Levina Teerlinc

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Levina Teerlinc held a position at the English royal court for thirty years, outlasting four monarchs and collecting an annual salary greater than the legendary Hans Holbein the Younger ever received. Born in Bruges in the 1510s, she crossed the Channel in 1545 after marrying George Teerlinc of Blanckenberge, and within a year she had secured a place painting miniatures for Henry VIII. She would stay at court through the reigns of Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I, becoming the most important miniaturist in England between Holbein and Nicholas Hilliard. Yet her name is barely known today, partly because no surviving work has been confirmed as definitively hers. How does a painter who documented Tudor royalty across three decades vanish from art history? And what traces remain to prove she was there at all?

• 2. A Family of Miniaturists

  ›

  Simon Bening, Levina's father, was one of the leading illuminators of the Ghent-Bruges school, a tradition known for exquisitely detailed manuscript painting. Her grandfather Alexander Bening was also a miniaturist, and her grandmother Catherine van der Goes was closely related to Hugo van der Goes, placing Levina within an extraordinary lineage of Flemish image-makers. Trained most likely in her father's workshop before her marriage, she absorbed a craft that demanded patience with tiny brushes and an eye for detail measured in fractions of an inch. That grounding in the Ghent-Bruges tradition shaped everything she would later produce for the Tudor court. Her four sisters shared this heritage; Levina was simply the one who carried it to England.

• 3. Forty Pounds and Four Monarchs

  ›

  From the moment Henry VIII added Levina to the court payroll in 1546, she received £40 a year, a sum the Florentine historian Lodovico Guicciardini noted in 1567 exceeded what had been paid to Holbein. That salary did not stop when one monarch died and another ascended; it continued through the reign of Edward VI and through the turbulent years of Mary I, and it kept coming under Elizabeth I until Levina died on the 23rd of June 1576. She did not quite live to collect her final £10 installment. Queen Elizabeth gave that outstanding sum to Levina's husband instead, characterizing it as a gift, and the court understood it as a reward for the Teerlincs' loyalty during Mary's reign. She was the only woman known to have held a painting post at the court of Henry VIII, although Catherine Parr is said to have employed three women miniaturists including Levina: Susannah Hornebolt, Levina herself, and Margaret Holsewyther.

• 4. Portraits of a Queen

  ›

  The documentary record of Levina's output is unusually rich, even if the objects themselves are hard to pin down. Court accounts show her delivering miniature portraits of Elizabeth I in 1559, 1562, 1563, 1564, 1567-1568, and again in 1575 and 1576. The 1567 entry specifies "a full-length portrait"; the 1568 entry describes a work "with Knights of the Order"; the 1575 entry shows Elizabeth "with other personages". For Mary I she painted "a small picture of the trynitie" as a New Year gift in 1556, and Mary responded with a gilt silver salt. In 1559 she was appointed tutor in painting to the King's daughter at the Spanish Court, a posting that extended her influence beyond England. The problem scholars face is that she did not always sign her work, leaving a trail of royal commissions with no names attached to the surviving objects.

• 5. The Attribution Problem

  ›

  A 1983 exhibition at the Victoria and Albert Museum brought together, for the first time, a group of miniatures assembled under Levina's name. Seven objects were included: five miniatures and two illuminated manuscript sheets. Among them was a miniature of Lady Katherine Grey from the V&A's own collection, along with pieces from the Yale Center for British Art, the Royal Collection, and private hands. Two works in the Royal Collection were identified as possibly depicting the young Elizabeth I. The scholar Roy Strong examined the group and found what he described as "a convincing group of miniatures that emerge as the work of a single hand, one whose draughtsmanship is weak, whose paint is thin and transparent and whose brushwork loose." That characterization, far from being dismissive, gives future researchers a stylistic fingerprint to test against other unattributed works. Some scholars also point to the fire at Whitehall as a likely culprit for the loss of a larger portion of her output. She probably also designed the Great Seal of England for Mary I and the earliest seal used by Elizabeth.

• 6. A Reputation Preserved in Words

  ›

  Antonius Sanderus, a Flemish historian writing roughly seventy-five years after Levina's death, told his readers she was "very capable in the two specialties of art." Lodovico Guicciardini, in his 1567 survey of Flemish artists, named her the best of the women painters working in that era. Art historian Louisa Woodville notes that Levina's contemporaries were consistently impressed by her work. These written tributes are now among the most durable evidence of her standing, given how few attributed objects have survived. English court records, meanwhile, preserved her name in a variety of forms; a 1552 entry spells it "Mrs Sevin Tilney, paintrix", the Latin suffix signaling her recognized professional status at a time when that recognition was rare for any woman. She and her husband had one son, Marcus, and she died in Stepney, London. The possibility that she trained Nicholas Hilliard, the goldsmith who would define English miniature portraiture in the decades after her death, remains an open question that scholars continue to debate.