Persius

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Persius, born Aulus Persius Flaccus on the 4th of December 34 AD, packed the full force of Roman Stoic philosophy into a single slim book of fewer than seven hundred lines. He died on the 24th of November 62 AD, at just twenty-seven years old, before he could finish what he had started. What survives is a work so dense and difficult that scholars have wrestled with it for centuries, yet so morally urgent that it became one of the most-read texts of the Middle Ages. Who was this quiet, bookish young man from a small Etruscan city? How did he come to write some of the most uncompromising satire in all of Latin literature? And why did his friend, a Stoic philosopher, take it upon himself to shape and rescue those incomplete pages after Persius was gone?

• 2. A Volterra Childhood

  ›

  Persius was born into an equestrian family at Volterra, the ancient Etruscan city known in Latin as Volaterrae, in the province of Pisa. His family line was good on both parents' sides, which placed him comfortably within the Roman aristocracy's middle tier. When he was six years old, his father died; his stepfather followed a few years later. Those early losses shaped a young man described by the sources as having a gentle disposition, girlish modesty and personal beauty, who lived with deep devotion to his mother Fulvia Sisennia, his sister, and his aunt.

  At twelve, Persius left Volterra for Rome. There he studied under the grammarian Remmius Palaemon and the rhetor Verginius Flavus. The Rome he arrived in was a literary world full of showy verse and fashionable excess, and the contrast with his own quiet upbringing would never leave him. In those boyhood years he wrote a tragedy drawn from Roman history, and another work that may have been about travel. The satires of Lucilius, the blunt Republican poet, eventually fired his ambition to write a book of his own. To his mother and sister he left his considerable fortune when he died.

• 3. Friends and Mentors

  ›

  Four years after arriving in Rome, Persius formed friendships that would define his writing life. He grew close to the Stoic philosopher Lucius Annaeus Cornutus, to the lyric poet Caesius Bassus, and to the poet Lucan. Lucan, who would himself become one of the great Latin poets, was a generous admirer of everything Persius wrote. The verbal resemblance between Persius's third satire and a passage in Lucan's Pharsalia suggests how close and mutually attentive the two men were.

  Thrasea Paetus, the husband of Arria, was a relative of Persius's, and the two men became close friends as well. Over the following ten years they travelled together extensively. Persius also encountered Seneca during this period, though he was not impressed by Seneca's genius. That cool assessment is striking: Persius borrowed themes and even phrases from Seneca, criticised the same stylistic excess that Seneca criticised, and yet arrived at an independent judgment of the man. Cornutus, meanwhile, became not just a mentor but the guardian of Persius's legacy, suppressing all his other work after his death and making careful alterations to the satires before passing them to Bassus to edit.

• 4. The Satires Themselves

  ›

  Persius composed his satires in hexameters, with the exception of the short prologue, which uses scazons, a limping iambic meter that signals self-deprecation from the outset. Six satires make it into the collection. The first takes on the literary tastes of the day, reading them as symptoms of moral decline; the theme closely parallels Seneca's 114th letter. The second examines what human beings may justly ask of the gods. The third argues for having a clear aim in life. The fourth, drawing on Plato's First Alcibiades, makes the case that public men must know themselves. The fifth opens with an extended tribute to Cornutus's teaching before developing the Stoic doctrine of liberty. The sixth closes on the proper use of money.

  The Life notes that the collection was left incomplete. Cornutus or Bassus removed some lines from the end so the work would appear quasi finitus, roughly finished. One specific editorial decision is recorded: Cornutus blacked out an offensive allusion to the emperor's literary taste, and in its place the manuscripts now read a line that translates roughly as "who does not have the ears of an ass?" a safer gibe than whatever originally named Nero. Traces of unfinished revision survive elsewhere, including a sudden transition from ambition to superstition in the fifth satire and a passage in the sixth where a criticism of Greek teachers sits oddly out of context.

• 5. Stoic Fire, Difficult Style

  ›

  Persius holds a precise position in the tradition of Roman satire. He took the form from Lucilius, absorbed the language and characters of Horace, and argued with the rhetorical fury of Juvenal, yet his moral earnestness sets him apart from all three. Ancient critics heard in him a preacher rather than a caricaturist of Stoicism, and even Montaigne mentioned him several times, recognising something uncomfortably direct in the writing.

  His style is notoriously hard. The obscurity is not a sign of deep thought but of a compressed, straining manner that the source itself concedes compares poorly with the terse clarity of Seneca's Epistolae morales. Persius pushes expression beyond its natural limits, crowds in excess of detail, and exaggerates for moral effect in ways that even outbid Seneca at his worst. Yet running through this knotted Latin are bursts of vivid popular language: words like baro, cerdo, ebullire, glutto, and mamma drop into passages of high moral seriousness, pulling the reader toward the street even while the argument reaches for philosophy. The Byzantine scholar Lydus, writing centuries later, noted that Persius was said to have emulated Sophron, and the opening scene of the third satire does carry kinship with the mime tradition of Theocritus and Herodas.

• 6. Manuscripts and Legacy

  ›

  The manuscripts of Persius fall into two groups. One is represented by a pair of the best surviving manuscripts; the other by the manuscript associated with Petrus Pithoeus, which is also important for the text of Juvenal. Since the publication of J. Bieger's study on the Pithoeus manuscript in Berlin in 1890, scholars have generally preferred its textual tradition.

  The first major scholarly edition appeared in Paris in 1605, prepared by Isaac Casaubon. Johann Friedrich Dübner expanded it in Leipzig in 1833. Otto Jahn produced a landmark edition in Leipzig in 1843, including the scholia and substantial introductory essays. John Conington's edition, with translation, reached its third edition at Oxford in 1893. Samuel Hemphill's edition of the satires appeared in 1901; Susanna Braund brought Persius and Juvenal together in the Loeb Classical Library in 2004, published by Harvard University Press. The manuscript tradition identifies its biographical source as a commentary by Valerius Probus, the same grammarian of Berytus known for his scholarly editions of Virgil and Horace, who was a contemporary of Persius himself.