Cimabue

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Cimabue, born Giovanni around 1240 in Florence, was a painter whose name translates as "ox-head" - or, more pointedly, "one who crushes the views of others." That nickname tells you something important about the man before you hear a single word about his art. He was known for a pride so fierce that if someone pointed out a flaw in his work, or if he spotted one himself, he would destroy the painting on the spot, regardless of how valuable it was. No matter how precious. Here was an artist who burned his own creations rather than let imperfection stand.

  He worked in Florence and died in Pisa in 1302. He created mosaics, tempera panels, and frescoes that stretched across the walls of Italy's most sacred buildings. And yet today, his name is most often spoken in the shadow of another: Giotto, the painter who became so celebrated that Cimabue's own fame, in the words of his era, was dimmed like a small light beside a great one.

  How did a man whose work hung in the Louvre, the Uffizi, and the cathedral at Pisa come to be remembered primarily as a stepping stone? And what does it mean that Dante himself wrote about Cimabue's fall from public favor - not as a tragedy, but as a meditation on the vanity of human glory? Those are the questions that run beneath everything that follows.

• 2. The Byzantine Break

  ›

  Pietro Toesca, an art historian, attributed the Crucifixion in the church of San Domenico in Arezzo to Cimabue, dating it to around 1270. That attribution matters because it makes the work the earliest known painting attributed to him that departs from the Byzantine style - the rigid, flat, gold-heavy tradition that had dominated Italian religious art for centuries.

  Cimabue was, by all accounts, trained within that Byzantine tradition. Hayden Maginnis speculates he studied under Florentine masters who were culturally connected to Byzantine art. But the Arezzo Crucifixion shows something different beginning to emerge. Christ's body is bent, not stiff. The golden striations in the clothing follow a technique introduced by Coppo di Marcovaldo, but the overall composition gestures toward something more physically present, more human.

  Around 1272, Cimabue is documented in Rome - one of the few firm biographical facts the historical record provides. Not long after, he created another Crucifix for the Florentine church of Santa Croce. That second Crucifix was larger and more ambitious than the one in Arezzo, and it showed traces of naturalism that may have been inspired by the sculptor Nicola Pisano. The Santa Croce work was later badly damaged in the 1966 Arno River flood and has since been restored.

  What Cimabue was working toward, across both Crucifixes and the mosaics he created for the Baptistery of Florence, was a figural language that gave painted bodies more believable weight and proportion than the Byzantine norm allowed. Compared with medieval conventions, his figures occupy space differently. The shading he used to suggest volume was more sophisticated. These were not dramatic departures; they were incremental ones. But incremental departures, accumulated over decades, were enough to put him at the front of a transformation that would reshape Italian painting.

• 3. The Maestas and Major Commissions

  ›

  Around 1280, Cimabue painted a Maestà - a depiction of the enthroned Virgin Mary - that was originally displayed in the church of San Francesco at Pisa. It now hangs in the Louvre. That work established a compositional template that spread through the studios of his contemporaries and successors.

  Duccio di Buoninsegna followed the style in his Rucellai Madonna, a painting that was for a long time wrongly attributed to Cimabue himself. The confusion speaks to how influential the template was: Cimabue's approach was so widely imitated that his own hand became hard to distinguish from those of his followers. A workshop painting from a slightly later period, the Maestà with Saints Francis and Dominic, now hangs in the Uffizi.

  During the pontificate of Pope Nicholas IV, the first Franciscan pope, Cimabue received a major institutional commission: decorating the apse and transept of the Upper Basilica of San Francesco at Assisi. Roman artists were working on the nave at the same time, making Assisi in this period a concentrated hub of Italian painting. The cycle Cimabue created there covers scenes from the Gospels, the lives of the Virgin Mary, and the lives of Saints Peter and Paul. Those frescoes are now in poor condition. The brighter pigments oxidized over time, leaving the walls in a state of deterioration that gives the remaining images a ghostly, reversed quality - shadows where highlights once were.

  In the Lower Basilica at Assisi, Cimabue also created a fresco known as Madonna with Child Enthroned, Four Angels and St Francis. Part of that fresco is lost. The attribution of the whole work has been recently disputed on technical and stylistic grounds, a reminder that even Cimabue's most celebrated commissions remain subjects of ongoing scholarly debate. The Maestà of Santa Trinita, dated to roughly 1290-1300 and now in the Uffizi Gallery, was originally painted for the church of Santa Trinita in Florence. The softer expression of its figures has led scholars to suggest it was influenced by Giotto, who by that point was already working as an independent painter.

• 4. The Giotto Question

  ›

  Giorgio Vasari, the 16th-century Italian painter and historian, claimed that Cimabue discovered the young Giotto around 1277 while traveling from Florence to Vespignano. In Vasari's telling, Cimabue came upon a 10-year-old boy drawing his sheep with a rough rock on a smooth stone. He asked the child to come study with him; the boy accepted with his father's permission.

  Vasari's account includes an anecdote that illustrates the dynamic between teacher and pupil. During his apprenticeship, Giotto allegedly painted a fly on the nose of a portrait Cimabue was working on. The master tried to brush the fly away several times before he realized what had happened. The story positions Giotto as a prodigy who could fool even his extraordinary teacher. Whether true or invented, Vasari clearly intended it to establish a lineage: Cimabue as the origin point from which Giotto's genius descended.

  Many scholars today discount the claim. Earlier sources suggest the relationship between the two painters was not that of master and pupil in the straightforward way Vasari described. The historiographic problem is significant because Vasari's Lives of the Most Excellent Painters, Sculptors, and Architects remains one of the few sources that recounts Cimabue's career in any detail - and its accuracy, by general scholarly consensus, is uncertain.

  What the sources do agree on is that Cimabue's mature work was later seen as a precursor to Giotto's. Whether or not Giotto learned directly from Cimabue, the two men's names became inseparable in the way that teachers and students sometimes do in retrospect: one figure used to explain the other.

• 5. Pride, Nickname, and Dante

  ›

  Vasari preserves a description of Cimabue's character from a contemporary: "Cimabue of Florence was a painter who lived during the author's own time, a nobler man than anyone knew but he was as a result so haughty and proud that if someone pointed out to him any mistake or defect in his work, or if he had noted any himself... he would immediately destroy the work, no matter how precious it might be." The sentence ends like a verdict: pride consuming the very object of its pride.

  The nickname "Cimabue" carries that same edge. It translates as "ox-head" in one reading, and in another as "one who crushes the views of others," derived from the Italian verb cimare, meaning to top, to shear, or to blunt. The parallel drawn by commentators is to Dante, who was also known for being contemptuous of criticism. Two Florentines, roughly contemporary, each famous for refusing to absorb a contrary opinion.

  Dante returned the attention in the Purgatorio. In Canto XI, the soul of Oderisi - a miniaturist repenting for the sin of pride - uses Cimabue as an example of how quickly fame passes. The lines are direct: "In painting Cimabue thought he held the field / but now it's Giotto has the cry, / so that the other's fame is dimmed." Cimabue does not appear in person; he is invoked as a cautionary figure by someone else doing penance for the same fault.

  That placement in the Purgatorio is striking. Dante did not put Cimabue in hell. He put him in a meditation on the vanity of earthly reputation, spoken by a penitent who shares that vanity. Cimabue becomes the example not of failure but of temporal glory - brilliant in its moment, then eclipsed. The poet who chose that example knew Cimabue's fame well enough to know his audience would recognize the reference.

• 6. The Last Work and Rediscovery

  ›

  Cimabue spent the final years of his life, 1301 to 1302, in Pisa. He had been commissioned to complete a mosaic of Christ Enthroned in the apse of Pisa's cathedral, a work that had been begun by a craftsman named Maestro Francesco. Cimabue's assignment was the section depicting St John the Evangelist. That mosaic remains the only work documented as being by Cimabue during his lifetime. Everything else in his catalogue has been attributed by art historians working backward through style and circumstance. He died around 1302.

  None of his panel paintings are signed or securely dated. The attributions are made with varying degrees of certainty, and over time, several major works once credited to him have been reassigned. The Rucellai Madonna, long attributed to Cimabue, is now understood to be by Duccio. Other works in major collections have been similarly reassigned. The process of correctly identifying which paintings are truly his continues.

  In 2019, that process produced a striking episode. On the 27th of October, a painting called The Mocking of Christ was sold at auction for 24 million euros - described by the auctioneers as a new world record for a medieval painting. The picture had been sitting in the kitchen of a house in northern France. Its owner had no idea what it was worth. The attribution to Cimabue, when it was made, transformed a piece of domestic furniture into a major work of medieval art. The Mocking of Christ is now listed among the works attributed to Cimabue, where it joins the St John mosaic in Pisa Cathedral as one of the paintings that keeps his name visible more than seven centuries after his death.