Barracks emperor

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Barracks emperors were Roman rulers who clawed their way to the throne not through bloodlines or senatorial approval, but through the loyalty of armed soldiers. Between 235 and 284 AD, roughly fourteen men seized the imperial purple this way, each averaging just over two years in power before being deposed, killed in battle, or cut down by the very troops who had raised them up. That fifty-year stretch is remembered as the Crisis of the Third Century. It began with the assassination of Severus Alexander and did not end until a cavalry commander named Diocletian brought the whole chaotic era to a close. What made a soldier emperor? How did men born into obscurity come to rule the ancient world's greatest empire? And what did their repeated seizures of power actually cost Rome? Those are the questions at the heart of this story.

• 2. Men from the Margins

  ›

  Maximinus Thrax, the first barracks emperor, began his career as an ordinary enlisted soldier. He came from the outlying edges of the empire, as did many of the men who would follow in his pattern. These were not senators with distinguished family names, not magistrates with records of public service. A barracks emperor's only credential was the loyalty of the men under his command, earned through shared hardship along Rome's distant frontiers. Some of these soldiers had climbed into the equestrian class and worked their way into positions of real influence within their legions. That gave them the standing to make a bid for power. But equestrian rank offered no guarantee of permanence. Soldiers who elevated one man could just as easily transfer their allegiance to another who seemed more capable or more generous. The throne, once seized this way, rested on nothing more stable than continued goodwill from the ranks.

• 3. The Cost of Constant War

  ›

  Because so many barracks emperors commanded troops on Rome's borders, their decision to march on Rome created a dangerous problem. When a frontier general turned his army inward to seize the throne, he left the border undefended. Rome's enemies noticed. Germanic tribes pushed through those gaps in the 260s, penetrating deep into Roman territory. The response was the construction of the Aurelian Walls around the city of Rome itself. Rome was now fortifying its own capital against attack. No emperor who had seized power by force could afford to let his soldiers grow unhappy, so state funds flowed constantly into military pay. Public works and infrastructure went unrepaired and fell into ruin. When the treasury ran short, emperors simply seized private property to cover the shortfall. That practice damaged the broader economy and drove inflation upward throughout the empire.

• 4. A Catalogue of Brief Reigns

  ›

  Gordian I was a governor in Africa when soldiers and civilians alike proclaimed him co-emperor alongside his son Gordian II by popular demand in early 238. Both were dead within weeks. Gordian I took his own life after Gordian II was killed in battle against the governor of Numidia. The Senate then elected two of its own members, Pupienus and Balbinus, as co-emperors; the Praetorian Guard murdered them both. Gordian III, grandson of Gordian I, was elected by the Senate at the age of thirteen and held on until around 244, when he was either killed fighting the Persians under Shapur I in what is now Iraq, or murdered by the Praetorian Prefect Philip, who then took power himself as Philip the Arab. Philip the Arab was himself killed in battle near modern-day Verona by Decius in 249. Decius died fighting the Goths in June 251 alongside his son Herennius Etruscus. The younger son, Hostilian, succeeded them but his authority barely extended beyond Rome, and he died in a plague outbreak shortly after. That single year of 238 alone saw six claimants rise and fall.

• 5. Betrayal from Within

  ›

  Philip the Arab had appointed Decius specifically to suppress the usurper Pacatianus, who had proclaimed himself emperor in 248 and was murdered by his own soldiers before the campaign even concluded. That pattern of armies killing the very man they had raised up repeats throughout this period with striking regularity. Pacatianus, Jotapian, Gallus, Volusianus, and Aemilian all died at the hands of their own troops. Aemilian had actually defeated a Gothic army as governor of Moesia Superior and Pannonia and was proclaimed emperor by his soldiers on the strength of that victory. His men killed him when they realized they could not defeat the approaching forces of Valerian. Valerian himself was eventually captured by the Persians and died in captivity, the only Roman emperor taken prisoner by a foreign enemy. His co-emperor and son Gallienus survived until 268, when he too was murdered. Usurpers like Silbannacus held brief control of the mint in Rome, and Aureolus proclaimed himself emperor before surrendering to Claudius II Gothicus.

• 6. Diocletian's Exit from Chaos

  ›

  In 284, a cavalry commander named Diocletian became the last of the barracks emperors in the traditional sense. He then did something his predecessors had not: he used power to restructure it. Diocletian introduced reforms aimed at stabilizing the imperial office itself, not just holding it personally. His changes brought the Crisis of the Third Century to a formal close and inaugurated what historians call the Dominate era of Roman history. Later emperors, including Constantine I, Valentinian I, and Theodosius I, would still reach the throne through military power. But the specific phenomenon of the barracks emperor gave way to something different in the late imperial period. Men like Stilicho, Ricimer, Flavius Aetius, and Odoacer chose not to wear the purple themselves. Instead they governed through weak emperors whom they controlled, functioning as generalissimos who ruled in fact while puppet rulers held the title. Odoacer eventually dispensed with even that fiction in 476.