Big Bang
The Big Bang places the beginning of the universe at an estimated 13.787 billion years ago. That single number, drawn from detailed measurements of how fast the universe is expanding, marks the moment cosmologists call the initial singularity. The Big Bang is a physical theory describing how the universe expanded from an initial state of high density and temperature. It does not describe a noise, and it does not describe an explosion into surrounding space. It describes the intrinsic expansion of everything the universe contains.
Fred Hoyle gave the idea its name in a March 1949 broadcast on the BBC Third Programme. He favored a rival picture and called this one, in passing, the big bang. The label did not catch on until the 1970s. By then the question was no longer whether the universe had a beginning, but how to read the fossil evidence it left behind.
That evidence raises stubborn puzzles. Why does the universe look the same in every direction. Why is it made almost entirely of matter and almost no antimatter. What accounts for the unseen 95% of the cosmos that emits no light. The answers live in faint radiation, in the ratios of the lightest elements, and in a theory whose earliest moments still lie beyond the reach of known physics.
The redshifts of galaxies form the most direct line of evidence for the Big Bang. Light from distant galaxies and quasars is shifted toward longer wavelengths, and these redshifts are spread evenly across the sky in all directions. When recessional velocity is plotted against distance, a straight line appears. This is Hubble's law, and it implies the universe is expanding uniformly everywhere.
The cosmic microwave background is a second pillar. It is an omnidirectional signal in the microwave band, today measured at approximately 2.725 K. Through the 1970s it was found to match the spectrum of a blackbody in all directions, a glow stretched and cooled by the expansion of space itself. The radiation comes from the surface of last scattering, the moment neutral hydrogen became stable and the universe turned transparent.
The abundance of light elements is the third. Big Bang models predict how much helium-4, helium-3, deuterium, and lithium-7 should exist relative to ordinary hydrogen. The ratios come out near 0.25 by mass for helium-4, around one part in a thousand for deuterium, near one in ten thousand for helium-3, and roughly one in a billion for lithium-7. The match is excellent for deuterium and close for helium, though lithium-7 is off by a factor of two, an anomaly called the cosmological lithium problem.
Galaxy formation and the distribution of large structures complete the set. Distant galaxies, seen as they were long ago, look markedly different from nearby ones. The first quasars and galaxies appear to have formed within a billion years after the Big Bang, and larger clusters and superclusters built up afterward. These changing populations are strong arguments against a universe that stays the same forever.
The Planck epoch is the universe's first chapter, lasting up to 10 to the minus 43 seconds. In this stage the four fundamental forces, electromagnetic, strong nuclear, weak nuclear, and gravitational, were unified as one. The characteristic scale was the Planck length, and the temperature reached roughly 10 to the 32 degrees. Here even the concept of a particle breaks down, and a full account waits on a theory of quantum gravity that does not yet exist.
Around 10 to the minus 37 seconds, a phase transition triggered cosmic inflation. The universe grew exponentially, unconstrained by the speed of light, and temperatures dropped by a factor of 100,000. All the mass-energy of the currently visible galaxies began in a sphere with a radius near 4 times 10 to the minus 29 meters and grew to a radius near 0.9 meters by inflation's end. Tiny quantum fluctuations, frozen in during this burst, became the seeds of all later structure.
Baryogenesis tilted the balance between matter and antimatter. An unknown reaction violated the conservation of baryon number, leaving a slight excess of quarks and leptons over their antiparticles, of order one part in 30 million. When the great annihilations followed, that sliver of surplus is what survived as the matter we see.
At about 10 to the minus 6 seconds, quarks and gluons combined into protons and neutrons. A few minutes in, when the temperature was about a billion kelvin and the density rivaled Earth's atmosphere, neutrons and protons fused into deuterium and helium nuclei through Big Bang nucleosynthesis. At about 380,000 years, electrons and nuclei joined into neutral atoms in an event called recombination, and the photons released then make up the cosmic microwave background.
Luminous matter, the stars and planets and everything that shines, makes up less than 5% of the universe's density. The rest is hidden. Dark matter accounts for 27% and dark energy for the remaining 68%. This accounting comes from combining astronomical observations with the laws of thermodynamics and particle physics across the lifespan of the cosmos.
Dark matter announced itself through gravity it should not have if only visible matter existed. During the 1970s and 1980s, observations showed there was not enough visible matter to explain the gravitational forces within and between galaxies. The idea emerged that up to 90% of the matter in the universe is dark, emitting no light and not interacting with normal baryonic matter. It is inferred from the cosmic microwave background, galaxy rotation, cluster velocities, gravitational lensing, and X-ray measurements of clusters, yet no dark matter particle has been seen in a laboratory.
Dark energy revealed itself in supernovae. Measurements of the redshift and magnitude of Type Ia supernovae show the expansion has been accelerating since the universe was about half its present age. To drive this, models require energy with large negative pressure that permeates all of space. Early on, with everything closer together, gravity won and braked the expansion. Only after billions of years, as matter thinned out relative to dark energy, did the expansion begin to speed up.
In its simplest form, dark energy is modeled by a cosmological constant in Einstein's field equations. Its energy density stays nearly constant as the universe expands, while the density of matter falls. The gap between the measured energy density of dark energy and the value naively predicted from Planck units has earned the name the most embarrassing problem in physics.
Vesto Slipher measured the first Doppler shift of a spiral nebula in 1912, and soon found that nearly all such nebulae were receding from Earth. He did not grasp the cosmological meaning, and at the time it was hotly contested whether these objects even lay outside the Milky Way. The pieces were on the table before anyone saw the picture.
Alexander Friedmann derived his equations from Einstein's field equations in 1922, showing the universe might be expanding, against the static model Einstein then favored. In 1924, Edwin Hubble used the 100-inch Hooker telescope at Mount Wilson Observatory to measure great distances and prove the spiral nebulae were other galaxies. By 1929, working with Milton Humason, he found the correlation between distance and recessional velocity now called Hubble's law.
Georges Lemaitre, a Belgian physicist and Roman Catholic priest, independently derived Friedmann's equations in 1927 and tied the recession of the nebulae to an expanding universe. In 1931 he pushed further, proposing that running the expansion backward led to a single point he called the primeval atom, where space and time came into being. He wrote that if the world began with a single quantum, the notions of space and time would altogether fail to have any meaning at the beginning.
That beginning unsettled many. In the 1920s and 1930s, almost every major cosmologist preferred an eternal steady-state universe, and several complained that a beginning in time smuggled religion into physics. Arthur Eddington, siding with Aristotle, found a beginning in time repugnant and held that matter is eternal. The discovery and confirmation of the cosmic microwave background in 1964 settled the contest in the Big Bang's favor.
Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson stumbled onto the cosmic background radiation in 1964, picking up a signal that came from every direction. Their find confirmed predictions made around 1950 by Ralph Alpher, Robert Herman, and George Gamow. For this they shared the 1978 Nobel Prize in Physics.
NASA launched the Cosmic Background Explorer in 1989, and it delivered two breakthroughs. In 1990, high-precision spectrum measurements showed the radiation to be an almost perfect blackbody, with no deviation at a level of one part in 10,000, and a residual temperature near 2.726 K. In 1992, the satellite found tiny temperature fluctuations across the sky, at a level of about one part in 100,000. John C. Mather and George Smoot shared the 2006 Nobel Prize in Physics for this work.
BOOMERanG and other experiments measured the shape of those fluctuations in 2000 and 2001, finding the universe to be spatially almost flat. The first results from the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe came in early 2003, giving the most accurate cosmological parameters then available. WMAP placed Hubble's constant at 70.4 kilometers per second per megaparsec and supported a Lambda-CDM model with cold dark matter.
A crack remains in this precise picture. The Hubble tension is an unexplained gap between two ways of measuring the expansion rate. Methods based on the cosmic microwave background give a lower value than methods built on the cosmic distance ladder, and no one yet knows why.
Baryon asymmetry is among the deepest open questions. It is not understood why the universe holds more matter than antimatter. The young, hot universe is assumed to have held equal numbers of baryons and antibaryons, with an imbalance of only one part in 10 billion. For baryogenesis to explain the surplus, the Sakharov conditions must hold, requiring violated baryon number, broken C and CP symmetry, and a departure from thermodynamic equilibrium. All occur in the Standard Model, but not strongly enough.
The horizon problem asks how distant regions came to share the same temperature. If radiation or matter had always dominated, the particle horizon at last scattering would span only about 2 degrees on the sky, leaving no way for wider regions to match. Inflation answers this. A rapid early expansion drove regions now on opposite sides of the observable universe into causal contact before inflation began.
The flatness problem, also called the oldness problem, turns on a knife's edge. Any small departure from the critical density grows over time, yet the universe today remains very close to flat. Even at the age of a few minutes, the density had to sit within one part in 10 to the 14 of its critical value. Inflation also resolves the magnetic monopole objection, raised in the late 1970s, by sweeping point defects out of the observable universe.
The Planck epoch still resists description, and there are no easily testable models for conditions before roughly 10 to the minus 15 seconds. Roger Penrose, Stephen Hawking, and George F. R. Ellis showed in 1968 and 1970 that singularities were an inevitable starting condition of these models. Whether time itself existed before the Big Bang is a question physics cannot yet answer, and future gravitational-wave observatories may one day detect relics from less than a second after the beginning.
Up Next
Continue Browsing
Common questions
What is the Big Bang theory?
The Big Bang is a physical theory describing how the universe expanded from an initial state of high density and temperature. It explains the abundance of light elements, the cosmic microwave background radiation, the redshift of galaxies, and the large-scale structure of the universe.
How old is the universe according to the Big Bang?
Detailed measurements of the universe's expansion rate place the initial singularity at an estimated 13.787 billion years ago, which is considered the age of the universe. This age agrees with estimates from the oldest stars and from Type Ia supernovae.
Who came up with the Big Bang theory?
Alexander Friedmann derived the equations of an expanding universe in 1922, and Georges Lemaitre proposed in 1931 that the universe emerged from a primeval atom. Edwin Hubble's 1929 observations with Milton Humason established that galaxies recede in proportion to their distance, now known as Hubble's law.
Why is it called the Big Bang?
Astronomer Fred Hoyle coined the term during a March 1949 BBC Third Programme broadcast while contrasting it with his own steady-state model. The name did not catch on until the 1970s, and Hoyle denied it was meant as a pejorative.
What is the evidence for the Big Bang?
The main evidence consists of four pillars: the expansion of the universe shown by galaxy redshifts and Hubble's law, the cosmic microwave background discovered in 1964, the relative abundances of light elements from Big Bang nucleosynthesis, and the formation and distribution of galaxies and large-scale structures.
What are dark matter and dark energy in the Big Bang model?
In Big Bang cosmology, luminous matter makes up less than 5% of the universe's density, dark matter accounts for 27%, and dark energy makes up the remaining 68%. Dark energy drives the accelerating expansion observed in Type Ia supernovae, while dark matter is inferred from gravitational effects but has never been detected in a laboratory.
All sources
174 references cited across the entry
- 1webCosmology: The Study of the UniverseNASA/WMAP Science Team — NASA — 6 June 2011
- 2harvnbKragh (1996) p. [https://archive.org/details/cosmologycontrov00helg 319]Kragh — 1996
- 3harvnbChow (2008) p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=fp9wrkMYHvMC&pg=PA211 211]Chow — 2008
- 4journalAlexander Friedmann and the origins of modern cosmologyAri Belenkiy — October 1, 2012
- 5journalAdventures in Friedmann cosmology: A detailed expansion of the cosmological Friedmann equationsRobert J. Nemiroff et al. — March 1, 2008
- 6journalTesting the Friedmann equation: The expansion of the universe during big-bang nucleosynthesisSean M. Carroll et al. — February 27, 2002
- 7journalCosmological histories from the Friedmann equation: the Universe as a particleEdvard Mörtsell — September 1, 2016
- 8harvnbPartridge (1995) p. 55Partridge — 1995
- 9journalThe cosmological constant and dark energyP. J. E. Peebles et al. — 22 April 2003
- 10journalReview of Particle PhysicsNavas, S. — 2024
- 11bookLight after Dark I: Structures of the SkyCharles Francis — Troubador Publishing Ltd — 2018
- 12bookThe Early UniverseEdward Kolb et al. — Chapman and Hall/CRC — 2018
- 13journalThe fine-structure constant: a new observational limit on its cosmological variation and some theoretical consequencesAlexandre V. Ivanchik et al. — March 1999
- 14journalExperimental Tests of General RelativitySlava G. Turyshev — November 2008
- 15journalTesting general relativity in cosmologyMustapha Ishak — December 2019
- 16journalGeocentrism reexaminedJeremy Goodman — 15 August 1995
- 17webPlanck Mission Brings Universe into Sharp Focus21 March 2013
- 18harvnbKolb, Turner (1988) p. chpt. 3Kolb, Turner — 1988
- 19journalChemical equilibrium in QCD gas in the early universeK. Enqvist et al. — September 1993
- 20harvnbHawking, Ellis (1973)Hawking, Ellis — 1973
- 21bookCosmological PhysicsJ. A. Peacock — Cambridge University Press — 1998-12-28
- 22journalSingularity Theorems and Their ConsequencesJosé M. M. Senovilla — May 1998
- 23bookThe early universeReidel — 1988
- 24bookFoundations of Modern CosmologyJohn F. Hawley et al. — OUP Oxford — July 7, 2005
- 26harvnbGuth (1998)Guth — 1998
- 28bookIntroduction to CosmologyBarbara Ryden — Cambridge University Press — 2016-11-17
- 29magazineAn Ocean of QuarksPhillip F. Schewe et al. — 20 April 2005
- 30journalAstrosociology: Interviews about an infinite universeErik Høg — 2014
- 31serialFirst Second of the Big BangMark (Director) Bridge — 30 July 2014
- 32harvnbKolb, Turner (1988) p. chpt. 6Kolb, Turner — 1988
- 33harvnbKolb, Turner (1988) p. chpt. 7Kolb, Turner — 1988
- 34webBaryogenesisJan Weenink — Tomislav Prokopec — February 26, 2009
- 35harvnbPeacock (1999) p. chpt. 9Peacock — 1999
- 36webNASA's Hubble and Spitzer Team up to Probe Faraway GalaxiesWhitney Clavin et al. — NASA — 7 January 2014
- 37journalSeven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Sky Maps, Systematic Errors, and Basic ResultsNorman Jarosik et al. — February 2011
- 38news'Big bang' astronomer diesBBC — 22 August 2001
- 39webHoyle on the Radio: Creating the 'Big Bang'St John's College
- 40journalBig Bang: the etymology of a nameHelge Kragh — April 2013
- 41webHoyle Scoffs at 'Big Bang' Universe TheoryBarbara (Project Leader) Mattson — NASA: High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center — 8 December 2017
- 42bookEssays on the Frontiers of Modern Astrophysics and CosmologySanthosh Mathew — Springer Science & Business Media — 2013
- 43bookThe Whole Shebang: A State of the Universe ReportTimothy Ferris — Simon and Schuster — 1998
- 44harvnbCroswell (1995) p. 113Croswell — 1995
- 45harvnbMitton (2011) p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=MWKQhXo2eaIC&pg=PA129 129]Mitton — 2011
- 46bookMasters of the Universe: Conversations with Cosmologists of the PastHelge Kragh — Oxford University Press — 2014
- 47harvnbRoos (2012) p. 216Roos — 2012
- 48harvnbDrees (1990) p. [https://archive.org/details/beyondbigbangqua0000dree/page/223 223–224]Drees — 1990
- 49bookThe Little Book of StarsJames B. Kaler — Springer Science & Business Media — 2013
- 50bookCovariant Physics: From Classical Mechanics to General Relativity and BeyondMoataz Emam — Oxford University Press — 2021
- 51webWas the Big Bang Really an Explosion?Clara Moskowitz — 2010
- 52webHubble Telescope Reveals Farthest View Into Universe EverClara Moskowitz — Future plc — 25 September 2012
- 53journalThe Radial Velocity of the Andromeda NebulaVesto M. Slipher — 1913
- 54journalSpectrographic Observations of NebulaeVesto M. Slipher — January 1915
- 55journalÜber die Krümmung des RaumesAlexander Friedman — December 1922
- 56journalOn the Curvature of SpaceAlexander Friedmann — December 1999
- 57journalA Relation Between Distance and Radial Velocity Among Extra-Galactic NebulaeEdwin Hubble — 15 March 1929
- 58harvnbChristianson (1995)Christianson — 1995
- 59journalUn Univers homogène de masse constante et de rayon croissant rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des nébuleuses extra-galactiquesGeorges Lemaître — April 1927
- 60journalA Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Increasing Radius accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extra-galactic NebulæGeorges Lemaître — March 1931
- 61journalContributions to a British Association Discussion on the Evolution of the UniverseAbbé Georges Lemaître — 24 October 1931
- 62harvnbKragh (1996)Kragh — 1996
- 63webBig bang theory is introduced – 1927WGBH Boston — 1998
- 64journalThe End of the World: from the Standpoint of Mathematical PhysicsArthur S. Eddington — 21 March 1931
- 66journalThe Beginning of the World from the Point of View of Quantum TheoryGeorges Lemaître — 9 May 1931
- 67harvnbMilne (1935)Milne — 1935
- 68harvnbTolman (1934)Tolman — 1934
- 69journalOn the Red Shift of Spectral Lines through Interstellar SpaceFritz Zwicky — 15 October 1929
- 70journalA New Model for the Expanding UniverseFred Hoyle — October 1948
- 71journalThe Origin of Chemical ElementsRalph A. Alpher et al. — 1 April 1948
- 72journalEvolution of the UniverseRalph A. Alpher et al. — 13 November 1948
- 73journalA Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/sArno A. Penzias et al. — July 1965
- 74journalThe Cosmic Black-Body Radiation and the Existence of Singularities in our UniverseStephen W. Hawking et al. — April 1968
- 75journalThe Singularities of Gravitational Collapse and CosmologyStephen W. Hawking et al. — 27 January 1970
- 76journalInflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problemsAlan Guth — 15 January 1981
- 77journalThe Hubble ConstantJohn P. Huchra — 2008
- 78harvnbLivio (2000) p. 160Livio — 2000
- 79journalThe COBE Mission: Its Design and Performance Two Years after the launchNancy W. Boggess et al. — 1 October 1992
- 80journalThree-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Implications for CosmologyDavid N. Spergel et al. — June 2007
- 81journalObservational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological ConstantAdam G. Reiss et al. — 1998
- 82journalMeasurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift SupernovaeS. Perlmutter et al. — 1999
- 83webFrequently Asked Questions in Cosmology: What is the evidence for the Big Bang?Edward L. Wright — Division of Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of California, Los Angeles — 24 May 2013
- 84journalCosmological Constraints from the Red-Sequence Cluster SurveyMichael D. Gladders et al. — 20 January 2007
- 85webThe Four Pillars of the Standard CosmologyCentre for Theoretical Cosmology; University of Cambridge — 2012
- 86webThe Four Pillars of the Standard CosmologyUniversity of Cambridge — 2006
- 87webDirect Searches for Dark MatterBernard Sadoulet — National Academies Press on behalf of the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences
- 88journalWhitepaper: For a Comprehensive Space-Based Dark Energy MissionRobert N. Cahn — National Academies Press on behalf of the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences — 2009
- 89journalThe kinematic origin of the cosmological redshiftBunn — 2009
- 90journalIn the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutionsEleonora Di Valentino et al. — 2021
- 91conferenceAnisotropies in the CMBMartin White — University of California, Los Angeles on behalf of the American Physical Society — 1999
- 92journalFirst-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Determination of Cosmological ParametersDavid N. Spergel et al. — September 2003
- 93journalNine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Final Maps and ResultsCharles L. Bennett et al. — October 2013
- 94webNew 'Baby Picture' of Universe UnveiledMegan Gannon — Future plc — 21 December 2012
- 95harvnbWright (2004) p. 291Wright — 2004
- 96journalA Measurement of Ω from the North American Test Flight of BoomerangAlessandro Melchiorri et al. — 20 June 2000
- 97journalA Flat Universe from High-Resolution Maps of the Cosmic Microwave Background RadiationPaolo de Bernardis et al. — 27 April 2000
- 98journalA Measurement of the Angular Power Spectrum of the Cosmic Microwave Background from l = 100 to 400Andre D. Miller et al. — 10 October 1999
- 99harvnbKolb, Turner (1988) p. chpt. 4Kolb, Turner — 1988
- 100journalPrimordial Nucleosynthesis: Successes And ChallengesGary Steigman — February 2006
- 101webAstronomers Grapple with JWST's Discovery of Early GalaxiesJonathan O'Callaghan — Scientific American — December 6, 2022
- 102arxivCosmological Perturbation Theory and Structure FormationEdmund Bertschinger — 2000
- 103journalSimulations of Structure Formation in the UniverseEdmund Bertschinger — September 1998
- 104webBICEP2 March 2014 Results and Data ProductsFAS Research Computing, Harvard University — 16 December 2014
- 105webNASA Technology Views Birth of the UniverseWhitney Clavin — NASA — 17 March 2014
- 106newsSpace Ripples Reveal Big Bang's Smoking GunDennis Overbye — 17 March 2014
- 107newsRipples From the Big BangDennis Overbye — 24 March 2014
- 108journalDetection of Pristine Gas Two Billion Years After the Big BangMichele Fumagalli et al. — 2 December 2011
- 109newsAstronomers find clouds of primordial gas from the early universeTim Stephens — University of California, Santa Cruz — 10 November 2011
- 110webDetermination of the Universe's Age, toDaniel Perley — Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley — 21 February 2005
- 111journalPlanck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parametersPlanck Collaboration — October 2016
- 112journalThe age problem in the ΛCDM modelR. J. Yang et al. — 2010
- 113journalReconciling the cosmic age problem in the Rh = ct universeH. Yu et al. — 2014
- 114journalFirst detection of CO in a high-redshift damped Lyman-α systemRaghunathan Srianand et al. — May 2008
- 115journalConstraints on the CMB temperature-redshift dependence from SZ and distance measurementsAnastasios Avgoustidis et al. — 14 February 2012
- 116harvnbBelusevic (2008) p. [https://media.wiley.com/product_data/excerpt/42/35274076/3527407642.pdf 16]Belusevic — 2008
- 117newsEinstein's gravitational waves 'seen' from black holesPallab Ghosh — BBC — 11 February 2016
- 118magazineThe Future of Gravitational Wave AstronomyLee Billings — 12 February 2016
- 119journalA Critical Look at Inflationary CosmologyJohn Earman et al. — March 1999
- 120harvnbHawking, Israel (2010) p. 581–638Hawking, Israel — 2010
- 121harvnbPenrose (1989)Penrose — 1989
- 122magazineThe Inflation Debate: Is the theory at the heart of modern cosmology deeply flawed?Paul J. Steinhardt — April 2011
- 123journalMatter and antimatter in the universeLaurent Canetti et al. — 2012-09-17
- 124journalНарушение СР-инвариантности, С-асимметрия и барионная асимметрия ВселеннойAndrei D. Sakharov — 10 January 1967
- 125journalViolation of CP Invariance, С Asymmetry, and Baryon Asymmetry of the UniverseAndrei D. Sakharov — 10 January 1967
- 126journalConstraining dark energy from the abundance of weak gravitational lensesNevin N. Weinberg et al. — May 2003
- 127webBaryon acoustic oscillations and dark energyMartin White
- 128journalCompleted SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point ObservatoryShadab Alam — April 2021
- 129harvnbTanabashi, M. (2018) p. [http://pdg.lbl.gov/2018/reviews/rpp2018-rev-dark-energy.pdf 406–413]Tanabashi, M. — 2018
- 130journalThe quantum vacuum and the cosmological constant problemSvend E. Rugh et al. — December 2002
- 131webDark MatterWilliam C. Keel — October 2009
- 132harvnbTanabashi, M. (2018) p. [http://pdg.lbl.gov/2018/reviews/rpp2018-rev-dark-matter.pdf 396–405]Tanabashi, M. — 2018
- 133bookLocal Group CosmologyJames S. Bullock — 2010
- 134journalCusps in cold dark matter haloesJürg Diemand et al. — December 2005
- 135journalThe Real Problem with MONDScott Dodelson — 31 December 2011
- 136harvnbKolb, Turner (1988) p. chpt. 8Kolb, Turner — 1988
- 137harvnbRyden (2003)Ryden — 2003
- 138harvnbPenrose (2007)Penrose — 2007
- 139magazineA Universe from NothingAlexei V. Filippenko et al. — March–April 2002
- 140av media'A Universe From Nothing' by Lawrence Krauss, AAI 2009Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science — 21 October 2009
- 141harvnbHawking, Israel (2010) p. 504–517Hawking, Israel — 2010
- 142webBrief Answers to Cosmic QuestionsHarvard–Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
- 143journalExpanding Confusion: Common Misconceptions of Cosmological Horizons and the Superluminal Expansion of the UniverseTamara M. Davis et al. — 31 March 2004
- 144bookThe Future of the Universe and the Future of Our CivilizationAlexei Starobinsky — World Scientific Publishing — 2000
- 145webConfronting the Multiverse: What 'Infinite Universes' Would MeanRobert Lawrence Kuhn — 2015-12-23
- 146harvnbCarroll, n.d.
- 147magazineQuantentrick schafft Urknall-Singularität abMike Beckers — 16 February 2015
- 148journalCosmology from quantum potentialAhmed Farag Ali et al. — 4 February 2015
- 149journalOn the correctness of cosmology from quantum potentialElsayed I. Lashin — 7 March 2016
- 150journalDark matter and dark energy from a Bose–Einstein condensateSaurya Das et al. — 21 May 2015
- 151webThe Beginning of TimeStephen W. Hawking — The Stephen Hawking Foundation — 1996
- 152webThe Big Bang Didn't Need God to Start Universe, Researchers SayMike Wall — 24 June 2012
- 153newsBefore the Big Bang, There Was . . . What?Dennis Overbye — 22 May 2001
- 154journalSpontaneous creation of the universe from nothingDongshan He et al. — 3 April 2014
- 155journalSpontaneous creation of the Universe Ex NihiloMaya Lincoln et al. — 1 December 2013
- 156journalWave function of the UniverseJames H. Hartle et al. — 15 December 1983
- 157journalBrane CosmologyDavid Langlois — 2003
- 158harvnbGibbons, Shellard, Rankin (2003) p. 801–838Gibbons, Shellard, Rankin — 2003
- 159webRecycled Universe: Theory Could Solve Cosmic MysteryKer Than — Future plc — 8 May 2006
- 160webWhat Happened Before the Big Bang?Barbara K. Kennedy — Eberly College of Science, Pennsylvania State University — 1 July 2007
- 161journalWhat happened before the Big Bang?Martin Bojowald — August 2007
- 162journalEternal Chaotic InflationAndrei D. Linde — May 1986
- 163journalEternally Existing Self-Reproducing Chaotic Inflationary UniverseAndrei D. Linde — 14 August 1986
- 164journalPrimordial black holes from pre-big bang inflationP. Conzinu et al. — August 2020
- 165webWhat is the Ultimate Fate of the Universe?NASA/WMAP Science Team — NASA — 29 June 2015
- 166journalA dying universe: the long-term fate and evolution of astrophysical objectsFred C. Adams et al. — April 1997
- 167journalPhantom Energy: Dark Energy with w<−1 Causes a Cosmic DoomsdayRobert R. Caldwell et al. — 15 August 2003
- 168harvnbHarris (2002) p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=Rx2Qf9ieFKYC&pg=PA128 128]Harris — 2002
- 169harvnbFrame (2009) p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=1mb-h1lom9IC&pg=PA137 137–141]Frame — 2009
- 170harvnbHarrison (2010) p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=0mSCHC0QMUgC&pg=PA9 9]Harrison — 2010
- 171harvnbBlock, Puerari, Stockton (2000) p. 723–740Block, Puerari, Stockton — 2000
- 172harvnbHarris (2002) p. [https://books.google.com/books?id=Rx2Qf9ieFKYC&pg=PA129 129]Harris — 2002
- 173journalThe Ultimate Question of Origins: God and the Beginning of the UniverseWilliam Lane Craig — December 1999
- 174webThe Ultimate Question of Origins: God and the Beginning of the UniverseWilliam Lane Craig