Dieppe Raid

• 1. Strategic Origins And Political Context

  ›

  On the 19th of August 1942, the Allied amphibious attack on Dieppe began as a desperate gamble to satisfy Soviet demands for a second front. Joseph Stalin had repeatedly pressured Winston Churchill and Franklin D. Roosevelt to open a Western Front in France since June 1940. The Red Army was fighting deep into southern Soviet territory during a summer offensive that pushed toward Stalingrad. German forces under Operation Barbarossa had failed to destroy the Soviet Union by late 1941. British planners knew that any attempt to seize a French port would trigger a maximum effort from the Luftwaffe. Intelligence from Ultra confirmed this assumption before the operation even started. The raid aimed to demonstrate UK commitment to re-open the Western Front while testing landing feasibility. It also sought to gather intelligence on coastal defenses and demolish port structures. Churchill personally briefed Louis Mountbatten about his desire for raids of increasing intensity. The chiefs of staff directive limited Mountbatten's authority to approving only small raids initially. By early 1942, pressure from Moscow became impossible to ignore without political consequences. The proposed invasion of continental Europe in 1943, known as Operation Roundup, seemed impractical to military planners. An alternative landing in 1942 called Operation Sledgehammer appeared even more difficult. At the Second Washington Conference in June 1942, Roosevelt and Churchill decided to postpone cross-Channel invasion. They scheduled Operation Torch, the Anglo-American invasion of French North Africa, for later that year. A large-scale Canadian-led raid on the French coast was intended to take some pressure off the Soviet Union during this interim period.

• 2. Operational Planning And Leadership Dynamics

  ›

  Louis Mountbatten received his commission as chief of combined operations on the 4th of March 1942 after being recalled from captaincy of an aircraft carrier under repair in the US. He replaced Admiral Roger Keyes who had fallen out with the chiefs of staff and Churchill. Mountbatten held a dual role as adviser to the chiefs of staff and commodore combined operations. In May 1942 it was agreed that Combined Operations HQ would handle detailed planning of the Dieppe raid. COHQ proposed flanking landings that would take Dieppe in a pincer movement. Home Forces argued for a frontal attack since flank attacks would not have enough time within the fifteen-hour window. Mountbatten argued that showing tactics could work was sufficient while General Bernard Montgomery countered that failure to take Dieppe would be seen as defeat. An initial heavy bombardment from air was approved then rescinded due to army opinion that wreckage would block streets for tanks. RAF belief held that most bombs would end up in sea or inland. Mountbatten pressed for battleship firepower but neither this nor cruisers were permitted. Combined Operations' proposed assault force of marines and commandos passed over in favor of untried Canadian troops. The 2nd Canadian Infantry Division chose three months specialist training in amphibious operations up to July. General Andrew McNaughton gave approval when approached after consulting superiors in Ottawa. McNaughton had dual command responsibility under operational command of Bernard Montgomery while ultimately responsible to government in Ottawa. This made for difficult relationship as McNaughton always consulted Ottawa first before making major decisions. McNaughton was first informed of Operation Rutter on the 30th of April 1942 by Montgomery. Together with his deputy Harry Crerar, McNaughton chose the 2nd Division as best suited for raid. Crerar attended staff meeting with Brooke on the 1st of March 1942 where CIGS brought up subject of Rutter. Roberts's deputy Lieutenant Colonel C. Churchill Mann wrote in May 1942 plan offered almost fantastic conception of place most suited to land strong force of tanks.

• 3. Tactical Execution On Dieppe Beaches

  ›

  Initial landings began at 04:50 on the 19th of August 1942 with attacks on artillery batteries flanking main landing area. These included Varengeville-Sainte-Marguerite-sur-Mer known as Orange Beach by No. 4 Commando and Pourville Green Beach by South Saskatchewan Regiment plus Queen's Own Cameron Highlanders of Canada. Puys Blue Beach fell to Royal Regiment of Canada while Berneval Yellow Beach went to No. 3 Commando. Landing craft heading toward Puys and Berneval ran into small German convoy at 03:48 exchanging fire. Allied destroyers and ORP Ślązak noticed engagement but commanders incorrectly assumed shore battery fire did not come rescue. No. 3 Commando wore steel helmets unlike No. 4 which did not wear them during raid. Mission for Lieutenant Colonel John Durnford-Slater required conducting two landings east of Dieppe to silence coastal battery Goebbels near Berneval. Three and four guns of 2/770 Batterie had to be out action before main force approached main beach. Craft carrying No. 3 Commando approaching coast east were not warned of approach German coastal convoy located by Chain Home radar stations at 21:30. German S-boats escorting tanker torpedoed some LCP landing craft disabling escorting Steam Gun Boat 5. Subsequently ML 346 commanded by Lt. A.D. Fear RNVR DSC combined with Landing Craft Flak 1 drove off German boats group dispersed with losses. Commandos from six craft who landed on Yellow I beaten back unable safely retreat join main force surrender. Only eighteen commandos under Major Peter Young got ashore on Yellow II beach reached perimeter battery via Berneval after attacked by Hurricane fighter-bombers engaging target small arms fire. Unable destroy guns sniping distracted battery such good effect gunners fired wildly no known instance battery sinking assault convoy ships off Dieppe. Commandos eventually forced withdraw face superior enemy forces aboard ML346 effected haste Major Young unable board ship towed part way port water clinging line tied ML 346 stern.

• 4. Air Superiority And Naval Support Failures

  ›

  Over past eighteen months inconclusive attritional engagements Fighter Command established measure air superiority within range fighters. Day incursions British airspace dwindled occasional pair German fighter bombers racing across Channel dropping bombs racing back. At 06:the 15th of July 7 two ships Solent troops Rutter aboard hit bombs failed explode passed hulls causing four casualties. German photographic reconnaissance much difficult adequate results required aircraft fly set course height. Repeat sorties once twice week ideal comparative analysis photographs manage only one set pictures month partial reconnaissance obtained 28 to the 31st of July after Rutter cancelled not again until the 24th of August five days Jubilee. Air plan exploit raid force Luftwaffe fight British terms suffer serious defeat. Air Vice-Marshal Trafford Leigh-Mallory commander 11 Group Fighter Command commanded air effort fifty-six fighter squadrons comprising Spitfire fighters Hurricane fighter-bombers Typhoon low-level interceptors. Four Mustang Mk I squadrons Army Cooperation Command provided long-range reconnaissance contingent five bomber squadrons participate smoke laying tactical bombing. Landings expected prompt maximum effort Luftwaffe Northern France Belgium Netherlands about 250 fighters 220 bombers. Leigh-Mallory controlled air battle 11 Group headquarters RAF Uxbridge commands flowing system normal sector control rooms airfields. RAF officer Hut 3 Bletchley Park seconded 11 Group Operations Room filter material Y-stations RAF Cheadle RAF Kingsdown intercepted wireless telegraphy radio telephony transmissions used direction finding pinpoint origin signals. Intention reduce time pass decryptions material German radar observer posts fighter control 11 Group through most expert officer Y German Fighter Defence ramifications. Fighter controllers headquarters ship communicate raid fighter cover shared frequency close support fighters checked headquarters ship approached direct alternative targets required. Moving squadrons within 11 Group reinforcement fifteen squadrons outside 11 Group carried out 14, the 15th of August guise Exercise Venom.

• 5. Casualty Analysis And Human Cost

  ›

  Of nearly 5,000-strong Canadian contingent 3,367 killed wounded taken prisoner exceptional casualty rate 68 per cent. One thousand British Commandos lost 247 men Royal Navy lost destroyer return crossing hit bombs Fw 190 scuttled 33 landing craft suffering 550 dead wounded. RAF lost 106 aircraft Air Sea Rescue Services picked around 20 pilots loss three Dover High Speed Launches. Among RAF losses six aircraft shot down gunners own side Typhoon Spitfire tails broke structural problem early Typhoons two Spitfires collided withdrawal across Channel. Germans suffered 591 casualties 322 fatal 280 wounded 48 aircraft one patrol boat. Of fifty US Army Rangers serving Commando units six killed seven wounded four captured. Losses Dieppe said necessary evil Mountbatten later justified raid arguing lessons learnt Dieppe 1942 put good use later war. He later said Battle Normandy won beaches Dieppe man died Dieppe at least ten more spared Normandy 1944. Half century only Briton earn VC raid Patrick Porteous criticized Mountbatten notion valuable lessons learned Dieppe Absolute nonsense learned Weymouth Bay. Direct response raid Churchill remarked Impression Jubilee results fully justified heavy cost Canadian contribution greatest significance final victory. To others especially Canadians major disaster exception success gained battle-hardened British commandos coast artillery batteries near Varengeville. Nearly 5,000 Canadian soldiers more than 900 killed about 18 per cent 1,874 taken prisoner 37 percent.

• 6. German Strategic Reassessment And Defense Upgrades

  ›

  Capture copy Dieppe plan allowed Germans analyze operation Rundstedt criticized plan rigidity saying plan German terms not plan position paper intended course exercise. Other senior German officers equally unimpressed General Konrad Haase considered incomprehensible division expected overrun German regiment supported artillery strength naval air forces entirely insufficient suppress defenders during landings. General Adolf-Friedrich Kuntzen could not understand Pourville landings reinforced tanks might succeed leaving beach. Germans unimpressed Churchill tanks left behind armament armour compared unfavourably used German Soviet tanks pleased Luftwaffe performed during air battle. One report judged Fw 190 every way suitable fighter-bomber ascribed good performance despite marked numerical superiority aggressiveness better training German fighter pilots. Luftwaffe so active during battle only 70 230 airframes available start day combat ready end day consumed all 20mm cannon ammunition West enough routine flight operations next couple days. Germans pleased successful defense noting faults own communications transport location support forces recognized Allies certain learn lessons operation set improving fixed defenses. As overall theatre commander West Rundstedt adamant Germans must learn Dieppe lessons anxious Germans not left learning Dieppe Just gained valuable experience day Dieppe enemy learnt well evaluate experience future enemy do extent even greater paid dearly. Dieppe raid provoked longer-term strategic decisions October Hitler high command produced Memorandum Regarding Experiences Coastal Defence provoked large part Dieppe document provided framework German commanders plan coastal defence future laid down amongst principles air superiority key successful coastal defense strategy.

• 7. Legacy And Influence On D-Day Landings

  ›

  Allied Dieppe became textbook example what not do amphibious operations laid framework Normandy landings two years later. Dieppe showed need Preliminary artillery support including aerial bombardment Surprise Proper intelligence concerning enemy fortifications Avoidance frontal attack defended port Proper re-embarkation craft. While Canadian contingent fought boldly face determined enemy ultimately circumstances outside control sealed fate. Despite criticism concerning inexperience Canadian brigades scholars noted seasoned professionals hard-pressed under deplorable conditions brought superiors. Commanders planned raid Dieppe envisaged such losses one first attempts Western Allies German-held port city consequence planning highest ranks preparation raid minimal Basic strategic tactical errors made resulted higher expected Allied death rate. To help future landings British develop specialist armoured vehicles engineers perform tasks protected armour. Tracks most Churchill tanks caught shingle beach Allies began study beach geology intended land adapting vehicles them. RAF generally able keep German aircraft land battle ships operation demonstrated need air superiority showing major deficiencies RAF ground support techniques led creation integrated tactical air force army support. the 21st of December 1942 Churchill wrote memo Hastings Ismay Cabinet Military Secretary stated although many reasons everyone concerned make business look good possible time now come informed precisely military plans. Churchill highly critical Operation Jubilee plans writing appear layman very much accord accepted principles war attack strongly fortified town front without securing cliffs sides use tanks frontal assault beaches.