Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Stellar black hole

~6 min read · Ch. 1 of 7
7 sections
  • In September 2015, gravitational waves carried news of a collision across more than a billion light years of space. Two black holes had merged into one, a rotating object of 62 solar masses, and the event announced itself by warping spacetime itself. This is the realm of the stellar black hole, an object born from the gravitational collapse of a star. These black holes carry masses ranging from about 5 to several tens of solar masses. Some are the remnants of supernova explosions, but other formation mechanisms may also operate. How does a dying star cross the threshold into a black hole, and why are some masses apparently forbidden? How do astronomers spot something that emits no light, and what happens to the matter that falls in? The answers reach from the cores of collapsing giants to binary systems scattered across the Milky Way and far beyond it.

  • At the end of a massive star's life, every internal energy source runs out, and gravitational collapse becomes inevitable. What the star becomes depends entirely on the mass of the collapsing part. Below the Chandrasekhar limit, the result is a white dwarf. Above that but below the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff limit for neutron-degenerate matter, the star ends as a neutron star. Cross the TOV limit, and the crush continues without pause until a black hole forms. These boundaries are approximate, shifting with a star's chemical composition and spin. The exact maximum mass a neutron star can hold before collapsing further remains poorly understood. In 1939 it was estimated at 0.7 solar masses, the origin of the TOV limit itself. A later estimate in 1996 placed the upper bound somewhere between 1.5 and 3 solar masses. The most massive neutron star yet observed is PSR J0740+6620, discovered in September 2019, which sits near the edge of what neutron matter can sustain.

  • By the no-hair theorem, a black hole can be described by only three fundamental properties: mass, electric charge, and angular momentum. Nothing else survives the collapse. The angular momentum of a stellar black hole comes directly from the conservation of angular momentum of the star or objects that produced it. The spinning of a dying star becomes the spinning of its remnant. In general relativity, a black hole could in principle exist at any mass at all. The lower the mass, the higher the density of matter required to form one. Yet there are no known stellar processes that can produce black holes lighter than a few times the mass of the Sun. If such tiny black holes exist anywhere, they are most likely primordial, dating to the early universe rather than to any star. Until 2016, the largest known stellar black hole measured 15.65 solar masses, and the smallest known sits in the binary system 2MASS J05215658+4359220, a mere 3.3 solar masses across a diameter of only 19.5 kilometers.

  • Several hundred million degrees: that is how hot matter becomes as it spirals from a companion star toward a black hole in a close binary system. The energy released in that fall is so enormous that the infalling material glows in X-rays. The black hole reveals itself through that radiation, while its companion star can be watched through optical telescopes. This is how astronomers identify them, by combining X-ray and optical data from compact sources. There is a complication. Black holes and neutron stars release energy of the same order of magnitude, which makes the two often difficult to tell apart. The dividing line comes from mass. Every identified neutron star carries a mass below 3.0 solar masses, and none of the compact systems above that threshold show neutron star properties. This makes it increasingly likely that compact stars heavier than 3.0 solar masses are genuinely black holes. The proof, though, is not purely observational. It leans on theory, because astronomers can imagine no other object that fits these massive compact binaries. A truly direct proof would require watching a particle or a cloud of gas actually fall into one.

  • Some black hole binaries sit at startling distances above the galactic plane, far from where stars are born. These heights are the result of black hole natal kicks, violent shoves delivered at the moment of formation. The velocity distribution of these kicks looks similar to that of neutron star kicks. That similarity is itself a puzzle. One might expect the momenta to match instead, which would give black holes lower velocities than neutron stars because of their greater mass. That does not seem to be the case. A possible explanation lies in the fall-back of asymmetrically expelled matter, which could add momentum to the resulting black hole and even out the velocities. The kicks help explain why some of these systems wander so far from home.

  • Two ranges of mass appear to be off limits to black holes formed directly by a single collapsing star. Some models of stellar evolution call them the lower and upper mass gaps, covering roughly 2 to 5 and 50 to 150 solar masses. The lower gap is suspected from a scarcity of observed candidates just above the maximum neutron star mass, though its existence and theoretical basis remain uncertain. Any black holes found there may have come from merging binary neutron stars rather than from stellar collapse. The LIGO/Virgo collaboration reported three candidate events in its O3 observing run with component masses falling in this lower gap. A bright, rapidly rotating giant star was also seen orbiting an unseen companion of 3.3 solar masses that emits no light at all, not even X-rays. The upper gap traces to pair-instability supernovae, where pair production of electrons and positrons in collisions between atomic nuclei and energetic gamma rays drops the pressure supporting the core. The star undergoes a runaway thermonuclear explosion and is blown completely apart, leaving no remnant behind. Such supernovae occur only in stars of around 130 to 250 solar masses with low to moderate metallicity, common in Population III stars. Pulsational mass loss can extend this gap down to about 45 solar masses. The LB-1 system was first read as a 70 solar mass black hole that the upper gap should forbid, but further investigation has weakened that claim.

  • The Milky Way holds several stellar-mass black hole candidates closer to us than the supermassive black hole at the galactic center. Most belong to X-ray binary systems, where the compact object draws matter from its partner through an accretion disk. The probable black holes in these pairs range from three to more than a dozen solar masses. Cygnus X-1, at 21.2 solar masses, ranks among the heaviest, lying some 6,000 to 8,000 light years away. GRS 1915+105 carries about 14 solar masses, and V404 Cygni roughly 12. A0620-00 sits at only 0.33 light years in its listed orbital separation, with a mass of 11. The disputed LB-1 system appears at 7 solar masses. Beyond the Milky Way, candidates come almost entirely from gravitational wave detections. GW150914 united black holes of 36 and 29 solar masses into a 62 solar mass remnant, about 1.3 billion light years away. GW190521 reached an estimated 155 solar masses. X-ray binaries in other galaxies add more, including M33 X-7 in the Triangulum Galaxy at 15.65 solar masses, 2.7 million light years off. Then there is N6946-BH1, a star in NGC 6946 that simply disappeared following a failed supernova, an event that may have produced a black hole without any explosion at all.

Common questions

What is a stellar black hole?

A stellar black hole, or stellar-mass black hole, is a black hole formed by the gravitational collapse of a star. They have masses ranging from about 5 to several tens of solar masses and can be the remnants of supernova explosions, though other formation mechanisms may also operate.

How massive can a stellar black hole be?

Stellar black holes range from about 5 to several tens of solar masses. Until 2016 the largest known stellar black hole was 15.65 solar masses, and a rotating black hole of 62 solar masses was detected forming in a merger in September 2015. The smallest known sits in 2MASS J05215658+4359220 at 3.3 solar masses.

What three properties define a stellar black hole?

By the no-hair theorem, a black hole can have only three fundamental properties: mass, electric charge, and angular momentum. The angular momentum of a stellar black hole comes from the conservation of angular momentum of the star or objects that produced it.

How do astronomers detect stellar black holes?

Stellar black holes in close binary systems become observable when matter transfers from a companion star and heats to several hundred million degrees, radiating in X-rays. The black hole is seen in X-rays while the companion is observed with optical telescopes, and masses are derived by combining X-ray and optical data.

What are the mass gaps for stellar black holes?

Some models predict that black holes cannot form directly from a single collapsing star in two ranges, the lower and upper mass gaps, roughly 2 to 5 and 50 to 150 solar masses. The upper gap arises from pair-instability supernovae, which blow apart stars of around 130 to 250 solar masses without leaving a remnant.

What is the difference between a stellar black hole and a neutron star?

When a collapsing star exceeds the Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff limit it forms a black hole rather than a neutron star. All identified neutron stars have masses below 3.0 solar masses, so compact systems above 3.0 solar masses that lack neutron star properties are most likely black holes.

Where are stellar black hole candidates found in the Milky Way?

The Milky Way contains several stellar-mass black hole candidates closer than the supermassive black hole at the galactic center, mostly members of X-ray binary systems. Examples include Cygnus X-1 at 21.2 solar masses, GRS 1915+105 at about 14 solar masses, and V404 Cygni at about 12 solar masses.

All sources

49 references cited across the entry

  1. 1journalAstrophysical evidence for the existence of black holesA. Celotti et al. — 1999
  2. 2arxivTrust but verify: The case for astrophysical black holesScott A. Hughes — 2005
  3. 3journalThe formation of stellar black holesFélix Mirabel — August 1, 2017
  4. 4journalThe Maximum Mass of a Neutron StarI. Bombaci — 1996
  5. 5journalRelativistic Shapiro delay measurements of an extremely massive millisecond pulsarH. T. Cromartie et al. — 2019-09-16
  6. 6journalBlack holes go extragalacticTomasz Bulik — 2007
  7. 7journalObservation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole MergerBP Abbott — 2016
  8. 9journalInvestigating stellar-mass black hole kicksSerena Repetto et al. — 2012
  9. 10journalNatal kicks of stellar mass black holes by asymmetric mass ejection in fallback supernovaeHans-Thomas Janka — 2013
  10. 12journalPulsational Pair-instability SupernovaeS.E. Woosley — 2017
  11. 13journalAn upper limit to the masses of starsD.F. Figer — 2005
  12. 14journalMass Measurements of Black Holes in X-Ray Transients: Is There a Mass Gap?Laura Kreidberg et al. — 2012
  13. 15journalFormation and Merging of Mass Gap Black Holes in Gravitational-wave Merger Events from Wide Hierarchical Quadruple SystemsMohammadtaher Safarzadeh et al. — 2019
  14. 16journalA noninteracting low-mass black hole–giant star binary systemTodd A. Thompson et al. — 2019
  15. 17journalInstabilities in Highly Evolved Stellar ModelsG. Rakavy et al. — June 1967
  16. 20journalImpact of the Rotation and Compactness of Progenitors on the Mass of Black HolesM. Mapelli et al. — 2020
  17. 21journalObservational evidence for stellar-mass black holesJorge Casares — 2006
  18. 22journalResolved Jets and Long Period Black Hole NovaeM.R. Garcia — 2003
  19. 23arxivBlack Hole BinariesJeffrey E. McClintock et al. — 2003
  20. 24journalCygnus X-1 contains a 21–solar mass black hole—Implications for massive star windsJames C. A. Miller-Jones et al. — 5 March 2021
  21. 25journalThe first accurate parallax distance to a black holeMiller-Jones, J. A. C. — 2009
  22. 26journalDetermination of Black Hole Masses in Galactic Black Hole Binaries using Scaling of Spectral and Variability CharacteristicsN. Shaposhnikov et al. — 2009
  23. 27journalOrbital Parameters for the Black Hole Binary XTE J1650–500J.A. Orosz et al. — 2004
  24. 28journalDynamical confirmation of a stellar mass black hole in the transient X-ray dipping binary MAXI J1305-704D. Mata Sánchez et al. — 2021-09-01
  25. 30journalA refined dynamical mass for the black hole in the X-ray transient XTE J1859+226I. V. Yanes-Rizo et al. — 2022-11-01
  26. 32journalA stellar census in globular clusters with MUSE: Binaries in NGC 3201Benjamin Giesers et al. — 2019-12-01
  27. 33journalConstraints on the Cosmological Coupling of Black Holes from the Globular Cluster NGC 3201Carl L. Rodriguez — 2023-04-01
  28. 34journalA Black Hole in the Superluminal source SAX J1819.3-2525 (V4641 Sgr)Orosz — 2001
  29. 35journalThe 'hidden' companion in LB-1 unveiled by spectral disentanglingShenar, T. et al. — July 2020
  30. 36webChinese Academy of Sciences leads discovery of unpredicted stellar black holeChinese Academy of Sciences — 27 November 2019
  31. 37journalA wide star–black-hole binary system from radial-velocity measurementsLiu, Jifeng — 27 November 2019
  32. 38journalOn the natal kick of the black hole X-ray binary H 1705-250Cordelia Dashwood Brown et al. — 2024-01-01
  33. 39journalX-Ray Properties of Black-Hole BinariesRonald A. Remillard et al. — 2006-09-01
  34. 40journalThe Donor of the Black Hole X-Ray Binary MAXI J1820+070Joanna Mikołajewska et al. — 2022-05-01
  35. 41citationThe superhump phenomenon in GRS 1716-249 (=X-Ray Nova Ophiuchi 1993)N. Masetti et al. — 1996
  36. 42journalA Black Hole in the X-Ray Nova Velorum 1993Alexei V. Filippenko et al. — 1999-08-01
  37. 43arxivGW190521 as a Highly Eccentric Black Hole MergerGayathri, V. — 2020
  38. 44journalChandra and XMM monitoring of the black hole X-ray binary IC 10 X-1Silas G. T. Laycock et al. — 2015-01-01
  39. 45journalThe Wolf-Rayet + Black Hole Binary NGC 300 X-1: What is the Mass of the Black Hole?Breanna A. Binder et al. — 2021-03-01
  40. 46journalA New Dynamical Model for the Black Hole Binary LMC X-1Jerome A. Orosz et al. — 2009-05-01
  41. 48journalThe Mass of the Black Hole in LMC X-3Jerome A. Orosz et al. — 2014-10-01
  42. 49arxivThe search for failed supernovae with the Large Binocular Telescope: conformation of a disappearing starS. M. Adams et al. — 9 September 2016