Naturalism (theatre)

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Naturalism in theatre set out to do something radical: strip the stage of gods, ghosts, and aristocratic heroes, and replace them with a kitchen. That single, unglamorous room is the entire setting of August Strindberg's Miss Julie, written in 1888, and it stands as the movement's most successful example. The play was built to a precise specification, one that Strindberg borrowed partly from his own convictions and partly from the French novelist Emile Zola, who had named and theorized the new approach in an 1880 essay called Naturalism on the Stage. What made this movement so unsettling to audiences of the time was not just what it showed, but what it insisted the stage must never show again: no supernatural intervention, no exotic locales, no mythic time periods. What questions does that leave? How does a movement that began with a French theorist and a Swedish playwright come to reshape European drama across two continents? And what exactly does it mean to bring Darwin's ideas into a theatre?

• 2. Zola's Blueprint

  ›

  Emile Zola gave naturalism its formal name, la nouvelle formule, and its three governing principles, which he laid out in French as faire vrai, faire grand, and faire simple. The first principle held that a play must be realistic, built from careful study of human behaviour and psychology. Characters were to be, in Zola's framing, flesh and blood, with motivations that grew from their heredity and their environment rather than from dramatic convention. The second principle demanded that the conflicts at stake be genuinely significant, life-altering in weight, not small or petty. Zola was building a theatre of consequence. The third principle called for simplicity: no tangled sub-plots, no lengthy expositions, nothing that would clutter the direct presentation of human experience. The setting and performances were to be realistic, not flamboyant. Zola's own literary works demonstrated what these principles looked like in practice. His writing engaged frankly with sexuality and carried a pervasive pessimism. He wrote about poverty, racism, prostitution, disease, and filth with a directness that drew sharp criticism for being too blunt.

• 3. Darwin on the Stage

  ›

  Charles Darwin's theory of evolution reached into naturalistic drama in a particular way: it gave playwrights a framework for understanding why characters behave as they do. Naturalistic writers believed that heredity and social environment together determine a person's character. This is more specific than the position of realism, which simply aims to describe the world as it is. Naturalism went further, seeking to determine scientifically the underlying forces shaping human action. Darwinism, as a result, pervades naturalistic plays most clearly in the emphasis on environment as a determining pressure on character. Everyday speech was mandatory; plausibility was required at every turn. Characters could not encounter ghosts, spirits, or gods intervening in human affairs. The social range of the drama widened too. Classical drama had centred on aristocrats. Naturalism opened the stage to bourgeois and working-class protagonists and to the social conflicts that defined their lives. That expansion of who deserved dramatic attention was as significant as any formal rule Zola had written down.

• 4. Strindberg and His Rivals

  ›

  Georg Buchner's Woyzeck, written in 1837, is generally regarded as a forerunner to naturalism, a work that arrived before the movement had a name. Aleksey Pisemsky followed with A Bitter Fate in 1859. Then, in the 1880s, the movement gathered momentum with named practitioners. Leo Tolstoy contributed The Power of Darkness in 1886. August Strindberg produced three plays in close succession: The Father in 1887, Miss Julie in 1888, and Creditors in 1889. Gerhart Hauptmann extended the tradition into the 1890s, with The Weavers in 1892 and Drayman Henschel in 1898. Anton Chekhov's Uncle Vanya also appeared in 1898, followed by The Cherry Orchard in 1904. Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House, written in 1879, belongs to this company as well. The movement was genuinely pan-European, drawing in Russian, German, Norwegian, and Swedish writers who each brought their own inflection to Zola's governing formula. Strindberg remained its most concentrated example, the playwright who most deliberately aligned his work with both Zola's principles and his own particular version of the doctrine.

• 5. What Naturalism Refused

  ›

  Naturalism defined itself as much by exclusion as by prescription. Romanticism was its declared opposite. Where romantic drama invited symbolic, idealistic, or supernatural treatment of its subjects, naturalism refused all three. No otherworldly or fantastic locales were permitted. Historical or mythic time periods were equally off limits. The subject matter had to be contemporary and recognizable. What filled that narrowed frame was frequently uncomfortable: the uncouth and the sordid, the experiences that earlier theatrical traditions had treated as unfit for the stage. Naturalistic works exposed a dark harshness in ordinary life, and writers who did so were regularly criticized for that choice. The style of acting was also reshaped. Rather than theatrical performance in the older sense, naturalistic acting aimed to recreate the impression of reality. Speech patterns followed everyday usage. The cumulative effect was a theatre that opposed its own medium's conventions, insisting that the stage should not look or sound like a stage at all. That insistence would carry into the 20th century alongside the works it produced.