1962 FIFA World Cup

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The 1962 FIFA World Cup nearly did not happen at all. Two years before the first whistle blew, the most powerful earthquake ever recorded tore through Chile on the 22nd of May 1960, registering 9.5 in magnitude, killing over 50,000 people and displacing more than two million. Four of the eight chosen host cities were so badly damaged they had to be abandoned as venues entirely. The man responsible for bringing the tournament to Chile, Carlos Dittborn, responded with a phrase that became the motto of the entire effort: "Because we have nothing, we want to do it all." That line had first been spoken at a FIFA Congress in Lisbon six years earlier, when Chile improbably beat Argentina by 32 votes to 10 to win the right to host. Dittborn did not live to see the result. He died one month before the opening match. The questions the tournament raises are not merely about football. They are about a country rebuilding itself under the gaze of the world, about violence that shocked even hardened observers, and about Brazil quietly achieving something no team had done before or has done since.

• 2. The Speech That Won the Bid

  ›

  On the 10th of June 1956, the FIFA Congress gathered in Lisbon, Portugal, to decide where the 1962 World Cup would be held. Argentina was the heavy favourite, backed by superior sporting infrastructure and international prestige. Raul Colombo, arguing Argentina's case, closed his address with a line of supreme confidence: "We can start the World Cup tomorrow. We have it all." The following day, Carlos Dittborn took the floor for Chile. His committee, led alongside Juan Pinto Duran, had spent years touring football associations around the world, making the case for a country most delegates considered the underdog. Dittborn built his argument on four pillars: Chile's consistent participation in FIFA-organised competitions, its sporting climate, its tolerance of race and creed, and its political stability. Around the fifteenth minute of his speech, he turned Colombo's boast on its head. Because Chile had nothing, he said, it intended to do everything. The congress voted 32 to 10 in Chile's favour, with fourteen abstentions. Chile had also cited Article 2 of the FIFA statutes, which spoke to the tournament's role in promoting football in countries considered less developed. That framing gave delegates a principled reason to look past Argentina's obvious advantages, and it worked.

• 3. A Country Rebuilt on a Deadline

  ›

  Braden Copper Company, an American firm that controlled the El Teniente copper mine, contributed one of the four stadiums used in the final tournament by allowing its own ground at Rancagua to host matches. That detail alone signals how improvised the infrastructure became after the 1960 earthquake. Talca, Concepcion, Talcahuan and Valdivia were all struck from the list of host cities. Antofagasta and Valparaiso declined to participate because their venues were not financially self-sustaining. What remained was a slimmed-down tournament spread across Santiago, Vina del Mar, Rancagua, and the remote northern port of Arica. The Estadio Nacional in Santiago, with a capacity of 66,660, was the only large venue in the group. Every other stadium held fewer than 20,000 spectators. Government support was minimal; President Jorge Alessandri gave what observers called an uninspiring inaugural speech before the opening match between Chile and Switzerland, then left before the final whistle. His ministers were later pushed to insist publicly that Alessandri was as caught up in football fever as everyone else. Whatever the political atmosphere, the stadiums were rebuilt on schedule and the tournament ran without a major organisational failure. The stadium built in Arica was named Estadio Carlos Dittborn after the man who made it possible, and it still carries that name.

• 4. The Battle of Santiago

  ›

  Ken Aston, the English referee assigned to the first-round match between Chile and Italy on the 2nd of June 1962, faced conditions no rulebook had prepared him for. Two Italian journalists had published articles before the tournament describing Santiago as a poverty-stricken city ridden with crime and prostitution. Those pieces, printed in La Nazione and Corriere della Sera, were amplified by Chilean newspapers and ignited public fury. By the time Italy and Chile kicked off, the atmosphere had curdled into something close to hatred. Players on both sides attempted repeatedly to injure opponents. Only two players were sent off, both Italian, but the match required police intervention to escort the Italian team safely from the pitch. The Daily Express in Britain described the tournament's early matches in terms usually reserved for armed conflict, calling the Italy versus West Germany game a scene of "wrestling and warfare" and warning that the competition was developing into a "violent bloodbath." The Battle of Santiago, as the Chile-Italy match came to be known, stands as the most notorious match of the tournament, though it was not an isolated incident. The tournament as a whole recorded six sendings-off, a record at the time. The goals-per-match average dropped to 2.78, the first time in World Cup history that figure had fallen below three, a threshold it has never crossed upward again.

• 5. Stars, Substitutes, and Surprises

  ›

  Pele scored once in the tournament before a knee injury in the second group match against Czechoslovakia ended his participation. His replacement, Amarildo, scored three goals and proved central to Brazil's title defence, including the equaliser in the final itself. The Soviet goalkeeper Lev Yashin, widely regarded as the finest in the world at that point, had a tournament to forget; the USSR were eliminated by Chile 2-1 in the quarter-finals. Garrincha emerged as the tournament's dominant personality, scoring two goals in Brazil's 3-1 quarter-final win over England and reaching the semi-final before being sent off against Chile. Six players shared the tournament's top-scorer distinction with four goals each: Garrincha, Vava, Leonel Sanchez, Florian Albert, Valentin Ivanov, and Drazan Jerkovic. In total, 89 goals were scored by 54 players across the competition. The tournament also produced a notable administrative consequence. Ferenc Puskas had played for Hungary in 1954 and then for Spain; Jose Altafini had represented Brazil in 1958 and then Italy. In response to such cases, FIFA created rules prohibiting any player who had represented a nation in World Cup competition from switching to another national team. The rule changed international football permanently.

• 6. Brazil's Back-to-Back Title

  ›

  Josef Masopust put Czechoslovakia ahead after 15 minutes of the final at the Estadio Nacional in Santiago, latching onto a long ball from Adolf Scherer to make it 1-0. Two minutes later, Amarildo equalised after a mistake by Czech goalkeeper Viliam Schrojf. Brazil added goals from Zito and Vava in the second half, both assisted by further Schrojf errors, and the match ended 3-1. It was the second consecutive World Cup final in which Brazil found themselves a goal down before recovering. Winning back-to-back tournaments made Brazil only the second nation to achieve that feat, after Italy in 1934 and 1938. No team has managed it since. Chile, competing with a squad of players largely unknown outside their home country, finished third by defeating Yugoslavia 1-0 in the match for third place. Eladio Rojas scored the winning goal, the same player who had scored the decisive goal against the USSR in the quarter-finals. Chile's result made them the fourth South American nation to reach a World Cup semi-final, joining Uruguay, Brazil, and Argentina. The 1962 tournament was also the last one in which every qualifier came from Europe or the Americas; no African or Asian nation reached the final stages.