Anattā
Anattā is one of the most challenging ideas Buddhism asks of its followers: that there is no unchanging, permanent self. Not a diminished self, not a hidden self, but the complete absence of any fixed essence in any phenomenon whatsoever. The word itself is a composite Pali term, built from "an" meaning "not" and "attā" meaning "self-existent essence". It sits alongside dukkha and anicca as one of the Three Marks of Existence, a trio of observations about reality that anchor the entire Buddhist worldview. Yet scholars argue fiercely about what the doctrine actually claims. Does it deny that any self exists at all? Or is it, as Peter Harvey suggests, more accurately rendered as "non-Self" -- meaning not an essential, permanent self, and not the possession of such a thing? And what happens when Buddhism's own traditions begin to contradict each other on the answer?
Peter Harvey draws a firm line between the translations "not-Self" and "non-Self". The first, he says, expresses an incomplete meaning. The second captures the fuller sense: empty of Self or what belongs to Self. Buddhist scholar Richard Gombrich adds a further precision, arguing that anattā means "is not ātman" rather than "does not have ātman". That distinction matters enormously because it shifts the doctrine from a statement about possession to a statement about identity. Harvey also warns against rendering the term simply as "ego-less", because the Indian concept of ātman and attā is categorically different from the Freudian concept of ego. What is close to the Western idea of ego in Buddhist thought is something the texts call the "I am" conceit -- the root of self-importance and self-centredness, described as a delusion that only the enlightened have shed.
The Anattalakkhaṇa Sutta is among the early Buddhist texts that scholars such as Alexander Wynne and Richard Gombrich examine when tracing how the doctrine developed. Wynne argues that in these texts, the five aggregates described as not-self are descriptions of human experience, not denials of a human being's existence. Tibetologist André Migot points to evidence from scholars Jean Przyluski and Caroline Rhys Davids suggesting that early Buddhism generally believed in a self. That reading would make Buddhist schools that admit some form of self not heretical, but conservative, adhering to the oldest beliefs. Johannes Bronkhorst offers a careful middle position: even if original Buddhism did not deny the soul outright, the texts clearly indicate that liberation comes not from seeking Atman-like self-knowledge but from turning away from what might be mistakenly regarded as the self. This is, as Bronkhorst notes, a direct reversal of the Vedic traditions, which recognized self-knowledge as the principal means to achieving liberation. Steven Collins adds that within the canonical Buddhist texts, the denial of self is "insisted on only in certain theoretical contexts", while the same texts use terms for person, self, and individual freely in everyday usage.
The Buddha held both karma and anattā simultaneously, and the tension between them is real. He criticized the doctrine he called "atthikavāda", which posited an unchanging essence as the subject of karmic moral responsibility. He equally rejected "natthikavāda", the materialistic doctrine that denied soul and rebirth and thereby dismantled any basis for moral accountability. Damien Keown notes that the Buddha viewed such annihilationist beliefs as dangerous because they encourage moral irresponsibility and material hedonism. The materialist schools -- such as Charvaka -- are called annihilationist precisely because they held that death is total dissolution, with no afterlife, no soul, no rebirth, and no karma. Buddhism drew a sharp contrast: no essence, but rebirth exists, and karmic moral responsibility remains non-negotiable. In the Buddha's framework, right view and right actions are necessary for liberation. Hinduism, Jainism, and Buddhism all assert rebirth and emphasize moral responsibility, but they diverge fundamentally on whether an essence underlies that continuity.
Nyanatiloka Mahathera put the stakes plainly: with the doctrine of Anattā, the entire Buddhist structure stands or falls. The Theravada tradition treats understanding anattā as a two-stage process, according to Collins. The first stage is intellectual: avoiding sakkayaditthi, or Personality Belief, which means resisting the urge to convert one's ordinary sense of "I" into a theoretical belief in a permanent self. This belief in a really existing body is classified as a false view and listed among the Ten Fetters that a practitioner must gradually dissolve. The second stage is psychological: the loss of what Collins calls the conceit of asmimana, or "I am". For the unenlightened, all experience appears as happening to or originating from an "I". As enlightenment deepens, that automatic framing loosens. Its final disappearance marks full attainment. In practice, Collins notes, the tradition has fiercely insisted on anattā as a doctrinal position, while for lay Theravada Buddhists across Southeast Asia the doctrines of kamma, rebirth, and punna -- merit -- drive the wider range of ritual and ethical life. The monastery-facing precision of anattā has always been thought possible only for the practising specialist.
The Dhammakaya tradition in Thailand teaches that nirvana is atta -- true self -- a position that Ven. Payutto, a well-known scholar monk, criticized as heretical in 1994, stating that the Buddha taught Nibbana as being no-self. The abbot Luang Por Sermchai of Wat Luang Por Sodh Dhammakayaram argued in response that it tends to be scholars who hold the absolute no-self view, rather than Buddhist meditation practitioners, and he pointed to the experiences of forest hermit monks such as Luang Pu Sodh and Ajahn Mun. A similar interpretation on the true self was put forward by the 12th Supreme Patriarch of Thailand in 1939, and Paul Williams notes that this reading echoes the tathāgatagarbha sutras. Ajahn Maha Bua, a well-known meditation master of the Thai Forest Tradition, described the citta -- mind -- as an indestructible reality that does not fall under anattā. American monk Thanissaro Bhikkhu of the same tradition describes the Buddha's statements on non-self as a path to awakening rather than a universal truth, and he calls the phrase "there is no self" the "granddaddy of fake Buddhist quotes". Bhikkhu Bodhi authored a rejoinder to Thanissaro, agreeing that anattā is a strategy for awakening but adding that its power as a strategy rests on it correcting a genuine ontological error about the nature of being. Thanissaro points to the Ananda Sutta (SN 44.10), where the Buddha stays silent when asked whether there is a self or not, as a foundational source of the entire dispute.
Nāgārjuna, the Buddhist philosopher active around 200 CE and founder of the Madhyamaka school, addressed anātman directly in chapter 18 of his Mūlamadhyamakakārikā, asserting that there is no substantial self and that the Buddha taught the doctrine of no-self. In his Madhyamaka thought, the notion of a self is tied to pride, selfishness, and a sense of psychophysical personality -- all of which are false and lead to bondage. Early Mahayana texts link "emptiness" (śūnyatā) to anātman in three ways identified by Mun-Keat Choong: a monk's meditative state of emptiness, the idea that everything in the world is empty of self, and ultimately the realization of emptiness as the nature of nirvana and an end to rebirth. The tathāgatagarbha sutras, which at their earliest probably appeared in the later part of the 3rd century CE, introduced a complication: they suggest that all sentient beings contain a Tathagata as their essential inner nature. Most scholars consider this to contradict anātman doctrines and posit the texts were written to draw non-Buddhists toward the tradition. Michael Zimmermann reads the Tathagatagarbha Sutra as asserting the existence of an eternal, imperishable self as its basic point, while Paul Williams counters that the "self" referenced in these sutras is actually "non-self" and not comparable to Hindu concepts of brahman. The Ratnagotravibhāga, translated into Chinese in 511 CE, states plainly that the "self" implied in the tathāgatagarbha doctrine is actually "not-self". In the Vajrayāna tradition, anātman inspires the ritual use of deities specifically to end self-grasping; one such deity, the goddess Nairatmya, whose name literally means "non-soul, non-self", symbolizes that all beings and phenomenal appearances lack an abiding self or essence.
In Hinduism, Atman is the observing pure awareness or witness-consciousness, unaffected by ego and distinct from the individual being embedded in material reality. Embodied personality changes; Atman does not. The Upanishadic inquiry sought and found it; the Buddhist inquiry, according to Jayatilleke, is satisfied with empirical investigation that shows no such Atman because there is no evidence. Harvey's summary of the contrast is precise: the Upanishads recognized many things as not-Self but held that a real Self could be found, identical to Brahman, the basis of everything; the Buddhist Suttas apply non-Self to literally everything, including Nirvana itself, and it is that total non-attachment that produces liberation. The Hindu term niratman, appearing in the Maitrayaniya Upanishad at verses 6.20, 6.21, and 7.4, literally means "selfless" and has been interpreted as analogous to anatman, but Thomas Wood notes that the Upanishad uses both niratman and sarvasyatman -- the self of all -- together, to explain a nondual concept of the highest Self. The ontological teachings differ fundamentally. An unexpected line of influence reaches as far as ancient Greece: the philosopher Pyrrho traveled to India as part of Alexander the Great's entourage, encountered the Indian gymnosophists, and was moved to create Pyrrhonism. Philologist Christopher Beckwith argues that Pyrrho based his philosophy on a Greek translation of the three marks of existence, and that adiaphora -- meaning not logically differentiable, negating Aristotle's use of "diaphora" -- reflects Pyrrho's encounter with the Buddhist concept of anattā.
Continue browsing
Common questions
What does anattā mean in Buddhism?
Anattā is the Buddhist doctrine of non-self, asserting that no unchanging, permanent self exists and that there is an absence of essence in any phenomenon. The term is a composite Pali word from "an" (not) and "attā" (self-existent essence). It is one of the Three Marks of Existence, alongside dukkha (suffering) and anicca (impermanence).
What is the difference between anattā and the Hindu concept of Atman?
In Hinduism, Atman is the eternal, unchanging observing awareness or witness-consciousness at the core of each being. Buddhism's anattā directly rejects any such permanent essence; the Buddhist Suttas apply non-Self to literally everything, including Nirvana, whereas the Upanishads held that a real Self could be found and known to be identical to Brahman.
Does anattā mean Buddhism denies the existence of a self entirely?
Scholars are divided. Richard Gombrich and Alexander Wynne argue that early Buddhist texts such as the Anattalakkhaṇa Sutta do not deny a self outright but present a "not-self" teaching that was later interpreted as a "no-self" teaching. Johannes Bronkhorst suggests the texts clearly reject seeking Atman-like self-knowledge as the path to liberation, without necessarily denying the soul's existence.
How does anattā relate to karma and rebirth in Buddhism?
The Buddha held anattā alongside belief in karma and rebirth, rejecting both the eternalist view (an unchanging essence underlies moral continuity) and the annihilationist view (death is total dissolution with no rebirth or karma). Anattā does not mean there is no afterlife or no fruition of karma; Buddhism explicitly contrasts itself with annihilationist schools such as Charvaka.
What is the Dhammakaya controversy over anattā and nirvana?
The Dhammakaya tradition in Thailand teaches that nirvana is atta, or true self, not no-self. In 1994, scholar monk Ven. Payutto criticized this as heretical, stating that the Buddha taught Nibbana as being no-self. The 12th Supreme Patriarch of Thailand had put forward a similar true-self interpretation in 1939.
What did Nāgārjuna teach about anātman in Mahayana Buddhism?
Nāgārjuna, the founder of the Madhyamaka school active around 200 CE, asserted in chapter 18 of his Mūlamadhyamakakārikā that there is no substantial self and that the Buddha taught the doctrine of no-self. He linked the notion of self to pride, selfishness, and bondage, and taught that accepting emptiness (śūnyatā) dissolves all such obsessions.
All sources
69 references cited across the entry
- 1BookExploring BuddhismChristmas Humphreys — Routledge — 2012
- 3BookPali-English DictionaryThomas William Rhys Davids et al. — Motilal Banarsidass — 1921
- 4BookBuddhist Teaching in IndiaJohannes Bronkhorst — Simon and Schuster — 2009
- 5BookAn Introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, History and PracticesPeter Harvey — Cambridge University Press — 2012
- 6BookA Companion to Buddhist PhilosophyPeter Harvey — John Wiley & Sons — 2015
- 7BookA History of Indian PhilosophySurendranath Dasgupta — Motilal Banarsidass (Republisher; Originally published by Cambridge University Press) — 1992
- 8BookDhammapadaJohn Carter et al. — Oxford University Press — 2008
- 9BookSelfless Persons: Imagery and Thought in Theravada BuddhismSteven Collins — Cambridge University Press — 1990
- 10BookSelfless Persons: Imagery and Thought in Theravada BuddhismSteven Collins — Cambridge University Press — 1990
- 11BookThe Two Traditions of Meditation in Ancient IndiaJohannes Bronkhorst — Motilal Banarsidass — 1993
- 13BookBuddhist Teaching in IndiaJohannes Bronkhorst — Wisdom Publications — 2009
- 14BookThe Selfless Mind: Personality, Consciousness and Nirvana in Early BuddhismPeter Harvey — Routledge — 2013
- 16BookFrom Self to Social Relationships: An Essentially Relational Perspective on Social MotivationMartijn van Zomeren — Cambridge University Press — 2016
- 18BookThe Sociology of Religion: Theoretical and Comparative PerspectivesMalcolm B. Hamilton — Routledge — 12 June 2012
- 19BookStructural Depths of Indian ThoughtP. T. Raju — State University of New York Press — 1985
- 20BookThe Princeton Dictionary of BuddhismRobert E. Buswell Jr. et al. — Princeton University Press — 2013
- 21BookUnderstanding Eastern PhilosophyRay Billington — Routledge — 2002
- 22BookUcchedavāda, śāśvata-vāda, rebirth, in A Dictionary of BuddhismDamien Keown — Oxford University Press — 2004
- 23BookEncyclopedia of Reincarnation and KarmaNorman C. McClelland — McFarland — 2010
- 24BookThe Spirit of Contradiction in Christianity and BuddhismHugh Nicholson — Oxford University Press — 2016
- 25BookKarma and Rebirth: A Cross Cultural StudyGananath Obeyesekere — Motilal Banarsidass — 2006
- 26BookBuddhist World of Southeast Asia, The: Second EditionDonald K. Swearer — State University of New York Press — 2012
- 27JournalEnlightenment in Buddhism and Advaita VedantaDavid Loy — Philosophy Documentation Center — 1982
- 28BookNibbāna as True Reality beyond the DebatePotprecha Cholvijarn — Wat Luang Phor Sodh
- 30Thanassaro BhikkhuUWE STOES — 2015-04-22
- 31Investigating the DhammaBhikkhu Bodhi — Buddhist Publication Society — January 2017
- 32NewsThere is no self.Thanissaro Bhikkhu
- 35BookEastern Philosophy: Key ReadingsOliver Leaman — Routledge — 2002
- 37BookThe Notion of Emptiness in Early BuddhismMun-Keat Choong — Motilal Banarsidass — 1999
- 38BookUnderstanding Eastern PhilosophyRay Billington — Routledge — 2002
- 39BookAwareness Bound and Unbound: Buddhist EssaysDavid Loy — State University of New York Press — 2009
- 40BookThe Encyclopedia of Eastern Philosophy and Religion: Buddhism, Hinduism, Taoism, ZenStephan Schuhmacher — Shambhala — 1994
- 41BookMūlamadhyamakakārikā of NāgārjunaNāgārjuna — Motilal Banarsidass — 1996
- 42BookFundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nagarjuna's MulamadhyamakakarikaBrad Warner — Monkfish — 2011
- 43BookThe Fundamental Wisdom of the Middle Way: Nagarjuna's MulamadhyamakakarikaNāgārjuna — Oxford University Press — 1995
- 44BookThe Buddhist Experience in AmericaDiane Morgan — Greenwood — 2004
- 45BookEmptiness Appraised: A Critical Study of Nagarjuna's PhilosophyDavid F. Burton — Routledge — 2015
- 46BookThe Continuity of Madhyamaka and Yogācāra in Indian Mahāyāna BuddhismIan Harris — BRILL Academic — 1991
- 48BookThe Refutation of the Self in Indian Buddhism: Candrakīrti on the Selflessness of PersonsJames Duerlinger — Routledge — 2013
- 49BookKarma and Rebirth: Post Classical DevelopmentsRonald W. Neufeldt — State University of New York Press — 31 May 1986
- 50BookMahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal FoundationsPaul Williams — Routledge — 2008
- 51BookThe Buddha Within: Tathagatagarbha Doctrine According to the Shentong Interpretation of the RatnagotravibhagaS. K. Hookham — State University of New York Press — 1991
- 52BookBuddhism: Beliefs and PracticesMerv Fowler — Sussex Academic Press — 1999
- 53BookMipham's Beacon of Certainty: Illuminating the View of Dzogchen, the Great PerfectionJohn W. Pettit — Simon and Schuster — 1999
- 54BookAn Introduction to Indian Philosophy: Hindu and Buddhist Ideas from Original SourcesChristopher Bartley — Bloomsbury Academic — 2015
- 56BookThe Three Levels of Spiritual Perception: A Commentary on the Three VisionsKun-Dga'-Bstan et al. — Simon and Schuster — 2003
- 57BookThe Golden Letters: The Three Statements of Garab Dorje, the First Teacher of Dzogchen, Together with a Commentary byGarab Dorje — Snow Lion Publications — 1996
- 58BookAbsorption in No External WorldJeffrey Hopkins — Snow Lion Publications — 2006
- 59BookA Complete Guide to the Buddhist PathKhenchen Konchog Gyaltshen — Snow Lion Publications — 2010
- 60BookLuminous Mind: The Way of the BuddhaKarma-Ran-Byun-Kun-Khyab-Phrin-Las et al. — Simon and Schuster — 1997
- 61BookEssence of Vajrayana: The Highest Yoga Tantra Practice of Heruka Body MandalaGeshe Kelsang Gyatso — Motilal Banarsidass — 2000
- 62BookA Concise Dictionary of Indian Philosophy: Sanskrit Terms Defined in EnglishJohn A. Grimes — State University of New York Press — 1996
- 63BookIndian BuddhismA. K. Warder — Motilal Banarsidass — 2000
- 64BookOn Knowing Reality: The Tattvārtha Chapter of Asaṅga's BodhisattvabhūmiAsaṅga et al. — Motilal Banarsidass — 2002
- 65BookBuddhist Goddesses of IndiaMiranda Eberle Shaw — Princeton University Press — 2006
- 66BookHindus: Their Religious Beliefs and PracticesJulius Lipner — Routledge — 2012
- 67BookSixty Upanishads of the VedaPaul Deussen — Motilal Banarsidass — 1980
- 68BookThe Māṇḍūkya Upaniṣad and the Āgama Śāstra: An Investigation Into the Meaning of the VedāntaThomas E. Wood — Motilal Banarsidass — 1992
- 69JournalNiratman and anatmanShinkan Murakami — 1971
- 70JournalPyrrhoRichard Bett et al. — Winter 2014
- 71BookGreek Buddha: Pyrrho's Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central AsiaChristopher I. Beckwith — Princeton University Press — 2015