The Myth of Sisyphus

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The Myth of Sisyphus, Albert Camus's 1942 philosophical essay, ends with one of the most counterintuitive sentences in modern thought: "One must imagine Sisyphus happy." A man condemned by the gods to push a boulder up a mountain for eternity, only to watch it roll back down every time it nears the top, and we are asked to imagine him happy. That is the challenge Camus sets for his reader. The questions the essay plants are urgent ones. Does recognizing the meaninglessness of life give a person reason to end it? And if it does not, how should a person live once that recognition has settled in? Camus wrote the essay beginning in 1940, during the Fall of France, when millions of refugees were fleeing advancing German armies. Robert Zaretsky, one of the essay's close readers, argues that this catastrophe prompted Camus's thinking about the absurd, because both a mundane event and something as devastating as an invasion push a person to ask the same single word: why?

• 2. Origins and Context

  ›

  Camus wrote The Myth of Sisyphus against the backdrop of early twentieth-century European philosophy, particularly existentialism and phenomenology. He was in dialogue with thinkers including Søren Kierkegaard, Arthur Schopenhauer, Friedrich Nietzsche, Martin Heidegger, Karl Jaspers, Edmund Husserl, and Lev Shestov. Yet despite being frequently grouped with the existentialists, Camus consistently rejected that label. He insisted his philosophy of the absurd was distinct from Kierkegaard's leap of faith and from Heidegger's ontology of Being. The essay was published in French in 1942, the same year as Camus's novel The Stranger and his play The Misunderstanding. The English translation by Justin O'Brien appeared in 1955. That translation included a preface Camus wrote while in Paris that year, in which he stated that "even if one does not believe in God, suicide is not legitimate." The essay is dedicated to Pascal Pia and is organized into four chapters and one appendix.

• 3. The Absurd Defined

  ›

  Camus opens the essay with a declaration about what he considers the only philosophical question that truly matters: whether the realization of life's meaninglessness necessarily requires suicide. He describes the absurd condition in terms of a double bind. Humanity builds its life on hope for tomorrow, yet tomorrow brings only closer proximity to death. People live as though the certainty of death is not real. The world, once stripped of what Camus calls its "common romanticism," becomes foreign, strange, and inhuman. True knowledge is impossible; rationality and science end in meaningless abstractions and metaphors. The absurd itself does not live in the world alone, nor in human thought alone. It arises at the collision between the human "appetite for the absolute and for unity" and the impossibility of reducing the world to any rational principle. Camus describes this collision as an "unreasonable silence" on the part of the universe in response to the human need for meaning. From the moment this absurdity is recognized, he writes, "it becomes a passion, the most harrowing of all."

• 4. Philosophical Suicide

  ›

  Kierkegaard and Shestov, Camus argues, each concluded that faith was the only exit from despair. He considered this a betrayal of the absurd itself. When a thinker confronts meaninglessness and then leaps toward God or metaphysical hope, Camus called it "philosophical suicide" because such a leap abandons reason in favor of what it cannot support. Husserl and Hegel received a parallel critique. Where Kierkegaard and Shestov abandoned reason for religion, Husserl elevated reason into abstract systems, ultimately arriving at what Camus described as ubiquitous Platonic forms and an abstract god. Both paths, in his view, obscure the absurd rather than face it. Camus also engaged seriously with Nietzsche. The concept of eternal recurrence and Nietzsche's affirmation of life informed Camus's own emphasis on revolt and freedom, but Camus rejected the metaphysical dimensions of Nietzsche's thought and grounded his own philosophy in lived experience. Scholars including Thomas Nagel and Ronald Aronson have since traced how Camus's concept of the absurd continues to shape debates in existential ethics and modern humanism.

• 5. Three Consequences

  ›

  Suicide must be rejected, Camus concludes, because without humanity the absurd cannot exist. The contradiction must be lived, not resolved. From that commitment, he derives three consequences: revolt, freedom, and passion. Revolt means constant confrontation with the absurd, never permanently accepting it. Freedom arrives in a concrete rather than metaphysical form. No longer bound by hope for eternity or a better future, the absurd man "enjoys a freedom with regard to common rules." And passion follows from embracing fully what the unreasonable world offers. Without meaning, there is no scale of values. Camus states the principle plainly: "What counts is not the best living but the most living." He then sketches three figures who embody this life. Don Juan, the serial seducer, lives the passionate life at full intensity. The actor depicts ephemeral lives for ephemeral fame. The conqueror forgoes all promises of eternity to act fully within human history, choosing engagement over contemplation, aware that no victory is final.

• 6. Art and Dostoevsky

  ›

  Absurd art, Camus argues in his third chapter, is restricted to describing the myriad experiences of the world because explanation is impossible. He writes: "If the world were clear, art would not exist." The absurd creator must also refrain from judging or gesturing toward even a shadow of hope. Camus tests this standard against the work of Fyodor Dostoevsky, examining The Diary of a Writer, The Possessed, and The Brothers Karamazov. All three begin from an absurd position. The first two explore what Camus means by philosophical suicide. But both The Diary of a Writer and The Brothers Karamazov ultimately find a path to hope and faith, and so, by his measure, they fall short as truly absurd creations. The appendix extends this logic to Franz Kafka. Camus acknowledges that Kafka's work offers an exquisite description of the absurd condition, but he concludes that Kafka too fails as an absurd writer because his work retains a glimmer of hope.

• 7. Sisyphus Imagined Happy

  ›

  In Greek mythology, Sisyphus defied the gods and placed Death itself in chains so that no human needed to die. When Death was eventually freed and came for Sisyphus, he contrived an escape from the underworld. After the gods finally recaptured him, they sentenced him to eternity: push a boulder to the top of a mountain, watch it roll back down, and begin again without end. Camus sees in that sentence not only punishment but a portrait of modern life. "The workman of today works every day in his life at the same tasks, and this fate is no less absurd. But it is tragic only at the rare moments when it becomes conscious." Camus says it is the moment when Sisyphus walks back down the mountain, before he must begin again, that most interests him. It is the moment of full awareness. "I see that man going back down with a heavy yet measured step toward the torment of which he will never know the end." Yet there is no fate, Camus insists, that cannot be surmounted by scorn. Sisyphus, in acknowledging the futility of his task and the certainty of his fate, is freed to reach what Camus calls a state of contented acceptance. The essay closes with its famous imperative: "The struggle itself toward the heights is enough to fill a man's heart. One must imagine Sisyphus happy."