Tolkien: A Cultural Phenomenon

• 1. Publication History And Editions

  ›

  A short version of the book appeared in 1992 under the title Tolkien: A Critical Assessment. Macmillan published this edition as a paperback containing 167 pages and four chapters. The full version arrived eleven years later in 2003 with the new title Tolkien: A Cultural Phenomenon. Palgrave Macmillan released this expanded paperback at 246 pages across six chapters. Translators brought the text into Italian for international readers. Brian Rosebury, a lecturer in humanities at the University of Central Lancashire, wrote both versions. His specialization covers Tolkien studies, literary aesthetics, and moral philosophy.

  34

• 2. Structural Analysis Of Middle-earth

  ›

  Rosebury shows that Tolkien builds up a detailed picture of Middle-earth on a journey through a series of tableaux. He simultaneously sends characters on a quest to destroy the Ring. These two elements support each other throughout the narrative. The tableaux create places realistic enough for readers to love and wish to save. The quest saves the Middle-earth that is being created as the reader moves through it. This dual structure allows the author to engage readers emotionally while advancing the plot. The diagram of his analysis illustrates how these paths intertwine from start to finish.

  2

• 3. Tolkien Within Twentieth Century Literature

  ›

  The fourth chapter situates Tolkien in the twentieth century literary scene by contrasting his work with Modernism. Rosebury describes the writing as not ignorant of that movement but actually antagonistic to it. He searches for parallels among the Modernists such as Marcel Proust, James Joyce, and T. S. Eliot. Jane Chance notes this approach contrasts sharply with Tom Shippey's comparison of Tolkien with fantasy authors like George Orwell and William Golding. Claire Buck comments in the J. R. R. Tolkien Encyclopedia that this brings up the problematic definition of what modern is according to critics who thought Tolkien a peripheral figure. Academic studies on Tolkien's works have been appearing at an increasing pace since the mid-1980s.

  5

• 4. Ideological And Philosophical Frameworks

  ›

  New chapters explore Tolkien as a thinker whose writing relates to historical times and various political or religious ideologies. The first new look examines how his writing relates to the times in which he lived. It considers how his work has been used to support various ideologies. Christopher Garbowski quotes him saying that the reader must be delighted in Middle-earth in order to care that Sauron does not lay it desolate. Allan Turner points out that Rosebury rejects unsupported assertions of archaising and wrenched syntax by critics like Catharine Stimpson. He noted that Tolkien used a plain descriptive style favoring familiar phrasal verbs over slightly more literary alternatives.

  1

• 5. Adaptations And The Film Legacy

  ›

  The later edition added two new chapters including one about the afterlife of his work. This chapter looks at how it has been retold in film and other media. Peter Jackson adapted the story for film despite Tolkien's stated opinion that The Lord of the Rings was quite unsuitable for dramatization. Douglas A. Anderson reviews this section noting that Rosebury is less rigorously critical when discussing Peter Jackson's film interpretation than when analyzing the literature. Tom Shippey thought Rosebury's chapter on Peter Jackson's film adaptation the best available at that time. Scholars analyze how these films successfully convey the original text's message.

• 6. Critical Reception And Scholarly Debate

  ›

  Jane Chance writes that the refusal by some critics to accept that Tolkien is a major writer has consistently annoyed Tolkien readers over the past twenty-five years. She notes that Rosebury strategically uses Shippey to begin his book praising him but saying he doesn't clinch the argument that Tolkien's works are of high quality. Nancy-Lou Patterson reviewing the first version in Mythlore found British critics like Rosebury were improving the standard. Douglas A. Anderson calls the book a shrewd and engaging academic study with clear prose without jargon. Tom Shippey finds the explanation of how Tolkien wove free will, moral choice, and creativity into Middle-earth especially convincing.