploration History, Development, Legacy and ProspectsBrian Harvey — Springer-Praxis — 2007
  44. 72webProjects LIFE Experiment: PhobosThe Planetary Society
  45. 73webHK triumphs with out of this world inventionHong Kong Trader — 1 May 2007
  46. 74webPolyU-made space tool sets for Mars againHong Kong Polytechnic University — 2 April 2007
  47. 77av mediaTimelapse of Hera's Mars flybyEuropean Space Agency, ESA — 2025-04-15
  48. 79webJAXA's exploration of the two moons of Mars, with sample return from PhobosMasaki Fujimoto — Lunar and Planetary Institute — 11 January 2017
  49. 81webISASニュース 2017.1 No. 430Institute of Space and Astronautical Science — 22 January 2017
  50. 82webPlanetary Science Division Status ReportJames Green — Lunar and Planetary Institute — 7 June 2016
  51. 83book1999 IEEE Aerospace Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No. 99TH8403)Olivier S. Barnouin-Jha — 1999
  52. 92newsNew Missions Target Mars Moon PhobosLeslie Mullen — Space.com — 30 April 2009
  53. 99conferencePhootprint: A European Phobos Sample Return MissionSimon Barraclough et al. — Airbus Defense and Space — 16 June 2014
  54. 100journalPhootprint – A Phobos sample return mission studyDetlef Koschny et al. — 2 August 2014
  55. 102webRussia's Dark Horse Plan to Get to MarsJamie Oberg — 20 May 2009
  56. 103conferenceOn the Use of the Sands of Phobos and Deimos as a Braking Technique for Landing Large Payloads on MarsFrancisco J. Arias — 2017
  57. 104journalSandbraking. A technique for landing large payloads on Mars using the sands of PhobosFrancisco J. Arias et al. — 2019
  58. 105conferencePhobos-Deimos ASAP: A Case for the Human Exploration of the Moons of MarsPascal Lee — USRA — 5–7 November 2007
  59. 107journalSpace Colonization Using Space-Elevators from PhobosLeonard M. Weinstein — January 2003
  60. 108journalHigh-resolution shape models of Phobos and Deimos from stereophotoclinometryCarolyn M. Ernst et al. — December 2023