Skip to content

Napoleon complex

Ch. 1 of 7
— CH. 1 · INTRODUCTION —

Contents

Napoleon complex

7 sections
  • The Napoleon complex, also called Napoleon syndrome or short-man syndrome, is a label for short men who seem overly aggressive or domineering. The term is mostly aimed at men, and sometimes at people with dwarfism. The unspoken claim is that the swagger is a cover. The man is supposedly making up for a physical or social shortcoming, or for a private insecurity. Ordinary speech and psychology both treat the label as a derogatory stereotype. It is named after Napoleon Bonaparte, the first emperor of the French. Yet the emperor's own height is more disputed than the nickname suggests. Did he ever deserve the reputation? Who turned a military ruler into a symbol of small men with big tempers? And when researchers put short men in front of heart monitors, competitive games and long-running surveys, what did they actually find?

  • Five feet two inches is the figure usually attached to Napoleon Bonaparte, but it was given in the old pre-metric French system of measurement. In imperial units that comes to just under 5 feet 6 inches, or about 1.67 metres. Depending on the source consulted, this matched the average adult male height of his era. Some historians argue for a different number, 5 feet 7 inches. Their reasoning is that he was measured on the island of Saint Helena, 28 years after the French adopted the metric system. A conversion between old and new units could easily have muddied the record. Either way, the best estimates put him close to average. The shortness, it turns out, was drawn rather than measured.

  • James Gillray, a British cartoonist, is the person credited with popularizing the myth of a short Napoleon. He was not alone in the effort. British political cartoonists repeatedly drew the emperor as small, and they did so to mock both the man and his expansionist ambitions. Size became a shorthand for overreach. Over time, cultural depictions settled into a familiar story. A little man, unhappy with his height, reaches for power and glory through aggressive military campaigns. That story gave the complex its name, and it handed psychologists a claim they could test.

  • Abraham Buunk, a professor at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands, reported findings that fit the stereotype. Researchers at the university found that men standing 1.63 metres tall were 50 percent more likely to show signs of jealousy than men standing 1.98 metres tall. In 2018, evolutionary psychologist Mark van Vugt and his team at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam reported evidence of the Napoleon complex in human males. In laboratory conditions, short men played competitive games against taller men. They behaved more aggressively toward those opponents, though mostly in indirect ways. The team's evolutionary hypothesis starts from a simple trigger. When a male, human or not, gets cues that he is physically outcompeted, he shifts strategy to level the playing field. Those alternative tactics include indirect aggression and coalition building. Not every researcher read the pattern as a matter of height at all.

  • A 2022 study led by Bleeker examined how height relates to the Dark Triad, a group of traits made up of narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. The researchers reported that antagonistic traits were more strongly tied to dissatisfaction with one's height than to a person's actual height. On this reading, it is not shortness that predicts a prickly personality. It is how a man feels about being short. The result is consistent with wider findings in social psychology. Perceived social status, more than physical characteristics alone, is associated with differences in antagonistic and competitive behavior. Other experiments went further and concluded that the whole idea was a myth.

  • In 2007, a study at the University of Central Lancashire set out to test the stereotype directly. Subjects dueled each other with sticks, and one participant deliberately rapped the other's knuckles. Heart monitors tracked how each person reacted. The result ran against the stereotype. Short men were less likely to lose their temper than men of average height, and it was the taller men who were more likely to hit back. Lecturer Mike Eslea offered an explanation for why the myth survives. He said, "when people see a short man being aggressive, they are likely to think it is due to his size, simply because that attribute is obvious and grabs their attention". A British community-based project, the Wessex Growth Study, took a longer view. It followed children from school entry to adulthood and controlled for gender and socioeconomic status. It found that "no significant differences in personality functioning or aspects of daily living were found which could be attributable to height". The traits it checked included generalizations tied to the Napoleon complex, such as risk-taking behaviours.

  • The Divine Comedy, a Northern Irish chamber pop band, released a song called "Napoleon complex" in 2016. It appears on Foreverland, the band's eleventh studio album. The track is tongue-in-cheek and lampoons the complex, treating the stereotype as a subject for gentle satire rather than serious diagnosis. A nickname that began in the political cartoons of Gillray's era has since found its way onto a pop record.

Updated

Common questions

What is the Napoleon complex?

The Napoleon complex, also called Napoleon syndrome or short-man syndrome, describes short men who are perceived as overly aggressive or domineering. It implies the behavior compensates for physical or social shortcomings or insecurities, and it is regarded as a derogatory stereotype.

Why is the Napoleon complex named after Napoleon Bonaparte?

It is named after Napoleon Bonaparte, the first emperor of the French, because cultural depictions showed him seeking power and glory through aggressive military endeavors to compensate for supposed shortness. British political cartoonists, including James Gillray, fostered this image.

How tall was Napoleon Bonaparte?

Napoleon is estimated to have been 5 feet 2 inches in pre-metric French measures, just under 5 feet 6 inches in imperial measure. Some historians argue for 5 feet 7 inches because he was measured on Saint Helena 28 years after the French adopted the metric system.

Is the Napoleon complex real according to research?

Research on the Napoleon complex has produced mixed results. A 2018 study by Mark van Vugt's team found indirect aggression in short men during competitive games, while a 2007 University of Central Lancashire study concluded the complex is a myth.

What did the University of Central Lancashire study find about the Napoleon complex?

The 2007 study found that short men were less likely to lose their temper than men of average height. Participants dueled with sticks while heart monitors recorded their reactions, and taller men were more likely to hit back.

Does the Wessex Growth Study support the Napoleon complex?

No. The Wessex Growth Study followed children from school entry to adulthood and found no significant differences in personality functioning or daily living attributable to height. This included traits such as risk-taking behaviours.

All sources

16 references cited across the entry

  1. 2JournalThe psychosocial consequences of short stature: a review of the evidenceDavid E. Sandberg — September 2002
  2. 5David A. Bell, Napoleon: A Concise Biography (Oxford University Press, 2015), p. 18.
  3. 6An Anthropometric History of Early-Modern FranceFaculty of Economics; CESifo — 12 Dec 2003
  4. 7BookBlundering to Glory: Napoleon's Military CampaignsOwen Connelly — Rowman & Littlefield — 2006
  5. 8NewsShort man syndrome is not just a tall storyNic Fleming — 13 March 2008
  6. 9NewsHeart of the Fifties generation beats once againRichard Morrison — 10 October 2005
  7. 11Knapen, J. E., Blaker, N. M., Van Vugt, M. (2018). "The Napoleon Complex: When Shorter Men Take More". Psychological Science, 0956797618772822.
  8. 12JournalThe Napoleon complex, revisited: Height, dark personality traits, and antagonismN. M. Blaker — 2022
  9. 13JournalIs the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literatureC. Anderson — 2015
  10. 14JournalPersonality functioning: the influence of statureF. Ulph — January 2004
  11. 15JournalPersonality Functioning: The Influence of StatureTerri H. Lipman — May–June 2005

Queue