The Rebel (book)

• 1. Metaphysical Foundations Of Rebellion

  ›

  Albert Camus published The Rebel in 1951 as a direct sequel to his earlier work The Myth of Sisyphus. This essay explores how rebellion and revolution function as states of being within human societies. Camus argues that both acts stem from a basic rejection of normative justice when people become disenchanted with contemporary applications of fairness. He describes this perception of the world as absurd, requiring what he terms lucidity to examine properly. The rebel finds values enabling them to determine that murder and oppression are illegitimate. This sensibility contradicts itself because claiming to believe in nothing actually means believing in one's own protest. Such an absurdist view irresistibly exceeds its own limits to conclude with hope for new creation.

  12

• 2. Historical Analysis Of Revolutions

  ›

  Camus examines various historical revolutions to demonstrate the inevitable failure of attempts at human perfection. His analysis focuses heavily on the French Revolution where revolutionaries aimed to kill God through execution of Louis XVI. They subsequently eradicated the divine right of kings to establish materialist idealism seeking the end of history. Since this end remains unattainable according to Camus terror ensued as revolutionaries attempted to coerce results. This culminated in temporary enslaving of people in the name of their future liberation. Camus relies on non-secular sentiment not to defend religion but to represent his apotheosis of transcendental moral values. The replacement of divinely justified morality with pragmatism simply represents this shift toward absolute ethical standards.

  34

• 3. Condemnation Of Revolutionary Violence

  ›

  Faced with manifest injustices of human existence modern revolutionaries often offer poor substitutes for true justice. Camus describes fastidious assassins like Russian terrorists led by Ivan Kalyayev active in the early twentieth century. These figures were prepared to offer their own lives as payment for the lives they took rather than licensing others to kill others. A third theme concerns how rebels who get carried away lose touch with the original basis of their rebellion. They then offer various defenses of crime through different historical epochs. Camus explicitly condemns Marxism-Leninism and denounces unrestrained violence as a means of human liberation. He became an outspoken champion of individual freedom while remaining an impassioned critic of tyranny and terrorism whether practiced by the Left or by the Right.

  56

• 4. Syndicalism And Midday Thought

  ›

  At the end of the book Camus espouses the possible moral superiority of syndicalist ethics and political plans. He grounds this politics in a wider midday thought which opposes love of this life against ideological promises of other worlds. This approach includes an unrelativisable normative commitment to fellow human beings instead of triumph of alleged master races. The true rebel is not the person who conforms to orthodoxy of some revolutionary ideology but someone who could say no to injustice. He suggested that the true rebel would prefer politics of reform such as modern trade-union socialism over totalitarian politics of Marxism. Systematic violence of ideology appeared to Camus wholly unjustifiable despite good ends never authorizing use of evil means.

  78

• 5. Sartre Critique And Philosophical Schism

  ›

  Jean-Paul Sartre published a critical response to The Rebel in 1952 within the review Les Temps modernes. This marked a public break between two major figures of twentieth-century philosophy. Many European Communists considered Camus thoughts reactionary following his publication of these ideas. The work received ongoing interest influencing modern philosophers like Paul Berman while being disliked by Marxists and existentialists. Henri Peyre writing for Encyclopædia Britannica Online considers the text grave but inconsistent and often unconvincing essays loosely linked together. Aidan Curzon-Hobson considers it important educational resource yet also Camus most underexplored text.

  57

• 6. Legacy In Modern Political Philosophy

  ›

  Contemporary scholars analyze the book's enduring influence on discussions regarding freedom tyranny and terrorism. David Simpson writes for Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy describing it as reflection on nature of freedom and rebellion plus philosophical critique of revolutionary violence. Meghan E. Von Hassel argues Camus presented new humanism finding hope in beauty of solidarity rooted in dignity of man. Fred Rosen examined influence of Simone Weil on Camus thinking noting he adopted her criticism of Marxism. George F Selfer analyzed parallels between Camus and Friedrich Nietzsche in philosophical aesthetics finding significant similarities and profound differences. John Foley states philosophically The Rebel is Camus most important book although much maligned and frequently ignored.

  68