Peredvizhniki

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The Peredvizhniki were a group of Russian realist artists who, in 1863, walked out of the Imperial Academy of Arts in Saint Petersburg. Fourteen students left together. They found the Academy's rules suffocating, its teachers conservative, its strict wall between high and low art an offense against everything they believed art should do. What they built in its place would carry paintings by cart and rail to cities across the Russian empire, reaching audiences who had never set foot in a gallery. Their name translates into English as The Wanderers or The Itinerants. Between 1871 and 1923 they organized 48 travelling exhibitions, moving through Kiev, Kharkov, Kazan, Oryol, Riga, Odessa, and dozens of other cities. Who were these artists, what drove their political convictions, what did they paint, and how did their images become the visual language through which ordinary Russians understood their own country?

• 2. The Walkout and Its Aftermath

  ›

  Saint Petersburg's Imperial Academy of Arts in 1863 operated under a clear hierarchy. Teachers were conservative, and the institution enforced a rigid separation between high and low art forms. The fourteen students who left formed a self-governing body immediately: the Petersburg Cooperative of Artists, known in Russian as the Artel. The Artel was designed from the start to be independent of state support. It brought art from Moscow and Saint Petersburg to the provinces, depicting the contemporary life of ordinary people. In 1870, this organization was largely succeeded by the Association of Travelling Art Exhibits, the body that carried the Peredvizhniki name. The transition gave the movement a clearer mission: to give people in the provinces a chance to follow the achievements of Russian art, and to teach them to appreciate it. Pavel Mikhailovich Tretyakov, whose gallery in Moscow became a permanent home for the society's work, provided the artists with important material and moral support throughout this period.

• 3. Critics Who Wrote the Script

  ›

  Vissarion Belinsky held that literature and art carried a social and moral responsibility. That conviction, articulated by a literary critic rather than a painter, became the philosophical foundation on which Peredvizhniki art stood. Nikolai Chernyshevsky pushed the argument further. He ardently supported the emancipation of serfs, which was finally realized in the reform of 1861. He regarded press censorship, serfdom, and capital punishment not as Russian traditions but as Western influences. Officials prohibited publication of any of his writing as a result of his political activism, including his dissertation. His ideas found their way to the Russian art world anyway. In 1863, almost immediately after emancipation, Chernyshevsky's goals took visual form through the Peredvizhniki. The artists adopted the Slavophile-populist view that Russia possessed a distinguishable, modest inner beauty of its own, and worked out how to display it on canvas. The critic Vladimir Stasov, a democrat and consistent advocate, shaped the development of Peredvizhniki art from within.

• 4. What the Paintings Said

  ›

  Ilya Repin's Barge Haulers on the Volga, painted between 1870 and 1873, placed exhausted labourers at the centre of Russian visual culture. Repin also made The Arrest of a Propagandist, Refusal of Confession, and They Did Not Expect Him, all of which portrayed the emancipation movement with direct empathy. Vasily Surikov turned to history with The Morning of the Streltsy Execution, using the past to speak about the common people and state violence. The Peredvizhniki did not paint only suffering. Their canvases showed poverty alongside the beauty of folk life, and suffering alongside fortitude and strength of character. During their most productive years, roughly 1870 to 1890, the artists moved away from the traditional dark palette of the period. They chose lighter tones and a freer manner in their technique. They worked toward naturalness in their figures and in depicting how people related to their surroundings. Among the members were artists from Ukraine, Latvia, and Armenia. The society also exhibited work by Mark Antokolski, Vasili Vereshchagin, and Andrei Ryabushkin.

• 5. The Landscape as National Symbol

  ›

  Landscape flourished as the movement's dominant genre through the 1870s and 1880s. Ivan Shishkin painted only Russian landscapes, and his devotion to forests earned him the lasting title of Russia's "Singer of forest." Isaak Levitan also confined himself entirely to Russian landscapes; his paintings became famous for their intense moods. Vasily Polenov used plein air technique, working directly from nature rather than in a studio. Levitan once said: "I imagine such a gracefulness in our Russian land -- overflowing rivers bringing everything back to life. There is no country more beautiful than Russia! There can be a true landscapist only in Russia." The Peredvizhniki painted landscapes to explore the beauty of their own country and encourage ordinary people to love and preserve it. Shishkin and Konstantin Savitsky together completed Morning in a Pine Forest in 1878. The society gave Russian landscape a national character so distinct that people of other nations could recognize it as Russian.

• 6. Reproduction and Reach

  ›

  Even as the provincial audience for the travelling exhibitions grew steadily, the main visitors to the shows were still the urban elite. Ordinary Russians in distant towns could not afford travel to Moscow or Saint Petersburg. Local photographers solved part of this problem by creating the first reproductions of Peredvizhniki paintings, available for purchase at the exhibitions themselves. Niva magazine published illustrated articles about the exhibitions, carrying the images into households that would never see the originals. From 1898, landscape images from the society entered the postcard industry. Books of poetry were published with landscape illustrations. These channels made Russian art familiar to people who could not travel, and the reproductions have continued in use. Publishers today still use them in textbooks as visual icons of national identity.

• 7. Absorption by the Academy

  ›

  By the 1890s, the Academy of Arts that the founders had fled in 1863 was incorporating Peredvizhniki art into its classes and official history. Government officials had previously attempted to repress the society's members and to restore the falling authority of Academy-sanctioned work. As the society's public influence grew, those repressive efforts ended. The Academy's structure began including the movement's art in its curriculum, and Peredvizhniki influence showed in national art schools. The final travelling exhibition ran in 1923, closing a sequence that began in 1871. Antonina Rzhevskaya and Leonid Pasternak were among the members whose participation connected the movement's later decades to a broader cultural world that the 1863 walkout had helped to create.