Bonaparte Crossing the Alps

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Bonaparte Crossing the Alps is an 1848-1850 oil painting by French artist Paul Delaroche, and it begins with a choice that scandalized some viewers from the moment it was unveiled. Napoleon is not shown astride a rearing warhorse, commanding and serene. He sits on a mule, bundled against the cold, led through a snow-choked Alpine pass by a rough peasant. It was a choice that put Delaroche on a collision course with one of the most celebrated paintings in France.

  The questions this work raises are not merely about art. They cut to how a nation chooses to remember its leaders, what painters owe their subjects, and whether fidelity to the truth is a virtue or a failure of imagination. Why did Delaroche paint Napoleon this way? Who asked him to? And why, nearly forty years after Napoleon's exile, did the subject feel urgent enough to revisit?

• 2. The Alpine Crossing

  ›

  On the 15th of May 1800, Napoleon and a force of 40,000 soldiers set out through the Great St. Bernard Pass. That figure excluded the field artillery and baggage trains. The army was split into roughly 35,000 light infantry and artillery troops alongside 5,000 cavalry, and they faced five days of grueling mountain travel.

  The route was deliberate. Napoleon had chosen the Great St. Bernard Pass specifically because it was the shortest path through the Alps, offering the fastest possible arrival in northern Italy. His gamble rested on a simple assumption: the Austrian forces stationed in the Cisalpine Republic would never believe that an army of that size could traverse the mountains at all.

  The human cost of those five days was measured partly in provisions. The army consumed almost 22,000 bottles of wine, more than a tonne and a half of cheese, and around 800 kilograms of meat during the crossing. Once through, Napoleon moved against the Austrians, and despite an unsteady start to the campaign, the Austrian forces were pushed back to Marengo. On the 14th of June, a large battle at Marengo ended with the Austrian evacuation of Italy.

• 3. Why Napoleon Was in the Alps

  ›

  Two years before the Alpine crossing, Napoleon had taken a French army to Egypt, then part of the Ottoman Empire. The stated goals of that campaign included protecting French commercial interests in the Middle East, severing British trade routes to the East Indies, and establishing a scientific foothold in Egypt. French forces won several engagements against Ottoman troops and occupied Lower Egypt, but the push into Syria collapsed at the siege of Acre in 1799.

  Napoleon led his army back to Egypt after the defeat at Acre. There he read reports of French losses in Italy, and he quietly returned to Paris. The Alpine crossing was his answer to those defeats. Italy had to be recovered, and surprise was the only practical advantage he could claim.

• 4. Delaroche and His Patron

  ›

  Paul Delaroche studied under Antoine-Jean Gros, who was himself a protege of Jacques-Louis David. That lineage mattered, because David was the very painter whose famous version of the Alpine crossing set the terms of comparison. David's series of five paintings, produced between 1801 and 1805, showed Napoleon "calm on a spirited horse" at the Great St. Bernard Pass. Delaroche had been trained, in a sense, in the shadow of the image he was eventually asked to challenge.

  Arthur George, the Third Earl of Onslow, commissioned the Liverpool version after he and Delaroche reportedly visited the Louvre in Paris together. They saw David's painting, which had only recently been rehung in the museum following a resurgence of interest in Napoleon. George owned a substantial collection of Napoleonic objects, and he and Delaroche agreed that David's depiction was unrealistic. George wanted something truer.

  The story of the commission is complicated by competing accounts. Scholar Elizabeth Foucart-Walker argues that the version now at the Louvre-Lens was produced first, since it was already in America by 1850 when the Liverpool painting was completed. Stephen Bann allows that George's meeting with Delaroche may have happened, but suggests Delaroche chose to make two nearly identical works and send one to America. Queen Victoria owned a smaller version as well.

• 5. A Realism That Divided Critics

  ›

  In 1850, the Athenaeum, a literary magazine, published a review of the painting after it arrived in England. The critic described the scene with unusual precision: an officer in French costume on a mule, conducted by a rough peasant through a dangerous pass, with an aide-de-camp just visible in a ravine. The reviewer praised the fidelity of physical detail, noting that the painting rendered the plait of a drapery, the shaggy texture of the mule, the harness on its back, the drifting of embedded snow, and a pendant icicle caught in a single transient shaft of sunlight.

  But the Athenaeum also delivered a pointed judgment. The review concluded that the "lofty and daring genius" that had carried the humble lieutenant of Ajaccio to rule over much of Europe would be sought in vain in Delaroche's canvas. Precise observation, in that reading, was not enough. The painting captured the man but missed the force behind him.

  The Gentleman's Magazine went further and turned its critique on Delaroche's career. The magazine wrote that his more recent works revealed a modification in his style, "but not a happy one." It called him an artist of talent rather than genius, arguing that education and diligent study had qualified him to paint, but not to be an artist in the true sense. The sharpest charge was that he had lowered himself to the public rather than elevating the public to himself. Those words tracked a broader anxiety about Delaroche's approach to popular subjects, and Bonaparte Crossing the Alps became evidence in a case some critics were already building against him.