Skip to content
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Standard Oil

~9 min read · Ch. 1 of 7
7 sections
  • Standard Oil began as a single company founded in Cleveland in 1870, and within forty years it would come to control nearly all of the refined oil flowing through the United States. John D. Rockefeller incorporated it in Ohio with just $1 million in capital and a name he chose deliberately: "Standard" was meant to signal reliable quality and service in a young industry still finding its footing. What followed was the creation of one of the most powerful corporate structures the world had ever seen. How did one company gain control of 91% of American oil refining? What tactics did it use, and who finally brought it down? And what did its end actually mean for the oil industry, for consumers, and for the men who built it?

  • Six partners stood at the origin of what became Standard Oil. In 1863, John D. Rockefeller formed an Ohio partnership with his brother William, Henry Flagler, chemist Samuel Andrews, silent partner Stephen V. Harkness, and Oliver Burr Jennings, who had married the sister of William Rockefeller's wife. When Rockefeller incorporated the company in 1870, the initial 10,000 shares were divided carefully: John D. Rockefeller took 2,667 shares, Harkness took 1,334, while William, Flagler, and Andrews each received 1,333. Jennings received 1,000, and the firm of Rockefeller, Andrews and Flagler received another 1,000.

    From the start, Rockefeller concentrated authority in Cleveland while distributing the actual work of policy-making to a system of committees. He remained the largest shareholder throughout, but decisions at the main office were made cooperatively. Growth came through two channels: increasing sales and buying competitors. Firms he judged inefficient were shut down; the rest were absorbed.

    The railroad deals were where Standard's leverage became visible. In 1868, the Lake Shore Railroad gave Rockefeller's firm a rate of one cent per gallon, or 42 cents per barrel, in exchange for a guarantee to ship at least 60 carloads of oil daily and to handle loading and unloading himself. That arrangement amounted to an effective 71% discount off listed rates. Smaller competitors, unable to produce enough volume to qualify for similar discounts, found themselves shut out. Between 1865 and 1870, Standard's kerosene price dropped from 58 cents to 26 cents a gallon, making it attractive to consumers even as it squeezed rivals.

  • State laws presented a practical problem for Rockefeller by the early 1880s. Some states taxed out-of-state corporations doing business within their borders; others banned in-state corporations from holding stock in companies based elsewhere. Rockefeller and his associates designed a solution: on the 2nd of January 1882, thirty-seven stockholders conveyed their shares in trust to nine named trustees, combining their companies spread across dozens of states under a single coordinating body. The nine trustees were John and William Rockefeller, Oliver H. Payne, Charles Pratt, Henry Flagler, John D. Archbold, William G. Warden, Jabez Bostwick, and Benjamin Brewster. The original trust was valued at $70 million.

    The arrangement was kept secret. A wider group of 41 investors signed the Standard Oil Trust Agreement, which pooled the securities of 40 companies into this single holding agency. The structure proved so effective that other large enterprises adopted the trust form for their own organizations.

    From 1882 to 1906, Standard paid out $548,436,000 in dividends at a 65.4% payout ratio. Total net earnings over the same period reached $838,783,800. The surplus beyond dividends, roughly $290 million, was reinvested in plant expansions. The controlling families, which Rockefeller identified in 1910 as the Pratt family, the Payne-Whitney family, the Harkness-Flagler family, and the Rockefellers themselves, reinvested much of their dividends outside oil, particularly in railroads, gas, electric lighting, and the Consolidated Gas Company of New York City. In 1885, Standard Oil of Ohio moved its headquarters from Cleveland to 26 Broadway in New York City, which remained its permanent address.

  • Production grew faster than domestic demand, and Standard began looking outward. In the 1890s, the company targeted China's population of close to 400 million as a market for kerosene lamp fuel. Standard adopted a Chinese brand name, Mei Foo, as a transliteration, and gave away or sold cheaply a tin lamp bearing that name to Chinese farmers to encourage the switch from vegetable oil to kerosene. The response was strong, and China became Standard's largest Asian market.

    Distribution required serious infrastructure. Standard built storage tanks, canneries where bulk oil from large ocean tankers was repackaged into five-gallon tins, warehouses, and offices in key Chinese cities. For inland delivery it operated motor tank trucks, railway tank cars, and a fleet of low-draft river vessels. The North China Division of Stanvac, the joint venture formed in 1933 between Jersey Standard and Socony-Vacuum, was based in Shanghai and owned hundreds of vessels including motor barges, steamers, launches, tugboats, and tankers.

    The most prominent ships on the Yangtze carried the Mei prefix. Mei An, launched in 1901, was the first vessel in the fleet. The tanker Mei Hsia, launched in 1926, measured 206 feet in length with a beam of 32 feet and a depth of 10 feet 6 inches; it carried 350 tons of bulk oil across three holds and featured a bulletproof wheelhouse, a practical necessity given the hazards of river navigation. Mei Ping, launched in 1927, was designed offshore but assembled and finished in Shanghai, with oil-fuel burners shipped from the United States and water-tube boilers from England. All three of these large tankers were destroyed in the 1937 USS Panay incident. Before World War II, Stanvac was the largest single American investment in Southeast Asia.

  • Public scrutiny of Standard Oil began to sharpen in 1879, when New York State legislator A. Barton Hepburn was directed to investigate railroad rebates. Few people outside the company itself understood the scale of Standard's control. According to historian Hawke, writing in 1980, only about a dozen people within Standard Oil knew the full extent of its operations. The committee's counsel, Simon Sterne, questioned executives from the Erie Railroad and the New York Central Railroad and found that at least half of their long-haul traffic carried rebates, with Standard Oil as the primary beneficiary. John Dustin Archbold, president of the Acme Oil Company, initially denied any association with Standard Oil before admitting he served as a Standard director.

    The more consequential reckoning came through journalism. Ida M. Tarbell was an American author and journalist whose own father had been an oil producer ruined by Rockefeller's business practices. After extensive interviews with senior Standard executive Henry H. Rogers, Tarbell published her investigation in 19 parts in McClure's magazine, running from November 1902 to October 1904, then released the complete work as a book, The History of the Standard Oil Company. Her reporting gave concrete shape to what had been rumor and suspicion, and it accelerated the public and political pressure on Standard Oil that led directly to the antitrust suit.

    The federal Commissioner of Corporations studied Standard's operations between 1904 and 1906 and concluded that Standard's dominant position in refining was due to unfair practices: abuse of pipeline control, railroad discriminations, and unfair methods of competition in the sale of refined petroleum products.

  • Ohio had already moved first. The state sued Standard in 1892 and won, compelling dissolution of the trust. Standard's response was to simply separate Standard Oil of Ohio from the structure while maintaining informal control. New Jersey then changed its laws to allow a company to hold shares in companies in any state, and by 1899 the trust was legally reborn as the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey at 26 Broadway, a holding company that held stock in 41 companies, each of which controlled further layers of companies.

    Congress had passed the Sherman Antitrust Act in 1890 by a vote of 51-1 in the Senate and 242-0 in the House. In 1909, the U.S. Justice Department sued Standard under that law for sustaining a monopoly and restraining interstate commerce. Prosecutors identified four illegal patterns in railroad arrangements: secret and semi-secret rates, discriminations in open rate arrangements, discriminations in classification and rules of shipment, and discriminations in the treatment of private tank cars. The government also charged Standard with local price-cutting to suppress competition, operating bogus supposedly independent companies, and espionage against competitors.

    On the 15th of May 1911, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the lower court judgment, declared the Standard Oil group an unreasonable monopoly under Section II of the Sherman Antitrust Act, and ordered it broken up into 39 independent companies with separate boards of directors. Standard's market share had already slipped from 90% of American refining capacity in 1880 to between 60 and 65% by 1911, as regional competitors including Pure Oil, Texaco, Gulf Oil, Cities Service, Sun, and Union had built themselves into vertically integrated rivals. In the Gulf Coast region Standard held just 10% of production by the time of the ruling.

  • John D. Rockefeller had retired from any management role well before 1911 but owned a quarter of the shares of the resulting companies. As those share values mostly doubled after the breakup, the dissolution made him the richest man in the world. The net value of the companies severed from Jersey Standard was $375 million, representing 57% of Jersey Standard's value. After dissolution, Jersey Standard became the second largest corporation in the United States, behind only United States Steel.

    Jersey Standard was subsequently renamed Exxon in 1973 and ExxonMobil in 1999. Standard Oil of New York became Mobil. Standard Oil of California became Chevron. Standard Oil of Ohio was purchased by BP in 1987, which continued selling gasoline under the Sohio brand until 1991. Standard Oil of Indiana became Amoco through mergers and a name change in the 1980s. The joint Stanvac venture operated in 50 countries from East Africa to New Zealand before it was dissolved in 1962.

    Some economists have argued that Standard was already losing its monopoly when the court ordered the breakup, pointing to the erosion from 90% refining capacity in 1880 to 60-65% by 1911. The only company since Standard Oil to be divided into parts in a similar fashion was AT&T, which was forced to divest the Bell System in 1984. Of the 39 successor companies, 11 were granted rights to use the Standard Oil name based on the state they operated in. As of 2024, Chevron registered a new federal trademark for the Standard name applied to its electric charging stations.

Common questions

Who founded Standard Oil and when?

Standard Oil was founded by John D. Rockefeller, who incorporated the company in Ohio in 1870 with $1 million in capital. Its origins trace to a partnership formed in 1863 with William Rockefeller, Henry Flagler, Samuel Andrews, Stephen V. Harkness, and Oliver Burr Jennings.

Why was Standard Oil broken up by the Supreme Court?

On the 15th of May 1911, the U.S. Supreme Court declared Standard Oil an unreasonable monopoly under Section II of the Sherman Antitrust Act and ordered it split into 39 independent companies. The court found that Standard had used secret railroad rebates, pipeline control abuses, local price-cutting, and bogus independent companies to restrain trade and suppress competition.

What was the Standard Oil Trust and how did it work?

The Standard Oil Trust was formed on the 2nd of January 1882, when 37 stockholders transferred their shares in trust to nine trustees, combining companies across dozens of states under a single holding agency. The original trust was valued at $70 million. The structure was designed to circumvent state laws that restricted out-of-state corporate ownership.

Who was Ida Tarbell and what role did she play in Standard Oil's breakup?

Ida M. Tarbell was an American journalist whose father's oil business had been destroyed by Rockefeller's practices. She published a 19-part investigation in McClure's magazine between November 1902 and October 1904, then released it as the book The History of the Standard Oil Company. Her reporting fueled public and political pressure that contributed directly to the antitrust suit.

What companies descended from Standard Oil after the 1911 breakup?

The 39 successor companies include what became ExxonMobil (from Standard Oil of New Jersey and Standard Oil of New York), Chevron (from Standard Oil of California), and BP, which later acquired Standard Oil of Ohio and Standard Oil of Indiana (known as Amoco). Marathon Oil and ConocoPhillips also trace lineage to Standard Oil successors.

How did Standard Oil operate in China?

Standard Oil entered China in the 1890s, marketing kerosene to a population of close to 400 million as lamp fuel under the brand name Mei Foo. The company gave away or sold cheaply tin lamps to encourage farmers to switch from vegetable oil, and China became Standard's largest Asian market. Standard also operated a river fleet on the Yangtze, including tankers Mei Ping, Mei Hsia, and Mei An, all three of which were destroyed in the 1937 USS Panay incident.

All sources

67 references cited across the entry

  1. 1bookThe Civil War Era and Reconstruction: An Encyclopedia of Social, Political, Cultural and Economic History (Volumes 1–2)Mary Ellen Snodgrass — Routledge — 2015
  2. 2bookJuggernaut: Why the System Cushes the Only People Who Can Save ItEric Robert Morse — New Classic Books — 2010
  3. 3bookThe History of the Standard Oil Company ( 2 Volumes in 1)Ida M. Tarbell — Cosimo, Inc. — 2010
  4. 5bookOil and Ideology: The Cultural Creation of the American Petroleum IndustryRoger M. Olien et al. — University of North Carolina Press — 2000
  5. 6bookAntitrust and Monopoly: Anatomy of a Policy FailureDominick Armentano — The Independent Institute — 1999
  6. 7magazineAntitrust with a Vengeance: The Obama Administration's Anti-Business CudgelEric Daniels — Glen Allen Press — Winter 2009
  7. 8harvnbYergin (1991) p. 96–98Yergin — 1991
  8. 9harvnbYergin (1991) p. 79Yergin — 1991
  9. 11webChart: The Evolution of Standard OilJeff Desjardins — 2017-11-24
  10. 14webThe Return of Esso Gasoline?February 16, 2016
  11. 16bookHistorische amerikanische AktienUdo Hielscher — Stadtsparkasse Ludwigshafen — 1987
  12. 17bookThe Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money, and PowerDaniel Yergin — Simon & Schuster — 1991
  13. 18webA Guide to the ExxonMobil Historical CollectionUniversity of Texas at Austin
  14. 19newsMicrosoft hit by record EU fineCNN — March 25, 2004
  15. 21newsAT&T Move Is a Reversal Of Course Set in 1980'sAndrew Pollack — September 22, 1995
  16. 22webJohn D. and Standard OilBowling Green State University
  17. 24webWarden Winter HomeWaymarking.com
  18. 27bookBehind the Wall Street CurtainEdward Dies — Ayer — 1969
  19. 29bookHistory of Standard Oil Co. (New Jersey : Pioneering in Big Business 1882–1911)Ralph W. Hidy et al. — Harper — 1956
  20. 30bookThe Trust Problem in the United StatesEliot Jones — New York, Macmillan Co. — 1922
  21. 31bookJohn D. The Founding Father of the RockefellersDavid Freeman Hawke — Harper & Row — 1980
  22. 33bookJohn D. The Founding Father of the RockefellersDavid Freeman Hawke — Harper & Row — 1980
  23. 34bookHandbook of American Business History: ManufacturingDavid O. Whitten et al. — Greenwood Publishing Group — 1990
  24. 36bookThe Robber BaronsMatthew Josephson — Harcourt Trade — 1962
  25. 37harvnbJones (1922) p. 88Jones — 1922
  26. 38webChart: The Evolution of Standard OilJeff Desjardins — November 24, 2017
  27. 39bookTitan: The Life of John D. Rockefeller, Sr.Ron Chernow — Warner Books — 1998
  28. 40harvnbJones (1922) p. 89–90Jones — 1922
  29. 41bookForeign Devils in the Flowery KingdomCarl Crow — Earnshaw Books — 2007
  30. 42bookEncountering Chinese Networks: Western, Japanese, and Chinese Corporations in China, 1880–1937S. Cochran — University of California Press — 2000
  31. 43bookThe Standard-Vacuum Oil Co. and United States East Asian Policy, 1933–1941Irvine H. Jr. Anderson — Princeton University Press — 1975
  32. 44harvnbAnderson (1975) p. 203Anderson — 1975
  33. 45harvnbCochran (2000) p. 31Cochran — 2000
  34. 46harvnbCochran (2000) p. 32Cochran — 2000
  35. 47harvnbAnderson, (1975) p. 106Anderson, — 1975
  36. 48bookThirty Years a Mariner in the Far East 1907–1937, The Memoirs of Peter Mender, a Standard Oil Ship Captain on China's Yangtze RiverPeter Mender — Booklocker — 2010
  37. 49bookAmerican Interests and Policies in the Middle East: 1900–1939John A. DeNovo — University of Minnesota Press — 1963
  38. 50harvnbJones (1922) p. 58–59, 64Jones — 1922
  39. 51harvnbJones (1922) p. 58Jones — 1922
  40. 52harvnbJones (1922) p. 65–66Jones — 1922
  41. 53bookMarket Dominance: How Firms Gain, Hold, or Lose It and the Impact on Economic PerformanceGreenwood Publishing Group — 1998
  42. 54bookAntitrust: The Case for Repeal.Dominick Armentano — Ludwig von Mises Institute — 1999
  43. 55bookMarket Dominance: How Firms Gain, Hold, or Lose it and the Impact on Economic PerformanceLeslie D. Manns — Praeger — 1998
  44. 56harvnbJones (1922) p. 73Jones — 1922
  45. 57harvnbJones (1922) p. 75–76Jones — 1922
  46. 58harvnbJones (1922) p. 80Jones — 1922
  47. 59harvnbYergin (1991) p. 113Yergin — 1991
  48. 60newsStandard ogreDecember 23, 1999
  49. 61webThe Sherman Antitrust Act and Standard OilUniversity of Houston — January 9, 2014
  50. 64webAntitrust, by Alan GreenspanJude Wanniski — June 12, 1998
  51. 65bookThe American Petroleum Industry, 1899–1959Harold F. Williamson — Northwestern University Press — 1963
  52. 66bookMarket Dominance: How Firms Gain, Hold, or Lose it and the Impact on Economic PerformancePraeger — 1998
  53. 67newsToo Big and Failing: The Missed Chance to Break Up GMHarry First et al. — June 19, 2009