Bronisław Malinowski

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Bronisław Malinowski arrived in the Trobriand Islands in 1915 having already made one embarrassing mistake. On his first field trip, lodged with a local missionary, he had relied on a translator to reach the people he was meant to study. When that translator disappeared, so did his access to everything he had come to learn. It was a humiliation that changed the course of anthropology.

  What Malinowski did next was radical. He pitched a tent in the middle of a village and stayed. Weeks became months. He learned the language, sat with families at meals, watched ceremonies unfold, and listened for what he called the "imponderabilia of everyday life." From that experiment came a set of ideas about how human culture works, and a body of fieldwork that scholars still argue over today.

  Born in Kraków on the 7th of April 1884, he began his education studying mathematics and the physical sciences, then pivoted to philosophy after a serious illness. A single book pulled him into anthropology: James Frazer's The Golden Bough. He would spend the rest of his life both building on that legacy and, quietly, demolishing it.

• 2. From Kraków to the Fieldwork

  ›

  Lucjan Malinowski, a professor of Slavic philology at Jagiellonian University, raised his son in Kraków at a moment when the city sat inside the Austrian partition of the former Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The younger Malinowski passed his matura examinations with distinction on the 30th of May 1902, and entered the same university his father served, initially drawn to the natural sciences.

  A serious illness during his student years, possibly tuberculosis, redirected him. While recuperating he turned toward philosophy and the social sciences. His doctoral thesis in 1908, titled On the Principle of the Economy of Thought, marked the formal end of his Kraków training, though not of his wandering. He had already visited Finland, Italy, the Canary Islands, western Asia, and North Africa, some of those trips partly motivated by health concerns.

  He then spent about three semesters at the University of Leipzig, studying under economist Karl Bücher and psychologist Wilhelm Wundt, and examining the works of anthropologist Heinrich Schurtz. It was during this restless stretch that he read Frazer's The Golden Bough and decided to become an anthropologist. By 1910 he was in London, a postgraduate student at the London School of Economics, where his mentors included C. G. Seligman and Edvard Westermarck.

• 3. Trapped in Paradise

  ›

  June 1914 found Malinowski leaving London for Australia in what was supposed to be a brief trip. He traveled partly as secretary to Robert Ranulph Marett, planning to attend a conference and return within about half a year. The outbreak of World War I made that plan impossible.

  As a subject of Austria-Hungary, now at war with Britain, Malinowski risked internment. Colleagues intervened, among them Marett and Alfred Cort Haddon, and the Australian authorities allowed him to stay in the region and even provided new funding. What might have been a temporary posting became years of fieldwork.

  His first field trip, from August 1914 to March 1915, took him to Mailu Island and Woodlark Island. He then organized two larger expeditions to the Trobriand Islands in Melanesia: the first from May 1915 to May 1916, and the second from October 1917 to October 1918. Between expeditions he stayed in Melbourne, writing and publishing, including the article Baloma; the Spirits of the Dead in the Trobriand Islands. In 1916 he received the title of Doctor of Sciences. The ethnographic artifacts he collected during those years ended up largely in the British Museum and the Melbourne Museum.

• 4. The Kula Ring

  ›

  The people of the Trobriand Islands maintained an elaborate ceremonial exchange system called the Kula ring. Malinowski's account of it, published in 1922 in Argonauts of the Western Pacific, described a trade network spanning island communities in which shell ornaments traveled in one direction and necklaces traveled in the other. The exchange carried no practical economic purpose in any simple sense; its value was social and ceremonial.

  In 1920 he published his first scientific article on the Kula ring, and he returned to the subject throughout his career. His description of it challenged what he called dismissals of "primitive economics," demonstrating how economic behavior was embedded in culture rather than separate from it. He was equally critical of the phrase "primitive superstition," showing through his fieldwork on the Trobriands the complex and interwoven relations among magic, science, and religion.

  Malinowski himself wrote that not even the most intelligent Trobriand Islander had a clear idea of the Kula as a large, organized social construction, let alone its sociological function. He compared the ethnographer's task to that of a physicist constructing a theory from experimental data that had always been within reach but needed a consistent interpretation. That framing, distinguishing what participants know from what an outside analyst can reconstruct, continued to inform anthropological method long after he was gone.

• 5. The Functionalist Argument

  ›

  Alfred Radcliffe-Brown, Malinowski's contemporary and rival in British anthropology, argued that social institutions function in relation to society as a whole. Malinowski argued something different. Culture, in his view, existed to meet the needs of individuals, not of some abstract social organism.

  He traced those needs to biology: metabolism, reproduction, bodily comfort, safety, movement, growth, and health. Culture arose, he argued, as the group's cooperative response to those drives, providing food supply, kinship, shelter, protection, activities, training, and hygiene. This perspective, known as psychological functionalism, was inseparable from his commitment to fieldwork. Only by observing customs in practice, empirically and in the present, could an anthropologist understand what those customs were actually doing.

  He also challenged Freud. In Sex and Repression in Savage Society, published in 1927, he conducted a cross-cultural examination that contested the claim that the Oedipus complex was universal. His 1924 paper "Psycho-Analysis and Anthropology" is believed to be the first use of the term "nuclear family." And in his 1923 essay "The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages," he coined the phrase "phatic communion," describing language used not to convey information but to bind speaker and listener through social sentiment.

• 6. The Teacher and His Seminars

  ›

  Raymond Firth, E. E. Evans-Pritchard, Edmund Leach, Meyer Fortes, and Jomo Kenyatta all passed through Malinowski's seminars at the London School of Economics. His students also included Hilda Beemer Kuper, Audrey Richards, Hortense Powdermaker, Lucy Mair, Camilla Wedgwood, Monica Wilson, Fei Xiaotong, and others who went on to shape social science in the mid-twentieth century.

  His seminars were described as electrifying. He preferred lecturing to discussion, and was praised for a friendly, egalitarian attitude toward women students, unusual in the discipline at the time. He declined a job offer from his home institution, Jagiellonian University, choosing instead to remain at the LSE, where he held a readership from 1924 and a full professorship from 1927. By then he had established the LSE as Europe's main centre of anthropology.

  Kenyatta's case was a particular one. Malinowski served as his academic mentor, wrote the introduction to Facing Mount Kenya, Kenyatta's ethnographic study of the Kikuyu, and is credited with influencing African studies through his involvement with the International African Institute. Many of Malinowski's students went to work in Africa, a pattern partly traceable to that institutional connection. Kenyatta later became the first president of modern Kenya.

• 7. The Diary and Its Aftermath

  ›

  After Malinowski died on the 16th of May 1942 in New Haven, Connecticut, at the age of 58, his personal diary was found in his Yale University office. Written in Polish, it covered the periods of his fieldwork in 1914-1915 and 1917-1918. His widow, Valetta Swann, published it in 1967 under the title A Diary in the Strict Sense of the Term.

  The publication set off what Michael W. Young called a "moral crisis of the discipline." The diary was ethnocentric and egocentric in ways that sat awkwardly alongside the reputation of the man who had taught a generation to respect and immerse themselves in cultures other than their own. Writing in 1987, James Clifford called it "a crucial document for the history of anthropology," a phrase that captured both its importance and its discomfort.

  Malinowski had spent much of his career criticizing fieldworkers who relied on second-hand accounts and armchair reasoning, particularly James Frazer, whose work had first drawn him to anthropology. Ian Jarvie wrote that many of Malinowski's publications represented an "attack" on Frazer's school of fieldwork, though James A. Boon suggested that conflict has been exaggerated. The Malinowski Memorial Lecture at the LSE, inaugurated in 1959, and the Bronislaw Malinowski Award from the Society for Applied Anthropology, re-established in 1973 and awarded annually since, carry that complex legacy forward.