Battle of Kulikovo
The year 1359 marked the death of Khan Berdi Beg, triggering a period known as the Great Troubles within the Golden Horde. Warlord Mamai seized power in the western part of this vast empire without being a direct descendant of Genghis Khan. His grip on authority remained tenuous because true Genghisids held competing claims to the throne. Mamai had to constantly fight for supreme power while struggling against separatist movements across his domain. During these years, new political powers emerged such as the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Principality of Moscow. The principality of Moscow grew in power and often challenged its neighbors over territory. In 1300, Moscow seized the city of Kolomna from Ryazan after killing the prince of that region. This expansion created friction with neighboring states like Tver and Ryazan. Meanwhile, the Grand Duchy of Lithuania continued its own expansion campaigns. It competed with Moscow for supremacy over Tver between 1368 and 1372. After the death of Algirdas in 1377, his sons struggled for their legitimate right to the throne. They allied with the Grand Prince of Moscow during these internal conflicts. Simultaneously, Prince Ivan II of Moscow died in 1359. The new Khan transferred the throne of Vladimir to the Prince of Nizhny Novgorod by official law pronouncement. Moscow elites did not accept this transfer and used armed force and bribes to various Khans. By 1365 they forced the princes of Nizhny Novgorod to give up claims to the Grand Duchy of Vladimir. In 1368 conflict began between Moscow and Tver when Prince Mikhail of Tver received support from Lithuania. Mamai gave him a jarliq to the Grand Duchy of Vladimir in 1371. Moscow troops prevented the new Grand Prince from entering Vladimir despite the presence of a Tatar ambassador.
Prince Dmitri learned of the approaching army of Mamai in August 1380 while he was still gathering forces. Some interpretations suggest that Oleg Ryazansky sent a message to him either as a warning or an intimidation tactic. Dmitry quickly assembled an army in Kolomna where ambassadors from Mamai arrived demanding increased tribute. He agreed to pay only the amount provided for by his previous contract with Mamai rather than the higher demands. After reviewing the army, on August 20 he moved west along the Oka River. He crossed it at the town of Lopasnya on the 24th of August 25 before moving south towards Mamai. On September 6 the Russian army reached the Don River where it reorganized taking into account units joining during movement from Kolomna. At a council they decided to cross the Don before enemies could combine their forces. This strategic decision cut off the path to retreat in case of defeat but allowed them to engage Mamai directly. Mamai camped his army on the bank of the Don River waiting for allies to arrive. He had allied with Prince Jogaila of Lithuania and expected their arrival soon. The Grand Duchy of Ryazan under Prince Oleg took the side of Mamai although this fact is sometimes challenged. Oleg had been defeated by Mamai in 1378 when his capital was burnt so he lacked strength to resist Mamai independently.
On the 7th of September Prince Dmitri received word that Mamai's army was approaching him. In thick fog on the morning of the 8th of September the army crossed the Don River according to the Nikon Chronicle. Bridges were destroyed after crossing to prevent any escape route back across the river. The day held special significance as it was the feast of the Nativity of the Theotokos considered a patron Saint of Russia. The army came to the clean field near Nepryadva mouth and assumed battle formation. Tatars appeared and began forming their order of battle against the Christians. The Russian army organized into six regiments including Patrol, Forward, two regiments of Right and Left Hand, Large regiment and Ambush regiment. Each regiment divided into smaller tactical units called banners totaling about 23. Units entered battle gradually due to terrain constraints preventing broad front deployment. Flanks protected by ravines with dense thickets excluded chances for surprise flank attacks from the Horde. Vladimir the Bold commanded the Ambush regiment hidden behind Russian lines in an oak grove alongside Dmitry Bobrok who was brother-in-law of the Grand Prince. The Grand Prince went to front lines leaving trusted boyar Mikhail Brenok as head of Large Regiment under great banner. He exchanged horses with Brenok giving him coat and helmet so he could fight like ordinary boyar remaining unrecognized. Battle opened with single combat between champions Alexander Peresvet and Temir-Murza also known as Chelubey or Chrysotovrul. During first pass each champion killed other with spear falling to ground together making victory unclear.
Only five primary sources about the battle survived into modern times: one Church Slavonic text, two Middle High German chronicles, and two Bolgar manuscripts. No sources from Tatar side exist likely destroyed when Timur burnt archives of Golden Horde in Sarai years later. Early three literary works of Kulikovo cycle probably derived from common source including Chronicle Tale Zadonshchina and Narration. Scholars consider Narration youngest version least reliable yet even admitting flaws it contains historical elements. For example Narration mistakenly claimed Cyprian Metropolitan of Kiev resided in Moscow rather than Kyiv in 1380. It also stated Algirdas still grand duke of Lithuania despite dying in 1377. Dmitry Donskoy meeting Sergius of Radonezh almost certainly did not happen according to most scholars. Contradictions appear on fundamentals such as Donskoy role during battle itself. According to Narration he fought horseback clothes wounded left field found unconscious under tree after battle. Chronicle Tale says switched clothes boyar frontline until end combat sustained scratch. Style differs significantly between Zadonshchina chivalric militaristic story superficial religious elements versus Narration highly religious depiction constant prayers miracles symbolism. Two German chroniclers Johann von Posilge and Ratshandschrift were not eyewitnesses but received information from Lithuanian informants with own biases. Ostrowski argued German chronicles generally earlier more accurate showing battle took place Don River less significant claimed. Literary works contain at least some historical errors fictions making reconstruction difficult task for historians.
Medieval sources do not give precise description site battle mention large clear field beyond Don River near mouth Nepryadva River. In 19th century Stepan Nechaev proposed exact location hypothesis accepted by many researchers. Studies old soils 20th century showed left bank Nepryadva influx Don covered dense forests while right wooded steppe vast openings. Between rivers Nepryadva Smolka place finally localized team archaeologists led Dvurechensky 2005. Historian Azbelev subjected localization sharp criticism assuming real battlefield source Nepryadva since Old Russian word ust'e designated place river flows lake. First searches traces done amateurs 18th 19th centuries asking peasants ploughed land discover fragments weapons baptismal crosses icons medallions items allegedly related Kulikovo. Economist Vasily Lyovshin collected personal interest history battle large number antiquities discovered 19th century leading publication first catalogue Kulikovo artefacts Ivan Sakharov Secretary Department Russian Slavic Archaeology Imperial Russian Archaeological Society. General Governor Alexander Balashov educator pointed fact iron objects often collected melted peasants used purposes. One case occurred recently 2009 when Persian blade dug field house local family transferred Kulikovo field museum. Numerous fragments weapons crosses armour noted famous 19th-century Tula historian suggesting building museum these artefacts. Some finds known sent gifts government officials members Imperial family 1839 1843 head mace blade sword gifted Emperor Nicholas I Kulikovo nobleman. While preparing work Parishes Churches Tula Diocese 1895 editor Pavel Malitsky received reports inhabitants Tula Oblast found spearheads poleaxes crosses field. Spears arrows dug locals mentioned worksheets Tula Provincial Academic Archival Commission. Many artifacts collected noble families owned Kulikovo Oltufyevs Safonovs Nechayevs Chebyshevs whose rich collections still remembered citizens 1920, 1930s. Estates situated village Monastyrschina close site battle Civil War most collections lost significant part Nechayevs collection survived revolutionary period extensive use agricultural machinery contributed loss remaining artefacts. Several antiquities found transferred museums late 20th early 21st centuries.
Upon learning Mamai defeat Prince Jogaila turned army back Lithuania people Ryazan Land attacked separate detachments battlefield plundered taken prisoners question return prisoners remained actual twenty years mentioned Moscow-Ryazan Treaties 1381 1402. Prince Dmitri began prepare reprisal but Prince Oleg Ryazan fled Nikon Chronicle stating went Lithuania Ryazan boyars received Moscow governors. Soon Prince Oleg returned power forced accept Prince Dmitry sovereign older brother sign treaty peace Mukhammad-Bulek Mamai figurehead Khan killed battle Mamai escaped Genoese stronghold Caffa Crimea assembled new army lacked legitimate khan nobles defected rival Tokhtamysh khan. Mamai again fled Caffa killed there war Moscow led Mamai Horde complete crash one stroke Tokhtamysh received full power eliminating 20-year split Golden Horde historian Gorsky stated Tokhtamysh received most concrete political benefit defeat Mamai. Prince Dmitri known Donsky after battle did not manage become fully independent from Golden Horde however. In 1382 Khan Tokhtamysh launched another campaign against Principality Moscow captured burned down Moscow forcing Dmitri accept him sovereign. Victory Kulikovo early sign decline Mongol power century followed Moscow power rose solidifying control other Russian principalities. Russian vassalage Golden Horde officially ended 1480 century after battle following defeat Horde invasion great stand Ugra River.
Battle Kulikovo gave rise unprecedentedly large stratum medieval Rus literature no other historical event received wide coverage. Russian historians singled out body literary works Kulikovo cycle short. Most important works include Letopisnaia povest Chronicle Tale passed down two redactions Kratkaia letopisnaia povest Short Chronicle Tale preserved Rogozh Chronicle 1450 Simeon Chronicle 1490s Prostrannaia letopisnaia povest Expanded Chronicle Tale preserved Novgorod Fourth Chronicle 1480s Sofia First Chronicle 1480s Zadonshchina Battle beyond Don famous epic based influenced Tale Igor Campaign earliest manuscript dates 1470s Skazanie o Mamaevom poboishche Tale Battle Mamai also known Narration Battle Mamai Slovo zhitii prestavlenii velikogo kniazia Dmitriia Ivanovicha Oration Concerning Life Passing Grand Prince Dmitrii Ivanovich Encomium Dmitrii Ivanovich Expanded Redaction 1449, 1470s Life St Sergii Radonezh 1418. While Zadonshchina based literary model Tale Igor Campaign latter elements Slavic paganism replaced idea Rus soldiers fought Rus Land Christian faith yet Christian elements pale comparison military chivalric ethos. On other hand Narration largely derived Zadonshchina highly religious depiction battle replete constant prayers miracles religious symbolism. As 2022 six known manuscripts Zadonshchina over hundred copies Narration survived indicating greater popularity later versions systemically rewrote various episodes Zadonshchina make more religious. For example Narration adds invocation Volodimer I Kiev baptising Rus Land Alexander Peresvet pronouncing prayer before going into battle unlike Zadonshchina nobody said fighting Rus Land only Christian faith Grand Prince Dmitrii Ivanovich. Paintings theme battle created many Russian Soviet artists Orest Kiprensky Vasily Sazonov Mikhail Nesterov Alexander Bubnov Mikhail Avilov French painter Adolphe Yvon later known works Napoleonic Wars 1850 wrote monumental painting Battle Kulikovo Field order Nicholas I. Minor planet 2869 Nepryadva discovered 1980 Soviet astronomer Nikolai Stepanovich Chernykh named honour Russian victory Tataro-Mongols.
Up Next
Continue Browsing
Common questions
When did the Battle of Kulikovo take place?
The battle occurred on the 8th of September 1380. Prince Dmitri received word that Mamai's army was approaching him on the 7th of September before the main engagement began in thick fog.
Who fought in the Battle of Kulikovo and what were their alliances?
Russian forces led by Grand Prince Dmitri Ivanovich fought against the Mongol army commanded by Warlord Mamai. Mamai allied with Prince Jogaila of Lithuania and Prince Oleg of Ryazan while Russian units included regiments from Moscow, Vladimir, and other principalities.
Where exactly is the site of the Battle of Kulikovo located today?
Archaeologists led by Dvurechensky localized the battlefield between the Nepryadva and Smolka rivers near the mouth of the Don River in 2005. Stepan Nechaev proposed this hypothesis in the 19th century which remains accepted by many researchers despite earlier criticism regarding river terminology.
What happened to Mamai after his defeat at the Battle of Kulikovo?
Mamai escaped to the Genoese stronghold Caffa in Crimea where he assembled a new army but eventually fled again and was killed there. Tokhtamysh received full power over the Golden Horde after Mamai's death eliminating the twenty-year split within the empire.
How many primary sources about the Battle of Kulikovo survive into modern times?
Only five primary sources survived including one Church Slavonic text two Middle High German chronicles and two Bolgar manuscripts. No sources from the Tatar side exist likely destroyed when Timur burnt archives of the Golden Horde in Sarai years later.