Ultramontanism

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Ultramontanism is a word that began as an insult. Catholic supporters of papal authority in France were called ultramontains by their opponents, a label meant to imply that they cared more about a foreign ruler beyond the Alps than about their own nation. The term stung precisely because it carried the accusation of disloyalty. And yet the idea it described would eventually help shape one of the most consequential doctrines in modern Catholic history. How did a medieval geographic description become a flashpoint between churches, states, and empires? And what happened when it finally won?

• 2. A Word from the Mountains

  ›

  The phrase papa ultramontano first appeared in the Middle Ages, when Italians used it simply to describe a pope who came from north of the Alps. Foreign students at medieval Italian universities were called ultramontani for the same reason. The geography was neutral; the term was purely descriptive.

  After the Protestant Reformation, the direction reversed. France now looked toward the man beyond the mountains, the Pope in Italy. French Catholics who deferred to Rome on matters of civil and church governance were called ultramontains by those who thought France should govern its own religious affairs. The name was meant to wound. From the 17th century onward, the label became closely associated with the Jesuits, who championed strong papal authority across Catholic Europe.

  By the 18th century, the word had broadened further. Across Europe, ultramontanists were those who sided with the Church in any dispute between ecclesiastical and civil authority. In Austria they pushed back against Josephinism, the reforming policy of the Habsburg Emperor Joseph II. In Germany they resisted Febronianism, a theological movement that also sought to limit papal power. In Britain and Ireland they opposed Cisalpinism, which proposed that Catholics should make concessions to the Protestant state in exchange for emancipation. The same word, different adversary in each country.

• 3. Spain, Canada, and the Shape of Resistance

  ›

  Charles III of Spain embodied one version of what ultramontanists were fighting against. His ministers, the Count of Floridablanca and the Count of Campomanes, rejected the argument that the Church held inalienable rights in secular matters. Their program of regalism sought to bring the Catholic Church under the monarchy's jurisdiction in everything outside the spiritual sphere. The Society of Jesus, already a symbol of ultramontane loyalty, had been expelled from the Spanish Empire in 1767, before those debates reached their peak. The Society had served as educators in Spain, and its expulsion was part of the same royal campaign to reduce the Church's independent footing.

  The regalist reforms were never fully completed. Resistance proved durable, fed in part by loyalties that ran deeper than political calculation.

  Far from Spain, in Canada, Catholic clergy formed their own version of this resistance. The majority of Catholic priests deeply distrusted the French Revolution and its hostility toward religion, and they turned to Rome for both spiritual and political direction. Laymen and laywomen joined them, seeing the Church's authority as inseparable from Canadian institutions. They too came to be called ultramontanists. These Canadian ultramontanes distrusted both Protestant anglophones and francophone liberals alike. Interestingly, the Church found it somewhat easier to work with British governors, who valued the Church's ability to contain political dissent, than with secular francophone professionals who wanted religion removed from public life.

• 4. The First Vatican Council

  ›

  By the middle of the 19th century, Catholic academic Jeffrey P. von Arx observed that the threats to the Church were arriving from multiple directions at once. Secular liberals pushed to expel religious congregations and close church schools. Socialists and others radicalized from revolutionary traditions aimed at what von Arx described as the Church's utter destruction. From the nationalist right, Otto von Bismarck's Kulturkampf placed Catholic schools and seminaries under state supervision and gave the German government the power to appoint bishops without any reference to Rome.

  The Church's response arrived in July 1870 with the Dogmatic Constitution Pastor aeternus, issued by the First Vatican Council. The council defined four doctrines: the apostolic primacy conferred on Saint Peter, the continuity of that primacy through successive Roman pontiffs, the scope of papal power, and papal infallibility. The text asserted that the Roman Church possesses "a pre-eminence of ordinary power over every other Church" and that both clergy and faithful "are bound to submit to this power by the duty of hierarchical subordination and true obedience."

  Cardinal Henry Edward Manning in Great Britain was among the most forceful advocates of this position. He believed unity and discipline within the Church were essential to protecting it within a liberal, democratic state. The English bishops at the council were noted for their ultramontanism and described by observers as being more Catholic than the Pope himself. Von Arx drew a comparison to the great empires and national states of the same era, which used new communications and transportation technology to consolidate power and build bureaucracies.

• 5. Schism, Backlash, and Survival

  ›

  Other Christian groups called the council's declarations the triumph of the heresy of ultramontanism. Three documents gave formal voice to that rejection: the Declaration of the Catholic Congress at Munich, the Theses of Bonn, and the Declaration of Utrecht. Together they became the founding texts of the Old Catholics, known in German as Altkatholische, who broke with Rome over the declarations on infallibility and supremacy. They joined the Old Episcopal Order Catholic See of Utrecht, which had been independent from Rome since 1723.

  Across Europe, liberals responded with legislation designed to reduce the Church's influence in public life. In France, the term ultramontanism was revived during the Third Republic, a period spanning 1870 to 1940, as a pejorative for policies opposed to laicite, the principle of strict secularism that traced back to the Revolution.

  The French philosopher Jacques Maritain examined the contrast between France's model and the American arrangement of church-state separation in the mid-twentieth century. He considered the American model of that period more workable, because it combined what he called "sharp distinction and actual cooperation" between church and state, something he described as "an historical treasure." He addressed the United States directly: "Please to God that you keep it carefully, and do not let your concept of separation veer round to the European one."

  The First Vatican Council itself ended abruptly, and informally, in 1870 when the outbreak of the Franco-Prussian War overtook its proceedings. After Italian Unification removed the papal states, ultramontanism and its theological opponent conciliarism both lost much of their urgency.

• 6. After the Storm

  ›

  Some extreme private opinions did persist well past 1870. A minority of ultramontane-leaning Catholics pushed the doctrine further than the council itself had sanctioned, attributing to the Pope absolute infallibility even in private opinions and even in matters beyond faith and morals. These views were never endorsed by the First Vatican Council's actual definition and, as the source notes, grew from erroneous private opinions rather than official teaching. Opponents of the Catholic Church nonetheless used these exaggerated versions in their arguments before the Second Vatican Council, which ran from 1962 to 1965.

  The Second Vatican Council addressed the question in its Dogmatic Constitution on the Church, Lumen gentium. The Apostolic See did not withdraw any previous teaching on papal infallibility or primacy. Instead, it shifted emphasis from structural authority to doctrinal teaching authority, a concept known as the magisterium. Papal magisterium was defined in Lumen gentium, paragraph 25, and later written into the 1983 revision of Canon Law.

  Former Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger argued that the Catholic social teaching of subsidiarity could serve as a counterweight to ultramontanism, with the potential to push authority down toward local churches. Others read the post-conciliar adjustments more narrowly, as a practical redistribution of pastoral responsibility to local bishops and parish priests, not a structural retreat from papal authority.

  Ultramontanism has continued to shadow ecumenical conversations, particularly with Lutherans and Anglicans. The joint Anglican-Roman Catholic International Consultation published The Gift of Authority in 1999, finding shared ground on the collegial role of bishops while leaving a clear gap on universal primacy. Anglicans stated an openness to recovering, under certain conditions, universal primacy exercised by the Bishop of Rome. The distinction between a primacy exercised within a college of equals and one carrying actual universal jurisdiction remained, as of that 1999 document, unresolved.