Bicameralism

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Bicameralism names a simple but consequential idea: split the legislature into two separate houses, give them different compositions, and require them to agree before a law can pass. Roughly 40% of the world's national legislatures are built this way. The other 60% operate as single chambers. That gap raises an immediate question: if a majority of countries get by with one house, why do so many others insist on two? The answers stretch back to medieval England, run through the arguments of Benjamin Rush and James Madison, and still echo in reform debates happening right now from Romania to Bangladesh.

• 2. The Mother of Parliaments

  ›

  In 1341, the Commons met separately from the nobility and clergy for the first time in England, creating what was effectively an upper and a lower chamber in one stroke. The knights and burgesses sat in the lower chamber; the peers and clergy formed the upper. The lower chamber became the House of Commons. The upper chamber acquired the name House of Lords from 1544 onward. Together they are the Houses of Parliament. The phrase "Mother of Parliaments" is almost always misquoted: John Bright said in 1865 that "England is the Mother of Parliaments". The attribution shifted over time to the institution rather than the nation. Because the British Parliament became the explicit model for so many other legislative systems, its Acts have directly created parliaments across the world, making that misquotation surprisingly apt in practice.

• 3. American Framers, Two Visions

  ›

  Benjamin Rush put the tension plainly: the desire for an upper chamber of wealthier and wiser men was, he noted, "almost always connected with opulence". James Madison saw the Senate's purpose differently. He wanted a body that would proceed with "more coolness, with more system and with more wisdom, than the popular branch", acting as a check on the "fickleness and passion" he feared would grip the House of Representatives. The Framers gave the Senate prerogatives in foreign policy precisely because steadiness and caution were considered especially important there. State legislators, not the general public, initially chose senators. That arrangement lasted until 1913, when the Seventeenth Amendment required senators to be elected by popular vote. The Connecticut Compromise added a federal dimension: the Senate would give every state exactly two delegates regardless of population, while the House would apportion seats by population. The result was a new rationale for bicameralism tied specifically to the structure of a federation.

• 4. Perfect and Imperfect Balance

  ›

  When both chambers must approve legislation by a concurrent majority, scholars call that arrangement perfect bicameralism. The rarer form, it tends to appear in federal systems and presidential governments. In many parliamentary and semi-presidential systems the balance tilts. The house to which the executive is responsible can overrule the other, and the system is considered imperfect bicameralism. The British House of Commons can override the House of Lords under the Parliament Acts of 1911 and 1949 if a bill is not passed within two sessions. France's National Assembly can overrule the Senate. Some legislatures fall between these poles, with one house able to override the other only under defined circumstances. The relationship also follows a geographic logic: unitary states with parliamentary systems tend toward clear lower-house dominance, while federal and presidential systems tend toward more equal chambers.

• 5. The Washminster Mutation

  ›

  Australia is, by its own political scientists' reckoning, a hybrid they nicknamed the "Washminster mutation". As of the 31st of August 2017, its lower House of Representatives held 151 members, each elected from single-member constituencies using full-preference instant-runoff voting. That method tends to consolidate power in two major groups, the Liberal/National Coalition and the Labor Party. The Senate is elected differently, under the single transferable vote system of proportional representation, with 76 senators total: 12 from each of the 6 states regardless of population, and 2 each from the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory. Proportional representation fills the Senate with multiple parties, which means the governing party in the lower house rarely holds a majority there. The consequence is structural: Australia's Senate retains a power analogous to what the British House of Lords held before the Parliament Act 1911, the ability to block supply to the government of the day. A government that loses supply can be dismissed by the governor-general, as happened in the 1975 Australian constitutional crisis.

• 6. Aristocracy Preserved and Challenged

  ›

  The House of Lords Act 1999 cut the number of hereditary peers from around 700 down to 92. Of those 92, one is the Earl Marshal, a hereditary office always held by the Duke of Norfolk. One is the Lord Great Chamberlain, held by turns and currently by Baron Carrington. The remaining 90 are elected by all sitting peers. When a representative peer dies, a by-election fills the vacancy. Life peers are appointed either by the Appointments Commission or through Dissolution Honours at the end of every parliamentary term, when leaving MPs may be offered a seat to preserve institutional memory. It is traditional to offer a peerage to every outgoing Speaker of the House of Commons. As of the 16th of February 2021, 803 people sat in the House of Lords, composed of 92 hereditary peers, 26 Lords Spiritual, and 685 life peers. The 26 Lords Spiritual include the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Archbishop of York, the Bishop of London, the Bishop of Durham, the Bishop of Winchester, and the next 21 longest-serving bishops. Japan once maintained a similar aristocratic chamber; its House of Peers was abolished after World War II and replaced with the elected House of Councillors.

• 7. Arguments For, Arguments Against

  ›

  Proponents of bicameralism point to the logic of checks and balances: a second chamber, differently composed, reduces the chance that a "sinister interest" can capture the legislature in a single moment. Critics counter that two chambers make meaningful political reform harder to achieve and increase the risk of gridlock, especially when both chambers hold similar powers. Italy illustrates the gridlock concern: both the Senate of the Republic and the Chamber of Deputies share the same role and power, but the Senate is elected on a regional basis while deputies are elected nationally. A party that leads nationally may finish second or third in key regions, producing different majorities in each chamber. Because the Italian government must win confidence votes in both chambers, this structure has produced legislative deadlocks and government instability. On the other side, a 2005 referendum in Romania found that 77.78% of voters favored switching to a unicameral parliament, with a turnout of 50.95%. The referendum was consultative, so it required further parliamentary action to take effect. Bahrain moved in the opposite direction in 2002, adopting a bicameral system with an elected lower chamber and an appointed upper house, a change that prompted the Al Wefaq party to boycott that year's elections.

• 8. Reform, Persistence, and Future Shape

  ›

  Nebraska converted its legislature from bicameral to unicameral during the 1930s, with one of the selling points being the elimination of the conference committee process, where a small number of legislators from each chamber finalize legislation in an unamendable take-it-or-leave-it form. Jesse Ventura, during his tenure as governor of Minnesota, advocated a similar move in his book Do I Stand Alone?, arguing that bicameral legislatures for states were excessive and contributed to legislative and budgetary problems. At the subnational level, several Argentine provinces have moved the other direction: Santiago del Estero switched to a bicameral system in 1884, then back to unicameral in 1903. Tucumán and Córdoba dropped their bicameral structures in 1990 and 2001 respectively. Bangladesh's Constitutional Reform Commission has proposed establishing a Senate of Bangladesh with 105 seats, with senators to be elected proportionally and five appointed by the president; the 2026 Bangladeshi constitutional referendum will determine whether that chamber comes into being. Georgia, a unitary republic, adopted a constitutional provision in 2017 that would trigger a shift to bicameralism once the country restores jurisdiction over territories currently under Russian occupation.