Henry Jenkins

• 1. Introduction

  ›

  Henry Guy Jenkins III was born on the 4th of June 1958, and he has spent his career asking one stubborn question: what happens when ordinary people stop sitting still and start talking back to their media? That question has driven him from vaudeville comedy to fan fiction, from video game violence debates to youth activism, earning him a named professorship at two different top universities along the way. He holds joint faculty appointments across the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, the USC School of Cinematic Arts, and the USC Rossier School of Education. Before arriving at USC, he built the Comparative Media Studies program at MIT from the ground up. His books have reached media scholars and industry practitioners on nearly every continent, with his transmedia storytelling and participatory culture work drawing particular attention across Europe, Brazil, and India. In 2013, he joined the board that selects the Peabody Award winners. The story of how he got there starts not with the internet, but with the Marx Brothers.

• 2. Vaudeville to Video Games

  ›

  Jenkins wrote his doctoral dissertation at the University of Wisconsin-Madison under the supervision of David Bordwell and John Fiske, and the subject was anarchistic comedy. He examined how the performance traditions of American vaudeville shaped the sound comedies of the 1930s, including the work of the Marx Brothers, W.C. Fields, and Eddie Cantor. The argument at the heart of that work was a striking one: vaudeville prized virtuoso performance and emotional impact, values that clashed directly with classical Hollywood cinema's emphasis on character motivation and coherent storytelling. That dissertation became his 1992 book What Made Pistachio Nuts?: Early Sound Comedy and the Vaudeville Aesthetic. The same intellectual move that drove his vaudeville scholarship, defending a rising popular art form against dismissive critics, would repeat itself when he turned his attention to video games. Drawing on Gilbert Seldes' 1924 book The Seven Lively Arts, which championed popular arts against high-culture snobbery, Jenkins called video games 'The New Lively Art.' His video game research eventually contributed to the creation of the Microsoft Games-To-Teach initiative at MIT Comparative Media Studies in 2001, which in 2003 became the Education Arcade, a collaboration with the University of Wisconsin.

• 3. Textual Poachers and Fan Culture

  ›

  Jenkins described himself as an 'aca-fan,' a term that gained currency in the early 1990s and that he is credited with helping to popularize alongside Matt Hills' related concept of the 'fan-academic,' introduced in Hills' 2002 work Fan Cultures. The idea captured something real about Jenkins' method: he was both a trained scholar and an admitted enthusiast of the popular culture he studied. His 1992 book Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture is regarded as a foundational work that helped legitimize fan studies as a serious field of academic inquiry, extending well beyond television studies. The book's central metaphor came from French philosopher Michel de Certeau's The Practice of Everyday Life, published in 1980: fans, Jenkins argued, were not passive recipients but active 'poachers' who appropriated and remixed mass culture for their own purposes. Those purposes were wide-ranging. Fans rewrote gender and sexuality through the lens of fictional storyworlds. They shifted narrative focus to secondary characters, extended official timelines, or filled in scenes the source material left out. Jenkins' framework helped explain these practices as genuine cultural production rather than mere imitation. His interest in the creative labor of fans would later feed directly into his broader theory of participatory culture.

• 4. Transmedia Storytelling

  ›

  Jenkins coined the term 'transmedia storytelling' in 2003, and it spread quickly beyond academia into media arts, advertising, and marketing. His definition was precise. Transmedia storytelling, he wrote, 'represents a process where integral elements of a fiction get dispersed systematically across multiple delivery channels for the purpose of creating a unified and coordinated entertainment experience. Ideally, each medium makes its own unique contribution to the unfolding of the story.' He also called it 'the art of world-making': designing a fictional universe detailed enough to sustain many different stories while remaining coherent enough that each story feels like it belongs. The listener or viewer who follows one strand of that universe is nudged to explore others, piecing together a fuller understanding through the whole media ecosystem. Jenkins pointed to The Matrix franchise as an example in his 2006 book Convergence Culture, arguing that the films, comics, and video games together created a unified hype engine. Jenkins also stressed that transmedia is not a new phenomenon. Ancient religious traditions, he noted, offered early examples of stories distributed across different forms. What digital and internet technologies added was the capacity for collective and participatory audience engagement at a scale that made the approach newly powerful. The principles Jenkins developed have since been applied to transmedia education and transmedia branding through initiatives at the USC Annenberg Innovation Lab.

• 5. Convergence Culture and Its Critics

  ›

  Jenkins founded the Convergence Culture Consortium at MIT in 2005, later renamed the Futures of Entertainment Consortium, to connect academic researchers with media industry practitioners. The following year it launched the annual Futures of Entertainment conference at MIT. By 2010, a sister event called Transmedia Hollywood had started up, jointly hosted by USC and UCLA, and renamed Transforming Hollywood in 2014. At the center of all this was a core argument: media convergence is better understood as a cultural process than as a technological endpoint. Audiences in the digital era are fragmented across many platforms, but they are also more empowered than ever to create and share media through online networks. In 2011, a special issue of the journal Cultural Studies dedicated itself entirely to critiquing Jenkins' work on convergence. Edited by James Hay and Nick Couldry, the volume gathered scholars who argued Jenkins overstated the participatory power of ordinary users and underappreciated the corporate logic embedded in converging media systems. Nico Carpentier argued that what he saw as Jenkins' conflation of interaction and participation was misleading: opportunities to interact had grown, but genuine participation in content production remained constrained by commercial media logic. In a 2012-13 dialogue, Carpentier and Jenkins found enough common ground to co-author a journal article on the distinction between participation and interaction. Jenkins published a detailed response to the entire special issue in 2014, in the same journal, arguing that critics had misread him as a technological determinist and that he had consistently acknowledged offline power structures throughout his scholarship.

• 6. New Media Literacies

  ›

  Jenkins helped lead Project New Media Literacies as part of a five-year, fifty-million-dollar initiative on digital learning funded by the MacArthur Foundation, which announced the initiative in 2006. The project's aim was to develop instructional materials that would prepare young people to participate meaningfully in the new media environment. Jenkins introduced a range of social skills and cultural competencies he argued were fundamental for that participation. The specific literacy areas his project defined included appropriation, collective intelligence, distributed cognition, judgment, negotiation, networking, performance, simulation, transmedia navigation, and what the project called the participation gap, the transparency problem, and the ethics problem. The framework also distinguished among four key forms of participatory culture practice: affiliations (membership in online communities), expressions (producing new creative forms such as fan fiction or mash-ups), collaborative problem-solving (working in teams to complete tasks or develop knowledge), and circulations (shaping the flow of media through blogging or podcasting). Jenkins' collaborators on the participatory culture framework included Mimi Ito and danah boyd, with whom he co-authored a 2015 book: Participatory Culture in a Networked Era: A Conversation on Youth, Learning, Commerce, and Politics.

• 7. Spreadable Media and Youth Activism

  ›

  Jenkins developed the concept of spreadable media in direct conversation with the industry and academia dialogue fostered by the Convergence Culture Consortium. The concept found its full expression in his 2013 book Spreadable Media: Creating Meaning and Value in a Networked Culture, co-authored with Sam Ford and Joshua Green. Jenkins distinguished spreadability sharply from the viral media metaphor. Viral spread leaves little room for deliberate human agency; spreadability, by contrast, places active agency at the center, emphasizing the choices ordinary media users make when they share, distribute, create, or remix. The concept also challenges 'stickiness,' the media strategy that calls for holding audiences on particular sites or channels. Spreadability proposes the opposite: that media strategists should embrace how their audiences will actively disperse content through both formal and informal networks, often in ways that are not officially approved. His attention to grassroots media activity extended into political life through the Civic Paths and Media, Activism & Participatory Politics initiatives at USC Annenberg, which he has led since 2009 with support from a MacArthur Foundation initiative on Youth and Participatory Politics. That research produced the 2016 book By Any Media Necessary: The New Youth Activism, co-authored with Jenkins. His 2025 book Where the Wild Things Were: Boyhood and Permissive Parenting in Postwar America revisits childhood and child-rearing in the United States of the 1960s, territory that has quietly threaded through his work since his earliest engagement with children's culture.