Imre Pozsgay

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Imre Pozsgay stood before his country on the 28th of January 1989 and said what no ruling Communist official had dared to say: the events of 1956 were not a counterrevolution but a popular uprising. That single declaration, from a man who had spent decades inside the Hungarian Communist system, rattled the party's foundations and opened a door that could not be closed again. Who was this politician who had once called the 1956 revolution a "pure counter-revolution" and later reversed that verdict so publicly? How did a loyal party functionary become one of the architects of Hungary's transition from Communist rule to parliamentary democracy? And what drove him, in the end, to place his private archives inside an American institution and authorize them for public release?

• 2. A Party Man's Formation

  ›

  Pozsgay was born on the 26th of November 1933 in Kóny, the son of a tailor, Imre Pozsgay Sr., who died in 1938, and a housewife, Rozália Lénárt. He completed his elementary studies in Enying and his secondary studies in Fertőd, and by 1950 he had joined the Hungarian Working People's Party, the organization that had by then imposed a Communist one-party system on the country. He was only seventeen years old. Within a year, he was running the party branch in Balatonbozsok.

  When the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 shook the country, Pozsgay did not waver publicly. His article in Petőfi Népe, published on the 15th of December 1957, framed the uprising as a "pure counter-revolution" that had aimed to restore capitalist conditions and bourgeois rule. He depicted the executed Prime Minister Imre Nagy as an "unprincipled" man who had come to power during what he called the days of the raging White Terror. These were the words of a man who understood the party's requirements and met them.

  After the revolution, he enrolled at the Lenin Institute in Budapest, which belonged to Eötvös Loránd University, and graduated with an English degree. He moved through a succession of regional and central party roles: directing a Marxist-Leninist evening university in Bács-Kiskun County, heading the county's Agitation and Propaganda Department, and serving as secretary of the county branch. By 1970 he had defended a doctoral thesis in philosophy, and in 1971 he became Deputy Editor in Chief of Társadalmi Szemle, one of the party's theoretical journals.

• 3. Minister and Cultural Operator

  ›

  In 1975, Pozsgay was appointed Deputy Minister of Culture in the cabinet of Prime Minister György Lázár, under Minister László Orbán. A year later he was promoted to Minister of Culture, replacing Orbán entirely. The ministry he ran gave him reach over a part of Hungarian life that was not purely administrative: in 1982, during his tenure, he established the independent Katona József Theatre, a concrete institutional act that would outlast his time in office.

  In June 1980, the Ministry of Culture was merged with the Ministry of Education, folding Pozsgay's responsibilities into a broader portfolio covering both education and cultural affairs. He also joined the MSZMP's Central Committee during this period. The combination of cultural authority and party standing gave him a platform unlike that of most Hungarian officials.

  But the platform also exposed a growing tension. His book Turning Point and Reform, which set out calls for reform within the system, led to a falling-out with party leader János Kádár. That rupture in 1982 redirected Pozsgay away from the ministerial track and toward the Patriotic People's Front, a Communist mass organization, where he became Secretary-General under President Gyula Kállai. It was a sideways move inside the apparatus, but it also gave him access to a broader constituency beyond the inner party circle.

• 4. The January Declaration

  ›

  By 1988, Pozsgay was back in the government proper, serving as Minister of State under Prime Minister Károly Grósz and then under Miklós Németh. He held a seat on the Politburo as well. But his position inside the reformist wing of the party was by then no secret, and on the 28th of January 1989 he delivered the statement that defined his historical reputation.

  He labelled the 1956 Hungarian revolution not a counterrevolution, as official doctrine had maintained for more than three decades, but a popular uprising. He was the first official from the ruling party to say this publicly. The declaration struck directly at one of the ideological pillars the party had used to justify its post-1956 authority. It did not come from an outsider or a dissident; it came from a man who had been inside the system since 1950 and who held a seat on the Politburo.

  The practical consequences followed quickly. In June 1989, Pozsgay participated in the reburial of Imre Nagy, the same prime minister he had once called unprincipled. That ceremony proved to be a catalyst. On the 26th of June 1989, the hard-line leader Károly Grósz was outranked inside the MSZMP by a four-member collective presidency that included Pozsgay, drawn from the party's reformist wing. The ruling party then opened formal discussions with opposition groups through the Round Table Talks.

• 5. The Pan-European Picnic

  ›

  Alongside his work within Hungarian party politics, Pozsgay co-sponsored one of the more unusual events of 1989: the Pan-European Picnic of the 19th of August. His co-sponsor was Otto von Habsburg, the Austrian politician and head of the Habsburg dynasty. The picnic was organized at the Hungarian-Austrian border, and on that day hundreds of East Germans who were visiting Hungary walked across what had been the Iron Curtain into Austria.

  The border crossing at the Pan-European Picnic was not a small breach in a symbolic barrier. It was a physical opening in one of the most fortified frontiers in Europe, and it happened in daylight, with the Hungarian government's awareness. The East Germans who crossed that day became the first of a much larger movement that accelerated through the autumn of 1989.

  For Pozsgay, the picnic was consistent with his broader posture: using his position inside the system to enable outcomes the system had been designed to prevent. His decision to co-sponsor the event, alongside a figure from the House of Habsburg, was itself a signal about how far the reformist wing of the Hungarian Communist party had traveled from orthodox positions.

• 6. The Presidential Question

  ›

  Among the disputes that complicated Hungary's transition from Communist rule, the question of how to elect a president became especially contentious. The MSZMP proposed a directly elected semi-presidential system. Pozsgay was the country's most popular politician at the time, and both SZDSZ and Fidesz, the sharply anti-Communist opposition parties, believed he would win any direct presidential election that took place before a new parliament was seated.

  Fidesz and SZDSZ responded by collecting signatures to force a referendum. On the 26th of November 1989, which was also Pozsgay's fifty-sixth birthday, voters answered yes to the question of whether the president should be elected after parliamentary elections rather than before them. They also chose a system in which parliament would elect the president indirectly. The referendum result blocked the scenario in which Pozsgay might have moved directly from his Communist-era prominence into the presidency of a post-Communist Hungary.

  In October 1989, the Hungarian Socialist Workers Party had renamed itself the Hungarian Socialist Party and announced Pozsgay as Deputy President. He stood as the MSZP's candidate for the presidency in 1990. He was elected to parliament from the party's Bács-Kiskun County Regional List after losing the Sopron constituency in Győr-Moson-Sopron County to József Szájer of Fidesz. He led the MSZP's parliamentary group from May until November 1990, then quit both the caucus and the party and continued as an independent MP.

• 7. After the Party Years

  ›

  In May 1991, Pozsgay founded a new party alongside Zoltán Bíró: the National Democratic Alliance, known by its Hungarian initials as the NDSZ. The party advocated what it described as a third way ideology, combining right-wing economic positions with left-wing social policies. In the 1994 parliamentary election it received 0.52 percent of the vote and won no seats. The party dissolved on the 20th of January 1996.

  From 1996 to 2001, Pozsgay served on the presidium of the World Federation of Hungarians. He had been teaching at the University of Debrecen, formerly Kossuth Lajos University, since 1991, and he became a lecturer at the Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church in Hungary from 2003. Between 1995 and 2000 he served as Rector of the Saint Ladislaus Academy. He received the Hungarian Heritage Award in 2003 and the Saint Stephen Prize in 2015. In 2012 he founded a journal called Stádium in Százhalombatta.

  His political path eventually led him toward Fidesz, the very party whose signature campaign had blocked his presidential ambitions. He became an adviser to the Hungarian Democratic Forum in 1997 and stood as a candidate in the 1998 parliamentary election without winning a seat. In 2005, he joined the National Consultation Body led by Viktor Orbán, the Fidesz president. When Fidesz formed a government in 2010 and began drafting a new constitution, Pozsgay joined the board advising Prime Minister Orbán on the conceptual foundations of that document.

  Richard Sousa, director of the Hoover Institution Library and Archives, estimated that Pozsgay would be recognized by history as a leader who helped Hungary's transition to democracy. That assessment rested partly on Pozsgay's decision in 1989 to donate his personal documents and records to the Hoover Institution and to authorize their release in 2009.