Electronic Frontier Foundation

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The Electronic Frontier Foundation was born in 1990 out of a specific, unsettling encounter. John Perry Barlow, a lyricist and Wyoming rancher, received a visit at his home in April of that year from a Federal Bureau of Investigation agent. The agent had come as part of Operation Sundevil, a Secret Service campaign to crack down on cybercrime. Before attending a conference hosted by Harper's, a hacker group had sent Barlow and others floppy discs containing pirated source code for Apple's ROM components. When Barlow sat down with the FBI agent, he quickly realized the man investigating the case had almost no grasp of how computers or the internet worked. Barlow later reflected that he thought he "would first have to explain to him what guilt might be." He posted about this encounter on The WELL, an online community, and argued that law enforcement's heavy-handed tactics during the raids of that era made a civil liberties organization an obvious necessity. What emerged from that post would grow into one of the most active legal and political forces defending freedom online. The questions that shaped its founding still drive it: who gets to decide what is legal online, who enforces those rules, and what happens when the enforcers don't understand what they're policing?

• 2. Three Founders, One Problem

  ›

  Mitch Kapor read Barlow's post on The WELL and reached out to say he had experienced something similar. The two agreed the internet needed a dedicated civil liberties defender, and Kapor offered to personally fund any legal fees required. Together, they contacted New York lawyers Rabinowitz, Boudin, Standard, Krinsky and Lieberman to represent people who had attended the Harper's event. John Gilmore, another early digital rights advocate, came on board around the same time, as did Steve Wozniak, who provided additional support when the organization launched. Kapor opened the foundation's first office inside his own Kapor Enterprises space in Boston. The group was not primarily building a membership organization in the traditional sense. It was designed to act: filing briefs, funding litigation, and putting pressure on policymakers who were drafting rules for a technology they barely understood. The early EFF worked from the conviction that the internet's civil liberties problems were fundamentally problems of institutional ignorance, and that the solution was part legal advocacy, part education.

• 3. A Restless Headquarters

  ›

  By the fall of 1993, the EFF consolidated its staff into a single Washington, D.C. office led by Executive Director Jerry Berman. The pivot toward national policy work during this period created friction inside the organization. Some members were uncomfortable with how much the EFF was orienting itself toward influencing government from within the capital. Berman parted ways with the organization in 1994 and went on to found the Center for Democracy and Technology, a group that carries some of the same policy-focused DNA. Under Executive Director Lori Fena, the EFF downsized and refocused, moving its offices to San Francisco, California in 1995. A second Washington, D.C. presence opened again in the spring of 2006, this time staffed by two new attorneys. In 2012, the organization moved its San Francisco headquarters from the Mission District to Eddy Street. On the 26th of March 2026, Nicole Ozer was named Executive Director, succeeding Cindy Cohn, with the transition taking effect on the 1st of June 2026.

• 4. Breaking the Government's Code Lock

  ›

  By the mid-1990s, the EFF had grown alarmed by the U.S. government's position on encryption. Federal agencies insisted they could not read messages protected by the Data Encryption Standard, or DES, while simultaneously refusing to license secure encryption products for export unless those products used key recovery features that gave authorities access. The EFF decided to test the government's claims directly. It coordinated and funded the construction of a specialized code-breaking machine, nicknamed Deep Crack, built from custom hardware and software at a cost of $250,000. On the 17th of July 1998, Deep Crack broke a DES-encrypted message in 56 hours, setting a new record and demonstrating that the cipher was not the secure wall authorities had implied. The achievement pushed government agencies to stop recommending DES for internal use. On the 19th of January 1999, in partnership with the distributed computing project distributed.net, the team cracked another DES cipher in under 24 hours. Within four years, the Advanced Encryption Standard was formally adopted as DES's replacement. The EFF also published a detailed account of the project in a 1998 book released by O'Reilly Media, titled Cracking DES: Secrets of Encryption Research, Wiretap Politics & Chip Design.

• 5. Courts, Patents, and Voting Machines

  ›

  MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. and Apple v. Does are among the significant technology law cases in which the EFF has been involved. The organization filed suit to invalidate the Digital Millennium Copyright Act and has long opposed strategic lawsuits against public participation, which it views as tools used to silence speech. Its Patent Busting Project, launched on the 19th of April 2004, targets patents the EFF believes are illegitimate and damaging to innovation or online expression. The project works in two phases: first documenting the harm caused by disputed patents, then submitting formal challenges to the United States Patent and Trademark Office. On the voting rights front, the EFF has advocated for paper audit trails in elections since before the 2004 presidential election, testifying in their support afterward. The organization later funded researcher Hariprasad Vemuru, whose work exposed security vulnerabilities in a specific voting machine model. Since 2008, the EFF has run a website called Our Vote Live, staffed by hotline volunteers on election days, designed to document irregularities and voter suppression in real time.

• 6. Rules for the Platforms

  ›

  In the spring of 2018, the EFF joined the Open Technology Institute, the Center for Democracy and Technology, the ACLU Foundation of Northern California, and four academics to write a document called The Santa Clara Principles: On Transparency and Accountability in Content Moderation. The principles called on social networks to publish statistics on removed posts, to notify banned users with clear reasons for their removal, and to provide an appeals process reviewed by a human. Six months after the document's release, the coalition sought the support of roughly 80 additional organizations, including Article 19, in pressing Facebook specifically to adopt the principles. That effort later expanded to include a call for Facebook to warn users who had interacted with accounts operated by undercover law enforcement. Also in 2019, the EFF launched a website called TOSsed Out to track cases where platform moderation rules were applied inconsistently. Cindy Cohn, writing about the organization's commitment to free speech, put the concern plainly: "once you've turned it on, whether through pressure or threats of lawsuits, the power to silence people doesn't just go in one direction."

• 7. Prizes, Publications, and Software

  ›

  The EFF's first book, The Big Dummy's Guide to the Internet, appeared in 1993, written by contracted technical writer Adam Gaffin and made available for free download. MIT Press published a paperback edition in 1994 under the title Everybody's Guide to the Internet. A second book, Protecting Yourself Online, followed in 1998, co-written by technical writer Robert B. Gelman and EFF Communications Director Stanton McCandlish, and published by HarperCollins. For its 25th anniversary in 2015, the EFF produced a digital anthology of speculative fiction called Pwning Tomorrow, drawing contributions from 22 writers including Neil Gaiman, Cory Doctorow, Paolo Bacigalupi, and David Brin. On the software side, the organization developed browser tools including HTTPS Everywhere and Privacy Badger. In 2014, the EFF released its Secure Messaging Scorecard, evaluating messaging apps against seven criteria including whether messages were encrypted in transit and whether the underlying code had been recently audited. The EFF Cooperative Computing Awards offer prizes as large as $250,000 to the first person or group to discover a prime number with at least one billion decimal digits; the first two prizes in the series, for primes with at least one million and ten million digits, were awarded on the 6th of April 2000 and the 14th of October 2009 respectively.