Excommunication

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Excommunication is a word that carries enormous weight: the act of cutting a person off from the religious community they belong to, stripping away sacraments, fellowship, and sometimes even ordinary social contact. At its most extreme, it has meant banishment, public shaming, and the severing of family bonds. At its most routine, it is a quiet administrative act that bars someone from taking communion on a Sunday morning. What drives religious communities to cast out their own members? And what happens to those who are cast out? The answers depend entirely on who is doing the excommunicating, and why.

• 2. The Catholic Architecture

  ›

  Pope Leo X set out the Catholic position with striking clarity in the papal bull Exsurge Domine, issued on the 16th of May 1520. He condemned Martin Luther's argument that excommunication is merely an external punishment that cannot deprive a person of the spiritual prayers of the Church. For Rome, the penalty runs far deeper than social exclusion. Pope Pius VI reinforced this in Auctorem Fidei on the 28th of August 1794, rejecting the idea that excommunication is only an outward matter. The Church teaches that it is a spiritual penalty binding in heaven and affecting souls.

  Catholic canon law divides excommunication into two types. Latae sententiae excommunication is automatic: the penalty takes effect the moment the offense is committed, with no tribunal required. Ferendae sententiae excommunication is imposed by a legitimate superior or declared by an ecclesiastical court. Canon 1331 lists precisely what an excommunicated person is barred from doing: ministerial participation in the Eucharist, receiving the sacraments, and exercising any ecclesiastical office.

  A priest navigates a subtle problem with those under automatic excommunication. If the excommunication has not been officially declared, the priest may not publicly refuse communion to that person, even if the priest privately knows the penalty has been incurred. Only when the excommunication is formally declared does the prohibition on administering communion become absolute. The path back into full communion runs through a declaration of repentance, a profession of the Creed where heresy was involved, and an act of absolution by an empowered priest or bishop.

• 3. Eastern Variations

  ›

  The Eastern Catholic Churches handle the same penalty with different mechanics. No automatic latae sententiae excommunication exists in their tradition; every excommunication must be imposed by decree. They draw a formal line between minor and major excommunication, where minor exclusion bars a person from the Eucharist and can restrict or block entry into a church during worship. The decree must spell out the precise effect and, where relevant, its duration.

  Major excommunication goes further still. The person is forbidden from receiving any sacrament, from administering sacraments or sacramentals, and from exercising any ecclesiastical office whatsoever. Any such acts performed in defiance of the decree are declared null and void. The person loses the right to vote or to be elected to church positions, and any pension or benefits tied to those positions are forfeited.

  The Eastern Orthodox Church takes a notably different approach. Excommunication there means exclusion from the Eucharist, not expulsion from the church community itself. It can arise from something as routine as failing to confess within a given year. For matters of serious and unrepentant heresy, a separate and more severe instrument exists: the pronouncement of anathema. The Second Council of Constantinople in 553 recorded this instrument in its eleventh capitula, naming Arius, Eunomius, Macedonius, Apollinaris, Nestorius, Eutyches, and Origen as those to be anathematized.

• 4. Reformers and the Democratic Process

  ›

  Martin Luther, in the Smalcald Articles, drew a distinction between what he called the "great" and "small" excommunication. The small version simply bars a member from the Lord's Supper and ordinary church fellowship. The great excommunication, which excluded a person from both church and civil community, Luther considered to be outside the church's proper authority and a matter for civil leaders only.

  Lutheran practice became, in some denominations, remarkably democratic. Individual congregations often set the rules themselves, sometimes requiring a vote at Sunday services, and in some cases insisting that the vote be unanimous. This structure created unusual situations. When serial killer Dennis Rader was targeted for excommunication from the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, individuals found themselves lobbying his fellow congregation members to vote for his removal.

  John Calvin offered a different rationale in his Institutes of the Christian Religion. Church censures, he argued, are not designed to consign the excommunicated to permanent ruin. The goal is repentance, reconciliation, and restoration. Calvin wrote that while ecclesiastical discipline does not allow familiar and intimate terms with excommunicated persons, the community ought to strive by all possible means to bring them to a better mind. Reformed theologian Jay E. Adams pushed this further, arguing that excommunication is not the final disciplinary step at all. The final step, he wrote, is when the offender becomes as the heathen and tax collector, as described in Matthew 18:17. The Westminster Confession of Faith places excommunication third in a sequence, after admonition and suspension from the Lord's Supper.

• 5. John Wesley's Ledger

  ›

  John Wesley, the founder of the Methodist Churches, kept a record that survives as one of the most striking documents in the history of church discipline. From the Newcastle Methodist society alone, he excommunicated sixty-four members. The breakdown is specific: seventeen were removed for drunkenness, twenty-nine for what Wesley recorded as lightness and carelessness, four for railing and evil-speaking, three for quarrelling and brawling, three for habitual wilful lying, two for cursing and swearing, two for habitual Sabbath-breaking, two for retailing spiritous liquors, one for beating his wife, and one for idleness and laziness.

  Methodist tradition also required procedural fairness. In the Methodist Episcopal Church, excommunication followed a trial before a jury of peers and included the right of appeal to a higher court. A penalty so imposed could be lifted after sufficient penance.

  Modern Methodist bodies have codified their grounds in denominational discipline documents. The Allegheny Wesleyan Methodist Connection's 2014 Discipline and the Evangelical Wesleyan Church's 2015 Discipline both set out the specific offenses and procedures in writing. The 2015 Discipline from the Evangelical Wesleyan Church gives any member accused of misconduct the right to request a trial within thirty days of the official board's final action.

• 6. Shunning Communities

  ›

  Jehovah's Witnesses use the term disfellowshipping for their form of excommunication, and the social consequences reach deep into family life. When a member is accused of a serious sin, a judicial committee of at least three elders investigates and determines whether a disfellowshipping offense has been committed. If it has, the committee weighs the person's attitude and their works befitting repentance.

  After disfellowshipping, contact with extended family is typically cut to a minimum. Interaction within a household may continue for practical needs, but spiritual fellowship such as family Bible study is suspended. Sociologist Andrew Holden documented that many Witnesses who feel disillusioned with the organization stay affiliated out of fear of losing contact with friends and family. The practice draws on what psychologists call relational aggression. In severe cases, researchers have found the psychological effects on those shunned resemble the trauma studied in the psychology of torture.

  Reinstatement among the Witnesses is not automatic at any fixed interval. Disfellowshipped persons may approach elders at any time but must apply in writing to be considered. A judicial committee then assesses whether repentance is genuine. Serious sins involving child sexual abuse permanently disqualify the sinner from any congregational privilege of service, regardless of whether a secular criminal conviction followed.

  Among the Bahá'ís, the equivalent process is reserved for a specific threat: organized attempts to promote schism or undermine the legitimacy of the religion's leadership succession. The term for such a person is Covenant-breaker. The Universal House of Justice holds the sole authority to declare someone a Covenant-breaker, and once that declaration is made, all Bahá'ís are expected to shun the person, including family members. 'Abdu'l-Baha described Covenant-breaking as a contagious disease.

• 7. Beyond Christianity

  ›

  In Judaism, herem is the highest form of ecclesiastical censure, representing total exclusion from the Jewish community. After the Enlightenment, when local Jewish communities lost their political autonomy and Jews were integrated into broader civic life, herem largely ceased to be practiced outside Charedi communities. In a more recent period tracked between 2010 and 2015, the Reform Jewish Central Conference of American Rabbis expelled six rabbis, the Orthodox Rabbinical Council of America expelled three, and the Conservative Rabbinical Assembly expelled one, suspended three, and caused one to resign without eligibility for reinstatement. Reasons included sexual misconduct, financial crimes, and failure to comply with ethics investigations.

  In Islam, the closest equivalent concepts are hajr, the act of abandonment or shunning, and takfir, a formal declaration that denounces someone as a nonbeliever. Because a takfir charge carries severe consequences, including the potential dissolution of a marriage under traditional interpretations of Islamic law, less extreme denunciations involving bidah, meaning deviant innovation or heresy, have historically been more common. The most widely known modern cases of takfir pursued through the courts involved Salman Rushdie, Nasr Abu Zayd, and Nawal El-Saadawi, as well as the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community.

  In Sikhism, the concept of patit describes a person initiated into the faith who has violated its rules. The Sikh Rehat Maryada sets out the four kurahit transgressions that cause a person to become patit: dishonouring the hair, eating meat slaughtered in the kutha manner, cohabiting with someone other than one's spouse, and using an intoxicant. These four causes were first listed by Guru Gobind Singh in his 52 hukams. In the LDS Church, the term excommunication was officially retired in 2020, replaced by withdrawal of membership, a change intended to shift the focus away from guilt and toward the possibility of repentance.