String Quintet No. 6 (Mozart)

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  String Quintet No. 6 in E major, K. 614, was completed by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart on the 12th of April 1791. That date sits just months before his death, and it marks the endpoint of his long engagement with chamber music for strings. What did it mean to be a composer running out of time, still writing at this level of invention? And what do we make of a piece that some listeners have brushed aside as a lesser work, while others hear it as pointing somewhere entirely new?

• 2. A Quintet of Violas

  ›

  K. 614 belongs to a very specific tradition that Mozart made his own. Every string quintet he wrote is what scholars call a viola quintet. Where a standard string quartet calls for two violins, one viola, and one cello, Mozart's quintets add a second viola rather than a second cello. That choice shifts the weight of the ensemble toward the middle register. The resulting texture is warmer and more enveloping than a quartet, and the two violas can divide labor in ways a single viola cannot. Leonard Ratner, in his commentary on the first movement coda, describes exactly this layering at work: three distinct levels of action operate simultaneously, with the paired violas in the middle register, the high violins paired above them, and the low cello anchoring the bottom.

• 3. The Coda's Physical Force

  ›

  Ratner's language about that first movement coda is unusually physical for a music analyst. He writes that the brilliance and drive of the passage "have a physical impact that would better be described as counteraction rather than counterpoint." The distinction matters. Counterpoint suggests voices weaving together in cooperative logic. Counteraction implies something more confrontational, voices pressing against each other. Whatever word one reaches for, the coda stands as one of the more discussed passages in the late chamber works. Simon Keefe traces a connection between this movement and Mozart's final piano concertos, arguing that K. 614's first movement takes the listener back to the world of Mozart's concertos. That cross-fertilization between the concerto and the intimate chamber setting is one of the defining features of what Keefe calls the late string chamber music.

• 4. One Idea, Many Forms

  ›

  K. 614 was written close in time to another string quintet, K. 593, and the two have often been grouped together by critics inclined to dismiss them both. That dismissal rests on the assumption that they reflect the composer's straitened circumstances toward the end of his life, as though financial pressure translated directly into lesser craft. Scholar Eisen pushes back hard on this reading. Rather than measuring K. 614 against a Classical ideal of surface variety and finding it wanting, Eisen argues that the quintet represents a new path. The work, in his analysis, foregoes surface variety in order to pursue something more concentrated: the exploration of a single motivating idea that determines both the surface and the structure. That is a very different ambition from variety, and it requires a very different kind of listening.

• 5. When a Slow Movement Refuses Its Label

  ›

  The slow movement of K. 614 presents a particular puzzle of form. On first appearance it looks like a theme and variations, and the variation structure is genuinely there. But Eisen observes that the movement simultaneously takes on the characteristics of a rondo and of a sonata. A rondo organizes itself around a recurring theme that returns between contrasting episodes. A sonata develops and transforms its material through tension and resolution. That a single movement can function as all three forms at once is not a contradiction; it suggests a composer whose command of form had become fluid enough to blur distinctions that earlier in his career he had kept separate. The formal complexity of this movement, quietly operating beneath what sounds like decorative variation writing, is part of what makes K. 614 difficult to hear correctly on a first encounter.