Beowulf

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Beowulf opens with a funeral. A great king, Scyld Scefing, is laid in a ship and sent out to sea, his body surrounded by treasure. It is a scene of mourning and of mystery, and it sets the tone for a poem that has puzzled, inspired, and obsessed readers for centuries. The poem is 3,182 alliterative lines long, written in Old English, and it survives in exactly one manuscript. Nobody knows who wrote it. Nobody knows precisely when. What scholars do know is that the manuscript dates to somewhere between AD 975 and 1025, and that the anonymous author has simply been called the Beowulf poet ever since.

  The story is set in pagan Scandinavia during the 5th and 6th centuries. A young warrior named Beowulf travels from his homeland of Geatland to help a Danish king whose great hall has been terrorized by a monster for twelve years. He fights that monster, then the monster’s mother, then fifty years later a dragon. The poem ends, as it began, with a funeral. In between, it asks questions about courage, pride, loyalty, and what a leader owes the people who depend on him.

  Those questions have drawn translators, scholars, and storytellers back to the text for more than two centuries. By 2020, a bibliographic database of Beowulf’s afterlives listed some 688 translations and other versions of the poem. The Old English original has been rendered into at least 38 other languages. J. R. R. Tolkien wrote both a prose and a verse translation of his own, and credited the poem’s techniques as an influence on The Lord of the Rings. Seamus Heaney’s 1999 translation won wide acclaim and brought the poem to a new generation of readers. What follows is the story of how this single, fire-damaged manuscript became one of the most studied works in the English literary tradition.

• 2. The Manuscript and Its Perils

  ›

  On the 23rd of October 1731, a fire broke out at Ashburnham House in London, where Sir Robert Cotton’s collection of medieval manuscripts was being stored. Around a quarter of the manuscripts bequeathed by Cotton were destroyed that night. The Beowulf manuscript survived, but its margins were charred, and letters on the edges of the parchment were lost. In the years since, parts of the manuscript have continued to crumble, and rebinding efforts, though saving the document from further deterioration, have covered up additional letters, causing their own form of damage.

  The manuscript is now housed in the British Library under the official designation Cotton Vitellius A.XV, a name that reflects the shelving system of Cotton’s private library. Cotton arranged his books under the busts of Roman emperors; the designation translates as the 15th book from the left on the top shelf of the bookcase topped by the bust of Emperor Vitellius. The manuscript gained its more familiar name, the Nowell Codex, from the 16th-century scholar Laurence Nowell, who is believed to have acquired it through William Cecil, 1st Baron Burghley, in 1563, when Nowell joined Cecil’s household as a tutor.

  The manuscript had a murky history before Nowell’s ownership, and that mystery extends to its cataloguing. The Reverend Thomas Smith catalogued the Cotton library in 1696, and Humfrey Wanley did so again in 1705. The poem was identified by name for the first time in a letter exchange in 1700 between George Hickes and Wanley. In that letter, Hickes responded to a charge that Smith had overlooked the manuscript entirely, writing back: "I can find nothing yet of Beowulph." Scholar Kevin Kiernan theorized that Smith missed it because he was relying on earlier catalogues, or simply did not know how to describe what he was looking at.

  The manuscript passed to Crown ownership in 1702 on the death of Sir John Cotton, who had inherited it from his grandfather Robert. It was transcribed for the first time in 1786 by the Icelandic scholar Grímur Jónsson Thorkelin, working under a Danish government historical research commission. Thorkelin hired a professional copyist with no knowledge of Old English, then made a second copy himself. Those transcriptions are now prized records of the text as it existed before further deterioration. Thorkelin used them as the basis for the first complete published edition of the poem, presented in Latin. Kevin Kiernan later used fibre-optic backlighting and ultraviolet lighting to recover letters lost to binding, erasure, and ink blotting, producing the Electronic Beowulf, whose first edition appeared in 1999.

• 3. Two Scribes, One Poem

  ›

  Two different scribes wrote out the Beowulf manuscript we have today, and their working habits were strikingly different. The first scribe wrote the prose at the beginning of the manuscript and continued through the first 1,939 lines of the poem before stopping mid-sentence. He was a careful editor: he regularized the spelling of his source into standard Late West Saxon, smoothing over archaic or regional forms as he went. The second scribe, who took over after line 1,939 and can be recognized by a visible change in handwriting, worked more vigorously and with, as scholars have noted, less apparent care. He did not modify the spelling of what he copied. He reproduced what he saw.

  That difference in approach has turned out to be valuable. Because the second scribe preserved archaic dialectal features without modernizing them, modern scholars can use those forms to trace the poem’s cultural origins and its journey through the dialect areas of England. The poem predominantly uses Late West Saxon, but it also contains Mercian, Northumbrian, Early West Saxon, Anglian, and Kentish forms, suggesting a long and complicated transmission across the main dialect zones before it reached the Nowell Codex.

  Both scribes appear to have proofread their sections, yet errors remain throughout. The Beowulf manuscript is followed in the codex by the Old English poem Judith, and wormholes found in the last leaves of Beowulf that are absent in the Judith manuscript suggest that Beowulf once ended the volume entirely. Knowledge of books held at Malmesbury Abbey, combined with the identification of words particular to the local dialect, have led some scholars to suggest the transcription took place there.

  The poem has no title in the original manuscript. It came to be known by the name of its protagonist, and the question of exactly when and where it was first composed would occupy scholars for more than two centuries after Thorkelin’s edition made the text widely accessible.

• 4. When Was It Written?

  ›

  The dating of Beowulf has generated more scholarly argument than almost any other question attached to the poem. The manuscript can be pinned to the period between AD 975 and 1025. When the poem itself was composed is a different matter entirely, and opinion has split along at least three main positions.

  J. R. R. Tolkien argued that the poem retains too genuine a memory of Anglo-Saxon paganism to have been composed more than a few generations after the Christianisation of England, which was largely complete by around AD 700. That would place composition in the 8th century. Tolkien’s position has been defended by scholars including Tom Shippey, Leonard Neidorf, Rafael J. Pascual, and Robert D. Fulk. Part of the linguistic argument rests on something called Kaluza’s law: the poem appears to observe distinctions in the lengths of unstressed vowels in a way that had disappeared before the 9th century, which would support a pre-9th-century composition date. Not everyone accepts that argument. B. R. Hutcheson does not believe Kaluza’s law can be used to date the poem, while nonetheless acknowledging that the weight of Fulk’s evidence points strongly toward the 8th century.

  Craig R. Davis proposed a composition date in the AD 890s, tying the poem to the reign of King Alfred of England. In this reading, the poem was a product of Alfred’s policy of asserting authority over the Angelcynn, with Scyldic descent being attributed to the West-Saxon royal pedigree. This aligns roughly with a separate proposal by Lapidge, who posited a West-Saxon exemplar dating to around AD 900.

  A third group argues the poem may be nearly contemporary with its 11th-century manuscript, and that the two scribes were not transcribing an older text but rather producing a fresh interpretation of an earlier version. Albert Lord, in his 1960 work The Singer of Tales, argued that the manuscript represents the transcription of a live oral performance, though likely recorded over more than one sitting. In 1914, F. W. Moorman, the first professor of English Language at the University of Leeds, placed the poem’s composition in Yorkshire. E. Talbot Donaldson favored a composition during the first half of the 8th century by a writer from what was then called West Mercia.

• 5. Heroes, Monsters, and Structure

  ›

  Heorot, the great mead hall built by King Hrothgar of the Danes, stands as the poem’s central image of human civilization. It is a place of singing, celebration, and community, and it is exactly that joy which draws Grendel’s wrath. Grendel is described as a monstrous troll-like eoten said to be descended from the biblical Cain. For twelve years he attacks the hall, devouring Hrothgar’s warriors as they sleep, until the king and his people abandon the building they built to mark their prosperity.

  Beowulf enters this crisis as a young warrior from Geatland who refuses to carry a weapon against Grendel, holding himself to be the monster’s equal by strength alone. When Grendel reaches into the hall one night and kills one of Beowulf’s men, Beowulf, who has been feigning sleep, seizes the monster’s hand. What follows is a violent struggle in which Beowulf’s retainers draw their swords and rush to help, only to find that blades cannot penetrate Grendel’s skin. Beowulf tears Grendel’s arm from the shoulder with his bare hands. The monster flees to die in the marshes. Beowulf then displays, as the source puts it, "the whole of Grendel’s shoulder and arm, his awesome grasp" for all to see.

  The poem’s structure mirrors that violence. E. Carrigan has shown its symmetry: the account of Grendel’s killing matches the account of the dragon fight; the glory of the Danes is balanced against depictions of both the Danish and Geatish courts. Gale Owen-Crocker sees the poem organized around its four funerals. Tolkien himself identified the primary structural division as the contrast between young Beowulf and old Beowulf. The poem also opens in medias res, as was characteristic of classical epics, with Grendel’s attacks already well under way before Beowulf arrives. An elaborate background of lineages, debts, and past deeds is woven throughout.

  The apparent digressions that run through the poem troubled early scholars. Frederick Klaeber wrote that they "interrupt the story"; W. W. Lawrence said they "clog the action". Scholars from Adrien Bonjour onward have argued that those digressions are actually structural, not decorative, providing context and comparison for the main action. One example: Beowulf’s swimming home across the sea from Frisia carrying thirty sets of armour is not a sidetrack but a pointed emphasis on the hero’s physical power. Tolkien drew on this technique of creating historical depth when writing The Lord of the Rings.

• 6. The Weight of Oral Tradition

  ›

  Roy Liuzza has noted that oral poetry is by its nature invisible to history, because evidence survives in writing and oral performance leaves no trace. Scholars have had to reconstruct how the poem might have been performed by comparing it with other bodies of verse and by drawing on ethnographic studies of early 20th-century oral performers.

  The model they developed pictures an Anglo-Saxon singer-poet, or scop, working from traditional stories and a repertoire of memorized phrases fitted to the traditional metre. Moving through recognizable scenes, such as putting on armour or crossing the sea, the scop improvised with different combinations of stock phrases at each telling, while the basic shape of the story held constant. The poem itself describes this technique directly. In lines 867-874, in Liuzza’s translation, a court poet assembles materials, "full of grand stories, mindful of songs... found other words truly bound together... to recite with skill the adventure of Beowulf, adeptly tell a tall tale, and (wordum wrixlan) weave his words." Lines 1065-1068 add that "the harp was touched, tales often told, when Hrothgar’s scop was set to recite among the mead tables his hall-entertainment."

  Albert Lord, in The Singer of Tales in 1960, cited Francis Peabody Magoun and others and considered it proven that Beowulf was composed orally. Later scholars pushed back. Larry Benson proposed that Germanic literature contains what he called "kernels of tradition" that Beowulf expands upon. Ann Watts argued against applying oral-formulaic theory as if the Homeric and Anglo-Saxon traditions were identical. Thomas Gardner agreed with Watts, arguing that the Beowulf text was too varied to have been built entirely from set formulae. John Miles Foley proposed a fluid continuum from traditionality to textuality, arguing that comparative work must always account for the particularities of the specific tradition being studied.

  The unresolved nature of this debate matters beyond academia. If the poem is oral in origin, then its Christian elements may have been added by a later literate transcriber, making the paganism central. If it was composed in writing by a Christian, then the pagan elements may be deliberate archaising, local color applied to a story set in a pre-Christian age.

• 7. Paganism, Christianity, and a Poet’s Ambiguity

  ›

  Christ is never mentioned by name in Beowulf. The biblical references in the poem are drawn exclusively from the Old Testament: Genesis, Exodus, and Daniel. The poem’s characters are Germanic pagans, yet it was recorded by Christian Anglo-Saxons who had converted from their native paganism largely by the 7th century. That gap has generated more interpretive disagreement than almost any other feature of the text.

  Fred C. Robinson argued that the Beowulf poet was sending a message to Anglo-Saxon readers about the imperfect state of Christianity in their own time, calling on them to recognize their residual "Anglo-Saxon Heathenism." In Robinson’s reading, both Beowulf and Hrothgar are admirable figures, but readers are ultimately left to feel sorry for them because they are fully detached from Christian truth. Richard North argued that the poet was interpreting Danish myths in Christian form for a Christian audience and raised an unsettling question: why did Anglo-Saxon audiences like hearing stories about people they classified as damned?

  Robert F. Yeager summarized the difficulty plainly: the scribes were demonstrably Christian, the composition took place in a Christianised England, yet none of the characters in the poem is demonstrably Christian. Beowulf himself offers prayers to a "Father Almighty" and the "Wielder of All", but whether those prayers reflect pagan usage that Christians later appropriated, or whether the poet intended Beowulf as a symbolic prefiguration of Christian virtue, remains open.

  Ursula Schaefer proposed that the poem operates within both horizons at once, a mode she called "vocality": not a compromise between pagan and Christian readings, and not a synthesis of them, but a third thing that participates in both oral and literate culture while possessing its own logic and aesthetic. Stanley B. Greenfield offered a different lens, arguing that references to the human body throughout the poem carry political meaning, with the word "shoulder-companion" functioning both as a physical description and as a term for a thane valuable to his lord. Greenfield noted that the warrior Unferð is placed at the king’s feet at line 499, a position consistent with his role as a member of the foot troops who, throughout the poem, serve mainly as background for more heroic action.

• 8. Translating the Untranslatable

  ›

  Sharon Turner translated selected verses into modern English in 1805, the first time any part of the poem appeared in that form. Nine complete translations followed in the 19th century, including those by John Mitchell Kemble and William Morris. After 1900, the pace accelerated sharply. Andy Orchard, in A Critical Companion to Beowulf, lists 33 representative translations in his bibliography. The Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies published Marijane Osborn’s annotated list of over 300 translations and adaptations in 2003. By 2020, the Beowulf’s Afterlives Bibliographic Database listed some 688 translations and other versions.

  The challenge is technical. Old English alliterative verse links the two halves of each line through similarity of initial sound, with no fixed number of beats per line. Kennings, evocative poetic descriptions of everyday things created to fulfill the alliterative requirements, run throughout the poem. The sea might be called the "swan’s riding"; a king might be called a "ring-giver." Reproducing these effects in modern English requires choices that inevitably reflect the translator’s priorities.

  Frederick Klaeber, a German philologist at the University of Minnesota, published his scholarly edition in 1922, which became, in the words of those who used it, "the central source used by graduate students for the study of the poem and by scholars and teachers as the basis of their translations." His third edition appeared in 1936; a fourth edition with new introductory material was published in 2008. J. R. R. Tolkien wrote an essay titled "On Translating Beowulf" exploring the specific difficulties; his own prose translation, edited by his son Christopher, was finally published in 2014 as Beowulf: A Translation and Commentary, alongside his retelling of the story in a tale he called Sellic Spell.

  Seamus Heaney’s 1999 translation, published in the US by W. W. Norton and included in the Norton Anthology of English Literature, generated both wide praise and sharp criticism. It became known among specialists as "Heaneywulf," a name coined by the translator Howell Chickering. Maria Dahvana Headley published a retelling called The Mere Wife in 2018, relocating the action to a 20th-century American suburb and centering Grendel’s mother. In 2020, Headley published a full translation in which the Old English opening word "Hwæt!" is rendered as "Bro!"; that translation won the Hugo Award for Best Related Work.