Black hole
A black hole is so compact that its gravity stops everything, including light, from escaping. That boundary of no escape has a name: the event horizon. Cross it, and you are trapped inside, yet you feel no local change at the moment of crossing. Einstein's theory of general relativity, which treats gravitation as the curvature of spacetime, predicts that any sufficiently compact mass will form one. For a long time these objects were dismissed as a mathematical curiosity. So how did a strange solution to a set of equations become an object that astronomers photograph and weigh? Why did serious physicists, including Einstein himself, spend decades trying to prove black holes could not exist? And what happens at the central singularity, where the curvature of spacetime becomes infinite?
In the late 18th century, English astronomer and clergyman John Michell imagined a body so massive that even light could not escape it. In a short part of a letter published in 1784, he calculated that a star of the sun's density but 500 times its radius would have an escape velocity exceeding the speed of light. Michell suggested such non-radiating bodies might be detected through their gravitational pull on nearby visible objects.
Pierre-Simon Laplace reached a similar idea independently. In 1796, in his book Exposition du Systeme du Monde, the French scientist suggested a star could be invisible if it were large enough. When Franz Xaver von Zach asked for a mathematical analysis, Laplace provided one and published it in von Zach's journal. Both men pictured very large stars, not the extremely dense objects we now describe.
The first solution of general relativity that would characterise a black hole arrived in 1916. Only by the late 1950s did physicists begin to read it as a region of space from which nothing can escape. The shift from curiosity to consensus came in the 1960s, when theoretical work showed black holes were a generic prediction of general relativity. The first widely accepted black hole, Cygnus X-1, was identified by several researchers independently in 1971.
Karl Schwarzschild solved Einstein's field equations only a few months after they were published, assuming spherical symmetry with no spin. Johannes Droste, a student of Hendrik Lorentz, independently found the same solution a few months later. At a certain radius the solution became singular, with terms in the equations turning infinite. That radius later became the Schwarzschild radius, and at the time no one understood what it meant.
Many early 20th-century physicists doubted black holes could be real. In a 1926 popular science book, Arthur Eddington criticised the idea of a star compressed to its Schwarzschild radius as a flaw in a poorly understood theory. In 1939, Einstein used general relativity to argue that black holes were impossible, leaning on pressure or centrifugal force balancing gravity. He missed the possibility that implosion would drive a system below the critical value.
Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar opened a different door. In 1931 he studied electron-degenerate matter and found it stable only below a limiting mass. When he announced his results, Eddington called the consequence absurd, insisting some unknown mechanism would halt the collapse. Lev Landau later took a similar view. The next breakthrough would not come from balancing forces but from following the collapse all the way down.
Robert Oppenheimer and his student Hartland Snyder formulated the modern concept of black holes in 1939. Working in general relativity, J. Robert Oppenheimer and George Volkoff had already predicted that neutron stars below a certain mass, the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff limit, would be stable under neutron degeneracy pressure. Above that limit, either their model failed or gravitational contraction would not stop.
In the Oppenheimer-Snyder model, Oppenheimer and Snyder solved Einstein's equations for an idealised imploding star and described the view from far outside. The star collapses inward as expected. As its density rises, gravitational time dilation grows, and from afar the collapse seems to slow until the star reaches its Schwarzschild radius and appears frozen in time.
David Finkelstein clarified the picture in 1958, identifying the Schwarzschild surface as an event horizon. He called it "a perfect unidirectional membrane: causal influences can cross it in only one direction." Events inside cannot affect events outside. Finkelstein built a new reference frame to include the view of infalling observers, linking events at the surface of an imploding star to events far away. By 1962 the two viewpoints were reconciled, persuading many sceptics that implosion into a black hole made physical sense.
The era from the mid-1960s to the mid-1970s was called the golden age of black hole research, when general relativity and black holes became mainstream subjects. In 1963, Roy Kerr found the exact solution for a rotating black hole. Two years later, Ezra Newman found the solution for a black hole both rotating and electrically charged.
Werner Israel showed in 1967 that any non-spinning, uncharged collapsing star yields a spherically symmetric black hole, with any asymmetry somehow vanishing. In 1972, Richard H. Price found that the asymmetry was converted into gravitational waves. Wheeler captured this stripping away of detail with the phrase "a black hole has no hair." The full no-hair theorem took another 15 years and many physicists, and it states that a stationary black hole is described by just three parameters of the Kerr-Newman metric: mass, angular momentum, and electric charge.
Roger Penrose proved in 1965 that general relativity predicts singularities appear in all black holes, though this may change once quantum mechanics is included. Vladimir Belinski, Isaak Khalatnikov, and Evgeny Lifshitz had tried to show singularities would not appear in generic, asymmetric cases, and they later reversed their positions. Observation kept pace with theory. In 1967, Antony Hewish and Jocelyn Bell Burnell discovered pulsars, shown by 1969 to be rapidly rotating neutron stars, proving that compact objects from gravitational collapse were physically real.
In 1971, X-ray telescope observations by Riccardo Giacconi's team showed Cygnus X-1 emitting X-rays in a rapid, sporadic way consistent with a compact source. Optical spectroscopy and modelling matched a binary system: a massive ordinary star feeding gas into an invisible compact companion that generated the X-rays. By 1974 the object was widely considered a black hole, though 100% confidence for Cygnus X-1 may not be possible. In 2011, the masses were estimated at 14.1 for the black hole and 19.2 for its stellar companion.
Work by James Bardeen, Carter, and Hawking in the early 1970s produced the laws of black hole mechanics, which mirror the laws of thermodynamics. Jacob Bekenstein strengthened the analogy, linking mass, surface area, and surface gravity to energy, entropy, and temperature. The link held only as an analogy until quantum mechanics entered the story.
Hawking completed it in 1974, showing that quantum field theory implies black holes radiate like a black body, with a temperature proportional to surface gravity. This effect is now called Hawking radiation, and its rate of emission is inversely proportional to mass. The catch is stark: even stellar black holes gain mass from the cosmic microwave background faster than they lose it this way. A stellar black hole's Hawking temperature of 62 nanokelvins sits far below the 2.7 K of the cosmic background, so such holes grow rather than shrink.
Sagittarius A*, the radio source at the core of the Milky Way, contains a supermassive black hole of about 4.3 million solar masses. Astronomers reached that conclusion by tracking the motions of over 100 stars orbiting an invisible object at that position. One star, called S2, completed a full orbit. Fitting these motions to Keplerian orbits pinned the hidden mass into a radius of less than 0.002 light-years, with no other plausible way to confine so much unseen mass in so small a space.
Supermassive black holes earned recognition more slowly than stellar ones. When the Hubble Space Telescope launched in the 1990s, optical studies of galaxy Messier 87 revealed a large concentration of mass. In 1995, microwave spectra from the Very Long Baseline Array tracked masers orbiting the centre of NGC 4258, and the orbits ruled out dense stellar clusters, leaving supermassive black holes as the only explanation. In 1999, David Merritt proposed the M-sigma relation, tying a galaxy bulge's velocity dispersion to the mass of its central black hole.
Gravitational waves opened a direct channel. In late 2015, the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration made the first direct detection, GW150914, the first observation of a black hole merger. The two holes were roughly 30 and 35 solar masses, about 1.4 billion light-years away. In 2017, Rainer Weiss, Kip Thorne, and Barry Barish received the Nobel Prize in Physics. On the 10th of April 2019, the Event Horizon Telescope published the first direct image of a black hole, the supermassive object at the centre of Messier 87.
For a non-rotating black hole, the singularity is a single point; for a rotating one it smears into a ring lying in the plane of rotation. In both cases the singular region has zero volume, yet holds all of the black hole's mass, giving it effectively infinite density. An observer falling into a Schwarzschild black hole cannot avoid being carried inward once past the event horizon.
Tidal forces tear an infalling observer apart in a process sometimes called spaghettification or the noodle effect, stretching and compressing them as they approach the centre. Rotating or charged black holes add an inner horizon, the Cauchy horizon, split into ingoing and outgoing sections. At the ingoing section, infalling matter and radiation build up and drive the spacetime curvature toward infinity, a phenomenon called mass inflation.
Some physicists argue that in realistic black holes, accretion and Hawking radiation would stop mass inflation from occurring. Alternative theories soften the picture further. The fuzzball model, based on string theory, holds that black holes are made of quantum microstates and need not have a singularity or an event horizon at all. Loop quantum gravity proposes that the curvature and density at the centre are large but not infinite, which keeps the question of what truly lies inside an open one, bound up with the information loss paradox.
Up Next
Continue Browsing
Common questions
What is a black hole?
A black hole is an astronomical body so compact that its gravity prevents anything, including light, from escaping. Its boundary of no escape is called the event horizon, and general relativity predicts a central singularity inside where the curvature of spacetime is infinite.
Who first proposed the idea of a black hole?
English astronomer and clergyman John Michell first proposed the idea of a body so massive that light could not escape, in a letter published in 1784. French scientist Pierre-Simon Laplace suggested the same idea independently in his 1796 book Exposition du Systeme du Monde.
What was the first widely accepted black hole?
Cygnus X-1 was the first widely accepted black hole, identified by several researchers independently in 1971 after X-ray observations by Riccardo Giacconi's team. By 1974 it was widely considered a black hole, and in 2011 its mass was estimated at 14.1 solar masses.
How massive is the black hole at the center of the Milky Way?
Sagittarius A*, the radio source at the core of the Milky Way, contains a supermassive black hole of about 4.3 million solar masses. Astronomers established this by tracking the motions of over 100 stars orbiting the invisible object, including one star called S2 that completed a full orbit.
What is Hawking radiation from a black hole?
Hawking radiation is thermal emission that quantum field theory predicts event horizons produce, with the rate inversely proportional to the black hole's mass. Hawking showed this in 1974, but stellar black holes gain mass from the cosmic microwave background faster than they lose it through Hawking radiation.
How are black holes detected and imaged?
Black holes are inferred through their interaction with matter and electromagnetic radiation, through gravitational waves from mergers, and through the motions of orbiting stars. The first direct detection of gravitational waves, GW150914, came in late 2015, and the Event Horizon Telescope published the first direct image of a black hole on the 10th of April 2019.
What happens inside a black hole at the singularity?
Every black hole has a singularity where spacetime curvature becomes infinite and all of its mass is concentrated in zero volume. An infalling observer is torn apart by growing tidal forces in a process called spaghettification, though alternative theories like the fuzzball model and loop quantum gravity propose black holes without true singularities.
All sources
277 references cited across the entry
- 1journalFirst M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black HoleThe Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. — 10 April 2019
- 2webAstronomers capture first image of a black hole10 April 2019
- 3journalSeeing relativity—I. Ray tracing in a Schwarzschild metric to explore the maximal analytic extension of the metric and making a proper rendering of the starsAlain Riazuelo — 2019
- 4newsBlack Hole HuntersDennis Overbye — June 8, 2015
- 5journalMichell, Laplace and the Origin of the Black Hole ConceptColin Montgomery et al. — 2009
- 6journalOn the Means of Discovering the Distance, Magnitude, &C. Of the Fixed Stars, In Consequence of the Diminution of the Velocity of Their Light, In Case Such a Diminution Should Be Found to Take Place in Any of Them, And Such Other Data Should Be Procured from Observations, As Would Be Farther Necessary for That PurposeJ. Michell — 1784
- 7bookGravitation and CosmologySteven Weinberg — John Wiley & Sons — 1972
- 8journalDie Feldgleichungen der GravitationAlbert Einstein — 1915
- 9journalArch and Scaffold: How Einstein Found His Field EquationsMichel Janssen et al. — 2015
- 10bookAstronomy 2eAndrew Fraknoi et al. — OpenStax — 2022
- 11journalÜber das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen TheorieK. Schwarzschild — 1916
- 12journalThe Field of a Single Centre in Einstein's Theory of Gravitation, And the Motion of a Particle in That FieldJ. Droste — Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen — 1917
- 13bookStudies in the History of General RelativityA. J. Kox — Birkhäuser — 1992
- 14webIntroduction to the Theory of Black HolesG. 't Hooft — Institute for Theoretical Physics / Spinoza Institute — 2009
- 15bookThe Internal Constitution of the StarsArthur Eddington — Cambridge University Press — 1926
- 16bookBlack Holes and Time Warps: Einstein's Outrageous LegacyKip S. Thorne et al. — W. W. Norton & Company — 1994
- 17magazineThe Reluctant Father of Black HolesJeremy Bernstein — 2007
- 18journalOn a Stationary System With Spherical Symmetry Consisting of Many Gravitating MassesAlbert Einstein — 10 May 1939
- 19journalResource Letter BH-1: Black HolesS. Detweiler — 1981
- 20journalOn Massive Neutron CoresJ. R. Oppenheimer et al. — 1939
- 21journalOn Continued Gravitational ContractionJ.R. Oppenheimer et al. — 1939
- 22journalPast-Future Asymmetry of the Gravitational Field of a Point ParticleD. Finkelstein — 1958
- 23webFirst Ever Image of a Black Hole: A CNRS Researcher Had Simulated It as Early as 1979French National Centre for Scientific Research — 10 April 2019
- 24bookThe Future of Theoretical Physics and Cosmology: Celebrating Stephen Hawking's 60th BirthdayKip Thorne — Cambridge University Press — 2003
- 25bookThe Kerr SpacetimeR. P. Kerr — Cambridge University Press — 2009
- 26journalMetric of a Rotating, Charged MassNewman ET, Couch E, Chinnapared K, Exton A, Prakash A, Torrence R — 1965
- 27journalChandrasekhar, Black Holes, And SingularitiesRoger Penrose — 1996
- 28journalGravitational Collapse and Space-Time SingularitiesR. Penrose — 1965
- 29journalThe Classical Singularity Theorems and Their Quantum LoopholesL. H. Ford — 2003
- 30webFifty Years Ago, A Grad Student's Discovery Changed the Course of AstrophysicsLorraine Boissoneault — 28 February 2018
- 31journalThe Mass of the Black Hole in Cygnus X-1Jerome A. Orosz et al. — 2011
- 32bookBlack hole thermodynamicsS. Carlip — 2017
- 33webThe First Black HoleBruce Rolston — University of Toronto — 10 November 1997
- 35conferenceBlack holes and galaxy evolutionDavid Merritt — Astronomical Society of the Pacific — 1999
- 36journalThe Slope of the Black Hole Mass Versus Velocity Dispersion CorrelationScott Tremaine et al. — 2002
- 37journalA Fundamental Relation Between Supermassive Black Holes and Their Host GalaxiesLaura Ferrarese et al. — 2000
- 38journalThe Relationship Between Black Hole Mass and Velocity Dispersion in Seyfert 1 GalaxiesCharles H. Nelson et al. — 2004
- 39journalOn the Nature of the Dark Mass in the Centre of the Milky WayR. Genzel et al. — 1997
- 40journalObservation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole MergerB. P. Abbott et al. — 2016
- 41journalImproved Analysis of GW150914 Using a Fully Spin-Precessing Waveform ModelB. P. Abbott et al. — 2016
- 42webThe Nobel Prize in Physics 2017Nobel Foundation
- 43webLIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Announce the 200th Gravitational Wave Detection of O4!Kimberly Burtnyk — 20 March 2025
- 44journalFirst M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black HoleThe Event Horizon Telescope — 2019
- 45web2020 Nobel Prize in PhysicsLeah Poffenberger
- 47newsNobel Prize in Physics Awarded to 3 Scientists for Work on Black HolesDennis Overbye et al. — 6 October 2020
- 49newsJohn A. Wheeler, Physicist Who Coined the Term 'Black Hole,' Is Dead at 96Dennis Overbye — 14 April 2008
- 50bookBlack Hole: How an Idea Abandoned by Newtonians, Hated by Einstein, And Gambled On by Hawking Became LovedMarcia Bartusiak — Yale University Press — 2015
- 51bookIntroduction to Black Hole PhysicsValeri P. Frolov et al. — Oxford University Press — 1 December 2011
- 52journalBlack-hole boundariesIvan Booth — 2005
- 53journalThe many definitions of a black holeErik Curiel — 2019
- 54bookThe black hole war: my battle with Stephen Hawking to make the world safe for quantum mechanicsLeonard Susskind — Little, Brown — 2008
- 55journalThe river model of black holesAndrew J. S. Hamilton et al. — 2008
- 56webA Black Hole is a Waterfall of SpaceAndrew Hamilton
- 57journalAsymptotically flat black holes with scalar hair: A reviewCarlos A. R. Herdeiro et al. — 2015
- 58journalStationary Black Holes: Uniqueness and BeyondChruściel PT, Costa JL, Heusler M — 2012
- 59journalNo-hair and almost-no-hair results for static axisymmetric black holes and ultracompact objects in astrophysical environmentsCarlos Barceló et al. — March 31, 2025
- 60bookBlack Holes, White Dwarfs, And Neutron Stars: The Physics of Compact ObjectsS. L. Shapiro et al. — John Wiley and Sons — 1983
- 61bookPerspectives on AstronomyMichael A. Seeds et al. — Cengage Learning — 2007
- 62bookBlack Holes, Gravitational Radiation and the UniverseR. M. Wald — Springer — 1997
- 63journalNumerical Approaches to Spacetime SingularitiesB. K. Berger — 2002
- 64magazineNaked SingularitiesPankaj S. Joshi — 1 February 2009
- 65webBlack Hole Basics13 March 2024
- 66journalBlack Hole Spin and Accretion Disk Magnetic Field Strength Estimates for More Than 750 Active Galactic Nuclei and Multiple Galactic Black HolesRuth A. Daly — 2019
- 67journalObserving black holes spinChristopher S. Reynolds — 2019
- 68bookEinstein gravity in a nutshellA. Zee — Princeton University Press — 2013
- 69journalMeasurement of the Spin of the M87 Black Hole from Its Observed Twisted LightFabrizio Tamburini et al. — 2020
- 70journalOn Neutralization of Charged Black HolesYi Gong et al. — 2019
- 71journalOn the Charge of the Galactic Centre Black HoleMichal Zajaček et al. — 2018
- 72journalDirect Measurements of Black Hole Charge with Future Astrometrical MissionsA. F. Zakharov et al. — 2005
- 73journalDistinguishable Feature of Electric and Magnetic Charged Black HoleBobur Turimov et al. — 2022
- 74journalLimiting Masses and Radii of Neutron Stars and Their ImplicationsChristian Drischler et al. — 2021
- 75journalThe Mass Distribution of Stellar-Mass Black HolesWill M. Farr et al. — 2011
- 76journalConstraints on Primordial Black HolesBernard Carr et al. — 2021
- 77journalMicro Black Holes Formed in the Early Universe and Their Cosmological ImplicationsTomohiro Nakama et al. — 2019
- 78journalGravity Coupling from Micro-Black HolesFabio Scardigli — 2000
- 79journalMaximum Black Hole Mass Across Cosmic TimeJorick S. Vink et al. — 2021
- 80journalA Global Spectral Study of Black Hole X-Ray BinariesR. J. H. Dunn et al. — 2010
- 81journalPopulation Synthesis of Black Hole X-Ray BinariesYong Shao et al. — 2020
- 82journalIntermediate-Mass Black HolesM. Coleman Miller et al. — 2004
- 83journalProduction of Intermediate-Mass Black Holes in Globular ClustersM. Coleman Miller et al. — 2002
- 84journalIntermediate Mass Black Hole Formation in Compact Young Massive Star ClustersFrancesco Paolo Rizzuto et al. — 2021
- 85journalIntermediate-Mass Black Hole Growth and Feedback in Dwarf Galaxies at High RedshiftsParamita Barai et al. — 2019
- 86journalProperties of "Lite" Intermediate-Mass Black Hole Candidates in LIGO-Virgo's Third Observing RunKrystal Ruiz-Rocha et al. — 2025
- 87bookEncyclopedia of AstrobiologyMar Mezcua — 2021
- 88journalIs There an Upper Limit to Black Hole Masses?Priyamvada Natarajan et al. — 2009
- 89journalUltramassive Black Holes in the Most Massive Galaxies: M BH–σ Versus M BH–R bBililign T. Dullo et al. — 2021
- 90journalHow big can a black hole grow?Andrew King — February 2016
- 91journalLimit to how big black holes can grow is astonishingDaniel Clery — 21 December 2015
- 92journalObservational Constraints on Black Hole SpinChristopher S. Reynolds — 2021
- 93journalSources of Relativistic Jets in the GalaxyI. F. Mirabel et al. — 1999
- 94webRelativistic Jets
- 95journalMegaparsec Relativistic Jets Launched from an Accreting Supermassive Black Hole in an Extreme Spiral GalaxyJoydeep Bagchi et al. — 2014
- 96journalA Universal Scaling for the Energetics of Relativistic Jets from Black Hole SystemsR. S. Nemmen et al. — 2012
- 97journalRelativistic Jets from Active Galactic NucleiRoger Blandford et al. — 2019
- 98journalThe Powers of Relativistic Jets Depend on the Spin of Accreting Supermassive Black HolesYongyun 永云 Chen 陈 et al. — 2021
- 99journalThe Role of Relativistic Jets in the Heaviest and Most Active Supermassive Black Holes at High RedshiftG. Ghisellini et al. — 2013
- 100journalThe Power of Relativistic Jets Is Larger Than the Luminosity of Their Accretion DisksG. Ghisellini et al. — 2014
- 101journalMicroquasars in our GalaxyI. F. Mirabel et al. — 1998
- 102journalGravitational Collapse: The Role of General RelativityR. Penrose — 1969
- 103bookGeneral Relativity, Cosmology and AstrophysicsRamesh Narayan et al. — 2014
- 104webBlack Hole Anatomy2 August 2022
- 105journalLensing and shadow of a black hole surrounded by a heavy accretion diskPedro V.P. Cunha et al. — 2020
- 106bookAstrophysics2024
- 107bookHigh-Energy Astrophysics2022
- 108bookAstrophysics of Black HolesJean-Pierre Lasota — 2016
- 109journalSuper-Eddington Accretion Discs Around Kerr Black HolesA. M. Beloborodov — 1998
- 110journalDisk-Accretion Onto a Black Hole. Time-Averaged Structure of Accretion DiskDon N. Page et al. — 1974
- 111journalAccretion into Black Hole, And Formation of Magnetically Arrested Accretion DisksGennady Bisnovatyi-Kogan — 2019
- 112journalModel Radiation Spectrum for an Accretion Disk Near a Rotating Black HoleA. F. Zakharov et al. — 2002
- 113journalExploring the Role of Accretion Disk Geometry in Shaping Black Hole ShadowsZi-Liang Wang — 2025
- 114journalMagnetised Polish Doughnuts RevisitedSergio Gimeno-Soler et al. — 2017
- 115bookGrowing Black Holes: Accretion in a Cosmological ContextM.A. Abramowicz — 2005
- 116journalThe Characteristic Blue Spectra of Accretion Disks in Quasars as Uncovered in the InfraredMakoto Kishimoto et al. — 2008
- 117journalColor Photographs of an Accretion Disk Around a Black HoleJun Fukue et al. — 1988
- 118journalGravitational Lensing by Spinning Black Holes in Astrophysics, And in the Movie InterstellarOliver James et al. — 2015
- 119journalUnveiling the Unconventional Optical Signatures of Regular Black Holes Within Accretion DiskSen Guo et al. — 2023
- 120journalMeasuring the Spins of Accreting Black HolesJeffrey E. McClintock et al. — 2011
- 121bookGravitationCharles Misner et al. — W. H. Freeman and Company — 1973
- 122journalInnermost Stable Circular Orbits of Spinning Test Particles in Schwarzschild and Kerr Space-TimesPaul I. Jefremov et al. — 2015
- 123journalInnermost Stable Circular Orbit of Spinning Particle in Charged Spinning Black Hole BackgroundYu-Peng Zhang et al. — 2018
- 124journalStrong-field gravitational lensing by a Kerr black holeS.E. Vázquez et al. — 2004
- 125journalSchwarzschild Black Holes Have the Largest SizeH. Lü et al. — 2020
- 126journalCurvatures, Photon Spheres, And Black Hole ShadowsChen-Kai Qiao — 2022
- 127journalUsing the Uncharged Kerr Black Hole as a Gravitational MirrorClaes R. Cramer — 1997
- 128journalRotating Black Holes: Locally Nonrotating Frames, Energy Extraction, And Scalar Synchrotron RadiationJames M. Bardeen et al. — 1 December 1972
- 129journalSpherical Photon Orbits Around a Kerr Black HoleEdward Teo — 2003
- 130journalDynamical Photon Spheres in Charged Black Holes and Naked SingularitiesYaghoub Heydarzade et al. — 2024
- 131journalRadii of Spherical Photon Orbits Around Kerr-Newman Black HolesYing-Xuan Chen et al. — 2023
- 132journalCalculating black hole shadows: Review of analytical studiesVolker Perlick et al. — February 2022
- 133journalShadows of Colliding Black HolesDaisuke Nitta et al. — September 2011
- 134bookSpacetime and GeometrySean M. Carroll — 2019
- 135journalContinuum Emission from Within the Plunging Region of Black Hole DiscsAndrew Mummery et al. — June 2024
- 136journalGlobal Three-Dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Black Hole Accretion Disks: X-Ray Flares in the Plunging RegionMami Machida et al. — 2003
- 137webStudy Proves Black Holes Have a 'Plunging Region,' Just as Einstein PredictedJacopo Prisco — 17 May 2024
- 138bookGeneral RelativityRobert M. Wald — University of Chicago Press — 1984
- 139bookThe New PhysicsPaul Davies — Cambridge University Press — 1992
- 140bookA Student's Guide to the Mathematics of AstronomyDaniel Fleisch et al. — Cambridge University Press — 2013
- 141bookThe Kerr Spacetime: Rotating Black Holes in General RelativityMatt Visser — Cambridge University Press — 2009
- 142journalHorizon geometry for Kerr black holes with synchronized hairJorge F. M. Delgado et al. — 2018
- 143arxivThe Kerr spacetime: A brief introductionMatt Visser — 2007
- 144webInside a Black Hole
- 145webWhat Happens to You If You Fall into a Black HoleJohn Baez
- 146magazineBlack Holes and the Information ParadoxLeonard Susskind — 1997-04-01
- 147webJourney into a Schwarzschild black holeHamilton, A.
- 148journalInternal Structure of Black HolesEric Poisson et al. — 1990
- 149journalGeometrodynamics: The Nonlinear Dynamics of Curved SpacetimeM. A. Scheel et al. — 2014
- 150journalOutgoing Gravitational Shock Wave at the Inner Horizon: The Late-Time Limit of Black Hole InteriorsDonald Marolf et al. — 2012
- 151journalInner Structure of a Charged Black Hole: An Exact Mass-Inflation SolutionAmos Ori — 1991
- 152journalStructure of the Black Hole's Cauchy-Horizon SingularityLior M. Burko — 1997
- 153journalCauchy-Horizon Singularity Inside Perturbed Kerr Black HolesLior M. Burko et al. — 2016
- 154journalMass Inflation Followed by Belinskii-Khalatnikov-Lifshitz Collapse Inside Accreting, Rotating Black HolesAndrew J. S. Hamilton — 2017
- 155journalClassical Mass Inflation Versus Semiclassical Inner Horizon InflationCarlos Barceló et al. — 2022
- 156journalThe Singularities of Gravitational Collapse and CosmologyS. W. Hawking et al. — 1970
- 157newsSizes of Black Holes? How Big Is a Black Hole?22 July 2014
- 158webOf Singularities And BreadmakingDavid Garfinkle — 2007
- 159journalNo Way Back: Maximizing Survival Time Below the Schwarzschild Event HorizonGeraint F. Lewis et al. — 2007
- 160journalHow to Delay Death and Look Further into the Future if You Fall into a Black HoleAlexei Toporensky et al. — 2023
- 161bookCosmic CatastrophesJ. Craig Wheeler — Cambridge University Press — 2007
- 162bookPerspectives in Theoretical PhysicsV.A. Belinskii et al. — 1992
- 163bookThe Science of InterstellarKip Thorne — W. W. Norton & Company — 7 November 2014
- 164journalRegular Black Holes: A Short Topic ReviewChen Lan et al. — 2023
- 165journalNonsingular Black Holes in ƒ (R) TheoriesGonzalo Olmo et al. — 2015
- 166journalThe Fuzzball Proposal for Black Holes: An Elementary ReviewSamir D. Mathur — 2005
- 167journalUnitarity and Fuzzball Complementarity: "Alice Fuzzes but May Not Even Know It!"Steven G. Avery et al. — 2013
- 168journalBlack-Hole Models in Loop Quantum GravityMartin Bojowald — 2020
- 169journalThe evolution and explosion of massive starsS. E. Woosley et al. — 2002
- 170journalBlack-Hole Remnants from Black-Hole–Neutron-Star MergersFrancesco Zappa et al. — 2019
- 171journalThe Assembly of the First Massive Black HolesKohei Inayoshi et al. — 2020
- 172journalTheory of Core-Collapse SupernovaeH. Janka et al. — 2007
- 173journalDegeneracy Pressure in Stars and Stellar CorpsesJeffrey Bennett — 2025
- 174bookSpacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General RelativitySean M. Carroll — Addison-Wesley — 2003
- 175journal"Golden Oldie": Gravitational Collapse: The Role of General RelativityR. Penrose — 2002
- 176journalAn 800-million-solar-mass black hole in a significantly neutral Universe at a redshift of 7.5Eduardo Bañados et al. — 2018
- 177journalUncertain Times: The Redshift–Time Relation from Cosmology and StarsMichael Boylan-Kolchin et al. — 2021
- 178journalThe First Stars: Formation, Properties, and ImpactRalf S. Klessen et al. — 2023
- 179journalTheoretical Black Hole Mass DistributionsChris L. Fryer et al. — 2001
- 180webPrimordial Black HolesAshley Balzer — 2024-05-07
- 181journalPrimordial black holes—perspectives in gravitational wave astronomyMisao Sasaki et al. — 2018
- 182webIs the Big Bang a Black Hole?Philip Gibbs — John Baez
- 183webWhy Didn't the Infant Universe Collapse into a Black Hole?Paul Sutter — 2023-06-21
- 185journalBlack holes and the LHC: A reviewSeong Chan Park — July 2012
- 186journalReview of the safety of LHC collisionsJohn Ellis et al. — 2008
- 187journalThe End of the World at the Large Hadron Collider?M. E. Peskin — 2008
- 188conferenceMassive Black Holes: Formation and EvolutionM. J. Rees et al. — 2007
- 189journalFormation of Massive Black Holes Through Runaway Collisions in Dense Young Star ClustersS. F. P. Zwart et al. — 2004
- 190journalBinary Mergers and Growth of Black Holes in Dense Star ClustersR. M. O'Leary et al. — 2006
- 191journalInteractions Between Multiple Supermassive Black Holes in Galactic Nuclei: A Solution to the Final Parsec ProblemTaeho Ryu et al. — 2018
- 192journalThe Final-Parsec Problem in Nonspherical Galaxies RevisitedEugene Vasiliev et al. — 2014
- 193bookCompact Stellar X-Ray SourcesJ. E. McClintock et al. — 2006
- 194journalNumerical Relativity Simulations of Black Hole and Relativistic Jet FormationTakami Kuroda et al. — 2024
- 195journalJets in Radio Galaxies and Quasars: An Observational PerspectiveD. J. Saikia — 2022
- 196journalAccretion Disks, Quasars and Cosmology: Meandering Towards UnderstandingBożena Czerny et al. — 2023
- 197journalXMM-Newton Archival Study of the Ultraluminous X-Ray Population in Nearby GalaxiesL. M. Winter et al. — 2006
- 198journalBreaking the Limit: Super-Eddington Accretion Onto Black Holes and Neutron StarsM. Brightman et al. — 2019
- 199journalSuper-Eddington Accretion and Feedback from the First Massive Seed Black HolesJohn A. Regan et al. — 2019
- 200journalThe Tidal Disruption of a Star by a Massive Black HoleCharles R. Evans et al. — 1989
- 201journalTidal Disruption of Stars by Supermassive Black Holes: Status of ObservationsS. Komossa — 2015
- 202journalThe Role of Black Holes in Galaxy Formation and EvolutionA. Cattaneo et al. — 2009
- 203journalThermodynamic Analysis of Kerr-Newman Black HolesO. Ruiz et al. — 2019
- 204newsAsk Ethan: Do Black Holes Grow Faster Than They Evaporate?Ethan Siegel — 2017
- 205journalBlack Hole Hawking Radiation May Never Be Observed!C. Sivaram — 2001
- 206webEvaporating Black Holes?Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics — 2010
- 207journalPrimordial black hole constraints with Hawking radiation—A reviewJérémy Auffinger — July 2023
- 208journalThe Thermodynamics of Black HolesRobert M. Wald — 2001
- 209journalBlack Hole ThermodynamicsS. Carlip — 2014
- 210journalIntroduction to Black Hole ThermodynamicsEdward Witten — 2025
- 211journalCounting black holes: The cosmic stellar remnant population and implications for LIGOOliver D. Elbert et al. — 2018
- 212journalNo observational proof of the black-hole event-horizonM. A. Abramowicz et al. — 2002
- 213journalFirst Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Testing the Black Hole MetricEvent Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. — May 2022
- 214journalFirst M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Array and InstrumentationKazunori Akiyama et al. — 2019
- 215webFAQ
- 216journalMonitoring Stellar Orbits Around the Massive Black Hole in the Galactic CenterS. Gillessen et al. — 2009
- 217journalHigh Proper-Motion Stars in the Vicinity of Sagittarius A*: Evidence for a Supermassive Black Hole at the Center of Our GalaxyA. M. Ghez et al. — 1998
- 218journalThe Event Horizon of Sagittarius A*Avery Broderick et al. — August 2009
- 219journalThe Proper Motion of Sagittarius A*. III. The Case for a Supermassive Black HoleM. J. Reid et al. — 2020
- 221journalX-Ray BinariesH. Schatz et al. — 2006
- 222journalMasses and Luminosities of X-Ray BinariesAndreas Quirrenbach et al. — National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- 223journalAstrophysical evidence for the existence of black holesA. Celotti et al. — 1999
- 224journalA Weight Limit Emerges for Neutron StarsAdrian Cho — 2018
- 225journalBlackCAT: A catalogue of stellar-mass black holes in X-ray transientsJ. M. Corral-Santana et al. — 2016
- 226journalFormation of the First Two Black Hole–Neutron Star Mergers (GW200115 and GW200105) from Isolated Binary EvolutionFloor S. Broekgaarden et al. — 2021
- 227journalModelling the Formation of the First Two Neutron Star–Black Hole Mergers, GW200105 and GW200115: Metallicity, Chirp Masses, And Merger Remnant SpinsDebatri Chattopadhyay et al. — 2022
- 228journalDynamics of Stellar Black Holes in Young Star Clusters with Different Metallicities – II. Black Hole-Black Hole BinariesB. M. Ziosi et al. — 2014
- 230journalBlack Holes, Galaxy Formation, And the MBH-σ RelationA. King — 2003
- 231journalA Fundamental Relation Between Supermassive Black Holes and Their Host GalaxiesL. Ferrarese et al. — 2000
- 232journalSupermassive Black Holes in Galactic Nuclei: Past, Present and Future ResearchLaura Ferrarese et al. — 2005
- 233journalMeasuring the Masses of Supermassive Black HolesBradley M. Peterson — 2014
- 234webRELEASE 15-001—NASA's Chandra Detects Record-Breaking Outburst from Milky Way's Black HoleFelicia Chou et al. — 5 January 2015
- 235bookActive Galactic NucleiJ. H. Krolik — Princeton University Press — 1999
- 236bookGalaxies in the Universe: An IntroductionL. S. Sparke et al. — Cambridge University Press — 2000
- 237journalLocal Supermassive Black Holes, Relics of Active Galactic Nuclei and the X-Ray BackgroundA. Marconi et al. — 2004
- 238journalInward Bound—The Search For Supermassive Black Holes In Galactic NucleiJ. Kormendy et al. — 1995
- 239journalThe Supermassive Black Hole at the Galactic CenterFulvio Melia et al. — 2001
- 240journalGravitational Lensing in AstronomyJoachim Wambsganss — 1998
- 241bookGravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and MicroJ. Wambsganss — 2006
- 242journalHunting Gravitational Wave Black Holes with MicrolensingNatasha S. Abrams et al. — December 1, 2020
- 243journalOn Finding Black Holes in Photometric Microlensing SurveysZofia Kaczmarek et al. — March 7, 2025
- 244webDoes God Play Dice?S. W. Hawking
- 245webThe Black Hole Information Loss ProblemWarren G. Anderson — 1996
- 246conferenceBlack Holes and Information: A Crisis in Quantum PhysicsJ. Preskill — 21 October 1994
- 247journalLessons from the information paradoxSuvrat Raju — 2022
- 248journalThe origins of massive black holesMarta Volonteri et al. — September 20, 2021
- 249journalDistribution of the Very First Population III Stars and Their Relation to Bright z ≈ 6 QuasarsM. Trenti et al. — 2007
- 250journalThe Formation of Supermassive Black Holes from Population III.1 Seeds. II. Evolution to the Local UniverseJasbir Singh et al. — 2023
- 251journalSupermassive Black Holes in the Early UniverseAaron Smith et al. — 2019
- 252journalRadiative Feedback from High-Mass X-Ray Binaries on the Formation of the First Galaxies and Early ReionizationMyoungwon Jeon et al. — 2014
- 253journalFormation of the Black Holes in the Highest Redshift QuasarsJaiyul Yoo Jordi Miralda-Escudé et al. — 2004
- 254journalWhat Do Observations Tell Us About the Highest-Redshift Supermassive Black Holes?Benny Trakhtenbrot — 2019
- 255journalThe Route to Massive Black Hole Formation via Merger-Driven Direct Collapse: A ReviewLucio Mayer et al. — 2019
- 256journalThe First Billion Years Project: Birthplaces of Direct Collapse Black HolesBhaskar Agarwal et al. — 2014
- 257journalSupermassive Primordial Black Holes: A View from Clustering of Quasars atTakumi Shinohara et al. — 2023
- 258bookFormation of the First Black HolesLucio Mayer — 2019
- 259journalDynamical Constraints on Alternatives to Supermassive Black Holes in Galactic NucleiEyal Maoz — 1998
- 260journalConstraints on Alternatives to Supermassive Black HolesM. Coleman Miller — 2006
- 261journalCan Stellar Mass Black Holes Be Quark Stars?Z. Kovacs et al. — 2009
- 262journalRestricting Quark Matter Models by Gravitational Wave ObservationHajime Sotani et al. — 2004
- 263webBetween Neutron Stars and Black HolesCharles Bonkowsky — 2025-01-05
- 264journalElectroweak Stars: How Nature May Capitalize on the Standard Model's Ultimate FuelDe-Chang Dai et al. — 2010
- 265journalPreon Stars: A New Class of Cosmic Compact ObjectsJ. Hansson et al. — 2005
- 266journalNomen Non Est Omen: Why It Is Too Soon to Identify Ultra-Compact Objects as Black HolesSebastian Murk — 2023
- 267journalDark Energy Star in Gravity's RainbowA. Bagheri Tudeshki et al. — 2022
- 268journalBlack Holes 'Do Not Exist'Philip Ball — 31 March 2005
- 269journalFate of Gravitational Collapse in Semiclassical GravityCarlos Barceló et al. — 2008
- 270journalNested Solutions of Gravitational Condensate StarsDaniel Jampolski et al. — 2024
- 271webEmbark on a visual voyage of art inspired by black holesJennifer Ouellette — December 26, 2025
- 272bookConjuring the void: the art of black holesLynn Gamwell et al. — The MIT Press — 2025
- 273webHow 'High Life' Created a Black Hole That Looks Just Like the Historic PhotoYasmin Tayag — 2019-04-20
- 274magazineUnderstanding Black Holes Through Science FictionDavid Kyle Johnson — 2019-06-19
- 275webScience Fiction Stories with Good Astronomy & Physics: A Topical IndexAndrew Fraknoi — January 2024
- 276bookScience Fiction Literature Through History: An EncyclopediaGary Westfahl — ABC-CLIO — 2021
- 277bookScience Fact and Science Fiction: An EncyclopediaBrian Stableford — Taylor & Francis — 2006