Congress of Vienna

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The Congress of Vienna gathered representatives of virtually every European power in one city at one time - a feat that had never been attempted before on a continental scale. Between September 1814 and June 1815, diplomats, monarchs, and their entourages descended on the Austrian capital to redraw a continent that Napoleon Bonaparte had spent two decades reshaping by force. What brought them there was the collapse of his empire. What kept them there, negotiating through balls and banquets, secret treaties and open insults, was the near-impossible task of building a peace that might actually last. Who would get Poland? What would become of Saxony? Could France, the defeated enemy, be trusted at the table at all? And what kind of Europe would emerge from all that bargaining - a free one, or a controlled one?

• 2. A New Kind of Diplomacy

  ›

  Austrian Foreign Minister Klemens von Metternich designed the Congress format with his aide Friedrich von Gentz, and what they built was genuinely without precedent. Before Vienna, European diplomacy meant a slow, grinding exchange of written notes between capitals, with separate negotiations happening in separate cities at separate times. Metternich replaced that with something simpler: put everyone in the same place and let them talk. The innovation proved durable. The 1856 Congress of Paris, which settled the Crimean War, borrowed directly from the Vienna model. So did the Concert of Europe, the international doctrine that used the balance of power and respect for spheres of influence to keep Europe from a major war until 1914. Historian and jurist Mark Jarrett later called the Congress format "the true beginning of our modern era", arguing it was the first genuine attempt to build international order on consensus rather than conflict.

  The social dimension was not incidental. A large portion of the Congress's actual work happened at salons, banquets, and balls, not in formal sessions. One famous joke attributed to an attendee captured the mood: the Congress danced a lot but did not move forward. The real decisions, however, were made in closed rooms by the five Great Powers: Austria, Britain, Russia, Prussia, and France. Lesser powers like Spain, Sweden, and Portugal could advocate their interests only occasionally. Still, the concentration of over 200 states and princely houses in one city meant that even smaller delegations could communicate and spread their views in ways impossible through written correspondence alone.

• 3. Talleyrand's Gambit

  ›

  Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand-Perigord, 1st Duke of Benevento, arrived in Vienna representing a France that the four victorious powers had every intention of sidelining. The strategy he deployed to insert himself into the inner circle is one of the more remarkable performances in diplomatic history. He allied France with a Committee of Eight lesser powers, including Spain, Sweden, and Portugal, using that coalition to force his way into the core negotiations. Once inside, he abandoned the committee entirely. On the 30th of September 1814, Talleyrand and the Marquess of Labrador of Spain were invited to a preliminary conference on protocol. What followed was, by the account of Congress Secretary Friedrich von Gentz, unforgettable. Gentz wrote that Talleyrand "protested against the procedure we have adopted and soundly rated us for two hours." When the embarrassed Allies claimed the document they had prepared meant nothing, Labrador snapped back: "If it means so little, why did you sign it?"

  The relationship between Talleyrand and Labrador was close but hostile. Labrador, who privately called Talleyrand "that cripple, unfortunately, going to Vienna", was treated with disdain in return. Talleyrand had no intention of returning the 12,000 afrancesados - Spanish fugitives loyal to Joseph Bonaparte - nor the paintings, documents, and books looted from Spanish archives, palaces, churches, and cathedrals. The diaries of Friedrich von Gentz also record that bribery was part of the diplomatic toolkit: he noted receiving 22,000 pounds through Talleyrand from Louis XVIII, while Castlereagh gave him 600 pounds accompanied by what Gentz described as "the wildest promises".

• 4. The Polish-Saxon Crisis

  ›

  Russia wanted most of Poland, and Prussia wanted all of Saxony, whose king had backed Napoleon. The tsar hoped to become king of Poland himself. Austria and Britain both concluded that a Russian Poland would tip the continental balance dangerously toward St. Petersburg, producing a standoff with no obvious exit. Talleyrand saw the opening. He proposed that France be admitted to the inner circle, and that France, Austria, and Britain together would oppose the Russo-Prussian plan. On the 3rd of January 1815, those three powers signed a secret treaty committing themselves to go to war against Russia and Prussia if necessary to block the arrangement.

  When Tsar Alexander learned of the treaty, the deadlock broke. The compromise that followed divided the disputed territories with surgical complexity. Russia received most of the Napoleonic Duchy of Warsaw as a new Kingdom of Poland - called Congress Poland - with the tsar as its king, but forbidden from uniting that realm with the Polish territories Russia had absorbed in the 1790s. Prussia received 60 percent of Saxony, the rest returning to King Frederick Augustus I. The Prussian share of Saxony largely became the new Province of Saxony from 1816, though specific districts were folded into the provinces of Brandenburg and Silesia. Krakow became a free city under joint protection of Austria, Prussia, and Russia.

• 5. The Final Settlement

  ›

  The Final Act, incorporating all the separate treaties, was signed on the 9th of June 1815, nine days before Napoleon's defeat at Waterloo. The territorial architecture it established reshaped Europe from Scandinavia to the Italian peninsula. A German Confederation of 39 states replaced the nearly 300 states of the former Holy Roman Empire, which had been dissolved in 1806, with the Austrian Emperor presiding. The Kingdom of the Netherlands united the old Dutch provinces with formerly Austrian territory in the south, a union that would hold until 1830 when those southern territories became modern Belgium. Switzerland's neutrality was formally guaranteed and its 22 cantons recognized, with the Congress aiming to end permanently the tradition of Swiss mercenary service that had fueled European wars for centuries.

  Britain kept the Cape Colony in southern Africa, Tobago, Ceylon, and Malta, among other territories. Austria gained Lombardy-Venetia in northern Italy. Russia retained Finland, which it had annexed from Sweden in 1809 and would hold until 1917. The slave trade was condemned. Freedom of navigation was guaranteed on the Rhine and the Danube. Spain did not sign the Final Act in 1815, partly because it received only 5 million francs in reparations compared to 100 million francs for each of the Great Powers, despite suffering some of the war's most intense fighting during the Peninsular campaign. Spain finally signed on the 7th of May 1817, but its territorial dispute over Olivenza, a town Portugal sought to recover under Article CV of the Final Act, remains unresolved to the present day.

• 6. A Century of Peace, and Its Critics

  ›

  Henry Kissinger devoted his 1954 doctoral dissertation, titled A World Restored, to the Congress of Vienna, and the title signals how the settlement came to be reassessed over time. Nineteenth-century critics condemned it for suppressing national, democratic, and liberal movements and for restoring traditional monarchs who had no interest in the aspirations unleashed by the American and French Revolutions. Those criticisms had force: the conservative leaders at Vienna, Metternich foremost among them, explicitly sought to eliminate Bonapartist, republican, and revolutionary movements they believed had destroyed the old constitutional order. The Italian peninsula was divided into seven separate parts - Lombardy-Venetia, Modena, Naples-Sicily, Parma, Piedmont-Sardinia, Tuscany, and the Papal States - and was reduced, in one description, to a mere "geographical expression". Poland remained partitioned.

  Historian Paul Schroeder countered that the old formulas for balance of power had themselves been destabilizing and predatory. What Vienna created, in his reading, was a stable and benign equilibrium that kept Europe from widespread war for the century between 1815 and 1914. The Congress also served as a direct model for later institutions: the British Foreign Office commissioned a history of Vienna before the Paris peace conference of 1918 to guide its own delegates, and the Congress structure influenced both the League of Nations in 1919 and the United Nations in 1945. Some analysts have since suggested that the Vienna model might offer lessons for resolving the interlocking territorial conflicts in Eastern Europe that emerged after the break-up of the Soviet Union.