Berlin Declaration (1945)

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The Berlin Declaration of the 5th of June 1945 did something that the German Instrument of Surrender of the 8th of May had not done: it formally transferred the full civil authority of a defeated nation to four foreign powers. The military surrender eight days earlier had covered only one thing, the capitulation of German armed forces. It said nothing about who would govern Germany, who held its courts, who controlled its borders. That gap was not an oversight. It was a problem the Allies had been quietly circling for years, and on a single day in early June, four commanders put pen to paper and filled it.

  The questions that document raised would echo for decades. Could four occupying powers legally abolish a state? Could they tear apart the old civic structures root and branch? And what happened when they disagreed among themselves about what to build in the ruins?

• 2. The Legal Gap After Surrender

  ›

  Karl Dönitz had been named Adolf Hitler's successor after Hitler killed himself in the ruins of Berlin on the 30th of April 1945. Dönitz claimed to have established a civil government at Flensburg. The Allies rejected that claim outright. Without a recognised German civilian authority to sign a full unconditional surrender, the Allies found themselves holding a country with no legal framework for its occupation.

  The European Advisory Commission had already drafted a comprehensive surrender text, written for a different scenario: one in which Nazi power had been overthrown from within Germany by its own military or civil authorities. A post-Nazi government would have emerged, sought an armistice, and signed. That scenario never came to pass. The Nazis held on until the very end, which meant the carefully prepared text sat unused. The Allies then took that text, recast it as a declaration, added an extended explanatory preamble, and adopted it unilaterally as the Declaration regarding the defeat of Germany.

  One clause from the original surrender instrument was deliberately left out: the proposed dismemberment clause, which had been added at the Yalta conference. Its absence would matter for later legal debates about whether Germany had been permanently partitioned or merely occupied.

• 3. What the Moscow Declarations Set In Motion

  ›

  The Moscow Declarations of October 1943 had planted the seeds of what followed. There, the Allies committed to pursuing Germany until its armed forces surrendered unconditionally, and they agreed that individuals who committed atrocities in occupied territories would be returned to those territories for judgment. The entire leadership of Nazi Germany was classed as "criminals" to be seized and punished by joint Allied decision. At the time, that formula was understood to mean summary execution without trial, and it remained British policy until April 1945.

  The shift came when the British War Cabinet came to agree with an American proposal: rather than execute Nazi leaders without process, tribunals of justice should be established. Every individual Nazi leader would be tried. Every Nazi institution, agency, and association would be declared a "criminal organisation," with proved membership carrying judicial penalties.

  The practical effect was sweeping. By May 1945, those Nazi bodies were the only functioning institutions of German civil administration. Declaring them criminal meant that the entire civil apparatus of the German state, and everyone who worked within it, was designated as having engaged in "criminal" activity. The declaration's own language described the Nazi state as "structurally, in its genesis and throughout its existence, a vast criminal enterprise."

• 4. Soldiers and Civilians Treated Differently

  ›

  One of the most striking features of the declaration's legal architecture was where it drew its line. Nazi civil institutions were declared criminal enterprises. The German High Command and the armed forces were not. Generals remained generals. Soldiers remained soldiers. Military orders issued right up to the 8th of May 1945 were treated as valid orders with full legal effect.

  This distinction was not arbitrary. It made the surrender itself legally coherent. The representatives of the German High Command had signed the Instrument of Surrender in Berlin, and their orders to the army, navy, and air force to lay down their arms had to be lawful commands, properly enforceable through military discipline, for the surrender to hold. If those officers had been acting criminally, their orders could have been refused or ignored.

  The Berlin Declaration thus recognised two parallel structures inside Nazi Germany, one civil and one military, and treated them under entirely different legal frameworks. That asymmetry allowed the formal end of the war to proceed on solid ground even while the entire state apparatus that had driven the war was being declared void.

• 5. Fifteen Articles and Their Consequences

  ›

  The declaration ran to fifteen articles. The first eight dealt with the mechanics of military capitulation: the surrender of equipment, the handover of intelligence assets. By July 1945 those steps had largely been completed.

  The articles that shaped postwar Germany most profoundly were Article 11 and Article 13. Article 11 provided for the arrest and trial of Nazi leaders and suspected war criminals. Article 13 gave the Allied Powers almost unrestricted authority to reshape German civil, economic, and legal structures within their respective zones.

  Under Article 13, de-Nazification drove through public institutions and businesses at every level. Reparations were extracted. In the Soviet zone, the article was applied to something far more structural: a major programme of land reform. Large prewar landed estates were expropriated, and the rural land was redistributed to surviving tenant occupiers and to expellee farmers who had been pushed out of formerly-eastern parts of Germany. That redistribution would become the subject of legal battles lasting into the twenty-first century.

  The declaration also defined Germany's territorial extent for the purpose of the document as the country's borders on the 31st of December 1937, after the 1935 Saar referendum and before the 1938 Anschluss. That baseline gave the Allies a clear reference point while leaving open their explicitly claimed authority to redraw Germany's future boundaries.

• 6. Signing Day and the Japanese Clause

  ›

  Dwight D. Eisenhower arrived in Berlin on the 5th of June 1945 expecting to sign the declaration and fly back to Frankfurt the same day. What followed was not so straightforward. Georgy Zhukov refused to sign. His objection focused on Article 10, which required Soviets to arrest Japanese nationals found in Germany. The Soviet Union was not yet at war with Japan, and Zhukov would not commit to that obligation.

  Eisenhower ordered the clause removed. The move surprised Zhukov, who had not anticipated it and needed to seek approval from Moscow. After that delay, the four commanders, Zhukov for the Soviet Union, Eisenhower for the United States, Bernard Montgomery for the United Kingdom, and Jean de Lattre de Tassigny for France, each signed four copies of the declaration in English, French, Russian, and German as press photographers captured the moment.

  A monument now stands at the site in the Wendenschloss district of Berlin-Köpenick on Niebergall Street. Its inscription reads: "On the 5th of June 1945 in the former headquarters of Marshal G. K. Zhukov here, the representatives of the high commands of the Anti-Hitler Coalition signed the Declaration of the defeat of Nazi Germany and the assumption of governmental authority through the four allied states."

• 7. Legal Challenges and the Long Reckoning

  ›

  The Allied Control Council was established on the 30th of August 1945, some weeks after the signing, because Zhukov had refused to allow it to begin functioning until the four powers' forces had redeployed to their own zones. When it did convene, the council assumed it held the sole repository of German state sovereignty, particularly for external relations. In practice each power largely ran its own occupation zone as it saw fit.

  France, which had not been invited to the Potsdam Conference and refused to be bound by the Potsdam Agreement, obstructed the council's work first. The Soviet Union walked out in 1948. The result was that the council could not meet again until 1971 and then 1990. A governing body designed to speak for all of Germany was paralysed almost from the start.

  Scholar debate challenged whether the Allies had actually extinguished the German state at all. The argument ran that a state's legal extinction required formal annexation of its people and territory into another state. Since the Berlin Declaration explicitly forswore annexation, some maintained that the German national state had survived the collapse of Nazi Germany in some form, independent of the Allied Control Council.

  The Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 posed a separate challenge. Those conventions set limits on what an occupying military power could do to a conquered country's civic and legal structures. The Allies held that those limits did not apply because eliminating Nazism and German militarism had been a major wartime objective. General Eisenhower's Proclamation Number 1, issued in October 1944, had already promised the total obliteration of Nazism and militarism alongside the suspension of the German legal system and the assumption of supreme executive, legislative, and judicial power.

  The most durable test came after German reunification in 1990. Descendants of landowners whose estates had been redistributed under the Soviet-instigated East German land reform brought a succession of four cases before the Federal Constitutional Court over a decade, then carried an appeal to the European Court of Human Rights in 2005. The court found in favour of the legality of the Allied occupation, ruling that the postwar occupation of Germany had been an occupation "sui generis" which had "conferred powers of sovereignty" on the Allied Powers. The Treaty on the Final Settlement With Respect to Germany, ratified in 1991, formally ended the occupation and closed the last chapter of the legal order the Berlin Declaration had opened on that June morning in 1945.