The Review of English Studies
The Review of English Studies has spent decades as one of the primary venues where scholars argue over the meaning, history, and language of English literature. Published by Oxford University Press and known by its initials RES, it covers English literature and language from the earliest surviving texts all the way to the present day. What makes it distinct among academic journals is a question worth sitting with. The editors describe its emphasis as falling on historical scholarship rather than interpretative criticism, though fresh readings of authors and texts do appear when newly discovered sources or new interpretations of known material justify them. That balance between the archival and the analytical is the tension this journal has chosen to hold. Who steers it today, how it positions itself in a crowded field of literary scholarship, and what its editorial priorities mean in practice are the questions worth following.
The journal's own description places historical scholarship at its center, not interpretative criticism. That is a deliberate stance. Most literary journals welcome close reading as an end in itself, but RES asks that fresh interpretations earn their place by resting on newly discovered sources or on genuinely new ways of reading material already known to scholars. The scope runs from the earliest period of English literature to contemporary writing, which means the journal must hold Old English poetry and twenty-first-century fiction within the same critical framework. That breadth is one reason Oxford University Press, which publishes RES, describes it as a leading scholarly journal of English literature and the English language. The peer-review process is the mechanism that keeps the standard consistent across such a wide chronological span.
Five scholars currently share editorial responsibility for RES. Colin Burrow and Daniel Wakelin are both based at the University of Oxford. Juliette Atkinson works at University College London. Philip Connell and Fiona Green are both at the University of Cambridge. Having editors drawn from three of the most prominent British universities for literary study is not incidental. It reflects the institutional weight the journal carries and the network of scholarly expertise it draws on when commissioning and reviewing work. The spread across Oxford, London, and Cambridge also positions the journal at the intersection of several distinct research cultures, each with its own emphases and methodological traditions.
Continue Browsing
Common questions
What is The Review of English Studies?
The Review of English Studies is a peer-reviewed academic journal published by Oxford University Press. It covers English literature and language from the earliest period to the present, with an emphasis on historical scholarship rather than interpretative criticism.
Who publishes The Review of English Studies?
Oxford University Press publishes The Review of English Studies.
Who are the current editors of The Review of English Studies?
The current editors are Colin Burrow and Daniel Wakelin (University of Oxford), Juliette Atkinson (University College London), and Philip Connell and Fiona Green (University of Cambridge).
What does The Review of English Studies focus on?
The journal emphasizes historical scholarship over interpretative criticism. Fresh readings of authors and texts are published when they arise from newly discovered sources or new interpretation of known material.
What time period does The Review of English Studies cover?
The Review of English Studies covers English literature and language from the earliest period to the present day, spanning the full chronological range of written English.