Hot blast

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Hot blast is the preheated air blown into a blast furnace, the technology that let ironmasters burn far less fuel for the same output. In 1828, James Beaumont Neilson found that raising the incoming air to 149 C cut fuel use dramatically. It fell from 8.06 tons of coal to 5.16 tons of coal for every ton of iron produced. That single change reshaped iron production across Britain and, later, the United States.

  Who was the man behind that number, and why would his own patent take him to court instead of just to the furnace floor? Why did some ironmasters wait more than a decade to adopt something that saved them so much fuel? And how did the same idea, invented once in Scotland, resurface independently across an ocean to unlock a coal nobody could get to burn?

• 2. A Contested Invention

  ›

  James Beaumont Neilson had worked as a foreman at Glasgow's gas works before turning his attention to furnace air. In 1828 he secured a patent for the process with a group of partners, including Charles Macintosh. His first heating vessel used wrought iron plates, but these oxidized under the heat, so he replaced them with one made of cast iron instead.

  Thomas Botfield filed his own patent in January 1828, giving him a historical claim to the same invention. Neilson is remembered today as the inventor of hot blast largely because he won the patent litigation that followed. He and his partners fought extensive legal battles against ironmasters who used the process without paying for a license. That legal victory meant the terms of his license would decide how quickly the rest of Britain adopted the process.

• 3. Licensing The Patent

  ›

  58 ironmasters held licenses to use the process by 1840, together generating £30,000 a year in royalties for Neilson's group. That tally reached 80 licenses by the time the patent lapsed. Even so, adoption of hot blast across Britain had been slower than the fuel savings alone might suggest.

  Just after expiry, in 1843, hot blast was running in 42 of south Staffordshire's 80 furnaces. South Wales adopted the process at a noticeably slower pace still. What ironmasters actually gained by paying for a license reached well beyond fuel savings alone.

• 4. Fuel And Output Gains

  ›

  At Calder ironworks, daily output rose from 5.6 tons in 1828 to 8.2 tons in 1833 once hot blast came into use. Hot blast let ironmasters burn raw coal instead of coke, removing a costly step from the fuel supply chain. In Scotland, this also meant the region's poor quality black band ironstone could be smelted profitably for the first time. By the 1830s, those combined gains had made Scotland the lowest cost steel producing region in Britain. None of that came without a mechanical cost, since the equipment behind these gains was notoriously hard to keep in one piece.

• 5. Taming The Machinery

  ›

  Thermal expansion plagued the earliest hot blast stoves, cracking and breaking pipes as they heated and cooled. Engineers partly solved this by mounting the pipes on rollers, letting them shift without snapping under heat. Fitting the blast pipes to the tuyeres needed new methods too, because leather, the older solution, no longer worked.

  The Cowper stove later refined the same principle far more efficiently, preheating incoming blast air with waste heat recovered from furnace flue gas, a design still used in modern blast furnaces. The same regenerative approach was carried into steelmaking through the open hearth furnace, using the Siemens-Martin process. Half a world away, a separate pair of ironmasters had reached the same conclusion without ever seeing Neilson's patent.

• 6. A Parallel Discovery

  ›

  George Crane and David Thomas, working at the Yniscedwyn Works in Wales, arrived at the same idea independently of Neilson. Crane filed for a British patent on the process in 1836, and by the 5th of February 1837 the pair were producing iron using the new method. Crane went on to buy Gessenhainer's patent as well, adding his own patented refinements and controlling use of the process in both Britain and the US.

  While Crane stayed in Wales, David Thomas crossed the Atlantic on behalf of the Lehigh Coal & Navigation Company. There he founded the Lehigh Crane Iron Company to put hot blast to work commercially in America. That move to America put hot blast directly in the path of a fuel that had defeated ironmasters for years: anthracite.

• 7. Cracking Anthracite

  ›

  In the United States, iron furnaces relied on charcoal at the time the process was invented. Sufficient good coking coal existed only in Great Britain and western Germany. That dependency forced American furnaces to draw on vast tracts of forest for fuel. Many went out of blast once the nearby woods had been felled. Earlier attempts to burn anthracite instead had failed outright, since the coal resisted ignition under cold blast conditions.

  In 1831, Dr. Frederick W. Gessenhainer filed a US patent for using hot blast together with anthracite to smelt iron. He produced a small quantity of anthracite iron with this method at Valley Furnace, near Pottsville, Pennsylvania, in 1836. Breakdowns, illness, and his death in 1838 kept him from ever scaling the process into large-scale production.

  Coke eventually displaced anthracite in American furnaces after the Civil War. Its greater porosity let it bear the heavier loads of the far larger furnaces that defined ironmaking by the century's end.