Anti-Comintern Pact
On the 25th of November 1936, two men signed a document in Berlin that would reshape the geopolitical landscape of the coming decade. Joachim von Ribbentrop and Kintomo Mushanokōji stood before each other as representatives of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan. Their signatures marked the beginning of an alliance built on shared hatred for communism but rooted in deep historical grievances against Western powers. The Washington Naval Conference of 1922 had left Japan feeling betrayed by the United States and United Kingdom. Japanese nationalists viewed this treaty as another humiliation comparable to the Treaty of Versailles imposed after World War I. Economic turmoil struck Japan during the Shōwa financial crisis of 1927 and the Great Depression of 1929. These events fueled political instability and created fertile ground for militaristic ideologies to take root within Japanese society. Meanwhile, Adolf Hitler's Germany sought to overturn the restrictions placed upon it after its defeat in the Great War. The German foreign policy establishment was divided between traditional diplomats like Konstantin von Neurath and Hitler's personal envoy Joachim von Ribbentrop. Ribbentrop operated through his semi-autonomous Dienststelle Ribbentrop, which allowed him to bypass official channels when pursuing agreements with Tokyo. This bureaucratic rivalry enabled rapid progress toward an anti-communist pact despite opposition from career diplomats who feared alienating China. The ideological foundations rested heavily on racial theories promoted by figures like Alfred Rosenberg in Germany and Shūmei Okawa in Japan. Both men argued that their respective nations possessed superior racial identities destined to dominate global affairs. Their writings gained traction among young military officers and bureaucrats who rejected democratic values in favor of authoritarian strength. The Communist International served as a common enemy for both regimes, providing justification for cooperation despite fundamental differences in their long-term strategic goals.
A secret additional protocol signed alongside the public treaty revealed the true purpose of the Anti-Comintern Pact. While the main agreement spoke vaguely about countering communist activities, this classified document explicitly targeted the Soviet Union by name. The text obligated both signatories to consult each other before engaging in any bilateral treaties with Moscow. This provision effectively nullified existing agreements such as the Treaty of Rapallo from 1922 and the Treaty of Berlin from 1926. German officials viewed these older accords as void under the new secret terms. Japanese ambassador Mushanokōji expressed satisfaction with this arrangement during his reply to Ribbentrop on the same day the pact was signed. The secret protocol allowed Germany and Japan to coordinate military and diplomatic actions against the USSR without public scrutiny. It remained exclusive between the two original signatories while later members joined only the public clauses. Soviet diplomats quickly recognized the threat posed by this hidden agreement. Maxim Litvinov, the Soviet foreign minister, called the pact a political instrument primarily controlled by Japan with hostile intentions toward Moscow. He declared that the public version served merely as camouflage for simultaneous discussions about a military alliance. Internal Soviet assessments confirmed that the Anti-Comintern Pact contained provisions designed specifically to encircle their nation. Trade relations between the USSR and Japan deteriorated sharply following the treaty's implementation. By 1939, Japanese imports from European Russia reached levels unseen since 1914, while exports fell below figures recorded in 1926. Economic sanctions imposed by the Soviet Union reflected growing alarm over the strategic implications of the secret addendum.
Hiroshi Oshima emerged as the single most important individual driving negotiations between Berlin and Tokyo. As Japan's military attaché stationed in Berlin, he operated outside official diplomatic channels to advance pro-German agendas within his embassy. His fluency in German language and deep connections with figures like Wilhelm Canaris facilitated unauthorized cooperation with Ribbentrop. Oshima frequently visited German military installations and gathered intelligence on Soviet strength despite lacking formal authorization from Tokyo. American military attaché Hugh W. Rowan observed these activities and concluded that Oshima received access to critical technical information held by the German army. Friedrich Wilhelm Hack served as a crucial networker linking Oshima, Canaris, and Werner von Blomberg through meetings organized in Freiburg starting early in 1935. These gatherings enabled direct communication between Japanese officers and high-ranking Nazi officials including Hitler himself. Ribbentrop reported at Nuremberg that he personally maintained certain connections with Japanese individuals, likely referring to his relationship with Oshima established via Hack. The Japanese foreign ministry initially resisted Oshima's aggressive diplomacy but eventually yielded to pressure from militarist factions led by Prince Kan'in Kotohito. Kotohito had been a close associate of Oshima's father Ken'ichi Oshima, who served as Minister of the Army during World War I. This familial connection provided political protection for Hiroshi Oshima even when he overstepped his assigned duties. Despite objections from career diplomats like Konstantin von Neurath, Oshima secured approval for the pact through persistent lobbying efforts within both governments. His actions demonstrated how individual initiative could override bureaucratic caution in authoritarian regimes.
China viewed the Anti-Comintern Pact as an existential threat given its reliance on German military assistance against impending Japanese invasion. The German foreign ministry attempted to reassure Beijing until hostilities erupted between Japan and China in July 1937. Afterward, Germany aligned clearly with Tokyo despite private criticism of Japanese aggression toward Chinese territories. France perceived the alliance as a power grab threatening Czechoslovakia and Poland while weakening existing European alliances. The Franco-Soviet Treaty of Mutual Assistance signed on the 27th of March 1936 heightened fears of encirclement among Western democracies. In Britain, debates within the House of Commons reflected growing concern about potential conflicts involving multiple Axis powers. American officials analyzed the agreement as evidence that Germany might follow Japan's path of satisfying territorial claims through military action. Joseph Grew, the U.S. ambassador to Japan, argued that the pact represented a banner for have-not nations seeking to challenge British Empire dominance rather than communism itself. Franklin D. Roosevelt shared French concerns regarding the safety of Eastern European states like Poland and Czechoslovakia. He believed secret clauses outlined both defensive and offensive alliances dividing global spheres of influence among signatories. Soviet trade relations with Japan collapsed dramatically after the treaty took effect. Imports from Asiatic Russia dropped below levels last seen in 1887, while exports fell beneath figures recorded since 1914. These economic disruptions underscored how quickly geopolitical alignments could reshape international commerce patterns.
Italy joined the Anti-Comintern Pact on the 6th of November 1937 following the failure of the Stresa Front initiative. Mussolini sought new partners after League of Nations sanctions isolated Rome due to its invasion of Ethiopia earlier that year. The Italian government initially abstained from negotiations but eventually agreed to complete a diplomatic triangle later formalized under the Tripartite Pact. Spain and Hungary entered the alliance in 1939 alongside other nations during World War II. Germany used state-controlled media outlets like Völkischer Beobachter to justify expansions by citing communist activities in places such as Hungary and Manchukuo. Publicly announced invitations allowed additional countries to join provided both original signatories granted consent. However, most new members signed only the public clauses rather than the classified secret protocol targeting the USSR. This distinction meant they lacked direct involvement in coordinated military planning against Moscow. The pact's flexibility enabled rapid growth despite initial skepticism from potential candidates. Japan hoped membership would free it from international isolation while acquiring valuable diplomatic and military allies including Poland and the Netherlands. Yet practical realities soon complicated these ambitions as global conflicts intensified throughout the late 1930s and early 1940s.
The Anti-Comintern Pact transitioned into the September 1940 Tripartite Pact which identified the United States as the primary threat instead of the Soviet Union. Although theoretically applicable to Soviets as well, this shift rendered the original agreement virtually inoperative by December 1941 when war broke out between Japan and America. Renewal efforts occurred in November 1941 allowing entry for several new member states before eventual termination following World War II's conclusion. Hitler viewed signing the pact as a litmus test of loyalty among prospective partners. After August 1939, Japan distanced itself from Germany due to the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact signed between Berlin and Moscow. This development forced Tokyo to reconsider its strategic priorities amid changing geopolitical conditions. Publicly, Nazi officials denied existence of the secret additional protocol even after Germany invaded the USSR in 1941. They launched pro-Japanese publicity campaigns attempting to improve German public opinion about their Asian ally despite underlying tensions. The treaty officially ceased to exist with the end of hostilities in 1945. Its legacy remains tied to how ideological alliances can evolve unpredictably under pressure from external threats and internal power struggles.
Up Next
Continue Browsing
Common questions
Who signed the Anti-Comintern Pact on the 25th of November 1936?
Joachim von Ribbentrop and Kintomo Mushanokōji signed the Anti-Comintern Pact on the 25th of November 1936. They acted as representatives for Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan respectively.
What was the secret additional protocol to the Anti-Comintern Pact?
The secret additional protocol explicitly targeted the Soviet Union by name rather than just communist activities generally. It obligated both signatories to consult each other before engaging in any bilateral treaties with Moscow.
How did Hiroshi Oshima influence the negotiations for the Anti-Comintern Pact?
Hiroshi Oshima drove negotiations between Berlin and Tokyo while operating outside official diplomatic channels. He utilized his fluency in German and connections with figures like Wilhelm Canaris to advance pro-German agendas within his embassy.
When did Italy join the Anti-Comintern Pact?
Italy joined the Anti-Comintern Pact on the 6th of November 1937 following the failure of the Stresa Front initiative. Mussolini sought new partners after League of Nations sanctions isolated Rome due to its invasion of Ethiopia earlier that year.
Why did the Anti-Comintern Pact transition into the Tripartite Pact?
The Anti-Comintern Pact transitioned into the September 1940 Tripartite Pact which identified the United States as the primary threat instead of the Soviet Union. This shift rendered the original agreement virtually inoperative by December 1941 when war broke out between Japan and America.