Corpus Juris Civilis

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  The Corpus Juris Civilis, which translates literally as "Body of Civil Law," was assembled between 529 and 534 by order of the Roman Emperor Justinian I. It is the foundation of virtually every legal system in the Western world that traces its roots to ancient Rome. But it was not written as a monument to history. It was written because the existing law had become unmanageable, buried under centuries of overlapping constitutions, contradictory opinions, and jurists' commentaries so voluminous that no single person could master them. Justinian's answer was radical: gather everything, cut what was redundant or obsolete, and issue a single authoritative source from which all law would flow. Every other source, even the original texts used to build the new code, was forbidden. What makes this project remarkable is not just its ambition but its reach across centuries and continents. Serbian medieval law, the civil code of modern Greece, the Napoleonic Code, and the canon law of the Catholic Church all carry its fingerprints. The questions worth asking are: how was this enormous project actually built, what did it contain, and how did a document produced in sixth-century Constantinople end up shaping the legal world we still inhabit?

• 2. The Man Behind the Work

  ›

  Tribonian was an official in Justinian's court in Constantinople, and it was Tribonian who directed the entire compilation. His commission was not merely asked to copy what already existed. It was explicitly authorized to edit, alter, and delete what it included. How far his team made amendments to the source texts is, in the main, unknowable, because most of the originals have not survived. What is preserved is the version Tribonian's team chose to preserve. For the Digest, Tribonian's commission worked through the writings of classical jurists who were assumed to have the authority to clarify law, a status known as ius respondendi. In total, excerpts from 38 jurists appear in the Digest. The work moved quickly. The Digest, a document drawing on centuries of legal opinion, was completed within three years. As the Digest neared completion, Tribonian worked alongside two professors, Theophilus and Dorotheus, to produce a student textbook called the Institutions or Elements. That textbook, given force of law on the 30th of December 533, was largely built from the earlier Institutiones of the jurist Gaius. Two-thirds of Justinian's Institutiones consists of direct quotations from Gaius.

• 3. Four Pillars of a Legal World

  ›

  The Code, finished on the 7th of April 529, came first. It compiled imperial pronouncements with the force of law going back as far as the emperor Hadrian, drawing on earlier collections including the Codex Theodosianus, the Codex Gregorianus, and the Codex Hermogenianus. That first edition is now lost; a second edition was issued in 534 and is the text that survives. The Digest, completed in 533, is an encyclopedia of juristic writing, assembling fragments from legal treatises and opinions mostly dating to the second and third centuries. In their original context those fragments were private scholarly opinions, though some had been privileged by Theodosius II's Law of Citations in 426. As part of the Corpus, they carried the full weight of law. The Institutions, a textbook in four books, entered legal education on the 21st of November 533. All three parts, including the student manual, were given force of law. A fourth component emerged because Justinian found himself needing to legislate further after the Corpus was complete. These additional laws, the Novellae Constitutiones, or New Laws, were later reworked into a practical lawyer's edition called the Syntagma by Athanasios of Emesa during the years 572-577. According to the legal historian Charles Donahue, the distinction between procedural and substantive law that entered medieval and modern legal thought came directly from Justinian's Institutes.

• 4. Religion, Heresy, and Law

  ›

  The very first law in the Codex requires all people under the jurisdiction of the empire to hold the Christian faith. The text itself reads: "We desire that all peoples who are governed by the moderation of Our Clemency shall practice that religion which was handed down by the divine Apostle Peter to the Romans." The Christianity that law refers to is specifically Chalcedonian Christianity as defined by the state church. The major Christian branches outside that definition, the Church of the East and Oriental Orthodoxy, were excluded. Laws aimed at Nestorianism and other heresies ran alongside provisions forbidding particular pagan practices. One law stated that all persons present at a pagan sacrifice could be indicted as if for murder. The Corpus did not simply organize law; it embedded a theology of citizenship. Anyone not connected to the Christian church was rendered a non-citizen. That opening clause on jurisdiction later became a reference point for discussions of international law, prompting legal scholars to ask what persons are subject to a given state or legal system in the first place. The church's own legal development absorbed the Corpus deeply enough that the Latin phrase ecclesia vivit lege romana, meaning "the church lives by Roman law," became a standard description of the relationship.

• 5. Survival in the East

  ›

  By the early 7th century, Greek had largely replaced Latin as the dominant language of the Eastern Roman Empire. The Corpus had been composed almost entirely in Latin, which was still the official government language when the work was produced in 529-534, even though merchants, farmers, and seamen overwhelmingly spoke Greek. As that shift accelerated, new Greek-language legal codes based on the Corpus were enacted. Emperor Leo the Isaurian issued the Ekloge ton nomon in 740. Emperor Basil the Macedonian produced both the Procheiron and the Epanagoge around 879. Basil also began the Basilika, a complete adaptation of Justinian's codification, which his son Emperor Leo the Wise finished in the late 9th century. At 60 volumes, the Basilika proved difficult for judges and lawyers to use in practice. A shorter version was finally produced in 1345 by Constantine Harmenopoulos, a Byzantine judge from Thessaloniki, who condensed it into six books called the Hexabiblos. The Hexabiblos was used throughout the Balkans during the subsequent Ottoman period. When Greece gained independence in the 1820s, the Basilika and the Hexabiblos together served as the first legal code for the new Greek state. In Serbia, the most significant medieval legal codes, the Zakonopravilo of 1219 and Dušan's Code of 1349 and 1354, transplanted Roman-Byzantine law drawn from the Corpus, the Procheiron, and the Basilika. Those codes remained in practice until the Serbian Despotate fell to the Ottoman Empire in 1459.

• 6. Rediscovery in the West

  ›

  The Corpus was distributed in the West and entered into effect in territories Justinian reconquered under the Pragmatic Sanction of 554, including the Exarchate of Ravenna. After those territories were largely lost again, almost nothing of the Corpus survived in Western legal practice. The recovery in Northern Italy around 1070 is a matter historians still debate. A complete 6th-century copy of the Digest known as the Littera Florentina was preserved in Amalfi and later moved to Pisa. An incomplete manuscript of most of the Codex, the Epitome Codicis from around 1050, also survived. A teacher named Pepo and then one named Irnerius began teaching the text at Bologna. Irnerius developed a technique of reading a passage aloud so students could copy it, then delivering an explanation of Justinian's text in the form of marginal notes called glosses. His students, known as the Four Doctors of Bologna, were among the first of the scholars called glossators, who built the curriculum of medieval Roman law. The University of Bologna remained the dominant center for legal study through the High Middle Ages. The tradition of glossing reached its peak with Accursius, whose compilation became known as the Glossa ordinaria. In the 13th century, French lawyers called the Ultramontani carried the tradition further. The merchant classes of Italian cities found in the Corpus a concept of equity and rules suited to urban commercial life far beyond what Germanic oral traditions could provide. Scholars who saw the Holy Roman Empire as a revival of Rome found additional reason to embrace the code's ancient authority.

• 7. Print, Translation, and Legacy

  ›

  The name Corpus Juris Civilis was not applied to the collection until the 16th century, when Dionysius Gothofredus printed it under that title in 1583. Before that printing, the parts circulated under their individual names. A two-volume edition of the Digest was published in Paris in 1549 and 1550, translated by Antonio Agustin, Bishop of Tarragona, and published by Carolus Guillardus under the full Latin title Digestorum seu Pandectarum tomus alter. Volume one ran to 2,934 pages; volume two to 2,754. The Corpus was translated into French, German, Italian, and Spanish during the 19th century. No complete English translation existed until 1932, when Samuel Parsons Scott published his version, titled The Civil Law. Scott's translation was severely criticized for not drawing on the best available Latin editions. Fred H. Blume later produced translations of the Code and the Novels using the most respected Latin texts. A new English translation of the Code, based on Blume's work, appeared in October 2016. Cambridge University Press published a new English translation of the Novels in 2018, based primarily on the Greek text. The Napoleonic Code, which Napoleon saw as a vehicle for reforming law across Europe and which marked the abolition of feudalism, drew its legal thinking directly from the Corpus. The Corpus also continues to carry weight in public international law, a lineage that traces back to that first law in the Codex, the one asking who is subject to a ruler's jurisdiction.