Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Black hole

~8 min read · Ch. 1 of 8
8 sections
  • A black hole is so compact that its gravity stops everything, including light, from escaping. That boundary of no escape has a name: the event horizon. Cross it, and you are trapped inside, yet you feel no local change at the moment of crossing. Einstein's theory of general relativity, which treats gravitation as the curvature of spacetime, predicts that any sufficiently compact mass will form one. For a long time these objects were dismissed as a mathematical curiosity. So how did a strange solution to a set of equations become an object that astronomers photograph and weigh? Why did serious physicists, including Einstein himself, spend decades trying to prove black holes could not exist? And what happens at the central singularity, where the curvature of spacetime becomes infinite?

  • In the late 18th century, English astronomer and clergyman John Michell imagined a body so massive that even light could not escape it. In a short part of a letter published in 1784, he calculated that a star of the sun's density but 500 times its radius would have an escape velocity exceeding the speed of light. Michell suggested such non-radiating bodies might be detected through their gravitational pull on nearby visible objects.

    Pierre-Simon Laplace reached a similar idea independently. In 1796, in his book Exposition du Systeme du Monde, the French scientist suggested a star could be invisible if it were large enough. When Franz Xaver von Zach asked for a mathematical analysis, Laplace provided one and published it in von Zach's journal. Both men pictured very large stars, not the extremely dense objects we now describe.

    The first solution of general relativity that would characterise a black hole arrived in 1916. Only by the late 1950s did physicists begin to read it as a region of space from which nothing can escape. The shift from curiosity to consensus came in the 1960s, when theoretical work showed black holes were a generic prediction of general relativity. The first widely accepted black hole, Cygnus X-1, was identified by several researchers independently in 1971.

  • Karl Schwarzschild solved Einstein's field equations only a few months after they were published, assuming spherical symmetry with no spin. Johannes Droste, a student of Hendrik Lorentz, independently found the same solution a few months later. At a certain radius the solution became singular, with terms in the equations turning infinite. That radius later became the Schwarzschild radius, and at the time no one understood what it meant.

    Many early 20th-century physicists doubted black holes could be real. In a 1926 popular science book, Arthur Eddington criticised the idea of a star compressed to its Schwarzschild radius as a flaw in a poorly understood theory. In 1939, Einstein used general relativity to argue that black holes were impossible, leaning on pressure or centrifugal force balancing gravity. He missed the possibility that implosion would drive a system below the critical value.

    Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar opened a different door. In 1931 he studied electron-degenerate matter and found it stable only below a limiting mass. When he announced his results, Eddington called the consequence absurd, insisting some unknown mechanism would halt the collapse. Lev Landau later took a similar view. The next breakthrough would not come from balancing forces but from following the collapse all the way down.

  • Robert Oppenheimer and his student Hartland Snyder formulated the modern concept of black holes in 1939. Working in general relativity, J. Robert Oppenheimer and George Volkoff had already predicted that neutron stars below a certain mass, the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff limit, would be stable under neutron degeneracy pressure. Above that limit, either their model failed or gravitational contraction would not stop.

    In the Oppenheimer-Snyder model, Oppenheimer and Snyder solved Einstein's equations for an idealised imploding star and described the view from far outside. The star collapses inward as expected. As its density rises, gravitational time dilation grows, and from afar the collapse seems to slow until the star reaches its Schwarzschild radius and appears frozen in time.

    David Finkelstein clarified the picture in 1958, identifying the Schwarzschild surface as an event horizon. He called it "a perfect unidirectional membrane: causal influences can cross it in only one direction." Events inside cannot affect events outside. Finkelstein built a new reference frame to include the view of infalling observers, linking events at the surface of an imploding star to events far away. By 1962 the two viewpoints were reconciled, persuading many sceptics that implosion into a black hole made physical sense.

  • The era from the mid-1960s to the mid-1970s was called the golden age of black hole research, when general relativity and black holes became mainstream subjects. In 1963, Roy Kerr found the exact solution for a rotating black hole. Two years later, Ezra Newman found the solution for a black hole both rotating and electrically charged.

    Werner Israel showed in 1967 that any non-spinning, uncharged collapsing star yields a spherically symmetric black hole, with any asymmetry somehow vanishing. In 1972, Richard H. Price found that the asymmetry was converted into gravitational waves. Wheeler captured this stripping away of detail with the phrase "a black hole has no hair." The full no-hair theorem took another 15 years and many physicists, and it states that a stationary black hole is described by just three parameters of the Kerr-Newman metric: mass, angular momentum, and electric charge.

    Roger Penrose proved in 1965 that general relativity predicts singularities appear in all black holes, though this may change once quantum mechanics is included. Vladimir Belinski, Isaak Khalatnikov, and Evgeny Lifshitz had tried to show singularities would not appear in generic, asymmetric cases, and they later reversed their positions. Observation kept pace with theory. In 1967, Antony Hewish and Jocelyn Bell Burnell discovered pulsars, shown by 1969 to be rapidly rotating neutron stars, proving that compact objects from gravitational collapse were physically real.

  • In 1971, X-ray telescope observations by Riccardo Giacconi's team showed Cygnus X-1 emitting X-rays in a rapid, sporadic way consistent with a compact source. Optical spectroscopy and modelling matched a binary system: a massive ordinary star feeding gas into an invisible compact companion that generated the X-rays. By 1974 the object was widely considered a black hole, though 100% confidence for Cygnus X-1 may not be possible. In 2011, the masses were estimated at 14.1 for the black hole and 19.2 for its stellar companion.

    Work by James Bardeen, Carter, and Hawking in the early 1970s produced the laws of black hole mechanics, which mirror the laws of thermodynamics. Jacob Bekenstein strengthened the analogy, linking mass, surface area, and surface gravity to energy, entropy, and temperature. The link held only as an analogy until quantum mechanics entered the story.

    Hawking completed it in 1974, showing that quantum field theory implies black holes radiate like a black body, with a temperature proportional to surface gravity. This effect is now called Hawking radiation, and its rate of emission is inversely proportional to mass. The catch is stark: even stellar black holes gain mass from the cosmic microwave background faster than they lose it this way. A stellar black hole's Hawking temperature of 62 nanokelvins sits far below the 2.7 K of the cosmic background, so such holes grow rather than shrink.

  • Sagittarius A*, the radio source at the core of the Milky Way, contains a supermassive black hole of about 4.3 million solar masses. Astronomers reached that conclusion by tracking the motions of over 100 stars orbiting an invisible object at that position. One star, called S2, completed a full orbit. Fitting these motions to Keplerian orbits pinned the hidden mass into a radius of less than 0.002 light-years, with no other plausible way to confine so much unseen mass in so small a space.

    Supermassive black holes earned recognition more slowly than stellar ones. When the Hubble Space Telescope launched in the 1990s, optical studies of galaxy Messier 87 revealed a large concentration of mass. In 1995, microwave spectra from the Very Long Baseline Array tracked masers orbiting the centre of NGC 4258, and the orbits ruled out dense stellar clusters, leaving supermassive black holes as the only explanation. In 1999, David Merritt proposed the M-sigma relation, tying a galaxy bulge's velocity dispersion to the mass of its central black hole.

    Gravitational waves opened a direct channel. In late 2015, the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration made the first direct detection, GW150914, the first observation of a black hole merger. The two holes were roughly 30 and 35 solar masses, about 1.4 billion light-years away. In 2017, Rainer Weiss, Kip Thorne, and Barry Barish received the Nobel Prize in Physics. On the 10th of April 2019, the Event Horizon Telescope published the first direct image of a black hole, the supermassive object at the centre of Messier 87.

  • For a non-rotating black hole, the singularity is a single point; for a rotating one it smears into a ring lying in the plane of rotation. In both cases the singular region has zero volume, yet holds all of the black hole's mass, giving it effectively infinite density. An observer falling into a Schwarzschild black hole cannot avoid being carried inward once past the event horizon.

    Tidal forces tear an infalling observer apart in a process sometimes called spaghettification or the noodle effect, stretching and compressing them as they approach the centre. Rotating or charged black holes add an inner horizon, the Cauchy horizon, split into ingoing and outgoing sections. At the ingoing section, infalling matter and radiation build up and drive the spacetime curvature toward infinity, a phenomenon called mass inflation.

    Some physicists argue that in realistic black holes, accretion and Hawking radiation would stop mass inflation from occurring. Alternative theories soften the picture further. The fuzzball model, based on string theory, holds that black holes are made of quantum microstates and need not have a singularity or an event horizon at all. Loop quantum gravity proposes that the curvature and density at the centre are large but not infinite, which keeps the question of what truly lies inside an open one, bound up with the information loss paradox.

Common questions

What is a black hole?

A black hole is an astronomical body so compact that its gravity prevents anything, including light, from escaping. Its boundary of no escape is called the event horizon, and general relativity predicts a central singularity inside where the curvature of spacetime is infinite.

Who first proposed the idea of a black hole?

English astronomer and clergyman John Michell first proposed the idea of a body so massive that light could not escape, in a letter published in 1784. French scientist Pierre-Simon Laplace suggested the same idea independently in his 1796 book Exposition du Systeme du Monde.

What was the first widely accepted black hole?

Cygnus X-1 was the first widely accepted black hole, identified by several researchers independently in 1971 after X-ray observations by Riccardo Giacconi's team. By 1974 it was widely considered a black hole, and in 2011 its mass was estimated at 14.1 solar masses.

How massive is the black hole at the center of the Milky Way?

Sagittarius A*, the radio source at the core of the Milky Way, contains a supermassive black hole of about 4.3 million solar masses. Astronomers established this by tracking the motions of over 100 stars orbiting the invisible object, including one star called S2 that completed a full orbit.

What is Hawking radiation from a black hole?

Hawking radiation is thermal emission that quantum field theory predicts event horizons produce, with the rate inversely proportional to the black hole's mass. Hawking showed this in 1974, but stellar black holes gain mass from the cosmic microwave background faster than they lose it through Hawking radiation.

How are black holes detected and imaged?

Black holes are inferred through their interaction with matter and electromagnetic radiation, through gravitational waves from mergers, and through the motions of orbiting stars. The first direct detection of gravitational waves, GW150914, came in late 2015, and the Event Horizon Telescope published the first direct image of a black hole on the 10th of April 2019.

What happens inside a black hole at the singularity?

Every black hole has a singularity where spacetime curvature becomes infinite and all of its mass is concentrated in zero volume. An infalling observer is torn apart by growing tidal forces in a process called spaghettification, though alternative theories like the fuzzball model and loop quantum gravity propose black holes without true singularities.

All sources

277 references cited across the entry

  1. 1journalFirst M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. IV. Imaging the Central Supermassive Black HoleThe Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. — 10 April 2019
  2. 3journalSeeing relativity—I. Ray tracing in a Schwarzschild metric to explore the maximal analytic extension of the metric and making a proper rendering of the starsAlain Riazuelo — 2019
  3. 4newsBlack Hole HuntersDennis Overbye — June 8, 2015
  4. 5journalMichell, Laplace and the Origin of the Black Hole ConceptColin Montgomery et al. — 2009
  5. 6journalOn the Means of Discovering the Distance, Magnitude, &C. Of the Fixed Stars, In Consequence of the Diminution of the Velocity of Their Light, In Case Such a Diminution Should Be Found to Take Place in Any of Them, And Such Other Data Should Be Procured from Observations, As Would Be Farther Necessary for That PurposeJ. Michell — 1784
  6. 7bookGravitation and CosmologySteven Weinberg — John Wiley & Sons — 1972
  7. 8journalDie Feldgleichungen der GravitationAlbert Einstein — 1915
  8. 9journalArch and Scaffold: How Einstein Found His Field EquationsMichel Janssen et al. — 2015
  9. 10bookAstronomy 2eAndrew Fraknoi et al. — OpenStax — 2022
  10. 13bookStudies in the History of General RelativityA. J. Kox — Birkhäuser — 1992
  11. 14webIntroduction to the Theory of Black HolesG. 't Hooft — Institute for Theoretical Physics / Spinoza Institute — 2009
  12. 15bookThe Internal Constitution of the StarsArthur Eddington — Cambridge University Press — 1926
  13. 16bookBlack Holes and Time Warps: Einstein's Outrageous LegacyKip S. Thorne et al. — W. W. Norton & Company — 1994
  14. 17magazineThe Reluctant Father of Black HolesJeremy Bernstein — 2007
  15. 18journalOn a Stationary System With Spherical Symmetry Consisting of Many Gravitating MassesAlbert Einstein — 10 May 1939
  16. 19journalResource Letter BH-1: Black HolesS. Detweiler — 1981
  17. 20journalOn Massive Neutron CoresJ. R. Oppenheimer et al. — 1939
  18. 21journalOn Continued Gravitational ContractionJ.R. Oppenheimer et al. — 1939
  19. 22journalPast-Future Asymmetry of the Gravitational Field of a Point ParticleD. Finkelstein — 1958
  20. 23webFirst Ever Image of a Black Hole: A CNRS Researcher Had Simulated It as Early as 1979French National Centre for Scientific Research — 10 April 2019
  21. 25bookThe Kerr SpacetimeR. P. Kerr — Cambridge University Press — 2009
  22. 26journalMetric of a Rotating, Charged MassNewman ET, Couch E, Chinnapared K, Exton A, Prakash A, Torrence R — 1965
  23. 27journalChandrasekhar, Black Holes, And SingularitiesRoger Penrose — 1996
  24. 28journalGravitational Collapse and Space-Time SingularitiesR. Penrose — 1965
  25. 29journalThe Classical Singularity Theorems and Their Quantum LoopholesL. H. Ford — 2003
  26. 31journalThe Mass of the Black Hole in Cygnus X-1Jerome A. Orosz et al. — 2011
  27. 32bookBlack hole thermodynamicsS. Carlip — 2017
  28. 33webThe First Black HoleBruce Rolston — University of Toronto — 10 November 1997
  29. 35conferenceBlack holes and galaxy evolutionDavid Merritt — Astronomical Society of the Pacific — 1999
  30. 36journalThe Slope of the Black Hole Mass Versus Velocity Dispersion CorrelationScott Tremaine et al. — 2002
  31. 37journalA Fundamental Relation Between Supermassive Black Holes and Their Host GalaxiesLaura Ferrarese et al. — 2000
  32. 38journalThe Relationship Between Black Hole Mass and Velocity Dispersion in Seyfert 1 GalaxiesCharles H. Nelson et al. — 2004
  33. 39journalOn the Nature of the Dark Mass in the Centre of the Milky WayR. Genzel et al. — 1997
  34. 40journalObservation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole MergerB. P. Abbott et al. — 2016
  35. 41journalImproved Analysis of GW150914 Using a Fully Spin-Precessing Waveform ModelB. P. Abbott et al. — 2016
  36. 42webThe Nobel Prize in Physics 2017Nobel Foundation
  37. 44journalFirst M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black HoleThe Event Horizon Telescope — 2019
  38. 45web2020 Nobel Prize in PhysicsLeah Poffenberger
  39. 50bookBlack Hole: How an Idea Abandoned by Newtonians, Hated by Einstein, And Gambled On by Hawking Became LovedMarcia Bartusiak — Yale University Press — 2015
  40. 51bookIntroduction to Black Hole PhysicsValeri P. Frolov et al. — Oxford University Press — 1 December 2011
  41. 52journalBlack-hole boundariesIvan Booth — 2005
  42. 53journalThe many definitions of a black holeErik Curiel — 2019
  43. 54bookThe black hole war: my battle with Stephen Hawking to make the world safe for quantum mechanicsLeonard Susskind — Little, Brown — 2008
  44. 55journalThe river model of black holesAndrew J. S. Hamilton et al. — 2008
  45. 57journalAsymptotically flat black holes with scalar hair: A reviewCarlos A. R. Herdeiro et al. — 2015
  46. 58journalStationary Black Holes: Uniqueness and BeyondChruściel PT, Costa JL, Heusler M — 2012
  47. 59journalNo-hair and almost-no-hair results for static axisymmetric black holes and ultracompact objects in astrophysical environmentsCarlos Barceló et al. — March 31, 2025
  48. 60bookBlack Holes, White Dwarfs, And Neutron Stars: The Physics of Compact ObjectsS. L. Shapiro et al. — John Wiley and Sons — 1983
  49. 61bookPerspectives on AstronomyMichael A. Seeds et al. — Cengage Learning — 2007
  50. 62bookBlack Holes, Gravitational Radiation and the UniverseR. M. Wald — Springer — 1997
  51. 63journalNumerical Approaches to Spacetime SingularitiesB. K. Berger — 2002
  52. 64magazineNaked SingularitiesPankaj S. Joshi — 1 February 2009
  53. 65webBlack Hole Basics13 March 2024
  54. 66journalBlack Hole Spin and Accretion Disk Magnetic Field Strength Estimates for More Than 750 Active Galactic Nuclei and Multiple Galactic Black HolesRuth A. Daly — 2019
  55. 67journalObserving black holes spinChristopher S. Reynolds — 2019
  56. 68bookEinstein gravity in a nutshellA. Zee — Princeton University Press — 2013
  57. 69journalMeasurement of the Spin of the M87 Black Hole from Its Observed Twisted LightFabrizio Tamburini et al. — 2020
  58. 70journalOn Neutralization of Charged Black HolesYi Gong et al. — 2019
  59. 71journalOn the Charge of the Galactic Centre Black HoleMichal Zajaček et al. — 2018
  60. 72journalDirect Measurements of Black Hole Charge with Future Astrometrical MissionsA. F. Zakharov et al. — 2005
  61. 73journalDistinguishable Feature of Electric and Magnetic Charged Black HoleBobur Turimov et al. — 2022
  62. 74journalLimiting Masses and Radii of Neutron Stars and Their ImplicationsChristian Drischler et al. — 2021
  63. 75journalThe Mass Distribution of Stellar-Mass Black HolesWill M. Farr et al. — 2011
  64. 76journalConstraints on Primordial Black HolesBernard Carr et al. — 2021
  65. 77journalMicro Black Holes Formed in the Early Universe and Their Cosmological ImplicationsTomohiro Nakama et al. — 2019
  66. 78journalGravity Coupling from Micro-Black HolesFabio Scardigli — 2000
  67. 79journalMaximum Black Hole Mass Across Cosmic TimeJorick S. Vink et al. — 2021
  68. 80journalA Global Spectral Study of Black Hole X-Ray BinariesR. J. H. Dunn et al. — 2010
  69. 81journalPopulation Synthesis of Black Hole X-Ray BinariesYong Shao et al. — 2020
  70. 82journalIntermediate-Mass Black HolesM. Coleman Miller et al. — 2004
  71. 83journalProduction of Intermediate-Mass Black Holes in Globular ClustersM. Coleman Miller et al. — 2002
  72. 84journalIntermediate Mass Black Hole Formation in Compact Young Massive Star ClustersFrancesco Paolo Rizzuto et al. — 2021
  73. 85journalIntermediate-Mass Black Hole Growth and Feedback in Dwarf Galaxies at High RedshiftsParamita Barai et al. — 2019
  74. 86journalProperties of "Lite" Intermediate-Mass Black Hole Candidates in LIGO-Virgo's Third Observing RunKrystal Ruiz-Rocha et al. — 2025
  75. 87bookEncyclopedia of AstrobiologyMar Mezcua — 2021
  76. 88journalIs There an Upper Limit to Black Hole Masses?Priyamvada Natarajan et al. — 2009
  77. 89journalUltramassive Black Holes in the Most Massive Galaxies: M BH–σ Versus M BH–R bBililign T. Dullo et al. — 2021
  78. 90journalHow big can a black hole grow?Andrew King — February 2016
  79. 91journalLimit to how big black holes can grow is astonishingDaniel Clery — 21 December 2015
  80. 92journalObservational Constraints on Black Hole SpinChristopher S. Reynolds — 2021
  81. 93journalSources of Relativistic Jets in the GalaxyI. F. Mirabel et al. — 1999
  82. 95journalMegaparsec Relativistic Jets Launched from an Accreting Supermassive Black Hole in an Extreme Spiral GalaxyJoydeep Bagchi et al. — 2014
  83. 96journalA Universal Scaling for the Energetics of Relativistic Jets from Black Hole SystemsR. S. Nemmen et al. — 2012
  84. 97journalRelativistic Jets from Active Galactic NucleiRoger Blandford et al. — 2019
  85. 98journalThe Powers of Relativistic Jets Depend on the Spin of Accreting Supermassive Black HolesYongyun 永云 Chen 陈 et al. — 2021
  86. 99journalThe Role of Relativistic Jets in the Heaviest and Most Active Supermassive Black Holes at High RedshiftG. Ghisellini et al. — 2013
  87. 100journalThe Power of Relativistic Jets Is Larger Than the Luminosity of Their Accretion DisksG. Ghisellini et al. — 2014
  88. 101journalMicroquasars in our GalaxyI. F. Mirabel et al. — 1998
  89. 102journalGravitational Collapse: The Role of General RelativityR. Penrose — 1969
  90. 103bookGeneral Relativity, Cosmology and AstrophysicsRamesh Narayan et al. — 2014
  91. 104webBlack Hole Anatomy2 August 2022
  92. 105journalLensing and shadow of a black hole surrounded by a heavy accretion diskPedro V.P. Cunha et al. — 2020
  93. 106bookAstrophysics2024
  94. 107bookHigh-Energy Astrophysics2022
  95. 108bookAstrophysics of Black HolesJean-Pierre Lasota — 2016
  96. 109journalSuper-Eddington Accretion Discs Around Kerr Black HolesA. M. Beloborodov — 1998
  97. 110journalDisk-Accretion Onto a Black Hole. Time-Averaged Structure of Accretion DiskDon N. Page et al. — 1974
  98. 111journalAccretion into Black Hole, And Formation of Magnetically Arrested Accretion DisksGennady Bisnovatyi-Kogan — 2019
  99. 112journalModel Radiation Spectrum for an Accretion Disk Near a Rotating Black HoleA. F. Zakharov et al. — 2002
  100. 113journalExploring the Role of Accretion Disk Geometry in Shaping Black Hole ShadowsZi-Liang Wang — 2025
  101. 114journalMagnetised Polish Doughnuts RevisitedSergio Gimeno-Soler et al. — 2017
  102. 115bookGrowing Black Holes: Accretion in a Cosmological ContextM.A. Abramowicz — 2005
  103. 116journalThe Characteristic Blue Spectra of Accretion Disks in Quasars as Uncovered in the InfraredMakoto Kishimoto et al. — 2008
  104. 117journalColor Photographs of an Accretion Disk Around a Black HoleJun Fukue et al. — 1988
  105. 118journalGravitational Lensing by Spinning Black Holes in Astrophysics, And in the Movie InterstellarOliver James et al. — 2015
  106. 119journalUnveiling the Unconventional Optical Signatures of Regular Black Holes Within Accretion DiskSen Guo et al. — 2023
  107. 120journalMeasuring the Spins of Accreting Black HolesJeffrey E. McClintock et al. — 2011
  108. 121bookGravitationCharles Misner et al. — W. H. Freeman and Company — 1973
  109. 122journalInnermost Stable Circular Orbits of Spinning Test Particles in Schwarzschild and Kerr Space-TimesPaul I. Jefremov et al. — 2015
  110. 123journalInnermost Stable Circular Orbit of Spinning Particle in Charged Spinning Black Hole BackgroundYu-Peng Zhang et al. — 2018
  111. 124journalStrong-field gravitational lensing by a Kerr black holeS.E. Vázquez et al. — 2004
  112. 125journalSchwarzschild Black Holes Have the Largest SizeH. Lü et al. — 2020
  113. 126journalCurvatures, Photon Spheres, And Black Hole ShadowsChen-Kai Qiao — 2022
  114. 127journalUsing the Uncharged Kerr Black Hole as a Gravitational MirrorClaes R. Cramer — 1997
  115. 128journalRotating Black Holes: Locally Nonrotating Frames, Energy Extraction, And Scalar Synchrotron RadiationJames M. Bardeen et al. — 1 December 1972
  116. 130journalDynamical Photon Spheres in Charged Black Holes and Naked SingularitiesYaghoub Heydarzade et al. — 2024
  117. 131journalRadii of Spherical Photon Orbits Around Kerr-Newman Black HolesYing-Xuan Chen et al. — 2023
  118. 132journalCalculating black hole shadows: Review of analytical studiesVolker Perlick et al. — February 2022
  119. 133journalShadows of Colliding Black HolesDaisuke Nitta et al. — September 2011
  120. 134bookSpacetime and GeometrySean M. Carroll — 2019
  121. 135journalContinuum Emission from Within the Plunging Region of Black Hole DiscsAndrew Mummery et al. — June 2024
  122. 136journalGlobal Three-Dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Black Hole Accretion Disks: X-Ray Flares in the Plunging RegionMami Machida et al. — 2003
  123. 138bookGeneral RelativityRobert M. Wald — University of Chicago Press — 1984
  124. 139bookThe New PhysicsPaul Davies — Cambridge University Press — 1992
  125. 140bookA Student's Guide to the Mathematics of AstronomyDaniel Fleisch et al. — Cambridge University Press — 2013
  126. 141bookThe Kerr Spacetime: Rotating Black Holes in General RelativityMatt Visser — Cambridge University Press — 2009
  127. 142journalHorizon geometry for Kerr black holes with synchronized hairJorge F. M. Delgado et al. — 2018
  128. 143arxivThe Kerr spacetime: A brief introductionMatt Visser — 2007
  129. 146magazineBlack Holes and the Information ParadoxLeonard Susskind — 1997-04-01
  130. 148journalInternal Structure of Black HolesEric Poisson et al. — 1990
  131. 149journalGeometrodynamics: The Nonlinear Dynamics of Curved SpacetimeM. A. Scheel et al. — 2014
  132. 150journalOutgoing Gravitational Shock Wave at the Inner Horizon: The Late-Time Limit of Black Hole InteriorsDonald Marolf et al. — 2012
  133. 151journalInner Structure of a Charged Black Hole: An Exact Mass-Inflation SolutionAmos Ori — 1991
  134. 152journalStructure of the Black Hole's Cauchy-Horizon SingularityLior M. Burko — 1997
  135. 153journalCauchy-Horizon Singularity Inside Perturbed Kerr Black HolesLior M. Burko et al. — 2016
  136. 154journalMass Inflation Followed by Belinskii-Khalatnikov-Lifshitz Collapse Inside Accreting, Rotating Black HolesAndrew J. S. Hamilton — 2017
  137. 155journalClassical Mass Inflation Versus Semiclassical Inner Horizon InflationCarlos Barceló et al. — 2022
  138. 156journalThe Singularities of Gravitational Collapse and CosmologyS. W. Hawking et al. — 1970
  139. 158webOf Singularities And BreadmakingDavid Garfinkle — 2007
  140. 159journalNo Way Back: Maximizing Survival Time Below the Schwarzschild Event HorizonGeraint F. Lewis et al. — 2007
  141. 160journalHow to Delay Death and Look Further into the Future if You Fall into a Black HoleAlexei Toporensky et al. — 2023
  142. 161bookCosmic CatastrophesJ. Craig Wheeler — Cambridge University Press — 2007
  143. 162bookPerspectives in Theoretical PhysicsV.A. Belinskii et al. — 1992
  144. 163bookThe Science of InterstellarKip Thorne — W. W. Norton & Company — 7 November 2014
  145. 164journalRegular Black Holes: A Short Topic ReviewChen Lan et al. — 2023
  146. 165journalNonsingular Black Holes in ƒ (R) TheoriesGonzalo Olmo et al. — 2015
  147. 166journalThe Fuzzball Proposal for Black Holes: An Elementary ReviewSamir D. Mathur — 2005
  148. 167journalUnitarity and Fuzzball Complementarity: "Alice Fuzzes but May Not Even Know It!"Steven G. Avery et al. — 2013
  149. 168journalBlack-Hole Models in Loop Quantum GravityMartin Bojowald — 2020
  150. 169journalThe evolution and explosion of massive starsS. E. Woosley et al. — 2002
  151. 170journalBlack-Hole Remnants from Black-Hole–Neutron-Star MergersFrancesco Zappa et al. — 2019
  152. 171journalThe Assembly of the First Massive Black HolesKohei Inayoshi et al. — 2020
  153. 172journalTheory of Core-Collapse SupernovaeH. Janka et al. — 2007
  154. 173journalDegeneracy Pressure in Stars and Stellar CorpsesJeffrey Bennett — 2025
  155. 174bookSpacetime and Geometry: An Introduction to General RelativitySean M. Carroll — Addison-Wesley — 2003
  156. 175journal"Golden Oldie": Gravitational Collapse: The Role of General RelativityR. Penrose — 2002
  157. 176journalAn 800-million-solar-mass black hole in a significantly neutral Universe at a redshift of 7.5Eduardo Bañados et al. — 2018
  158. 177journalUncertain Times: The Redshift–Time Relation from Cosmology and StarsMichael Boylan-Kolchin et al. — 2021
  159. 178journalThe First Stars: Formation, Properties, and ImpactRalf S. Klessen et al. — 2023
  160. 179journalTheoretical Black Hole Mass DistributionsChris L. Fryer et al. — 2001
  161. 180webPrimordial Black HolesAshley Balzer — 2024-05-07
  162. 181journalPrimordial black holes—perspectives in gravitational wave astronomyMisao Sasaki et al. — 2018
  163. 182webIs the Big Bang a Black Hole?Philip Gibbs — John Baez
  164. 185journalBlack holes and the LHC: A reviewSeong Chan Park — July 2012
  165. 186journalReview of the safety of LHC collisionsJohn Ellis et al. — 2008
  166. 187journalThe End of the World at the Large Hadron Collider?M. E. Peskin — 2008
  167. 188conferenceMassive Black Holes: Formation and EvolutionM. J. Rees et al. — 2007
  168. 189journalFormation of Massive Black Holes Through Runaway Collisions in Dense Young Star ClustersS. F. P. Zwart et al. — 2004
  169. 190journalBinary Mergers and Growth of Black Holes in Dense Star ClustersR. M. O'Leary et al. — 2006
  170. 191journalInteractions Between Multiple Supermassive Black Holes in Galactic Nuclei: A Solution to the Final Parsec ProblemTaeho Ryu et al. — 2018
  171. 192journalThe Final-Parsec Problem in Nonspherical Galaxies RevisitedEugene Vasiliev et al. — 2014
  172. 193bookCompact Stellar X-Ray SourcesJ. E. McClintock et al. — 2006
  173. 194journalNumerical Relativity Simulations of Black Hole and Relativistic Jet FormationTakami Kuroda et al. — 2024
  174. 195journalJets in Radio Galaxies and Quasars: An Observational PerspectiveD. J. Saikia — 2022
  175. 196journalAccretion Disks, Quasars and Cosmology: Meandering Towards UnderstandingBożena Czerny et al. — 2023
  176. 197journalXMM-Newton Archival Study of the Ultraluminous X-Ray Population in Nearby GalaxiesL. M. Winter et al. — 2006
  177. 198journalBreaking the Limit: Super-Eddington Accretion Onto Black Holes and Neutron StarsM. Brightman et al. — 2019
  178. 199journalSuper-Eddington Accretion and Feedback from the First Massive Seed Black HolesJohn A. Regan et al. — 2019
  179. 200journalThe Tidal Disruption of a Star by a Massive Black HoleCharles R. Evans et al. — 1989
  180. 201journalTidal Disruption of Stars by Supermassive Black Holes: Status of ObservationsS. Komossa — 2015
  181. 202journalThe Role of Black Holes in Galaxy Formation and EvolutionA. Cattaneo et al. — 2009
  182. 203journalThermodynamic Analysis of Kerr-Newman Black HolesO. Ruiz et al. — 2019
  183. 205journalBlack Hole Hawking Radiation May Never Be Observed!C. Sivaram — 2001
  184. 206webEvaporating Black Holes?Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics — 2010
  185. 207journalPrimordial black hole constraints with Hawking radiation—A reviewJérémy Auffinger — July 2023
  186. 208journalThe Thermodynamics of Black HolesRobert M. Wald — 2001
  187. 209journalBlack Hole ThermodynamicsS. Carlip — 2014
  188. 210journalIntroduction to Black Hole ThermodynamicsEdward Witten — 2025
  189. 211journalCounting black holes: The cosmic stellar remnant population and implications for LIGOOliver D. Elbert et al. — 2018
  190. 212journalNo observational proof of the black-hole event-horizonM. A. Abramowicz et al. — 2002
  191. 213journalFirst Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Testing the Black Hole MetricEvent Horizon Telescope Collaboration et al. — May 2022
  192. 214journalFirst M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. II. Array and InstrumentationKazunori Akiyama et al. — 2019
  193. 215webFAQ
  194. 216journalMonitoring Stellar Orbits Around the Massive Black Hole in the Galactic CenterS. Gillessen et al. — 2009
  195. 217journalHigh Proper-Motion Stars in the Vicinity of Sagittarius A*: Evidence for a Supermassive Black Hole at the Center of Our GalaxyA. M. Ghez et al. — 1998
  196. 218journalThe Event Horizon of Sagittarius A*Avery Broderick et al. — August 2009
  197. 219journalThe Proper Motion of Sagittarius A*. III. The Case for a Supermassive Black HoleM. J. Reid et al. — 2020
  198. 221journalX-Ray BinariesH. Schatz et al. — 2006
  199. 222journalMasses and Luminosities of X-Ray BinariesAndreas Quirrenbach et al. — National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  200. 223journalAstrophysical evidence for the existence of black holesA. Celotti et al. — 1999
  201. 224journalA Weight Limit Emerges for Neutron StarsAdrian Cho — 2018
  202. 225journalBlackCAT: A catalogue of stellar-mass black holes in X-ray transientsJ. M. Corral-Santana et al. — 2016
  203. 226journalFormation of the First Two Black Hole–Neutron Star Mergers (GW200115 and GW200105) from Isolated Binary EvolutionFloor S. Broekgaarden et al. — 2021
  204. 227journalModelling the Formation of the First Two Neutron Star–Black Hole Mergers, GW200105 and GW200115: Metallicity, Chirp Masses, And Merger Remnant SpinsDebatri Chattopadhyay et al. — 2022
  205. 228journalDynamics of Stellar Black Holes in Young Star Clusters with Different Metallicities – II. Black Hole-Black Hole BinariesB. M. Ziosi et al. — 2014
  206. 230journalBlack Holes, Galaxy Formation, And the MBH-σ RelationA. King — 2003
  207. 231journalA Fundamental Relation Between Supermassive Black Holes and Their Host GalaxiesL. Ferrarese et al. — 2000
  208. 232journalSupermassive Black Holes in Galactic Nuclei: Past, Present and Future ResearchLaura Ferrarese et al. — 2005
  209. 233journalMeasuring the Masses of Supermassive Black HolesBradley M. Peterson — 2014
  210. 235bookActive Galactic NucleiJ. H. Krolik — Princeton University Press — 1999
  211. 236bookGalaxies in the Universe: An IntroductionL. S. Sparke et al. — Cambridge University Press — 2000
  212. 237journalLocal Supermassive Black Holes, Relics of Active Galactic Nuclei and the X-Ray BackgroundA. Marconi et al. — 2004
  213. 238journalInward Bound—The Search For Supermassive Black Holes In Galactic NucleiJ. Kormendy et al. — 1995
  214. 239journalThe Supermassive Black Hole at the Galactic CenterFulvio Melia et al. — 2001
  215. 240journalGravitational Lensing in AstronomyJoachim Wambsganss — 1998
  216. 241bookGravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and MicroJ. Wambsganss — 2006
  217. 242journalHunting Gravitational Wave Black Holes with MicrolensingNatasha S. Abrams et al. — December 1, 2020
  218. 243journalOn Finding Black Holes in Photometric Microlensing SurveysZofia Kaczmarek et al. — March 7, 2025
  219. 244webDoes God Play Dice?S. W. Hawking
  220. 245webThe Black Hole Information Loss ProblemWarren G. Anderson — 1996
  221. 246conferenceBlack Holes and Information: A Crisis in Quantum PhysicsJ. Preskill — 21 October 1994
  222. 247journalLessons from the information paradoxSuvrat Raju — 2022
  223. 248journalThe origins of massive black holesMarta Volonteri et al. — September 20, 2021
  224. 249journalDistribution of the Very First Population III Stars and Their Relation to Bright z ≈ 6 QuasarsM. Trenti et al. — 2007
  225. 250journalThe Formation of Supermassive Black Holes from Population III.1 Seeds. II. Evolution to the Local UniverseJasbir Singh et al. — 2023
  226. 251journalSupermassive Black Holes in the Early UniverseAaron Smith et al. — 2019
  227. 252journalRadiative Feedback from High-Mass X-Ray Binaries on the Formation of the First Galaxies and Early ReionizationMyoungwon Jeon et al. — 2014
  228. 253journalFormation of the Black Holes in the Highest Redshift QuasarsJaiyul Yoo Jordi Miralda-Escudé et al. — 2004
  229. 254journalWhat Do Observations Tell Us About the Highest-Redshift Supermassive Black Holes?Benny Trakhtenbrot — 2019
  230. 255journalThe Route to Massive Black Hole Formation via Merger-Driven Direct Collapse: A ReviewLucio Mayer et al. — 2019
  231. 256journalThe First Billion Years Project: Birthplaces of Direct Collapse Black HolesBhaskar Agarwal et al. — 2014
  232. 257journalSupermassive Primordial Black Holes: A View from Clustering of Quasars atTakumi Shinohara et al. — 2023
  233. 258bookFormation of the First Black HolesLucio Mayer — 2019
  234. 259journalDynamical Constraints on Alternatives to Supermassive Black Holes in Galactic NucleiEyal Maoz — 1998
  235. 260journalConstraints on Alternatives to Supermassive Black HolesM. Coleman Miller — 2006
  236. 261journalCan Stellar Mass Black Holes Be Quark Stars?Z. Kovacs et al. — 2009
  237. 262journalRestricting Quark Matter Models by Gravitational Wave ObservationHajime Sotani et al. — 2004
  238. 263webBetween Neutron Stars and Black HolesCharles Bonkowsky — 2025-01-05
  239. 264journalElectroweak Stars: How Nature May Capitalize on the Standard Model's Ultimate FuelDe-Chang Dai et al. — 2010
  240. 265journalPreon Stars: A New Class of Cosmic Compact ObjectsJ. Hansson et al. — 2005
  241. 266journalNomen Non Est Omen: Why It Is Too Soon to Identify Ultra-Compact Objects as Black HolesSebastian Murk — 2023
  242. 267journalDark Energy Star in Gravity's RainbowA. Bagheri Tudeshki et al. — 2022
  243. 268journalBlack Holes 'Do Not Exist'Philip Ball — 31 March 2005
  244. 269journalFate of Gravitational Collapse in Semiclassical GravityCarlos Barceló et al. — 2008
  245. 270journalNested Solutions of Gravitational Condensate StarsDaniel Jampolski et al. — 2024
  246. 271webEmbark on a visual voyage of art inspired by black holesJennifer Ouellette — December 26, 2025
  247. 272bookConjuring the void: the art of black holesLynn Gamwell et al. — The MIT Press — 2025
  248. 274magazineUnderstanding Black Holes Through Science FictionDavid Kyle Johnson — 2019-06-19
  249. 276bookScience Fiction Literature Through History: An EncyclopediaGary Westfahl — ABC-CLIO — 2021
  250. 277bookScience Fact and Science Fiction: An EncyclopediaBrian Stableford — Taylor & Francis — 2006