Russia–European Union relations

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Russia-European Union relations stand at the most fractured point in their post-Cold War history. Before 2022, the EU was Russia's single largest trading partner, handling 52.3% of all Russian foreign trade as of 2008. Russian gas covered 38.7% of the EU's total gas imports that same year. Those numbers alone reveal how tightly the two sides had woven their economies together across three decades. Then the 2022 invasion of Ukraine collapsed that entire architecture. Direct flights were suspended. Russian assets in the EU were frozen. On the 23rd of November 2022, the European Parliament voted to declare Russia a state sponsor of terrorism. The questions worth examining are how that partnership was built, what it was actually worth, how Russia used its energy leverage against Europe long before 2022, and how Russia spent years cultivating political allies and running intelligence operations inside the EU itself.

• 2. The Legal Foundation

  ›

  The EEC-Soviet Union Cooperation Agreement was signed in Brussels on the 18th of December 1989, just weeks after the Berlin Wall fell. It came into force on the 1st of April 1990. When the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, Russia became the sole continuator state, inheriting all Soviet international obligations. The Declaration of the Twelve, published on the 23rd of December 1991 by Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Portugal, Spain, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom, formally acknowledged this transfer.

  The true legal foundation for post-Soviet EU-Russia ties came with the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement, signed in June 1994 and in force from December 1997. Intended to be valid for ten years, it was never replaced. Since 2007, it has been automatically renewed each year. The PCA set up a political, economic, and cultural framework. It committed both parties to respecting democratic principles and human rights as defined in the Helsinki Final Act and the Charter of Paris for a new Europe.

  At the St Petersburg Summit in May 2003, the two sides agreed to build four Common Spaces: a common economic space; a common space of freedom, security, and justice; a space of cooperation on external security; and a space for research, education, and cultural exchange. The Moscow Summit of May 2005 adopted road maps for all four. Russia declined to join the EU's European Neighbourhood Policy because it sought equal partnership rather than the junior relationship it associated with that framework.

• 3. Energy as Leverage

  ›

  In 2007, EU member states imported 185 million tonnes of crude oil from Russia, covering 32.6% of the bloc's total oil imports. Natural gas imports from Russia that year reached 100.7 million tonnes of oil equivalent, or 38.7% of total EU gas imports. Germany alone imported between 50% and 75% of its natural gas from Russia. These figures describe a structural dependency that took decades to build.

  Russia did not always treat that dependency gently. As early as 2006, pipeline shutdowns were described as a "tool for intimidation and blackmail." In August 2021, Russia unexpectedly cut volumes of gas sent to the EU, driving sudden price spikes across the European market. The following month, Russian officials suggested that a rapid start-up of the newly completed Nord Stream 2 pipeline would resolve the crisis. An anti-trust investigation launched in 2011 against Gazprom seized internal documents showing attempts to segment the EU market along national borders and impose unfair pricing on member states.

  Nuclear fuel added another layer of dependency. As of 2024, there were 20 Rosatom VVER nuclear power plants operating in EU territory: two in Bulgaria, six in the Czech Republic, two in Finland, four in Hungary, and six in Slovakia. Anxiety over post-2022 sanctions caused that group of countries to collectively double their imports of Russian nuclear fuel for 2023. The fuel price paid to Russia by the EU rose by 34% year over year, reaching an average of just under 1.2 million euros per ton in 2023. A Polish industry forum noted at the time that a 50% increase in uranium prices would translate into only about a 5% rise in the cost of electricity generation.

• 4. Cultivating Political Allies

  ›

  By the end of 2014, a network of European political parties was receiving financial or organisational support from Russia. The list included the Freedom Party of Austria, Alternative for Germany, the National Democratic Party of Germany, France's National Front, Italy's Lega Nord, Hungary's Jobbik, Bulgaria's Attack party, and the Latvian Russian Union. On the left, representatives of Die Linke, the Communist Party of Greece, and Syriza attended events organised by Russia. In the European Parliament, the European United Left-Nordic Green Left was described as a "reliable partner" of Russian interests, voting against resolutions condemning Russia's military intervention in Ukraine in 78% of cases reviewed by Hungary's Political Capital Institute. Future members of Marine Le Pen's Europe of Nations and Freedom group voted against such resolutions in 93% of cases.

  In November 2014, Marine Le Pen confirmed a 9 million euro loan from a Russian bank to the Front National. In April 2015, leaked emails between Timur Prokopenko, a member of Putin's administration, and Konstantin Rykov, a former State Duma deputy, documented Russian financial support to the Front National in exchange for its backing of Russia's annexation of Crimea. In 2019, Italian deputy prime minister Matteo Salvini led a delegation to Moscow where representatives of Italy's Lega party were offered tens of millions of dollars in funding.

  According to a 2022 report, Russia spent over 300 million dollars since 2014 on covert subsidies to political parties and movements globally, including within the EU. The funding of far-right and far-left parties passed partly through the Russian Saint Basil the Great Charitable Foundation, operated by Konstantin Malofeev. In 2017, three Alternative for Germany Bundestag deputies acknowledged jointly receiving $29,000 for a sponsored private jet visit to Moscow.

• 5. Intelligence and Cyber Operations

  ›

  In 2007, following Estonia's decision to relocate a Soviet soldier statue, major Estonian commercial banks, government agencies, media outlets, and ATMs were hit by a coordinated cyberattack later traced to Russia. The attack was the first of its kind to target a NATO member at national scale. In May 2015, the Bundestag's computer system was shut down for days by a hacker group that Germany's Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution assessed was likely "being steered by the Russian state." In 2020, German prosecutors issued an arrest warrant for Dmitry Badin, a GRU operative, for his role in that 2015 hack. In April 2015, France's television channel TV5 Monde was targeted in an attack initially claimed by ISIL but which French investigators traced toward Russia.

  Physical intelligence work ran alongside the cyber campaigns. A Russian spy named Sergey Cherepanov operated in Spain from the 1990s until June 2010 under the false identity of Henry Frith. Sweden's Security Service named Russia as its single biggest intelligence threat in its 2014 annual report. Since 2009, Estonia alone tried and convicted 20 people as operatives or agents of Russian intelligence, the highest count of any NATO country. Eleven of those convictions involved FSB operatives, five involved GRU, and two involved SVR.

  In October 2016, Montenegrin security services foiled an armed coup planned for election day on the 16th of October. More than 20 people were arrested. Montenegro's chief prosecutor Milivoje Katnic stated that the group planned to break into parliament, kill Prime Minister Milo Djukanovic, and install a pro-Russian coalition. Two Russian GRU officers, Eduard Shishmakov and Vladimir Popov, were later convicted in absentia for their roles in the plot.

• 6. Public Opinion and the Kaliningrad Fault Line

  ›

  Kaliningrad Oblast, the Russian exclave wedged between Poland and Lithuania, became an unusual pressure point in EU-Russia relations after 2004. Since Poland and Lithuania joined the EU that year, Kaliningrad has been surrounded on land by EU territory. Stricter border controls arrived with Schengen membership, isolating the exclave from the Russian mainland. Between 2012 and 2016, a visa-free travel arrangement operated between the Kaliningrad region and northern Poland, offering a partial remedy. After the 2022 invasion, those practical accommodations collapsed. The EU banned Russian flights from EU airspace, making even direct air travel between Kaliningrad and the Russian mainland impossible. Russia responded by escalating its military presence in the oblast and threatening to station nuclear weapons there, citing Sweden and Finland's NATO membership bids.

  Public opinion inside Russia tracked the political temperature with some precision. A February 2014 poll by the Levada Center, Russia's largest independent polling organisation, found that nearly 80% of Russian respondents had a positive view of the EU. After the annexation of Crimea later that year, 70% took a hostile view. A Levada poll released in August 2018 found that 68% of Russian respondents still believed Russia needed to dramatically improve relations with Western countries. By February 2020-80% of Russian respondents told Levada that Russia and the West should become friends and partners, and 49% viewed the EU positively. A separate 2012 survey by Deutsche Welle found that between 36% and 54% of Russians supported Russia joining the EU outright. Those figures sit in sharp contrast to the military exercises Russia was simultaneously running across the Baltic region.