1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre
The 1989 Tiananmen Square protests ran in Beijing from the 15th of April to the 4th of June. Chinese speakers call them the June Fourth Incident. At their peak, on the 17th of May, roughly one million people had gathered in the square. Students and workers stood together, though each group came with its own grievances. The spark was the death of one former party leader, a small cause for a crowd that size. This documentary asks how that death set the capital in motion. It asks why the men at the top of the Communist Party could not agree on a reply. It asks what happened on the night of the 3rd of June. And it asks why the subject is still among the most heavily censored in China.
Mao Zedong died in 1976, and the Gang of Four was arrested. The Cultural Revolution had left the country poor, with production slowed or halted. Deng Xiaoping proposed Boluan Fanzheng, meaning bringing order out of chaos, and launched a program called reform and opening up. Within several years, the push for ideological purity gave way to a push for prosperity. Deng placed allies in top posts. Zhao Ziyang became Premier in September 1980. Hu Yaobang became head of the party as General Secretary in 1982.
By 1981, about 73 percent of rural farms no longer ran as collectives. Eighty percent of state enterprises could keep their earnings. Most people welcomed this. But the reforms also dismantled the iron rice bowl, the Mao-era promise of lifetime jobs and workplace benefits in state firms. Deng thought the guarantee cost too much for a country trying to modernize. Its loss fed unrest over layoffs and prices.
Prices had been fixed at low levels since the 1950s. Early reforms created two tracks, with some prices frozen and others free to move. In a market of constant shortages, a person with connections could buy cheap at the fixed price and sell dear at the market price. The bureaucrats who ran the economy had huge incentives to play that game. Anger at corruption and favouritism among senior officials boiled over.
At the 1988 summer retreat in Beidaihe, Deng's leadership agreed to shift toward market-based pricing. Word of looser controls sent people rushing to withdraw cash, buy goods and stockpile them across the country. Within two weeks the government cancelled the plan, but the damage lingered. Official figures showed Beijing's Consumer Price Index up 30 percent between 1987 and 1988. Salaried workers panicked about affording basic goods. Meanwhile, money-losing state firms were pressed to cut costs. That brought fear of xiagang, the Chinese term for layoffs, and with it the loss of job security, healthcare and subsidised housing.
Graduates in Beijing faced their own squeeze. New universities opened and enrollment rose, yet the job market stayed thin, especially for students of social sciences and the humanities. Private firms no longer had to take students assigned by the state, and many well-paid posts went to relatives and favourites. With few prospects at home or abroad, students and intellectuals cared more about politics. Study groups such as the Democracy Salon and the Lawn Salon sprang up on campuses.
Meanwhile the party's socialist label sat awkwardly beside its capitalist practices. Private business produced profiteers who exploited weak rules and flaunted their wealth before poorer neighbours. Greed, not skill, seemed to decide who succeeded. People wanted change, but only an unelected government could define "the correct path". Many intellectuals concluded that only democracy, backed by the rule of law, could heal the country.
In 1978, reformist leaders hoped intellectuals would guide China through the changes. The plan went sideways. Intellectuals in the New Enlightenment movement championed democracy, humanism, human rights and even Total Westernisation, all of which challenged socialist doctrine. In 1979, Deng answered with the Four Cardinal Principles, designed to cap political liberalisation.
Hu Yaobang led the reformers, nicknamed the right. Chen Yun led the conservatives, nicknamed the left. Hu's camp welcomed a variety of ideas as a safety valve for public discontent. Chen's camp believed reform had gone too far and wanted the state to tighten its grip for the sake of stability. Both camps needed Deng's backing before any major decision.
On the 18th of August 1980, Deng addressed a full Politburo meeting. His speech, titled "On the Reform of the Party and State Leadership System", attacked bureaucracy, concentrated power and patriarchy, and floated term limits. The current constitution was adopted in December 1982. In September 1986, a five-man committee including Zhao Ziyang, Hu Qili, Tian Jiyun, Bo Yibo and Peng Chong began studying political reform. Deng wanted a leaner administration with a clearer split between party and government. He talked of democracy and law but kept reform inside the one-party system. He rejected Western-style constitutionalism.
In mid-1986, the astrophysics professor Fang Lizhi came home from Princeton University and toured Chinese campuses. He lectured on freedom, human rights and the division of government powers, and recordings of his talks spread across the country. Fang spoke for intellectuals who blamed China's poverty and the Cultural Revolution on its authoritarian system and rigid command economy. Deng accused him of blind admiration for Western ways of life, capitalism and rival parties. Students took to the streets in December 1986, starting in Hefei, where Fang lived. The protests soon reached Shanghai, Beijing and other big cities. They demanded faster reform, and Voice of America broadcasts kept students informed.
Hu Yaobang died of a heart attack on the 15th of April 1989. Many students linked his death to his forced resignation. Eulogy posters filled campuses, and within days they turned to corruption, democracy and press freedom. That same day, small gatherings formed around the Monument to the People's Heroes in Tiananmen Square. Students from Peking University and Tsinghua University trickled in.
On the 17th of April, students at the China University of Political Science and Law made a wreath. More people showed up than organisers expected. At 5 pm, 500 of them arrived at the Great Hall of the People's eastern gate to mourn. Speakers addressed social problems until police urged the crowd to disperse, since it obstructed the hall's work. That night, 3,000 Peking University students marched on the square, and nearly a thousand from Tsinghua soon joined them.
From that crowd came the Seven Demands. The students wanted the government to call Hu's views on democracy and freedom correct. They wanted it to admit that the campaigns against spiritual pollution and bourgeois liberalisation were mistakes. They asked for the incomes of leaders and their families to be made public. They asked for private newspapers and an end to censorship. They sought more education funding and better pay for intellectuals. They also wanted the limits on Beijing demonstrations lifted and fair treatment of students in state media.
On the 18th of April, a few thousand students massed at Xinhua Gate, the entrance to the party leadership's compound at Zhongnanhai, and demanded talks. The next day they tried repeatedly to rush the gate, and police pushed them back. Elsewhere a banner reading "Freedom & Democracy Enlightenment" hung from the Monument beneath a huge portrait of Hu. On the 20th, police used batons on about 200 students still at the gate. Rumours of police brutality spread, and previously uninvolved students joined in. The Beijing Workers' Autonomous Federation also handed out two handbills that challenged the leadership.
Hu's state funeral was held on the 22nd of April. On the evening of the 21st, about 100,000 students marched toward the square despite orders to keep it closed. The ceremony in the Great Hall was relayed live to them, and Zhao Ziyang read the eulogy. It lasted just 40 minutes. Three students, Zhou Yongjun, Guo Haifeng and Zhang Zhiyong, slipped through the police line. They knelt on the Great Hall steps with a petition and asked to see Premier Li Peng. Wu'erkaixi pleaded beside them for Li to come out. No leader appeared. Angry and let down, some students called for a classroom boycott.
On the 23rd of April, about 40 students from 21 universities formed the Beijing Students' Autonomous Federation, known as the Union. They chose Zhou Yongjun as chair, and Wang Dan and Wu'erkaixi rose as leaders. The Union called a boycott of classes at every Beijing university. An independent body beyond party control alarmed the leadership.
Trouble also flared elsewhere. Near dusk on the 22nd of April, serious rioting erupted in Changsha and Xi'an. In Xi'an, arson destroyed cars and houses, and shops near Xihua Gate were looted. At Xincheng Square, rioters disrupted a broadcast of Hu's memorial and tried to push into a provincial government compound. They smashed windows and set part of it on fire. Reports counted 20 houses and 10 vehicles destroyed and 130 police injured. In Changsha, 38 stores were ransacked. Over 350 people were arrested across the two cities, and Chinese television showed the damage.
Zhao Ziyang convened the Politburo Standing Committee repeatedly. He urged three steps: send students back to class, use every necessary measure against rioting, and open dialogue at several levels. Premier Li Peng pressed him to condemn the protesters, but Zhao brushed that aside. On the 23rd of April, Zhao departed on a planned trip to North Korea.
That left Li Peng in charge. On the 24th of April, Li and the committee met Beijing Party Secretary Li Ximing and mayor Chen Xitong. Those two described the protests as a plot against the political system and leaders such as Deng. On the morning of the 25th, Li Peng and President Yang Shangkun visited Deng at his home, and Deng backed a hard line. The meeting set the first official verdict on the protests and showed that Deng had the last word. On the 26th of April, the People's Daily printed a front-page editorial titled "It is necessary to take a clear-cut stand against disturbances". It cast the student movement as a revolt against the party and the government. Its language recalled the Cultural Revolution and the 1976 Tiananmen Incident, which was first branded a conspiracy and later rehabilitated as patriotic. The editorial backfired. Students read it as an accusation, and it stayed a sore point for the rest of the protests.
On the 27th of April, some 50,000-100,000 students from every Beijing university marched to the square. They broke through police lines and won cheers from the public, particularly factory workers. The leaders softened their slogans to "anti-corruption" and "anti-cronyism", but "pro-party". Ironically, the editorial gave new traction to students who truly wanted the party gone. The march forced the government to bargain. On the 29th, State Council spokesman Yuan Mu met delegates from government-approved student groups. Independent leaders such as Wu'erkaixi stayed away, and little came of the talks.
Zhao returned from Pyongyang on the 30th of April, convinced that hardball was failing. He asked that the press report favourably on the movement. In speeches on the 3rd and the 4th of May, he called the students' worries about corruption legitimate and their movement patriotic. That undid the editorial's message. On the 4th, about 100,000 students marched to mark the May Fourth Movement, but many felt satisfied. All Beijing universities except Peking University and Beijing Normal University ended their boycott, and most students lost interest. The two holdouts were not ready to let the movement fade.
On the 1st of May, Zhao and Li Peng clashed in the Standing Committee. Li said stability mattered above all. Zhao said the party should back democracy and openness, and he pushed for dialogue. Student leaders formed a delegation for talks but hesitated to hand it control. The movement was losing steam, split by infighting and drawing fewer ordinary students. Wang Dan, Wu'erkaixi and a few other magnetic leaders saw the offer of dialogue as a stalling trick. They wanted a return to confrontation, and they planned a hunger strike for the 13th of May. Recruits were few until Chai Ling gave an emotional appeal the night before.
The hunger strike began on the 13th of May, two days before Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev arrived for a state visit. His welcome ceremony was planned for the square, and the strikers hoped it would force the government to bargain. The strike also won broad public sympathy and gave the students moral standing. By that afternoon, some 300,000 people filled the square. Students in other cities began their own protests, and many travelled to Beijing. Daily marches from colleges stayed orderly, and the crowd sang the Internationale.
Deng feared losing control and ordered the square cleared before the visit. Zhao tried a gentler path. He told subordinates to open talks at once, trusting the students' patriotism to prevail. On the morning of the 13th, Yan Mingfu of the party's United Front gathered student leaders and intellectuals. Among them were Liu Xiaobo, Chen Ziming and Wang Juntao. He promised immediate dialogue. He also revealed that the Tiananmen ceremony would be called off regardless of whether the students left. That erased the pressure they believed they held, and the student leadership fell into disarray.
On the 14th of May, intellectuals led by Dai Qing won Hu Qili's permission to bypass censorship. They used it to print their views in the Guangming Daily and to urge students to leave the square. Many students assumed the intellectuals spoke for the government and stayed put. That evening, Yan Mingfu led government negotiators, while Shen Tong and Xiang Xiaoji led the student side. Yan called the movement patriotic and begged the students to withdraw. The session descended into chaos as rival factions made uncoordinated demands. It collapsed when students learned that the talks had not gone out on national broadcasts as promised. Yan went to the square himself and even offered to be held hostage. The next day he urged Li Peng to withdraw the 26th of April editorial and call the movement patriotic and democratic. Li said no.
Gorbachev's welcome ceremony took place at the airport, because the students stayed in the square. The visit was the first Sino-Soviet summit in some 30 years and marked a normalisation of relations. The protests spoiled its smooth running, causing a major "loss of face" for the leadership and pushing many moderates toward a harder line. On the 16th of May, Gorbachev met Zhao. Zhao told him, and so the international press, that Deng remained the "paramount authority" in China. Deng suspected Zhao of shifting the blame onto him. Zhao answered that telling world leaders this in private was routine, and that Li Peng had told US president George H. W. Bush much the same in February 1989. Still, the remark opened a decisive rift between the country's two top leaders.
Controls on the press loosened sharply. State media showed sympathetic footage of the hunger strikers. Marchers on the 17th and the 18th of May came from every walk of Beijing life. Soldiers, police officers and lower-ranking party officials joined them. Grassroots party and Youth League groups and government-run unions encouraged members to take part. Several non-Communist parties wrote to Li Peng in support. The Chinese Red Cross sent staff to treat the hunger strikers. Foreign journalists stayed on after Gorbachev left, and Western governments urged restraint.
By the 17th of May, protests of various sizes were under way in some 400 cities. Students rallied outside provincial party offices in Fujian, Hubei and Xinjiang. Local officials, without a clear line from Beijing, were unsure how to react. With so many groups involved, each with its own complaints, nobody could say whom the government should negotiate with. Press control had already tightened elsewhere. On the 19th of April, editors of the World Economic Herald planned a tribute to Hu. It included an article by Yan Jiaqi praising the Beijing students. Jiang Zemin ordered it censored, and many copies went to press with a blank page. He suspended lead editor Qin Benli, and his firmness won the trust of conservative elders.
Back in Beijing, the authorities watched student leaders closely. Traffic cameras watched the square, and phones in nearby restaurants and other student haunts were tapped. That surveillance later helped police identify, arrest and punish participants.
The decisive meeting took place on the 17th of May at Deng's residence. Zhao Ziyang's strategy of concessions, which included retracting the 26th of April editorial, came under heavy criticism. Li Peng, Yao Yilin and Deng blamed Zhao's soothing speech to the Asian Development Bank on the 4th of May. They said it had exposed splits at the top and emboldened the students. Deng warned that "there is no way to back down now without the situation spiraling out of control". Troops would enter Beijing under martial law. Of the five committee members present, Zhao and Hu Qili opposed martial law. Li Peng and Yao Yilin backed it firmly, and Qiao Shi stayed neutral. Deng gave those last three the job of carrying it out. Zhao maintained until he died that the decision was Deng's.
That evening, the committee met at Zhongnanhai to settle the plans. Zhao said he was ready to "take leave" because he could not bring himself to enforce martial law. The elders Bo Yibo and Yang Shangkun told the committee to follow Deng. Zhao did not treat the inconclusive vote as binding. Yang, as Vice Chairman of the Central Military Commission, moved the army toward the capital anyway. On the 18th, Li Peng met students for the first time. The talks were tense, and student leaders once more insisted the editorial be withdrawn. They did gain prominent time on national television.
At 4:50 am on the 19th of May, Zhao Ziyang walked into Tiananmen Square with Wen Jiabao, in what proved his political swan song. Li Peng also visited the square but left quickly. Through a bullhorn, Zhao urged the students to end their hunger strike. He told them they were still young, and he asked them not to sacrifice themselves without thought for their futures. Some applauded his emotional speech. It was his last public appearance.
The government declared martial law on the 20th of May. It drew on at least 30 divisions from five of the seven military regions, with at least 14 of the 24 army corps contributing troops. As many as 300,000 soldiers headed for Beijing. Guangzhou's civil aviation authorities suspended airline travel to ferry military units. Crowds of protesters and ordinary residents blocked the army's entry in the suburbs. Finding no route in, the authorities ordered the army to withdraw on the 24th of May. All forces pulled back to bases outside the city.
Support from abroad swelled in those weeks. The Chinese University of Hong Kong donated HK$10,000 by early May. The Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China took shape. The Chinese Alliance for Democracy, based in New York, supplied money and organised rallies in New York and Washington, D.C. Donors in the United States, Canada, Japan, Taiwan, Australia and across Europe sent money too. On the 27th of May, over 300,000 people filled Happy Valley Racecourse in Hong Kong for the Concert for Democracy in China. The next day, 1.5 million people, a quarter of Hong Kong's population, marched on Hong Kong Island behind Martin Lee and Szeto Wah. The United States and Japan warned their citizens against travel to China.
Inside the square, the movement was coming apart. Students passed the time with music, drinking and smoking, but the square was overcrowded and unsanitary. Hou Dejian proposed an open election for student leaders and met opposition. Wang Dan softened his stance and urged a temporary retreat to campus, but hardline factions wanted to hold the square. Control of the loudspeakers became a prize in a series of "mini-coups", since whoever held them seemed to lead. Rival groups accused each other of collusion with the government or of chasing fame. Some students even tried to kidnap Chai Ling and Feng Congde to force them out. Chai called it a "well-organised and premeditated plot".
Chai seemed ready to let the movement end in violence. In a late May interview, she was blunt. "What we actually are hoping for is bloodshed, the moment when the government is ready to brazenly butcher the people. Only when the Square is awash with blood will the people of China open their eyes." She felt she could not persuade her fellow students of this. She also said she had heard the idea from Li Lu rather than coming up with it herself.
On the 1st of June, Li Peng sent every Politburo member a report titled "On the True Nature of the Turmoil". It claimed that a "tiny minority" had plotted the unrest and was treating the square as a staging ground for conflict. It also alleged ties to criminal elements and said foreign and domestic money had paid for better communications gear and weapons. The same day, Ministry of State Security chief Jia Chunwang sent a second report to the Politburo. Elders including Deng, Li Xiannian and Chen Yun received it too. It blamed Western influence, especially American, and called the Voice of America a tool of psychological warfare. It said a CIA agent at the US Embassy had nearly fifty contacts between 1981 and 1988. Fifteen of them were linked to the Economic Restructuring Commission. The report urged immediate military action and was seen as one of the strongest justifications for it.
On the 2nd of June, newspapers called on the students to clear out of the square, and protests broke out in response. Many were especially angered by the Beijing Daily's article "Tiananmen, I Cry for You", written by a disillusioned student. Liu Xiaobo, Zhou Duo, Gao Xin and the Taiwanese singer Hou Dejian began a second hunger strike to rekindle the movement. That day, Deng and several elders met the three Standing Committee members who remained after Zhao and Hu Qili were ousted. They were Li Peng, Qiao Shi and Yao Yilin. The group agreed to clear the square as peacefully as possible, with force authorised if protesters refused. Troops from the 27th, 65th and 24th armies were quietly moved into the Great Hall of the People and the Ministry of Public Security compound.
That evening, a jeep of the People's Armed Police mounted a sidewalk, killing three pedestrians and injuring a fourth. Fear spread that troops were about to advance, and student leaders ordered roadblocks at major intersections. On the morning of the 3rd, crowds at Xinjiekou stopped a busload of plainclothes soldiers and questioned them. Soldiers and Beijing security staff were beaten, and some were seized on their way to a hospital. At 1 pm, a crowd at Liubukou boarded another bus and held military helmets aloft on bayonets. At 2:30 pm, police used tear gas on a crowd, but rock-throwing demonstrators forced them back into Zhongnanhai through the west gate. Around 5:30 pm, thousands of troops waiting for orders started to withdraw from the Great Hall. The leaders spent the evening watching events.
On the evening of the 3rd of June, the government told citizens to "stay off the streets and away from Tiananmen Square". Protesters answered with their own broadcasts across campuses, urging students and citizens to take up arms and gather at intersections and the square. At 8 pm, the 38th Army, under interim commander Zhang Meiyuan, set out from Shijingshan and Fentai in western Beijing. It advanced east along Chang'an Avenue's western extension. At 9:30 pm, a blockade at Gongzhufen stopped it, and the troops tried to break through. Protesters threw rocks and molotov cocktails. Troops in riot gear used rubber bullets, gas, electric prods and batons. Warning shots into the air had no effect.
At 10:10 pm, an officer took up a megaphone and told the crowd to disperse. At about 10:30 pm, with rocks still raining down, the troops began shooting live rounds. The crowd, stunned, fell back toward Muxidi Bridge, about 5 km from the square. Another blockade halted the advance there. Protesters repelled an anti-riot brigade. Regular troops then moved forward and turned their weapons on the crowd, firing sometimes into the air and sometimes at people. The troops used expanding bullets, which are barred in warfare between nations but allowed for other purposes. Deaths were recorded all along Chang'an Avenue. The largest number came on the two-mile stretch from Muxidi to Xidan. There, 65 PLA trucks and 47 armoured personnel carriers were destroyed, and 485 other military vehicles were damaged.
Demonstrators hit back with poles, stones and molotov cocktails. Jeff Widener reported seeing military vehicles set alight and soldiers beaten to death inside them. On one western avenue, protesters torched a column of over 100 trucks and armoured vehicles. They also took over an armoured personnel carrier and drove it around for fun. Chinese state television broadcast these scenes. On the 5th of June 1989, The Wall Street Journal reported that angry mobs shouting "Fascists" had dragged soldiers from trucks and beaten them. It described one soldier's stripped body hung from a bus and another's corpse strung up east of the square.
In the square itself, the early hours of the 4th of June brought a different kind of fight. The first armoured personnel carrier rolled in from Chang'an West Boulevard. Demonstrators disabled it with a traffic divider and set it on fire. Accounts of the three men inside differ. Wu Renhua says students escorted them to a medic station. A Chinese-American reporter said two soldiers burned alive and a third was beaten to death. Larry Wortzel, then a military intelligence officer at the US Embassy, noted that the crowd's swarming tactics looked rehearsed. The first troops from the west reached the square around 1:30 am, and others soon sealed the main roads. Loudspeakers then blared a second announcement. "Citizens and students must evacuate the Square immediately so that martial law troops can successfully carry out their mission." By 2 am, only a few thousand people remained.
At 3 am, Hou Dejian, Liu Xiaobo, Zhou Duo and Gao Xin decided to persuade the students to leave. Chai Ling insisted that "those who wish to leave may leave, and those who don't may stay." Hou spoke over the loudspeaker, urging the crowd to give up their weapons and go. He and Zhou Duo then took an ambulance to the Museum of Chinese History. Between 3:30 and 3:45 am, they met a regimental political commissar named Ji Xinguo. Ji passed their request for time and a way out to Martial Law Headquarters, which agreed and told them to leave by the south. Back in the square, Feng Congde called a voice vote on staying or leaving. The result was unclear, but Feng said the shouts to leave were louder. Students began marching out behind their school banners toward the southeast.
At about 4:35 am, the square's lights came on and troops started forward. A squad of commandos rushed the monument and destroyed the students' loudspeaker with gunfire. Hou Dejian said tear gas was used. At 5:23 am, an armoured car rammed the Goddess of Democracy statue several times. After it fell, soldiers carried off its broken torch as a memento. The troops were then told to hand over their ammunition and given a rest from 7 am to 9 am. Debris from the occupation was burned in piles or bagged and flown away by military helicopters. Troops inside the Great Hall stayed confined for the next nine days. They apparently slept on floors and shared one packet of instant noodles among three men each day.
Just past 6 am, a column of students who had left the square was walking west in the bicycle lane of Chang'an Avenue. Three tanks went after them, firing tear gas, and one drove into the crowd. It killed 11 students and injured scores. By dawn, smoke rose from the city centre and burned-out vehicles lined the streets. Some demonstrators regrouped and tried to get back into the square from the northeast, but gunfire drove them off. At 5 pm, a US State Department report to the US Embassy said the PLA was "mopping up isolated resistance". Public access to the square was barred for two weeks.
On the 5th of June, a column of tanks from the 1st Armored Division left the square and rolled east along Chang'an Avenue. A lone man stood in the road ahead of them. Western media on the Beijing Hotel photographed the standoff. After the man returned to his spot in front of the tanks, a group of people pulled him aside. Charlie Cole of Newsweek said they were government agents. Jan Wong of The Globe and Mail thought they were worried bystanders. Contemporary sources and Timothy Brook's analysis name Tank Man as Wang Weilin. He was 19, the son of a factory worker, and received a ten-year prison term. His fate is not known. In 1990, Jiang Zemin said he doubted the man had been killed. Time later included him on its list of the 100 most influential people of the 20th century.
The city stayed in turmoil. A convoy of 37 armoured personnel carriers at Muxidi had to be abandoned among burned buses and military vehicles. Foreign news reports described fighting between rival PLA units. Meanwhile, 26 tanks and three armoured personnel carriers took defensive positions at the Jianguomen and Fuxingmen overpasses. Shellfire was heard through the night. A US Marine in the east reported seeing an armoured vehicle disabled by an armour-piercing shell. No copies of the People's Daily reached Beijing on the 5th of June. Many shops, offices and factories stayed shut, and public transit shrank to the subway and suburban buses.
After order returned to Beijing on the 4th of June, some 80 other Chinese cities saw further protests. In Hong Kong, people again wore black, and many abroad wore black armbands. In Shanghai, students marched on the 5th and blocked roads and railways. When the city government tried to clear the rails on the 6th, crowds fought back fiercely, and several people died under a train. The situation was eased without deadly force, and Beijing's top leaders credited the city with averting an upheaval. In Chengdu, security forces violently crushed large protests on the 4th and the 5th of June, and eyewitnesses reported "300 to 400 people killed". In Wuhan, students shut the Yangtze River Railway bridge, and about a thousand staged a sit-in on the tracks. Residents there began a bank run and panic buying.
At a news conference on the 6th of June, State Council spokesperson Yuan Mu said "nearly 300 people died". He counted soldiers, 23 students and others he called criminals or victims of mistakes. He put the wounded at 5,000 officers and soldiers and over 2,000 civilians. Military spokesperson Zhang Gong claimed that no one died in Tiananmen Square itself. On the 9th, Deng made his first public appearance since the protests began and praised the soldiers he called "martyrs". Other estimates range from several hundred to the low thousands dead, with thousands more wounded.
The consequences came quickly. Western countries imposed arms embargoes on China, and Western media called the crackdown a massacre. The government put down protests elsewhere and carried out mass arrests, which spurred Operation Yellowbird. It tightly controlled Chinese and foreign-linked media and removed or demoted officials it saw as sympathetic. It also invested heavily in better riot police. Political reforms begun in 1986 halted, as did the New Enlightenment movement, and the liberalising policies of the 1980s slowed. Some resumed after Deng's southern tour in 1992. Market reforms then sped up under strong state direction, while political liberalisation stayed curtailed.
The Chinese government has used many names for these events since 1989. At first it called them a "counter revolutionary rebellion", then a "riot", then "political turmoil" and "1989 storm". Today it uses the label "political turmoil between the spring and summer of 1989". Outside mainland China, and among critics inside it, the crackdown is called the June Fourth Massacre or the June Fourth Crackdown. English labels such as Tiananmen Square Massacre point to the square. Yet much of the violence took place on a stretch of Chang'an Avenue only a few miles long, especially near Muxidi. To slip past the Great Firewall, internet users coined other names. They wrote May 35th, VIIV for 6 and 4 in Roman numerals, and Eight Squared, since 8 squared is 64. The last, 8964, is simply the date with the year first, written as 89, 6 and 4.
Updated
Common questions
What set off the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests?
The death of Hu Yaobang, a former pro-reform general secretary of the Communist Party, on the 15th of April 1989. Students mourned him in Tiananmen Square, and the gatherings soon turned to wider complaints about corruption, inflation and limits on political participation.
Why did students and workers join the same movement?
Their grievances overlapped. Students wanted democracy, a free press and accountability. Workers feared inflation and the loss of lifetime job guarantees known as the iron rice bowl. Both groups shared anger at corruption and called for anti-corruption measures.
How did divisions inside the Chinese leadership shape events?
Zhao Ziyang favoured dialogue and concessions, while Premier Li Peng pushed a hard line. Deng Xiaoping sided with the hardliners, and the 26th of April editorial and the decision to impose martial law on the 20th of May followed from that.
Where did most of the killing take place?
Most of the violence happened outside the square itself, along Chang'an Avenue in western Beijing, especially around Muxidi. Death toll estimates range from several hundred to the low thousands, with thousands more wounded.
Why are there so many names for the events?
The Chinese government has changed its official label several times and now uses the phrase political turmoil between the spring and summer of 1989. Critics use names such as the June Fourth Massacre, and internet users coined codes such as May 35th, VIIV, Eight Squared and 8964 to avoid censorship.
All sources
280 references cited across the entry
- 1JournalChina Historical Materials of Science and TechnologyQing-sheng Guo — 2001
- 2NewsI watched the 1989 Tiananmen uprisingMay 30, 2019
- 4BookThe Transformation of Chinese SocialismChun Lin — Duke University Press — 2006
- 5JournalThe Tiananmen PapersAndrew J. Nathan et al. — 2002
- 6News30 Years After Tiananmen, 'Tank Man' Remains an Icon and a MysteryJavier C. Hernández — 2019-06-03
- 7NewsThe forbidden images of the Chinese internetKelsey Ables
- 8Behind the Scenes: Tank Man of TiananmenPatrick Witty — 2009-06-03
- 10News20 Years After Tiananmen SquareNPR
- 11Tiananmen and the end of Chinese enlightenmentMinxin Pei — June 3, 2019
- 13After 20 Years of 'Peaceful Evolution,' China Faces Another Historic MomentDamien Ma — 23 January 2012
- 14The inside story of the propaganda fightback for Deng's reforms14 November 2018
- 15BookRed Swan: How Unorthodox Policy-Making Facilitated China's RiseSebastian Heilmann — The Chinese University of Hong Kong Press — 2018
- 16NewsProsperity, repression mark China 30 years after TiananmenChristopher Bodeen — 3 June 2019
- 17中国共产党简史(四十一): 经济上的治理整顿和经受国内外政治风波的考验7 April 2021
- 19News261 ways to refer to the Tiananmen Square massacre in ChinaNikhil Sonnad — 3 June 2019
- 20He tried to commemorate erased history. China detained him, then erased that tooAlice Su — 24 June 2021
- 21Bus driver in '8964' massacre memento suspended for 3 months – reportChantal Yuen — 2016-06-13
- 22《亲历拨乱反正》: 拨乱反正的日日夜夜Baoxiang Shen
- 23NewsHuíshǒu 1978 – Lìshǐ zài zhèlǐ zhuǎnzhéCentral Committee of the Chinese Communist Party
- 24The Cultural RevolutionTom Phillips — 11 May 2016
- 27Economics helped spur Tiananmen Square protestsJennifer Pak — June 5, 2019
- 28BookReinventing Modern China: Imagination and Authenticity in Chinese Historical WritingHuaiyin Li — University of Hawaiʻi Press — October 2012
- 29JournalDeng Xiaoping's Ideas on Law: China on the Threshold of a Legal OrderCarlos W. H. Lo — 1992
- 31On the Reform of the System of Party and State LeadershipXiaoping Deng
- 32JournalDeng Xiaoping's Political Reform and Political OrderMichael Ng-Quinn — 1982
- 33JournalDeng Xiaoping: The Social ReformerMartin King Whyte — 1993
- 34JournalModern Chinese Constitutionalism: Reflections of Economic ChangeGeorge Finch — 2007
- 35JournalChinese-Style Constitutionalism: On Backer's Chinese Party-State ConstitutionalismJiang Shigong — 2014
- 36NewsThe New York TimesWei Wu — 18 March 2014
- 37NewsThe New York TimesTong Bao — 4 June 2015
- 38BookToward a Democratic China: The Intellectual Autobiography of Yan JiaqiJiaqi Yan — University of Hawaii Press — 1992
- 39BookChinese Democracy and the Crisis of 1989: Chinese and American ReflectionsLou Ning — SUNY Press — 1993
- 40The New York TimesWei Wu — 15 December 2014
- 41The New York TimesWei Wu — 7 July 2014
- 42NewsTiananmen 30 years on: A China that's averse to political reforms – for nowHermes Auto — 4 June 2019
- 43JournalChina after the 13th CongressStuart R. Schram — 1988
- 44JournalPostsocialism? Reflections on 'socialism with Chinese characteristics'Arif Dirlik — 2019
- 46Qiping, Luo., Yantting, Mai., Meifen, Liang., Li Peter., trans., Fons Lampoo., "Student Organizations and Strategies," China Information Vol 5, No 2 (1990)
- 47Goldman, Merle, Sowing the Seeds of Democracy in China. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1994
- 48Zhang Liang, "An Emergency Report of the Beijing Party Committee" in The Tiananmen Papers (New York: Public Affairs, 2001). pp. 334–5.
- 49Chen, J. (2014). The Overseas Chinese Democracy Movement after Thirty Years: New Trends at Low Tide. Asian Survey.
- 50The Life and Legacy of Liu XiaoboLink Perry
- 51Beijing police suppress rally: FINAL edition. (1989, Apr 19). The Windsor Star.
- 52The, B. S. (1989, Apr 20). Activists scatter as police columns sweep Beijing: HOME edition. Newsday
- 53Tiananmen Square massacre: How Beijing turned on its own peopleBen Westcott — CNN — 2019-06-03
- 54Rioters in china attack local government office: final edition. (1989, Apr 23). The Gazette
- 55130 HURT AS CHINESE RIOTS GROW. (1989, Apr 23). St.Louis Post - Dispatch
- 56Uli Schmetzer, C. h. T. (1989, Apr 24). Chinese riots: NORTH SPORTS FINAL, C edition. Chicago Tribune (Pre-1997 Fulltext)
- 57Amnesty International, 30 August 1989. Preliminary Findings on Killings of Unarmed Civilians, Arbitrary Arrests and Summary Executions Since 3 June 1989, p. 19.
- 59BookThe New Politics of Surveillance and VisibilityRichard Victor Ericson Kevin D. Haggerty — University of Toronto Press — 2006
- 60NewsObituary: Yang ShangkunAndrew Higgins — 14 September 1998
- 62NewsOrganisers ready for mass concertSimon Macklin et al. — 27 May 1989
- 63NewsAnother vast crowd joins world-wide show of solidarityChris Yeung — 29 May 1989
- 65L. Zhang (2001) p. 482L. Zhang — 2001
- 66JournalThe Tiananmen Tragedy and the Failed Uprising in ChinaSharon Erickson Nepstad
- 67Chinese troops open fire killing 13, wounding 200: 4*C edition 1. (1989, Jun 03). The Vancouver Sun
- 70News"Tank Man" photographer reflects on 30 years since Tiananmen SquareJune 4, 2019
- 71NewsImages Vilify Protesters; Chinese Launch Propaganda CampaignJohn Burgess — 12 June 1989
- 72NewsTURMOIL IN CHINA; FOREBODING GRASPS BEIJING; ARMY UNITS CRISSCROSS CITY; FOREIGNERS HURRY TO LEAVENicholas D. Kristof — June 8, 1989
- 73NewsClass Struggle: China's Harsh Actions Threaten to Set Back 10-Year Reform Drive – Suspicions of Westernization Are Ascendant, and Army Has a Political Role Again – A Movement Unlikely to DieRobert S. Greenberger et al. — 5 June 1989
- 76JournalHE TIANANMEN MASSACRE REAPPRAISEDLarry Wortzel — Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College — 2005
- 77NewsACTIVIST: NO KILLINGS IN TIANANMENAug 19, 1989
- 78NewsRead TIME's 1989 cover story about the Tiananmen Square massacreJesse Birnbaum — June 4, 2014
- 81NewsJan Wong, August 1988 – August 1994Wong Jan
- 82NewsThe West Condemns the CrackdownRobert D. McFadden — 5 June 1989
- 84BookDas Politbüro: Ende eines Mythos: eine BefragungGünter Schabowski — Rowohlt — 1990
- 85BookThe Search for Modern ChinaJonathan Fenby — W W Norton & Co Inc. — 2012
- 86Lilley, James, China Hands, 322.
- 88NewsTiananmen Square protest death toll 'was 10,000'23 December 2017
- 90六四死难者名册August 2011
- 91BookThe Second Chinese RevolutionE. Bregolat — Springer — 2016
- 93Birth of a massacre mythGregory Clark — 21 July 2008
- 95NewsRemembering Tiananmen SquareRobin Munro — 2009-06-02
- 97NewsTiananmen Square: the long shadowJamil Anderlini — June 2014
- 99China: Tiananmen's Unhealed Wounds13 May 2009
- 101boxun.com
- 104香港01朱加樟 — 2 June 2019
- 10511. "Troops march near Beijing square; foreign press coverage restricted," The Globe and Mail, June 2, 1989, A4.
- 10621. Jonathan Mirsky, "Revenge of the old guard," The Observer, June 11, 1989.
- 107NewsTiananmenGregory Clark — June 3, 2014
- 108Tiananmen StoryGraham Earnshaw — 20 March 2019
- 110BookPax Indica: India and the World of the Twenty-first CenturyShashi Tharoor — Penguin Random House India Private Limited — 2013
- 112MagazineCPI(M) assailed for welcoming hardliners' coup, but refuses to budge from Marxist dogmasRaj Chengappa — 15 September 1991
- 113BookThe Taiwan Question in Xi Jinping's Era: Beijing's Evolving Taiwan Policy and Taiwan's Internal and External DynamicsAdam P. Liff et al. — Routledge — 2024
- 114NewsTiananmen toll 'exaggerated'July 13, 1992
- 116BookSentimental Republic: Chinese Intellectuals and the Maoist PastHang Tu — Harvard University Asia Center — 2025
- 117BookWhy the People's Army Fired
- 118BookThe Communist Party of China: Understanding the Durability of the World's Most Powerful Political OrganizationLi Bingqin — Cambridge University Press — 2025
- 119NewsTiananmen Massacre Online Museum Blocked in Hong Kong29 September 2021
- 120University of Hong Kong removes Tiananmen Massacre monument in dead of nightTom Grundy — 22 December 2021
- 121NewsPillar of Shame: Hong Kong's Tiananmen Square statue removed23 December 2021
- 122BookThe Dragon Roars Back: Transformational Leadership and the Dynamics of Chinese Foreign PolicySuisheng Zhao — Stanford University Press — 2023
- 123JournalNEW EMIGRATION FROM CHINA: PATTERNS, CAUSES AND IMPACTSQian Song — 2019
- 124JournalChinese Immigrants in the U.S. Labor Market: Effects of Post-Tiananmen Immigration PolicyPia Orrenius — 2012
- 127NewsBush to Formalize Shield for Chinese in U.S.Andrew Rosenthal — 1990-04-07
- 128JournalChinese Immigrants in the U.S. Labor Market: Effects of Post-Tiananmen Immigration PolicyPia Orrenius — 2012-06-25
- 132NewsCabinet papers 1988-89: Bob Hawke acted alone in offering asylum to Chinese studentsGabrielle Chan — 2014-12-31
- 133Canada's Chinese diaspora: How the Tiananmen Square protests changed VancouverPaige Jasmine Gilmar — 2023-06-14
- 135One App, Two SystemsLotus Ruan et al. — December 2016
- 136News中國火箭軍發布六四「首都衛士」影片 網罵急下架鍾錦隆 — 2024-03-19
- 138News天安門事件37週年 中國政府壓制查明事件真相聲音4 June 2026
- 140NewsDespite censorship, young Chinese are learning the truth about Tiananmen SquareHuiyee Chiew — 2026-06-04
- 141NewsThey faced down the tanks in Tiananmen Square. Now they want their children to forget itLily Lee et al. — CNN — 3 June 2019
- 142NewsThe west is complicit in the 30-year cover-up of TiananmenWeiwei Ai — 4 June 2019
- 143NewsWhy searching for the truth about Tiananmen is more important than everKirsty Needham — 31 May 2019
- 144NewsTiananmen Square protests: crackdown intensifies as 30th anniversary nearsHelen Davidson — 31 May 2019
- 145NewsTiananmen Square massacre: Le Monde reveals unseen footage of the Chinese regime's violent repressionKarim El Hadj — August 14, 2026
- 147China tried to pay off Tiananmen Square family, activists claimJonathan Watts — 31 May 2011
- 148NewsChina doctor calls 1989 'mistake'8 March 2004
- 149Downloads
- 150NewsAgeing rebels, bitter victims29 May 2014
- 151All references to Tiananmen Square massacre closely censored for 20 yearsReports Without Borders — 2 June 2009
- 152NewsWen lays ground for Tiananmen healingJamil Anderlini — 20 March 2013
- 153China's Youth post-Tiananmen: Apathy a fact or front?CNN — 4 June 2009
- 154BookBurying Mao: Chinese Politics in the Age of Deng XiaopingRichard Baum — Princeton University Press — 1996
- 155NewsIn Taiwan, Sympathies Lean Toward HomeRichard Bernstein — 4 June 1989
- 156NewsBeijing Orders Its Ambassadors Home for a MeetingRichard Bernstein — 29 June 1989
- 157NewsChinese detain Zhang Shijun, soldier who spoke out against Tiananmen Square massacreTania Branigan — 20 March 2009
- 158NewsTVE in TiananmenEugenio Bregolat — 4 June 2007
- 159NewsJournalists banned from TiananmenMichael Bristow — 4 June 2009
- 160BookQuelling the People: The Military Suppression of the Beijing Democracy MovementTimothy Brook — Stanford University Press — 1998
- 161NewsChen Xitong, Beijing Mayor During Tiananmen Protests, Dies at 82Chris Buckley — 5 June 2013
- 162BookThe Impact of China's 1989 Tiananmen MassacreJean-Pierre Cabestan — Routledge — 2010
- 163JournalRevolution and repression in Tiananmen squareCraig Calhoun — 1989
- 164BookA Heart for Freedom: The Remarkable Journey of a Young Dissident, Her Daring Escape, and Her Quest to Free China's DaughtersLing Chai — Tyndale House Publishers — 2011
- 165BookMade in Censorship: The Tiananmen Movement in Chinese Literature and FilmThomas Chen — Columbia University Press — 2022
- 166BookStandoff at TiananmenEddie Cheng — Sensys Corp — 2009
- 167Document of 1989: 21 Most Wanted Student LeadersEddie Cheng — 13 June 2012
- 168BookBehind the Tiananmen Massacre: Social, Political, and Economic Ferment in ChinaChu-yüan Cheng et al. — Westview Press — 1990
- 169China: The massacre of June 1989 and its aftermathAmnesty International — 31 March 1990
- 170NewsChina tightens information controls for Tiananmen anniversary4 June 2009
- 171China: 15 years after Tiananmen, calls for justice continue and the arrests go onAmnesty International — 2 June 2004
- 172NewsOlympic hopeful who lost his legs in Tiananmen SquareClifford Coonan — 6 August 2008
- 173NewsThe Day China trampled on freedom30 May 2009
- 175NewsDeng's June 9 Speech: 'We Faced a Rebellious Clique' and 'Dregs of Society'30 June 1989
- 176NewsXiaoping Deng9 June 1989
- 177Talking Points, June 3–18Clayton Dube — China.usc.edu — 2014
- 178BookChina Since Tiananmen: The Politics of TransitionJoseph Fewsmith — Cambridge University Press — 2001
- 179Most Chinese students have never heard of Tank ManMax Fisher — 3 June 2014
- 180BookRights beyond borders : the global community and the struggle over human rights in ChinaRosemary Foot — Oxford University Press — 2000
- 181BookChina Road: A Journey into the Future of a Rising PowerRob Gifford — Random House Publishing Group — 2007
- 182BookDeng Xiaoping and the Chinese Revolution: A Political BiographyDavid S. G. Goodman — Psychology Press — 1994
- 183Foreign journalists in China harassed over Tiananmen Square anniversaryRoy Greenslade — 3 June 2014
- 184BookCries for DemocracyMinzhu Han et al. — Princeton University Press — 1990
- 185NewsMiao Deshun: China's last Tiananmen prisoner?Celia Harron — 3 June 2014
- 186NewsDirector hailed at Cannes faces five-year film ban in ChinaCharlotte Higgins — 5 September 2006
- 187NewsHow Many Really Died? Tiananmen Square Fatalities4 June 1990
- 188BookPrisoner of the State: The Secret Journal of Premier Zhao ZiyangAdi Ignatius — Simon & Schuster — 2009
- 189Interview with Jan WongPBS — 11 April 2006
- 190Interview with John PomfretPBS — 11 April 2006
- 191Interview with Timothy BrookPBS — 11 April 2006
- 193NewsTime 100: The Unknown RebelPico Iyer — 13 April 1998
- 194Japan concerned by call to lift China embargo – official27 November 2008
- 195NewsHong Kong's Tiananmen Museum to closeVivian Kam — CNN — 11 July 2016
- 196BookInternational Business in ChinaPsychology Press — 1993
- 197NewsBeijing Residents Block Army Move Near City Center: Tear Gas said to be FiredNicholas D. Kristof — 3 June 1989
- 198NewsUnits Said to Clash: Troops in Capital Seem to Assume Positions Against an AttackNicholas D. Kristof — 6 June 1989
- 199NewsModerates Appear on Beijing TV, Easing Fears of Wholesale PurgeNicholas D. Kristof — 14 June 1989
- 200NewsBeijing Ousts 2 American CorrespondentsNicholas D. Kristof — 14 June 1989
- 201NewsA Reassessment of How Many Died in the Military Crackdown in BeijingNicholas D. Kristof — 21 June 1989
- 202How China has censored words relating to the Tiananmen Square anniversaryKeng Kek Ser Kuang — 4 June 2016
- 203JournalThe Dragon Still Has Teeth: How the West Winks at Chinese RepressionJoshua Kurlantzick — 2003
- 204JournalGenerational Differences in the Impact of Historical Events: The Tiananmen Square Incident in Contemporary Hong Kong Public OpinionFrancis L.F. Lee — June 2012
- 205Less Than a Dozen June Fourth Protesters Still in PrisonThe Dui Hua Foundation — 31 May 2012
- 206Book李鵬六四日記真相Peng Li — Au Ya Publishing — 2010
- 207BookCulture and Politics in China: An Anatomy of Tiananmen SquarePeter Li et al. — Transaction Publishers — 2011
- 208JournalLatin American Diplomat Eyewitness Account of June 3–4 Events on Tiananmen SquareJames Lilley — 12 July 1989
- 209BookThe People's Republic of Amnesia: Tiananmen RevisitedLouisa Lim — Oxford University Press — 2014
- 210NewsAfter 25 Years of AmnesiaLouisa Lim — NPR — 15 April 2014
- 211JournalDeng's 9 June SpeechChong-Pin Lin et al. — 28 June 1989
- 212BookThe Impact of China's 1989 Tiananmen MassacrePerry Link — Routledge — 2010
- 213JournalAspects of Beijing's Crisis Management: The Tiananmen Square DemonstrationAlan P.L. Liu — May 1990
- 214MagazineArticle: Still on the wing; inside Operation Yellowbird, the daring plot to help dissidents escapeMelinda Liu — 1 April 1996
- 215NewsAt least 10,000 people died in Tiananmen Square massacre, secret British cable from the time allegedAdam Lusher — 24 December 2017
- 216BookThe Politics of China: Sixty Years of The People's Republic of ChinaRoderick MacFarquhar — Cambridge University Press — 2011
- 217NewsChinese human rights official says the crackdown 'completely correct'Rebecca MacKinnon — CNN — 2 June 1999
- 218News'The Tank Man,' a 'Frontline' Documentary, Examines One Man's Act in Tiananmen SquareEd Martel — 11 April 2006
- 219NewsChinese Army Moving Closer to Protesters: Finances, Leadership Split Student RanksJay Mathews — 2 June 1989
- 222BookThe Legacy of Tiananmen: China in DisarrayJames A. R. Miles — University of Michigan Press — 1997
- 223NewsTiananmen killings: Were the media right?James Miles — 2 June 2009
- 224Places 20 years apart – Indian ExpressRaja Mohan — 4 June 2009
- 225Tiananmen's Most Wanted – Where Are They Now?Stacy Mosher — 26 May 2004
- 226The Tiananmen PapersAndrew J. Nathan — January–February 2001
- 227JournalOn the Tiananmen PapersAndrew Nathan — 2002
- 228InterviewThe Consequences of TiananmenAndrew J. Nathan — 3 June 2009
- 229BookThe Chinese Economy: Transitions and GrowthBarry Naughton — MIT Press — 2007
- 230BookThe Impact of China's 1989 Tiananmen MassacreBarry Naughton — Routledge — 2010
- 231BookBeijing Spring, 1989: Confrontation and Conflict: The Basic DocumentsM.E. Sharpe — 1990
- 232NewsWeb-savvy & cynical: China's youth since TiananmenAlexa Olesen — 30 May 2009
- 233BookOut of Mao's Shadow: The Struggle for the Soul of a New ChinaPhilip P. Pan — Simon and Schuster — 2008
- 234BookFrom Reform to RevolutionMinxin Pei — Harvard University Press — 1994
- 235NewsFresh details of 'savage' Tiananmen massacre emerge in embassy cablesTom Phillips — 27 January 2015
- 236JournalTiananmen and Chinese Political Culture: The Escalation of Confrontation from Moralizing to RevengeLucian W. Pye — 1990
- 238Tiananmen Square, 1989: The Declassified History – Document 13: Secretary of State's Morning Summary for June 4, 1989, China: Troops Open FireGeorge Washington University — 1 June 1999
- 239BookA History of ChinaJohn A.G. Roberts — Macmillan International Higher Education — 2011
- 240Remembering Tiananmen SquareRichard Roth — CBS News — 11 February 2009
- 241There Was No 'Tiananmen Square Massacre'Richard Roth — CBS News — 4 June 2009
- 242BookThe Chinese People's Movement: Perspectives on Spring 1989Tony Saich — M.E. Sharpe — 1990
- 243China faces dark memory of TiananmenRobert J. Saiget — 31 May 2009
- 244JournalChina's Fear of Contagion: Tiananmen Square and the Power of the European ExampleM.E. Sarotte — 2012
- 2458 Sentenced to Die in Beijing Fighting : Are Convicted of Beating Soldiers, Burning VehiclesKarl Schoenberger — 18 June 1989
- 246BookSino-American relations: One year after the massacre at Tiananmen SquareU.S. G.P.O. — 1991
- 247BookThe Search for Modern ChinaJonathan D Spence — Norton — 1999
- 248BookBeyond Tiananmen: The Politics of U.S.-China Relations 1989–2000Robert L. Suettinger — Brookings Institution Press — 2004
- 249BookInternational Management: Concepts and CasesManab Thakur et al. — Tata McGraw-Hill Education — 1997
- 250The Gate of Heavenly Peace – TranscriptLong Bow Group in collaboration with ITVS — 1995
- 251VideoThe Tank ManAntony Thomas — PBS — 2006
- 253NewsWhy China Refuses to Arrest its 'Most Wanted' DissidentsCatherine A. Traywick — 25 November 2013
- 254NewsChina's Tiananmen activists: Where are they now?Anjali Tsui et al. — CNN
- 255BookDeng Xiaoping and the Transformation of ChinaEzra F. Vogel — Belknap Press of Harvard University Press — 2011
- 256Workers in the Tiananmen ProtestsAndrew W. Walder et al. — 1993
- 257BookChina's New Order: Society, Politics, and Economy in TransitionHui Wang — Harvard University Press — 2006
- 258NewsChen Ziming, Dissident in China, Is Dead at 62Bruce Weber — 25 October 2014
- 259NewsFar-Ranging Support for Google's China MoveMichael Wines — 14 January 2010
- 260NewsTroops Brace for Attack in BeijingJan Wong — 6 June 1989
- 261Security tight on Tiananmen anniversaryAndy Wong — MSNBC — 3 June 2009
- 262JournalThe Political Fortunes of Shanghai's World Economic HeraldKate Wright — 1990
- 263BookRenhua Wu真相出版社 — 2009
- 264Boxun blogRenhua Wu — 23 April 2010
- 265Boxun blogRenhua Wu — 4 May 2010
- 266Boxun blogRenhua Wu — 23 May 2010
- 267Boxun blogRenhua Wu — 5 June 2010
- 268Boxun blogRenhua Wu — 5 June 2010
- 269Boxun blogRenhua Wu — 12 June 2010
- 270Boxun blogRenhua Wu
- 271Boxun blogRenhua Wu
- 272Boxun blogRenhua Wu
- 273Boxun blogRenhua Wu
- 274Boxun blogRenhua Wu — 4 June 2011
- 275NewsWhy China's Political Reforms FailedWei Wu — 4 June 2015
- 276NewsChina's Newspapers, After Crackdown by Beijing, Revert to a Single VoiceSheryl Wudunn — 22 June 1989
- 277NewsYoung clerk let Tiananmen ad slip past censors: paper6 June 2007
- 278MagazineChina Censors: The Tiananmen Square Anniversary Will Not Be TweetedKim Zetter — 2 June 2009
- 279BookThe Tiananmen Papers: The Chinese Leadership's Decision to Use Force, in Their Own WordsLiang Zhang — Public Affairs — 2001
- 280BookThe Power of Tiananmen: State-Society Relations and the 1989 Beijing Student MovementDingxin Zhao — University of Chicago Press — 2001
- 281BookPrisoner of the State: The Secret Journal of Premier Zhao ZiyangZiyang Zhao — Simon & Schuster — 2009